Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act

Last updated

The Helms Amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act , sometimes called simply the Helms Amendment, [1] is a 1973 amendment, passed by the U.S. Congress in the wake of the Roe v. Wade decision by the United States Supreme Court, to limit the use of US foreign assistance for abortion. [2] [3]

Contents

Named after North Carolina senator Jesse Helms, the amendment states that "no foreign assistance funds may be used to pay for the performance of abortion as a method of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to practice abortions." [4]

Background and passage

After the Supreme Court's landmark 1973 decision Roe v. Wade , anti-abortion activists began mobilizing at the federal level. [5] [1] One of the goals of the anti-abortion movement in the wake of Roe was to cut off all federal funding support for abortion care in order to reduce the availability of legal abortions. In the year after the decision, socially conservative, evangelical Protestants who were anti-abortion mobilized to an unprecedented extent, and pro-life lawmakers introduced a number of measures designed to cut off access to abortions in the United States and elsewhere. [5] [1]

Senator Jesse Helms, a prominent opponent of abortion, introduced his amendment to the Foreign Assistance Act during his first term in Congress. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] It prohibited the use of any U.S. foreign assistance funds for "abortion as a method of family planning". It eventually passed both houses of Congress and was signed into law on December 17, 1973. It has been interpreted by every administration since as an outright ban on funding abortions, including cases of rape, incest, and pregnancies that endanger the life of the mother. It is applied even to countries where abortion is completely legal. [12] [13]

Effects

Despite its focus on "abortion as a method of family planning," American global health funding programs, such as USAID, currently interpret the Helms Amendment language to exclude funding for abortion services in cases not connected to family planning, such as rape, incest, or to save the life of the woman. [1] [4]

The Agency for International Development (AID) halted most abortion related activity due to the passing of the amendment, though they had previously been a very prominent supporter of abortion. This left the World Bank and The United Nations Fund for Population Activities as the only publicly open contributions of support. [14]

The 1984 Mexico City Policy was an expansion of the Helms Amendment's restrictions. An executive order first issued by Ronald Reagan, it prohibited spending foreign aid money on any non-governmental organizations that provide services relating to abortions. The order was continued or re-instated by all subsequent Republican presidents and rescinded by all Democrats through to Joe Biden. [15]

Abortion

Several anti-abortion groups support the current interpretation of the Helms Amendment to exclude abortions for rape or incest, considering it an important ban on "taxpayer-funded abortions." [16]

In 1990 Congress provided clarity on the amendment advising USAID programs are in fact allowed to provide counseling and information on all pregnancy options as long as the programs are following each countries' laws. [1]

Support and opposition

The amendment is supported by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and anti-abortion groups such as the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America [17]

Several abortion-rights and human rights organizations, including Planned Parenthood, [2] the Global Justice Center,[ citation needed ] Population Action International, [18] the Center for Health and Gender Equity, [19] Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International USA pressured United States President Barack Obama to mitigate what they considered the harmful effects of the Helms Amendment. Population Action International, for example, stated that since the Helms Amendment restricts US funds for abortions "as a method of family planning," abortions "conducted as a result of rape, incest, and abortions to save women's lives, are eligible for U.S. support". [18] The Center for Health and Gender Equity worked with other human rights and faith-based organizations in calling on President Obama to take executive action on the Helms Amendment for women raped in conflict. [20] More than 100 Members of Congress also had called on President Obama to take action. [21] One of the ways that President Obama could have taken action would have been through the issuance of a presidential memorandum [22] but President Obama never issued a presidential memorandum on the Helms Amendment. [23]

During the 2016 Democratic Presidential Primary, candidates (former) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) each pledged that as president they would take executive action on Helms and work to repeal the Amendment entirely. [24]

Possible repeal

Many women's rights and women's health advocates press for the repeal of the law. Approximately 47,000 women perish annually due to unsafe or illegal abortions, mostly in foreign countries. [1] Many reported abortions in foreign countries are being performed in unsafe ways by people without proper qualifications and in places that are not fit to medical standards. [1]

In 2021, more than 140 human rights and global health organizations called on Biden to permanently repeal the Helms amendment. The Guttmacher Institute estimated that repealing the Helms amendment could result in 19 million fewer unsafe abortions and 17,000 fewer maternal deaths a year. [25]

See also

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span> Termination of a pregnancy in the United States

The United States is a global outlier among developed countries on the issue of abortion, with the subject being divisible in American politics and culture wars to an extent not found elsewhere. There are widely different abortion laws depending on state.

The Mexico City policy, sometimes referred to by its critics as the global gag rule, is a former United States government policy that blocked U.S. federal funding for non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that provided abortion counseling or referrals, advocated to decriminalize abortion, or expanded abortion services. When in effect, the Mexico City policy is a U.S. government policy that requires foreign non-governmental organizations to certify that they will not "perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning" with non-U.S. funds as a condition for receiving U.S. global family planning assistance, and during its January 23, 2017 implementation any other U.S. global health assistance, including U.S. global HIV and maternal and child health (MCH) assistance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shelley Moore Capito</span> American politician and educator (born 1953)

Shelley Wellons Moore Capito is an American politician and retired educator serving in her second term as the junior United States senator from West Virginia, a post she has held since 2015. A member of the Republican Party, Capito served seven terms as the U.S. representative from West Virginia's 2nd congressional district from 2001 to 2015. The daughter of three-term West Virginia governor Arch Alfred Moore Jr., she is the dean of West Virginia's congressional delegation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kay Granger</span> American politician (born 1943)

Norvell Kay Granger is an American Republican politician from the U.S. state of Texas serving as the U.S. representative for Texas's 12th congressional district since 1997. She became chair of the United States House Committee on Appropriations in 2023.

An abortion fund is a non-profit organization that provides financial and logistical assistance to individuals who cannot afford the costs of an abortion. Abortion funds play a role in financing abortion services in countries where abortion is legal but not accessible. For example, health insurance may not cover abortion or transportation to abortion clinics may be financially or logistically infeasible. Abortion funds also provide assistance in cities, states, provinces or countries where abortion is illegal and women travel elsewhere to obtain a legal abortion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Americans United for Life</span> Public interest law firm

Americans United for Life (AUL) is an American anti-abortion law firm and advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. Founded in 1971, the group opposes abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, embryonic stem cell research, and certain contraceptive methods. The organization has led campaigns and been involved in judicial actions to prevent the passage and implementation of legislation that permits abortion, or may increase prevalence of abortion, including successfully defending the Hyde Amendment in the U.S. Supreme Court.

In U.S. politics, the Hyde Amendment is a legislative provision barring the use of federal funds to pay for abortion, except to save the life of the woman, or if the pregnancy arises from incest or rape. Before the Hyde Amendment took effect in 1980, an estimated 300,000 abortions were performed annually using federal funds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political positions of Joe Biden</span> Policies of Joe Biden, President of the United States

Joe Biden, President of the United States, served as Vice President from 2009 to 2017 and in the United States Senate from 1973 until 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, he made his second presidential run in 2008, later being announced as Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama's running mate in 2008. He was elected vice president in 2008 and re-elected in 2012. In April 2019, Biden announced his 2020 presidential campaign. He became the presumptive Democratic nominee in April 2020, was formally nominated by the Democratic Party in August 2020, and defeated Republican incumbent Donald Trump in the November 2020 election.

This is a timeline of reproductive rights legislation, a chronological list of laws and legal decisions affecting human reproductive rights. Reproductive rights are a sub-set of human rights pertaining to issues of reproduction and reproductive health. These rights may include some or all of the following: the right to legal or safe abortion, the right to birth control, the right to access quality reproductive healthcare, and the right to education and access in order to make reproductive choices free from coercion, discrimination, and violence. Reproductive rights may also include the right to receive education about contraception and sexually transmitted infections, and freedom from coerced sterilization, abortion, and contraception, and protection from practices such as female genital mutilation (FGM).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span> Termination of pregnancy in states of the United States

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictions on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counselling requirements.

The platform of the Republican Party of the United States has historically been based on American conservatism, contrasting with the modern liberalism of the Democratic Party. The positions of the Republican Party have evolved over time. Currently, the party's fiscal conservatism includes support for lower taxes, small government conservatism, free market capitalism, free trade, deregulation of corporations, and restrictions on labor unions. The party's social conservatism includes support for gun rights outlined in the Second Amendment, the death penalty, and other traditional values, often with a Christian foundation, including restrictions on abortion. In foreign policy, Republicans usually favor increased military spending, strong national defense, and unilateral action. Other Republican positions include restrictions on immigration, more specifically opposition to illegal immigration, opposition to drug legalization, pornography and affirmative action, and support for school choice and school prayer.

The Global Justice Center (GJC) is an international human rights and humanitarian law organization aiming to advance gender equality by helping to implement and enforce human rights laws. Headquartered in New York City and led by Akila Radhakrishnan, the GJC is a member of the United Nations NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security. The GJC works with national and international Non-governmental organizations, the United Nations, the International Criminal Court, and others to promote the progressive, feminist interpretation and application of international law.

Abortion in Nevada is legal within 24 weeks since fertilization, under the Nevada Revised Statutes chapter 442, section 250; and after 24 weeks if the pregnancy could be fatal for the pregnant woman. 62% of adults said in a poll by the Pew Research Center that abortion should be legal while 34% said it should by illegal in all or most cases. Legislation by 2007 required informed consent. Attempts were successfully made to pass abortion legislation in May 2019, being pushed through a largely Democratic controlled state legislature. The number of abortion clinics in Nevada has declined over the years, with 25 in 1982, seventeen in 1992 and thirteen in 2014. There were 8,132 legal abortions in 2014, and 7,116 in 2015.

Abortion in Maryland is legal up to the point of fetal viability and later when necessary to preserve the life or health of the pregnant person. The first laws regulating abortion in the state were passed in 1867 and 1868, banning abortion except by a physician to "secure the safety of the mother." Abortion providers continued to operate both within and outside of the law. Legal enforcement became more strict from the 1940s through 60s, with numerous police raids on abortion providers. In 1968, Maryland passed a liberalized abortion law that clarified the wording of the previous law, allowing abortion in hospital settings in cases of rape, severe fetal deformity, or when life and health were endangered.

Abortion in Puerto Rico is legal throughout pregnancy. On June 22, 2022, the Senate passed a bill limiting abortion to 22 weeks, with exceptions for danger to the mother's life, fetal defects, and if the fetus would not be viable. The bill will need to be considered by the House.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social policy of the Joe Biden administration</span> Overview of the social policy of the Biden administration (2021-present)

The social policy of the Joe Biden administration is intended to improve racial equity, increase access to safe and legal abortions, tighten restrictions on gun sales, among other aims. A number of policies aim to reverse the former policies of President Donald Trump, including the "Muslim" travel ban and loosened anti-discriminatory policies relating to LGBT people.

Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, No. 19-1392, 597 U.S. 215 (2022), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the Constitution of the United States does not confer a right to abortion. The court's decision overruled both Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), returning to individual states the power to regulate any aspect of abortion not protected by federal law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Kansas abortion referendum</span> Abortion ballot measure

The 2022 Kansas abortion referendum was a rejected legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Kansas Constitution that appeared on the ballot on August 2, 2022, alongside primary elections for statewide offices, with early voting from July 13. If enacted, the amendment would have declared that the Kansas Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion, given the Kansas state government power to prosecute individuals involved in abortions, and further declared that the Kansas government is not required to fund abortions.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Barot, Sneha (September 23, 2013). "Abortion Restrictions in U.S. Foreign Aid: The History and Harms of the Helms Amendment". Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
  2. 1 2 "Helms Amendment Hurts Women Worldwide". www.plannedparenthoodaction.org. Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  3. Amendments, United States Congress Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Constitutional (1974). Abortion: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session [-Ninety-fourth Congress, First Session] ... U.S. Government Printing Office. p. 90. Retrieved February 17, 2023.
  4. 1 2 "Helms Amendment | U.S. Foreign Policy & Funding | The Issues | CHANGE". www.genderhealth.org. Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  5. 1 2 Ziegler, Mary (2014). "Beyond Backlash: Legal Hist ond Backlash: Legal History, Polarization, and Roe v olarization, and Roe v. Wade". Florida State University College of Law. p. 1005. Retrieved February 15, 2023.
  6. Benshoof, Janet (2009). "Twisted Treaty Shafts U.S. Women by Janet Benshoof". www.ontheissuesmagazine.com. Retrieved February 10, 2023. Drafted by the late Republican Senator Jesse Helms, a vociferous opponent of abortion, this language can and has been used as an anti-abortion weapon.
  7. Weatherford, J. McIver (1985). Tribes on the Hill. ABC-CLIO. p. 127. ISBN   978-0-89789-072-4 . Retrieved February 10, 2023. As an outspoken and imaginative strategist of conservative issues, Helms rose to national leadership in the anti-busing, anti-abortion, anti-sex education, and anti-Equal Rights Amendment movements.
  8. Yachot, Noa (August 12, 2022). "Biden urged to clarify that abortion aid abroad unaffected by Roe v Wade ruling". The Guardian. Retrieved February 10, 2023.
  9. Hanrahan, John (December 14, 1987). "Supreme Court nominee Anthony Kennedy denied today that he... - UPI Archives". UPI. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
  10. Ford, Liz (July 29, 2020). "Democrats introduce bill to repeal anti-abortion rule for US overseas aid". The Guardian. Retrieved February 9, 2023.
  11. "Divisive Conservative Firebrand Jesse Helms Dies at 86". PBS NewsHour. July 4, 2008. Retrieved January 24, 2023.
  12. Gaddy, Ellen (July 8, 2022). "It's Time to End My Grandfather's Harmful Legacy — the Helms Amendment". POLITICO. Retrieved September 9, 2022.
  13. Moss, Kellie; Kates, Jennifer (January 18, 2022). "The Helms Amendment and Abortion Laws in Countries Receiving U.S. Global Health Assistance". KFF.org. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved February 15, 2023.
  14. Warwick, D. P. (April 1980). "Foreign aid for abortion". The Hastings Center Report. 10 (2): 30–37. doi:10.2307/3561278. ISSN   0093-0334. JSTOR   3561278. PMID   7372467.
  15. Keating, Joshua (January 28, 2021). "The Biden Administration Is Repealing the Global Gag Rule. That's Not Enough". Slate. Retrieved December 19, 2023.
  16. Crockett, Emily (February 12, 2016). "Both Clinton and Sanders want to help rape victims abroad by changing this major policy". Vox. Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  17. "US bishops urge Congress to prohibit taxpayer funding of abortions".
  18. 1 2 "Helms Hurts: It's Time to Fix this Broken Policy - PAI" . Retrieved June 29, 2016.
  19. "CHANGE: Center for Health and Gender Equity". genderhealth.org. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  20. Bassett, Laura. "This U.S. Policy Drives Rape Victims Worldwide To Undergo Grisly Abortions" . Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  21. "Democrats Urge Obama to Address Needs of Rape Survivors in War Zones". Roll Call. October 26, 2015. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  22. Pauqette, Danielle (November 30, 2015). "How a 42-year-old law keeps the U.S. from helping ISIS's rape victims get abortions: Anti-abortion groups hailed the 1973 Helms amendment as a victory in the aftermath of Roe v. Wade". The Washington Post. ProQuest   1737943394.[ better source needed ]
  23. "Presidential Memoranda". whitehouse.gov. May 14, 2015. Retrieved June 17, 2018.[ non-primary source needed ]
  24. Reporter, Laura Bassett Senior Politics; Post, The Huffington Post Ryan Grim Washington bureau chief for The Huffington (February 11, 2016). "Clinton And Sanders Make Major Pledge On Abortion Policy". The Huffington Post. Retrieved September 6, 2016.
  25. Ford, Liz (April 30, 2021). "Biden urged to end US aid 'abortion ban'". The Guardian. Retrieved November 3, 2023.