Hartlib Circle

Last updated

The Hartlib Circle was the correspondence network set up in Western and Central Europe by Samuel Hartlib, an intelligencer based in London, and his associates, in the period 1630 to 1660. Hartlib worked closely with John Dury, an itinerant figure who worked to bring Protestants together.

Contents

Workings of the Circle

Structure

J. T. Young writes: [1]

At its nexus, it was an association of personal friends. Hartlib and Dury were the two key figures: Comenius, despite their best efforts, always remained a cause they were supporting rather than a fellow co-ordinator. Around them were Hübner, Haak, Pell, Moriaen, Rulise, Hotton and Appelius, later to be joined by Sadler, Culpeper, Worsley, Boyle and Clodius. But as soon as one looks any further than this from the centre, the lines of communication begin to branch and cross, threading their way into the entire intellectual community of Europe and America. It is a circle with a definable centre but an almost infinitely extendable periphery.

Examples given of the "periphery" are John Winthrop and Balthazar Gerbier. [2]

Themes

Education

Educational reform was topical and central to the pansophist programme. Hartlib compiled a list of "advisers", and updated it. It included Jeremy Collier, Dury, Thomas Horne, Marchamont Nedham, John Pell, William Rand, Christian Ravius, Israel Tonge, and Moses Wall. [22] [23] The staff proposed for Durham College was influenced by the Circle's lobbying. John Hall was another associate [24] who wrote on education. In the period 1648–50 many works on education appeared from Circle authors (Dury, Dymock, Hall, Cyprian Kinner, Petty, George Snell, and Worsley). [25]

A letter from Hartlib to John Milton prompted the tract Of Education (1644), subtitled To Master Samuel Hartlib. But Milton's ideas were quite some way from those of the Comenians. [26]

Individuals involved with the Hartlib Circle played an important role in Sweden's scientific revolution, as they travelled to consult on educational and religious reform, as well as tutored Swedish students who were sent abroad. [27]

The problem of the "Invisible College"

Robert Boyle referred a few times in his correspondence to the 'Invisible College'. Scholarly attention has been paid to identifying this shadowy group. The social picture is not simplistic, since en masse Hartlib's contacts had fingers in every pie.

Margery Purver concluded that the Invisible College coincided with the Hartlib-led lobbyists, those who were promoting to the Parliament the concept of an Office of Address. [28] The effective lifetime of this idea has been pinned down to the period 1647 to 1653, and as the second wave of speculation on the ideal society, after Comenius left England. [29]

In the later Interregnum the "Invisible College" might refer to a group meeting in Gresham College. [30] According to Christopher Hill, however, the 1645 group (the Gresham College club that was convened from 1645 by Theodore Haak, certainly a Hartlibian) was distinct from the Comenian Invisible College. [31] Lady Katherine Ranelagh, who was Boyle's sister, had a London salon during the 1650s, much frequented by virtuosi associated with Hartlib. [32]

Projects

Office of Address

One of Hartlib's projects, a variant on Salomon's House that had more of a public face, was the "Office of Address" he envisaged an office in every town where somebody might go to find things out. This might well be compatible with Baconian ideas, and a related public office scheme was mooted under James I (by Arthur Gorges and Walter Cope). [33] But the immediate inspiration was Théophraste Renaudot and his Paris bureau d'adresse. [34] For example, at a practical level, Hartlib thought people could advertise job vacancies there and prospective employees would be able to find work. At a more studious level, Hartlib wanted academics to pool their knowledge so that the Office could act as a living and growing form of an encyclopedia, in which people could keep adding new information.

The Office of address idea was promoted by Considerations tending to the happy Accomplishment of Englands Reformation in Church and State (1647), written by Hartlib and Dury, a pamphlet also including an ambitious tiered system of educational reform. [35] There was a limited implementation, by Henry Robinson, in 1650. [36]

Foundation of the Royal Society

In 1660 Hartlib was at work writing to John Evelyn, an important broker of the royal charter for the eventual Royal Society. He was, however, not promoting a purist Baconian model, but an "Antilia". This was the name chosen by Johann Valentin Andreae for a more hermetic and utopian fellowship. The proposal, which conformed to Comenian ideas as more compatible with pansophia or universal wisdom, was in effect decisively rejected. Hartlib was relying on a plan of Bengt Skytte, a son of Johan Skytte and knighted by Charles I, [37] and the move was away from Bacon's clearer emphasis on reforming the natural sciences. Despite some critical voices, the Hartlib-Comenius trend was written out of the Royal Society from the beginning. Hartlib himself died shortly after the Society was set up. [38]

Eclectic attitudes and associations

Hartlib was noted as a follower of Francis Bacon and Comenius, but his background in the German academies of the period gave him a broad view of other methods and approaches, including those of Petrus Ramus, Bartholomäus Keckermann, and Jacobus Acontius. [39] Further, the Hartlib Circle was tolerant of hermetic ideas; Hartlib himself had an interest in sigils and astrology. [40] Boyle too attempted to straddle the opening divide between experimental chemistry and alchemy, by treating the latter in a less esoteric way; he did distance himself to an extent from the Hartlib group on moving to Oxford around 1655. [41]

Both Boyle and William Petty became more attached to a third or fourth loose association, the group around John Wilkins, at this period, now referred to as the Oxford Philosophical Club. Wilkins was to be the founding Secretary of the Royal Society. [42]

Related Research Articles

Samuel Hartlib or Hartlieb was a Royal Prussian born, English educational and agricultural reformer of German-Polish origin who settled, married and died in England. He was a son of George Hartlib, a Pole, and Elizabeth Langthon, a daughter of a rich English merchant. Hartlib was a noted promoter and writer in fields that included science, medicine, agriculture, politics and education. He was a contemporary of Robert Boyle, whom he knew well, and a neighbour of Samuel Pepys in Axe Yard, London, in the early 1660s. He studied briefly at the University of Cambridge upon arriving in England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Oldenburg</span> 17th-century German-English theologian, philosopher, and scientist

Henry Oldenburg, was a German theologian, diplomat, and natural philosopher, known as one of the creators of modern scientific peer review. He was one of the foremost intelligencers of 17th-century Europe, with a network of correspondents to rival those of Fabri de Peiresc, Marin Mersenne, and Ismaël Boulliau. At the foundation of the Royal Society in London, he took on the task of foreign correspondence, as the first Secretary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Invisible College</span> Informal group of scholars, as in Royal Society of Londons precursor groups

Invisible College is the term used for a small community of interacting scholars who often met face-to-face, exchanged ideas and encouraged each other. One group that has been described as a precursor group to the Royal Society of London consisted of a number of natural philosophers around Robert Boyle, such as Christopher Wren. It has been suggested that other members included prominent figures later closely concerned with the Royal Society; but several groups preceded the formation of the Royal Society, and who the other members of this one were is still debated by scholars.

John Dury was a Scottish Calvinist minister and an intellectual of the English Civil War period. He made efforts to re-unite the Calvinist and Lutheran wings of Protestantism, hoping to succeed when he moved to Kassel in 1661, but he did not accomplish this. He was also a preacher, pamphleteer, and writer.

<i>British Critic</i> 18th/19th-century British journal

The British Critic: A New Review was a quarterly publication, established in 1793 as a conservative and high-church review journal riding the tide of British reaction against the French Revolution. The headquarters was in London. The journal ended publication in 1843.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New College, Durham (17th century)</span>

New College, Durham, or Durham College, was a university institution set up by Oliver Cromwell, to provide an alternative to the older University of Oxford and University of Cambridge. It also had the aim of bringing university education to Northern England.

Nathan Paget (1615–1679) was an English physician, active during the English Civil War, under the Commonwealth and the Protectorate, and after the Restoration. Despite being a mainstay of a generally conservative profession, he was interested in the experimental methods of the Enlightenment. Although from a strongly Presbyterian background, he seems to have developed radical political and religious sympathies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice of the Common Pleas</span>

Justice of the Common Pleas was a puisne judicial position within the Court of Common Pleas of England and Wales, under the Chief Justice. The Common Pleas was the primary court of common law within England and Wales, dealing with "common" pleas. It was created out of the common law jurisdiction of the Exchequer of Pleas, with splits forming during the 1190s and the division becoming formal by the beginning of the 13th century. The court became a key part of the Westminster courts, along with the Exchequer of Pleas and the Court of King's Bench, but with the Writ of Quominus and the Statute of Westminster, both tried to extend their jurisdiction into the realm of common pleas. As a result, the courts jockeyed for power. In 1828 Henry Brougham, a Member of Parliament, complained in Parliament that as long as there were three courts unevenness was inevitable, saying that "It is not in the power of the courts, even if all were monopolies and other restrictions done away, to distribute business equally, as long as suitors are left free to choose their own tribunal", and that there would always be a favourite court, which would therefore attract the best lawyers and judges and entrench its position. The outcome was the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873, under which all the central courts were made part of a single Supreme Court of Judicature. Eventually the government created a High Court of Justice under Lord Coleridge by an Order in Council of 16 December 1880. At this point, the Common Pleas formally ceased to exist.

During the early part of the 17th century, and persisting in some form into the early 18th century, there were a number of proposals for an English Academy: some form of learned institution, conceived as having royal backing and a leading role in the intellectual life of the nation. Definite calls for an English Academy came in 1617, based on the Italian model dating back to the 16th century; they were followed up later, after the 1635 founding of the French Académie, by John Dryden (1664), John Evelyn (1665), and Daniel Defoe (1697).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gresham College and the formation of the Royal Society</span> Precursor to the Royal Society of London

The Gresham College group was a loose collection of scientists in England of the 1640s and 1650s, a precursor to the Royal Society of London. Within a few years of the granting of a charter to the Royal Society in 1662, its earlier history was being written and its roots contested. There is still some debate about the effect of other groups on the way the Royal Society came into being. The composition of those other groups is unclear in parts; and the overall historiography of the early Royal Society is still often regarded as problematic. But this group has always been seen as fundamental to the course of events.

Katherine Jones, Viscountess Ranelagh, also known as Lady Ranelagh, was an Anglo-Irish scientist in seventeenth-century Britain. She was also a political and religious philosopher, and a member of many intellectual circles including the Hartlib Circle, the Great Tew Circle, and the Invisible College. Her correspondents included Samuel Hartlib, Edward Hyde, William Laud, Thomas Hyde, and John Milton. She was the sister of Robert Boyle and is thought to have been a great influence on his work in chemistry. In her own right, she was a political and social figure closely connected to the Hartlib Circle. Lady Ranelagh held a London salon during the 1650s, much frequented by virtuosi associated with Hartlib.

William Rand was an English physician who projected general reforms in medical education, practice and publication. His views were Paracelsian and Helmontian, and he participated in the Hartlib Circle.

Cyprian Kinner was a Silesian educator and linguist. He has been described as the bridge between the projects of 17th-century Europe concerned with a universal language, and those concerned with a philosophical language. He has also been called a pioneer of faceted classification.

Thomas Coxe (1615–1685) was an English physician. He studied at Emmanuel College, Cambridge, graduating with a BA in 1635 and an MA in 1638. He was among the initial fellows of the Royal Society, but ran into money difficulties in old age.

Georg Ritschel was a Bohemian Protestant minister and educator. He associated with the Hartlib Circle, and was considered by Richard Popkin to belong to his "Third Force".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Chamberlen the third</span>

Peter Chamberlen M.D. (1601–1683), known as Peter the Third, was an English physician. The obstetrical forceps as invention has been credited to the Chamberlen family: the earliest evidence of what was a family trade secret points to his having it in 1630. He continued the family tradition of trying to bring the profession of midwifery under their control. His writings blend ideas associated with the Fifth Monarchists and Levellers with social schemes of his own with a utopian flavour.

Dorothy Durie or Dorothy Dury (1613–1664), born Dorothy King, first married name Dorothy Moore (c.1618–1645), was an Anglo-Irish writer on education. She had a talent for languages and she was interested in the education of women, in alchemy and in the study of medicine.

References

  1. Young, J. T. (1998), Faith, Alchemy and Natural Philosophy: Johann Moriaen, Reformed Intelligencer, and the Hartlib Circle p.248
  2. Ted-Larry Pebworth (2000). Literary circles and cultural communities in Renaissance England. University of Missouri Press. p. 93. ISBN   978-0-8262-1317-4 . Retrieved 3 April 2012.
  3. Turner, James Grantham. "Austen, Ralph". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/905.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  4. Woodland, Patrick. "Beale, John". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/1802.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  5. Clucas, Stephen. "Child, Robert". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/53661.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  6. Greengrass, M. "Dymock, Cressy". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/54119.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  7. McConnell, Anita. "Plattes, Gabriel". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/22360.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  8. "Speed, Adolphus"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  9. Hunter, Michael. "Boyle, Robert". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/3137.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  10. "Hartlib Papers - Special Collections - the University Library - the University of Sheffield". 10 January 2018.
  11. Hutton, Sarah. "Foxcroft, Elizabeth". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/53695.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  12. Elmer, Peter. "French, John". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10164.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  13. "On Adam Smith's Straw Man". 11 July 2016.
  14. "Archived copy". Bloomberg News . Archived from the original on 6 August 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  15. Donald R. Dickson (1998). The Tessera of Antilia: Utopian Brotherhoods and Secret Societies in the Early Seventeenth Century. BRILL. p. 239. ISBN   978-90-04-11032-8 . Retrieved 9 July 2013.
  16. Gillian Darley, John Evelyn: Living for ingenuity (2006), p. 146.
  17. S.-J. Savonius-Wroth; Jonathan Walmsley; Paul Schuurman (6 May 2010). The Continuum Companion to Locke. Continuum. p. 84. ISBN   978-0-8264-2811-0 . Retrieved 8 August 2013.
  18. Withington, P. J. "Hewley, Sarah". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/13156.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  19. G. H. Turnbull, Hartlib, Dury, and Comenius: Gleanings from Hartlib’s Papers, London, University Press of Liverpool (Hodder & Stoughton), 1947, pp. 127-316.
  20. Graeme Murdock (21 September 2000). Calvinism on the Frontier, 1600-1660: International Calvinism and the Reformed Church in Hungary and Transylvania. Oxford University Press. p. 89. ISBN   978-0-19-820859-4 . Retrieved 28 March 2012.
  21. "Boate, Gerard"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  22. Christopher Hill, Milton and the English Revolution (1979), pp. 146–7.
  23. Charles Webster, Samuel Hartlib and the Advancement of Learning (2010), p. 58; Google Books.
  24. Barbara Lewalski, The Life of John Milton (2003), p. 210.
  25. Webster, p. 51; Google Books.
  26. Barbara Lewalski, The Life of John Milton (2003), pp. 172–3.
  27. Wennerlind, Carl (2022). "Atlantis Restored: Natural Knowledge and Political Economy in Early Modern Sweden" (PDF). American Historical Review. 127 (4). doi:10.1093/ahr/rhac419.
  28. Margery Purver, The Royal Society: Concept and Creation (1967), p. 205.
  29. J. C. Davis, Utopia and the Ideal Society: A Study of English Utopian Writing, 1516-1700 (1983), p. 315.
  30. "London Royal Society".
  31. Christopher Hill, Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution (1965), p. 105.
  32. Lisa Jardine, The Curious Life of Robert Hooke (2003), p. 88.
  33. John Barnard; D. F. McKenzie (14 November 2002). The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain. Cambridge University Press. p. 308 note 28. ISBN   978-0-521-66182-9 . Retrieved 26 March 2012.
  34. Hugh Trevor-Roper, Renaissance Essays (1985), p. 188.
  35. Denis Lawton, Peter Gordon, A History of Western Educational Ideas (2002), p. 74.
  36. Kathleen Anne Wellman, Making Science Social: The Conferences of Théophraste Renaudot, 1633-1642 (2003), p. 42.
  37. Marjory Harper, Emigrant Homecomings: The Return Movement of Emigrants, 1600-2000 (2005), p. 63.
  38. Margery Purver, The Royal Society: Concept and Creation (1967), p. 206-234.
  39. John Barnard; D. F. McKenzie (14 November 2002). The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain. Cambridge University Press. p. 311. ISBN   978-0-521-66182-9 . Retrieved 26 March 2012.
  40. Keith Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic (1971), p. 270 and p. 346.
  41. Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump (1985), pp. 71-2.
  42. Markku Peltonen, The Cambridge Companion to Bacon (1996), pp. 166.