Hans-Joachim Niemann

Last updated
Hans-Joachim Niemann, 2020, 79 years old HJN2020.jpg
Hans-Joachim Niemann, 2020, 79 years old

Hans-Joachim Niemann (born 26 April 1941 in Kiel) is a German philosopher and PhD chemist, [1] who has become known especially as a translator and editor of works by Karl Popper, including first editions and first translations. As a scholarly writer, he first published scientific papers, then many essays and several books on Karl Popper's philosophy and Critical Rationalism, including a 400-page Lexicon of Critical Rationalism. [2] His Popper studies helped to establish Karl Popper as a major ethicist and as an important biophilosopher.

Contents

Life

Niemann studied from 1962 to 1964 at the universities of Kiel, Munich and Marburg Philosophy and Physics. In 1965, he began studying Chemistry at the University of Tübingen and graduated in 1972 with the Dr. rer. nat. degree. He then researched and published on light-induced chemical reactions. [3] Based on the knowledge acquired in the process, he became head of unit for uranium enrichment using laser light (uranium laser isotope separation) at Kraftwerk Union, a joint subsidiary of Siemens and AEG. As inventor and co-inventor, he was granted about thirty domestic and foreign patents. [4]

In 1984, Niemann switched from technology and natural science to philosophy. Since 1991, now in his sixth decade, he has published five books and more than a hundred essays on Critical Rationalism and translated books and writings of Karl Popper into German. [5]

This was preceded by studies (1984-1990, partly private, partly at the University of Erlangen) of Analytic Philosophy and Critical Rationalism. He then became an assistant lecturer at the University of Bamberg (1993-1999), where he taught Vienna Circle, Critical Rationalism (Karl Popper, Hans Albert) and Popper's critics (Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos), as well as the ethics of Bertrand Russell, John Leslie Mackie and Hans Jonas. During the summer semester of 1994, he gave a guest lecture on Rational Decision Making at the University of Passau.

During a visit to Kenley/UK, Niemann met Karl Popper personally in February 1994. His correspondence with Popper (1991-1994) is documented in the Karl-Popper-Archive and accessible in ResearchGate. [6] Popper judged his work kindly. About his 1992 book manuscript Vernunft als Wille zur Problemlösung (Reason as the Will to Solve Problems) [7] Popper wrote: "It seems to me excellent; and I wish to congratulate you heartily on it... fundamentally everything you have to say seems to me excellent - hitting the nail on the head - and not accidental! (Also, it is all very original.)" [8] Popper also praised Niemann's simple and unpretentious style. [9]

Popper biographer Friedel Weinert [10] sees Niemann, along with David Miller, Jeremy Shearmur, and Hans Albert, among the few who currently continue Critical Rationalism. [11] Reinhard Neck [12] calls Niemann "one of the most active writers and researchers in the field of critical rationalism." [13]

Niemann is co-founder of the Society for Critical Philosophy Nuremberg.He lives in Poxdorf near Erlangen (Germany).

Interviews

Research

Popper as a major ethicist

Karl Popper did not write a book on ethics. Niemann proved, based on archival material and many essays scattered throughout Popper's writings, that he, contrary to his reputation, [14] was an important ethical theorist who advocated three major ethical concepts: (1) Negative Utilitarianism , i.e., avoiding concrete suffering instead of striving for indefinable happiness. (2) Epistemological ethics, i.e., first solve the factual problems associated with any ethical problem in order to avoid discussions about values as much as possible. And (3) problem-oriented ethics, i.e., treating values, moral laws, and principles of action as objective attempts to solve problems. [15]

Niemann has also summarized and commented on Popper's moral philosophy from many of his scattered contributions. He counts Popper among the great moral philosophers. [16]

Popper as an important biophilosopher

In 2012–2022, Niemann worked out another lesser known side of Popper: Karl Popper as a major biophilosopher. He showed this in his English written book Karl Popper and the Two New Secrets of Life (Niemann (2014)) and in many papers in which he refers to and comments on Popper's biological work. [17] In these studies, Niemann draws not only on Popper's previously known work, but also on seven German first publications translated and edited by him [18] as well as on new archival material from which he edited and published for the first time four of Popper's English writings concerning biology. [19]

The first edition of Popper's Medawar Lecture

Niemann's work was well received, even by biologists, [20] especially the above-mentioned 2014 published book in which Popper's long kept closed First Medawar Lecture 1986 is reprinted. Popper had delivered the lecture titled A New Interpretation of Darwinism to the Royal Society in the presence of four Nobel laureates. [21] It had caused a great stir at that time, partly because one of the Nobel laureates, Max Perutz, got into an argument with Popper after the lecture about whether or not biochemical and biological processes could be explained in purely chemical-physical terms. [22] Since Popper's lecture was not published at that time and was to remain locked as 'closed material' in the Popper-Archive until 2029, it was largely forgotten. In 2012, Niemann was able to get Popper's former assistant and heir to his copyrights, Melitta Mew, to allow him to publish it ahead of time: in 2013 appeared the German translation; [23] in 2014 the original English version. [24] For an account of the long road from Popper's 1986 Medawar Lecture to its publication, see Niemann (2014), pp. 58–62.

Popper and his improvement of the Modern Synthesis

Independently of Popper, some evolutionary biologists had begun to correct and reformulate Neo-Darwinism, [25] but Popper's proposals are decades older [26] The impact that the Medawar Lecture produced after its rediscovery in 2014 is described by Denis Noble, a pioneer of systems biology: He agrees with Popper that Darwinism is incomplete unless one includes the preferences of living things. Neither biology nor biochemistry could be understood in purely physical-chemical terms unless the goals of organisms and organs were used to explain them. "He [Popper] proposed a radical interpretation of Darwinism, essentially rejecting the Modern Synthesis, by proposing that organisms themselves are the source of the creative processes in evolution, not random mutations in DNA. Popper suggested Darwinism was not so much wrong, but seriously incomplete. He also stated that biochemistry (and so a fortiori physiology) could not be reduced to physics and chemistry. Many points made in the recent special issue of The Journal of Physiology were therefore made nearly 30 years ago." [27]

Noble agrees with Niemann's view that Popper found a third way of evolutionary theory and quotes him in the motto of his article: "The story of how humans and all living things came into existence is told in two widely believed versions: the Book of Genesis and Darwin's Origin of Species. It was the philosopher Karl Popper who presented us with a third story, no less important." [28]

Plea for Popper's World 3

In several essays, Niemann argues for taking seriously Popper's world 3 philosophy, which had been devalued by many philosophers, including critical rationalists, as metaphysics or old-age philosophy. [29] Using many of Popper's scattered World 3 works, as well as unpublished archival material and the two monographs on World 3 (both in Popper (2012)), he compiles 'The Chronology of a Lifelong Interest': [30] showing that Popper had been working towards this World 3 theory since he was 18 years old. In Niemann (2019) the importance of this theory and its future potential is elaborated.

Popper's 'Theory of Knowledge' as a new philosophical discipline

In Popper's London lecture 'Towards an Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge' (1989) [31] ), the term "theory of knowledge" is used for the first time for something quite different from epistemology. [32] Popper had elaborated it already earlier without calling it a "theory of knowledge", mainly in his works on World 3. Niemann showed that with this kind of theory of knowledge (in German 'Wissenstheorie') Popper has founded a new philosophical discipline. [33] It is not about processes of cognition nor methods of cognition that are supposed to lead to the truest possible knowledge, [34] but about (1) objective knowledge, which is objectified in myths, traditions, and books, and which in the course of evolution has become increasingly important for man, for his self-consciousness, and for the development of his personality. [35] And it is (2) about whether plants and biological cells have knowledge in the non-subjective sense, stored digitally in DNA and analogously in the cell. [36] Above all, however, Popper's new theory of knowledge is concerned with (3) whether linguistic world-3-knowledge preserved in books and other media has a reality of its own and obeys laws of its own, and whether it can act on man and on new ideas that come to his mind, thus enabling his transcendence. [37] In this way, theory of knowledge means according to Popper two rather different things: (A) epistemology (in German Erkenntnistheorie) and (B) evolutionary theory of knowledge (in German Wissenstheorie).

Problem-Solving Ethics

Since 1993, Niemann developed from Popper's epistemological problem-solving scheme of 1937 [38] a general problem-solving scheme that makes objective judgments possible everywhere in life, but especially in ethics and morality. [39] Niemann considers, unlike Popper, an objectively decidable and even scientific ethics possible, which in the field of ethical values, social norms and ethical maxims and principles, like other sciences, can lead to verifiable and therefore generally accepted results. [40]

Science seeks truth, technology seeks repeatability

In the field of critical-rational epistemology Niemann contributed to the solution of the so-called induction problem. He argues that while Popper is right with his dictum 'There is no such thing as certain knowledge', we can still be sure that no stone falls from the bottom to the top. Niemann's answer to this inner conflict is: Science seeks truth and erroneously relies on the principle of induction ; while Technology seeks repeatability (to ensure security, and safety) and rightly relies on the constancy of nature . [41]

A contribution to the correspondence theory of truth

Niemann analyzed Popper's and Alfred Tarski's concept of truth and their correspondence theory of truth. Truth as the linguistic correspondence with physical facts is ascertainable, but the actual correspondence between the linguistic world and the physical world is inexplicable. "The Aim of Science" (title of the 5th chapter in Popper's Objective Knowledge, Routledge 1979), can therefore not be the absolute truth as in Popper, but only, as in Hans Albert, the more accurate of several alternative theories. [42]

The theory of possibility spaces

In Popper's 1988 theory of propensities in his book A World of Propensities (Thoemmes 1990) and in archival notes, possibility spaces were only hinted at and not elaborated on. [43] These fragments and Popper's interpretation of biological evolution as a perpetual reoccupation of newly discovered possibility spaces served Niemann as a starting point for a theory of real possibility spaces. [44]

Publications

Books

Essays, lectures, book chapters, patents

According to ResearchGate (January 2023), Niemann has authored 83 journal articles and 27 book chapters, and he has filed 14 patents. His topics are mainly ethics, critical rationalism, philosophy of science, biophilosophy, Karl Popper, and Hans Albert. See also the ORCID directory 'Niemann'.

English first editions of Karl Popper writings

German first editions of Karl Popper books

Published by Mohr Siebeck (Tübingen), Niemann translated and edited six books of Karl Popper:

See the corresponding German Wikipedia page.

He also translated and edited 22 essays and lectures of Karl Popper in German language: See the corresponding German Wikipedia page: Essays of Karl Popper.

Wikibooks (extensible by everyone)

Bibliography

List and abbreviations of works cited several times

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Falsifiability</span> Property of a statement that can be logically contradicted

Falsifiability is a deductive standard of evaluation of scientific theories and hypotheses, introduced by the philosopher of science Karl Popper in his book The Logic of Scientific Discovery (1934). A theory or hypothesis is falsifiable if it can be logically contradicted by an empirical test.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Popper</span> Austrian–British philosopher of science (1902–1994)

Sir Karl Raimund Popper was an Austrian–British philosopher, academic and social commentator. One of the 20th century's most influential philosophers of science, Popper is known for his rejection of the classical inductivist views on the scientific method in favour of empirical falsification. According to Popper, a theory in the empirical sciences can never be proven, but it can be falsified, meaning that it can be scrutinised with decisive experiments. Popper was opposed to the classical justificationist account of knowledge, which he replaced with critical rationalism, namely "the first non-justificational philosophy of criticism in the history of philosophy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mario Bunge</span> Argentine-Canadian philosopher (1919–2020)

Mario Augusto Bunge was an Argentine-Canadian philosopher and physicist. His philosophical writings combined scientific realism, systemism, materialism, emergentism, and other principles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Critical rationalism</span> Epistemological philosophy advanced by Karl Popper

Critical rationalism is an epistemological philosophy advanced by Karl Popper on the basis that, if a statement cannot be logically deduced, it might nevertheless be possible to logically falsify it. Following Hume, Popper rejected any inductive logic that is ampliative, i.e., any logic that can provide more knowledge than deductive logic. This led Popper to his falsifiability criterion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Albert</span> German philosopher (1921–2023)

Hans Albert was a German philosopher. He was professor of social sciences at the University of Mannheim from 1963, and remained at the university until 1989. His fields of research were social sciences and general studies of methods. He was a critical rationalist, paying special attention to rational heuristics. Albert was a strong critic of the continental hermeneutic tradition coming from Heidegger and Gadamer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl-Otto Apel</span> German philosopher (1922–2017)

Karl-Otto Apel was a German philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Frankfurt am Main. He specialized on the philosophy of language and was thus considered a communication theorist. He developed a distinctive philosophical approach which he coined transcendental pragmatics.

Evolutionary epistemology refers to three distinct topics: (1) the biological evolution of cognitive mechanisms in animals and humans, (2) a theory that knowledge itself evolves by natural selection, and (3) the study of the historical discovery of new abstract entities such as abstract number or abstract value that necessarily precede the individual acquisition and usage of such abstractions. As a branch of inquiry in epistemology, evolutionary epistemology lies at the crossroads of philosophy and evolutionary biology.

Pancritical rationalism, also called comprehensively critical rationalism (CCR), is a development of critical rationalism and panrationalism originated by William Warren Bartley in his book The Retreat to Commitment. PCR attempts to work around the problem of ultimate commitment or infinite regress by decoupling criticism and justification. A pancritical rationalist holds all positions open to criticism, including PCR itself. Such a position in principle never resorts to appeal to authority for justification of stances, since all authorities are held to be intrinsically fallible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">W. W. Bartley III</span> American philosopher

William Warren Bartley III, known as W. W. Bartley III, was an American philosopher specializing in 20th century philosophy, language and logic, and the Vienna Circle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fallibilism</span> Philosophical principle

Originally, fallibilism is the philosophical principle that propositions can be accepted even though they cannot be conclusively proven or justified, or that neither knowledge nor belief is certain. The term was coined in the late nineteenth century by the American philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce, as a response to foundationalism. Theorists, following Austrian-British philosopher Karl Popper, may also refer to fallibilism as the notion that knowledge might turn out to be false. Furthermore, fallibilism is said to imply corrigibilism, the principle that propositions are open to revision. Fallibilism is often juxtaposed with infallibilism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Münchhausen trilemma</span> A thought experiment used to demonstrate the impossibility of proving any truth

In epistemology, the Münchhausen trilemma is a thought experiment intended to demonstrate the theoretical impossibility of proving any truth, even in the fields of logic and mathematics, without appealing to accepted assumptions. If it is asked how any given proposition is known to be true, proof in support of that proposition may be provided. Yet that same question can be asked of that supporting proof, and any subsequent supporting proof. The Münchhausen trilemma is that there are only three ways of completing a proof:

The positivism dispute was a political-philosophical dispute between the critical rationalists and the Frankfurt School in 1961, about the methodology of the social sciences. It grew into a broad discussion within German sociology from 1961 to 1969. The naming itself is controversial, since it was the Frankfurt School proponents who accused the critical rationalists of being positivists—while the latter considered themselves to be opponents of positivism.

Gerhard Vollmer is a German physicist and philosopher. He is perhaps best known for his development of an evolutionary theory of knowledge.

The Medawar Lecture was an annual lecture on the philosophy of science organised by the Royal Society of London in memory of Sir Peter Medawar. It was last delivered in 2004 after which it was merged with the Wilkins Lecture and the Bernal Lecture to form the Wilkins-Bernal-Medawar Lecture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer</span> German philosopher (born 1952)

Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer is a German philosopher and professor of theoretical philosophy at the university of Leipzig. He was the president of the international Ludwig Wittgenstein society (2006-2009) and is now a vice-president of this institution.

Ingolf Ulrich Dalferth is a philosopher of religion and theologian. His work is regarded as being on the methodological borderlines between analytic philosophy, hermeneutics and phenomenology, and he is a recognized expert in issues of contemporary philosophy, philosophy of religion, and philosophy of orientation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John W. N. Watkins</span> Philosopher and professor

John William Nevill Watkins was an English philosopher, a professor at the London School of Economics from 1966 until his retirement in 1989 and a prominent proponent of critical rationalism.

Hermann Vetter is a German academic and translator who has made many works of English-language philosophy available in German. He specialized in sociology of knowledge and social psychology. His academic career was interrupted by the "student revolutions" of the 1960s.

Andreas Suchanek is a German economy and business ethicist and one of the best-known students of Karl Homann, an expert in business ethics.

"In Praise of Polytheism (On Monomythical and Polymythical Thinking)" (‹See Tfd›German: Lob des Polytheismus. Über Monomythie und Polymythie) is an essay by the German philosopher Odo Marquard, which was held as a lecture at Technische Universität Berlin in 1978. It was first published in 1979 in an anthology, and was published again in 1981 in Marquard's book Farewell to Matters of Principle (German: Abschied vom Prinzipiellen).

References

  1. ↑ Title of his doctoral thesis: Zur kinetischen Analyse spektral-photometrisch verfolgter Photoreaktionen – Methodik und Anwendung der formalen Integration, University of Tübingen (Germany) 1972.
  2. ↑ Niemann (2004), with about 1000 keywords.
  3. ↑ Niemann in ORCID and Niemann in ResearchGate, each covering the years 1970-1974.
  4. ↑ Niemann in ORCID and ResearchGate, see the years 1974-1985.
  5. ↑ Publication lists in ORCID directory and in ResearchGate, see the years 1991 and later.
  6. ↑ German parts translated into English downloadable in ResearchGate.
  7. ↑ published in 1993 under the new title Die Strategie der Vernunft (The Strategy of Reason) by Vieweg, Braunschweig-Wiesbaden
  8. ↑ translated from German, documented in Karl Popper Archive, Box 554, Folder 3, Sheet 16 dated 4/14/1992; also downloadable from ResearchGate, see above.
  9. ↑ "I found your book [Die Strategie der Vernunft 1993] today - among mountains of letters, dissertations, books sent to me. I looked at it for about 2 hours, and I like it very much because of its simple and unpretentious style. This is rare in German books – even those advocating critical rationalism." Karl Popper, translated from German, in: Karl Popper-Archive of Klagenfurt University Library, Box 554, Folder 3, Sheet 8 dated 14. 4. 1992.
  10. ↑ Emeritus at the University of Bradford/UK, a philosopher, sociologist, and physicist
  11. ↑ "Critical Rationalism may have lost its influence among professional philosophers. But David Miller, Jeremy Shearmur, Hans Albert and Hans-Joachim Niemann keep the flame alive.", F. Weinert in Karl Popper. Professional Philosopher and Public Intellectual, Springer 2023, p. 221
  12. ↑ Emeritus at the University of Klagenfurt
  13. ↑ Reinhard Neck in his introduction to a H.-J. Niemann, guest lecture on Nov. 20, 2019 at the University Library, University of Klagenfurt.
  14. ↑ "As things stand, there is no reason to suppose that rational ethics is possible", wrote one of Popper's best scholars, Herbert Keuth, in his essay 'Ist eine rationale Ethik möglich?' (Is rational ethics possible?), Logos, N. F. 1 (3) 1994, pp. 288-305, the citation p. 300. This widely held view, which goes back to Jürgen Habermas, is discussed in H.-J. Niemann, Gibt es eine rationale Ethik oder gibt es sie nicht? (Is rational ethics possible or not?) Niemann (2008), 203-225, on Habermas see p. 216.
  15. ↑ H.-J. Niemann, Karl Popper's Three Theoretical Ethics (preprint), and an earlier version in German in Franco (2019), pp. 553-573. DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-16242-9_39-1.
  16. ↑ Niemann on Popper's Practical Morality and on Popper's Morality and Ethics.
  17. ↑ H.-J. Niemann on Popper's biophilosophy (translation in brackets): (i) Geist als ein Kraftfeld (Mind as a force field), Aufklärung und Kritik 4 (2012), pp. 13-22. – (ii) Chronologie eines lebenslangen Interesses (Chronology of a lifelong interest), in Popper (2012), editor's afterword, sections 25-41. – (iii) Alle Lebewesen steuern ihre eigene Evolution (All living things control their own evolution), Aufklärung und Kritik 1 (2013), pp. 21-39. – (iv) Karl Popper, die Mühle bei Hunstanton und die Anfänge der Molekularbiologie (Karl Popper, the mill at Hunstanton, and the beginnings of molecular biology), Aufklärung und Kritik 2 (2013), 7-34. - (v) Karl Popper und die biologischen Ursprünge von Aktivität, Wissen und Freiheit (Karl Popper and the biological origins of activity, knowledge, and freedom), Aufklärung und Kritik 1 (2014), pp. 7-22. – (vi) Nachwort des Herausgebers (Editor's afterword) in Popper (2015), pp. 445-477, esp. sections 1-2, 4-5, 12, 15, 18. – (vii) Alles Leben ist Wissen und Wollen. Karl Poppers Evolutionsbiologie (All life is knowledge and will. Karl Popper's evolutionary biology), in: R. Neck (ed.), Evolution, Natur, Mensch und Gesellschaft (Evolution, Nature, Man, Society), Peter Lang 2016, pp. 239-261. – (viii) Niemann (2017), esp. sections 2.2 to 2.4 and 3. – (ix) Popper, Darwin und die Biologie (Popper, Darwin, and biology). In: Franco (2019), pp. 359-380; also as an English and revised version: (x) Popper, Darwin, and Biology, in: Zuzana Parusniková, David Merrit (eds.), Karl Popper: his Science and his Philosophy, Springer 2021, pp. 231-256. – (xi) H.-J. Niemann, 'Offene Forschungsprogramme' (open research programs), Nachwort des Herausgebers (editor's afterword) in: Popper (2022), pp. 617-653, esp. sections 2.1, 2.3, 3; as well as in Popper (2014).
  18. ↑ English in brackets: (i) Karl Popper, Die Beziehung zwischen Bewusstsein und Gehirn (The relation between consciousness and the brain), with co-authors B. I. B. Lindahl and P. Århem, Aufklärung und Kritik 4 (2010) pp. 9-21. – (ii) Das Geist-Gehirn-Problem (The mind-brain problem), Aufklärung und Kritik 4 (2012), pp. 7-12. – (iii) Eine Neuinterpretation des Darwinismus. Die erste Medawar Lecture 1986 (A new interpretation of Darwinism. The first Medawar Lecture 1986), Aufklärung und Kritik 1 (2013), pp. 7-20. – (iv) Die Natürliche Selektion und die Emergenz des Geistes (Natural selection and the emergence of mind), Aufklärung und Kritik 4 (2019), pp. 7-25. – (v) Der Platz des Geistes in der Natur (The place of mind in nature), Popper (2022), appendix 5. – (vi) Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie (Evolutionary epistemology), Popper (2022), appendix 6. – (vii) Eine Weiterentwicklung des Darwinismus (A further development of Darwinism), Popper (2022), Appendix 7
  19. ↑ Popper (2014), Appendix A: K. Popper, A New Interpretation of Darwinism. The First Medawar Lecture (1986). – Appendix B: K. Popper, Lamarckism and DNA (1973). – Appendix C: K. Popper, A World without Natural Selection but with Problem Solving. – Appendix D: K. Popper, Letter to a Friend (1989).
  20. ↑ Frantisek Baluska, Sir Patrick Bateson, Keith Baverstock, M. Polo Camacho, Eva Jablonka, Kalevi Kull, Marion Lamb, Natalie Gontier, Peter Marsch, Denis Noble, Raymond Noble, Pippa J. Madgwick, and others.
  21. ↑ Peter Medawar, Peter Mitchell, Max Perutz, George Porter.
  22. ↑ An account of this in: Max Perutz, A new view of Darwinism, New Scientist 2 (1986), pp. 36-38, and in: Niemann (2014), section 13: 'The clash with Nobel Prize Winner Max Perutz'.
  23. ↑ Karl R. Popper (posthumously), A Reinterpretation of Darwinism. The First Medawar Lecture 1986, Aufklärung und Kritik 1 (2013), pp. 7-20.
  24. ↑ Niemann (2004), Appendix A.
  25. ↑ D. Noble et al, Evolution evolves – physiology returns to the centre stage, Journal of Physiology 592 (2014) 2237-2244.
  26. ↑ Noble (2014), p. 34-35. In fact, already in 1961, Popper had brought into play the preferences of living things and 'genetic dualism' as creative and guiding evolutionary developments, fifty years before biologists; reprinted in Popper (2022), ch. 7.
  27. ↑ Noble (2014), p. 34-35. The mentioned 'special issue' is D. Noble et al, Evolution evolves – physiology returns to the centre stage, Journal of Physiology 592 (2014), pp. 2237-2244. See also his 'Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology', Experimental Physiology 98.8 (2013) pp. 1235–1243.
  28. ↑ Popper (2012), p. 34, similar Niemann (2014), back cover and p. 3.
  29. ↑ Niemann proves this for: Herbert Keuth, Jan Böhm, Edward Morscher, Mario Bunge, and Hans Albert. See Niemann in: Popper (2012), Editor's Afterword, pp. 510-512, 545-546, as well as sections 18-20.
  30. ↑ Niemann in Popper (2012), Editor's Afterword, pp. 510-546,
  31. ↑ In Popper (1990), Part II
  32. ↑ Niemann (2022)), ch. 1.
  33. ↑ H.-J. Niemann, Poppers Wissenstheorie. Eine neue Disziplin in der Philosophie (Popper's "evolutionary theory of knowledge": a new discipline in philosophy), in Popper (2022), editor's afterword, section 1, pp. 617-628.
  34. ↑ This is, for example, the content of Popper's The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, London 2002, as well as of Popper's Objective Knowledge, Routledge, London 1979, chaps. 1, 2, 5, 8, 9
  35. ↑ Content of Popper's World 3-books, Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem, Routledge 1994, and The Self and Its Brain, Springer 1977; and Objective Knowledge, chaps. 3, 4, 6
  36. ↑ In Popper (2016), ch. 16, it is called "evolutionary knowledge"; in D. Noble it is called "analogous knowledge" (D. Noble, Genes and Causation, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A (2008) 366, 3001-3015 DOI10.1098/rsta.2008.0086. sections 3 and 4) and in Niemann (2014) "built-in knowledge", see index 'knowledge, inbuilt'.
  37. ↑ Popper (2012). Popper's Tanner Lecture in Popper (2022), appendix 6. On self-transgression (transcendence), see esp. Popper (2022), ch. 3, section 9; appendix 4, section XVIII; appendix 5, section XIX; appendix 6, section 8; Niemann (2022), section 3.5, points 36-39.
  38. ↑ K. R. Popper, What is Dialectics? (New Zealand 1937), in Popper, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge 2009, ch. 15.
  39. ↑ First in Niemann (1993), ch. III. Further contributions on this topic in his Bibliography above.
  40. ↑ H.-J. Niemann, Moral als Problemlösung (Morality as a problem solution), Niemann (2008), pp. 227-257. H.-J. Niemann, Wie objektiv kann Ethik sein? (How objective can ethics be?), Aufklärung und Kritik 5 (2001), pp. 23-41, with a comment by Hans Albert, p. 130. H.-J. Niemann, Grundzüge der Vereinheitlichenden Theorie der Ethik (Outlines of the unifying theory of ethics), Aufklärung und Kritik 2 (2009), pp. 66-90.
  41. ↑ H.-J. Niemann, Über Wahrheit und Sicherheit. Mit einer Lösung des Restproblems der Induktion (On truth and certainty. With a solution of the residual problem of induction), Aufklärung und Kritik 4 (2018), pp. 96-117.
  42. ↑ As for 'Hans Albert's comparativism versus Popper's absolutism' see H.-J. Niemann, Die drei Wahrheiten und das Korrespondenzproblem (The three truths and the correspondence problem), in R. Neck, V. Gadenne (eds.), Hans Albert und der Kritische Rationalismus (Hans Albert and Critical Rationalism), Peter Lang 2021, pp. 25-67. DOI 10.3726/b18019.
  43. ↑ Karl Popper-Archive, Klagenfurt, Box 583, Folder 19-A, Sheet 19, cited and commented on in: Niemann (2014), pp. 104-105, and Niemann (2016), Alles Leben ist Wissen und Wollen (All Life is Knowledge and Will). Karl Popper's evolutionary biology; in: R. Neck (ed.), Evolution, Natur, Mensch und Gesellschaft (Evolution - Nature, Man, Society), Peter Lang 2016, pp. 239-261, ch. 12.3.2 and note 22; and H.-J. Niemann in Popper (2015), Editor's Afterword, sections 17-18.
  44. ↑ Niemann (2014), p. 105; Niemann (2017), Niemann (2020) and Niemann (2022), pp. 630-631, 635.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.