Hermosa Beach oil drilling controversy

Last updated

The City of Hermosa Beach, located on the coast in Los Angeles County, California, called for a special election regarding oil drilling which took place on 3 March 2015. [1] All of the materials prepared for the election on behalf of the City of Hermosa Beach were available on the city's website. [2]

Contents

The ballot measure, titled Measure O, presents to the electorate for its consideration an ordinance that proposes various legislative changes that would lift the ban on oil drilling within the City, to allow an oil drilling and production project proposed by E&B Natural Resources Management Corp. to go forward at the site of the City Maintenance Yard at 555 Sixth Street, a development agreement, as well as an oil and gas pipeline franchise.

The question appeared on the ballot to which voters chose a “yes” or “no” answer to the following: "Shall E&B Corporation’s 34 well oil and gas drilling/production project at the City’s 555 Sixth Street maintenance yard be approved by 1) amending the General Plan and Municipal Code to exempt the project from the City’s oil drilling ban and repeal the restriction on City’s use of project royalties, 2) awarding a pipeline franchise to transport oil/gas underground, 3) approving a 34 year development agreement, and 4) determining that project financial benefits outweigh its unavoidable environmental impacts?" [3]

In preparation for the election, the City of Hermosa Beach prepared an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) in compliance with the Environmental Quality Act, as well as a Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Health Impact Assessment (HIA), and provided an extensive community education and review process. [4]

E&B Natural Resources, the company behind the proposed Oil Drilling and Production Project, looks to access oil fields located offshore from a single onshore location using directional drilling technology. [5] The proposed project is the result of a recently resolved legal battle between the city and the Macpherson Energy Corporation, in which Macpherson sued the city for damages over a previous plan that the city backed out of. [6] The plan has been met with controversy, as residents are divided over the promise of an economic windfall versus potential health and environmental impacts on the community.

Background: History of the Proposed Oil Drilling Project

A complete summary of important dates surrounding cases regarding Oil Drilling in Hermosa Beach can be accessed through the following link located on the City of Hermosa Beach website: http://www.hermosabch.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=1660.

The current proposal from E&B Natural Resources to recover oil in Hermosa Beach is the result of a series of voter-approved initiatives and legal settlements stretching back to 1984. Following voter approval of two initiatives to allow for oil drilling at this site in 1984, the City Council approved an agreement and a 35-year lease with Macpherson Oil Company to recover oil from the huge oil reservoir underneath the City. In 1995, voters reversed their previous approval and Macpherson then sued the City for more than $700 million. To put that number into perspective, Hermosa Beach’s annual budget is about $30 million. After losing at trial and prior to the start of the damages trial, the City hired jury experts who conducted independent “Mock Trials” to determine the amount of damages a jury might award Macpherson. The mock jurors awarded Macpherson hundreds of millions of dollars. A copy of these mock jury decisions can be found online at the City of Hermosa Beach’s website.

A judgment of this size against Hermosa Beach would have bankrupted the City. Following the advice of the City Attorney, outside legal counsel and the jury experts, the City negotiated a settlement that included the payment of $30 million to Macpherson. At this point E&B stepped in and paid $12.5 million to Macpherson and received their rights to the project, plus E&B loaned the City their share of the settlement payment – $17.5 million.

The settlement called for E&B to submit an application to the City that would include an exhaustive Environmental Impact Report as well as other financial and community studies. Following their review, the City will submit to the voters a new proposal to allow the safe recovery of oil from the same site. You can review the City’s overview of the project’s history on the “Proposed Oil Production Project” section of the City’s website. If the voters reject the proposal, the City will be required to repay the $17.5 million loan (plus interest) it received from E&B to pay its share of the settlement. If the proposed oil recovery project is approved, E&B will forgive $14 million and allow the balance to be paid from the City’s royalties from the oil produced.

Background: Macpherson Energy vs City Of Hermosa

In 1992, Hermosa Beach granted an operating lease to the Macpherson Energy Company allowing them to use directional drilling to tap into underwater oil reserves off-shore from a single site located in the cities maintenance yard. [7] As the company was preparing for the project, the City voted in 1995 to approve Proposition E, which restored a previously held ban on drilling. Since the agreement was in place before the vote, Hermosa moved ahead with the project. [7] In 1998, following a report by the California Coastal Commission that raised safety concerns regarding the project, City Council voted to halt the project. Citing damages in lost revenue, Macpherson sued the city. [7]

After 14 years of litigation, on March 2, 2012, the Hermosa Beach City Council entered into a settlement agreement to end the lawsuit. [8]

Pursuant to the settlement agreement, E & B Natural Resources Management Corp. paid Macpherson Oil Co. $30 million for those rights, including Macpherson Oil Co.’s existing Conditional Use Permit and an oil and gas lease. E & B Natural Resources Management Corp. also would secure payment from the city of up to $17.5 million based on the results of a future election.

At that election, which is scheduled for March 3, 2015, Hermosa Beach voters will review a ballot measure, titled Measure O, and decide whether to repeal the existing ban on oil drilling in the city limits and enter into a development agreement for E & B Natural Resources Management Corp. to complete what it describes as a “state-of-the-art” oil drilling project at the city’s maintenance yard. [9]

If the project is turned down by the voters, Hermosa would have to pay E&B Natural Resources the full amount of the loan. [10]

Project scope

E&B Natural Resources has proposed a 30-35 year project that involves four phases: [11]

Since E&B Natural Resources will be using directional drilling for this project, traditional offshore drilling platforms will not be necessary for recovery. The process of Hydraulic Fracturing, or “fracking”, will also not be used, as the oil field provides naturally occurring characteristics that make the fracking unnecessary. [12] Berkeley Research Group Director William Hamm completed a study that estimated that the City of Hermosa would receive $519 million of total economic benefit from the project, a figure that was quickly criticized by opponents of the project as speculative and unreliable since it is based on a study paid for by E&B. [13] [14]

Public response

The residents of Hermosa Beach are very strongly divided on the merits of reversing its ban on oil drilling within the city limits. [15] In the past year, the City of Hermosa Beach has held several public meetings on the project's EIR, as well as upon the health and economic impacts of the project. Advocates against oil drilling have rallied loudly against overturning the city's ban since early last year, citing the inescapable health and environmental concerns attached to such a project. [16] A local advocacy group, Keep Hermosa Hermosa, has actively campaigned against undoing the city's current law banning oil drilling, and has become a significant political advocacy group in the city. [17] E&B promises a windfall in profits to the community and contends that it is able to mitigate the health, environmental, and aesthetic concerns of the community, though the EIR released in April 2014 demonstrates that not all of the community's concerns can be completely mitigated. [18] The estimated revenue to the city is projected to be approximately $500 million or more, according to the oil company. [19] Some residents are concerned with the payback of the $17,500,000 loan to E&B if the project does not pass by the voters. It may be possible that it is for this reason that some residents are in favor of the project, though the city manager of the City of Hermosa Beach has also publicly stated that a vote "no" on this proposal will not bankrupt the city, as it has sizable cash reserves and an excellent credit rating.

The financial impact on the city is a consideration for many, as one recent quote from a former city councilman suggests. “I’m truly agnostic about what voters choose to do,” said former Mayor Kit Bobko, who helped negotiated the deal with the two companies. “My primary concern in this is extracting us from this litigation, which is potentially ruinous.” [20]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil spill</span> Release of petroleum into the environment

An oil spill is the release of a liquid petroleum hydrocarbon into the environment, especially the marine ecosystem, due to human activity, and is a form of pollution. The term is usually given to marine oil spills, where oil is released into the ocean or coastal waters, but spills may also occur on land. Oil spills may be due to releases of crude oil from tankers, offshore platforms, drilling rigs and wells, as well as spills of refined petroleum products and their by-products, heavier fuels used by large ships such as bunker fuel, or the spill of any oily refuse or waste oil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oil Pollution Act of 1990</span> US federal law

The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) was passed by the 101st United States Congress and signed by President George H. W. Bush. It works to avoid oil spills from vessels and facilities by enforcing removal of spilled oil and assigning liability for the cost of cleanup and damage; requires specific operating procedures; defines responsible parties and financial liability; implements processes for measuring damages; specifies damages for which violators are liable; and establishes a fund for damages, cleanup, and removal costs. This statute has resulted in instrumental changes in the oil production, transportation, and distribution industries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kansas Geological Survey</span>

The Kansas Geological Survey (KGS) is a research and service division of the University of Kansas, charged by statute with studying and providing information on the geologic resources of Kansas. The KGS has no regulatory authority and does not take positions on natural resource issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baca National Wildlife Refuge</span>

The Baca National Wildlife Refuge is a 78,697-acre (31,848 ha) United States National Wildlife Refuge located in southern Colorado. It is within the Sangre de Cristo National Heritage Area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary</span> Marine protected area in California, U.S.

The Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (MBNMS) is a federally protected marine area offshore of California's Big Sur and central coast in the United States. It is the largest US national marine sanctuary and has a shoreline length of 276 miles (444 km) stretching from just north of the Golden Gate Bridge at San Francisco to Cambria in San Luis Obispo County. Supporting one of the world's most diverse marine ecosystems, it is home to numerous mammals, seabirds, fishes, invertebrates and plants in a remarkably productive coastal environment. The MBNMS was established in 1992 for the purpose of resource protection, research, education, and public use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arctic Refuge drilling controversy</span> Question of whether to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

The question of whether to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) has been an ongoing political controversy in the United States since 1977. As of 2017, Republicans have attempted to allow drilling in ANWR almost fifty times, finally being successful with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Steam-assisted gravity drainage is an enhanced oil recovery technology for producing heavy crude oil and bitumen. It is an advanced form of steam stimulation in which a pair of horizontal wells are drilled into the oil reservoir, one a few metres above the other. High pressure steam is continuously injected into the upper wellbore to heat the oil and reduce its viscosity, causing the heated oil to drain into the lower wellbore, where it is pumped out. Dr. Roger Butler, engineer at Imperial Oil from 1955 to 1982, invented the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) process in the 1970s. Butler "developed the concept of using horizontal pairs of wells and injected steam to develop certain deposits of bitumen considered too deep for mining". In 1983 Butler became director of technical programs for the Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority (AOSTRA), a crown corporation created by Alberta Premier Lougheed to promote new technologies for oil sands and heavy crude oil production. AOSTRA quickly supported SAGD as a promising innovation in oil sands extraction technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracking in the United States</span>

Fracking in the United States began in 1949. According to the Department of Energy (DOE), by 2013 at least two million oil and gas wells in the US had been hydraulically fractured, and that of new wells being drilled, up to 95% are hydraulically fractured. The output from these wells makes up 43% of the oil production and 67% of the natural gas production in the United States. Environmental safety and health concerns about hydraulic fracturing emerged in the 1980s, and are still being debated at the state and federal levels.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keystone Pipeline</span> Oil pipeline in North America

The Keystone Pipeline System is an oil pipeline system in Canada and the United States, commissioned in 2010 and owned by TC Energy and, as of March 2020, the Government of Alberta. It runs from the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin in Alberta to refineries in Illinois and Texas, and also to oil tank farms and an oil pipeline distribution center in Cushing, Oklahoma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore oil and gas in California</span> Drilling in state and federal zones

Offshore oil and gas in California provides a significant portion of the state's petroleum production. Offshore oil and gas has been a contentious issue for decades, first over the question of state versus federal ownership, but since 1969 mostly over questions of resource development versus environmental protection.

The Yasuní-ITT Initiative was a project that attempted to keep over a billion barrels of oil in the ground under the Yasuni National Park in the Ecuadorian Amazon. The initiative was launched in 2007 by Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa and offered a perpetual suspension of oil extraction from the Ishpingo-Tambococha-Tiputini oil field (ITT) in return for $3.6 billion from the international community.

<i>Deepwater Horizon</i> oil spill Oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico

The Deepwater Horizon oil spill was an environmental disaster which began on 20 April 2010, off the coast of the United States in the Gulf of Mexico on the BP-operated Macondo Prospect, considered the largest marine oil spill in the history of the petroleum industry and estimated to be 8 to 31 percent larger in volume than the previous largest, the Ixtoc I oil spill, also in the Gulf of Mexico. Caused in the aftermath of a blowout and explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil platform, the United States federal government estimated the total discharge at 4.9 MMbbl. After several failed efforts to contain the flow, the well was declared sealed on 19 September 2010. Reports in early 2012 indicated that the well site was still leaking. The Deepwater Horizon oil spill is regarded as one of the largest environmental disasters in world history.

<i>Deepwater Horizon</i> litigation Aspect of the Deepwater Horizon explosion

The civil and criminal proceedings stemming from the explosion of Deepwater Horizon and the resulting massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico began shortly after the April 20, 2010 incident and have continued since then. They have included an extensive claims settlement process for a guilty plea to criminal charges by BP, and an ongoing Clean Water Act lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and other parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jubilee Oil Field</span>

The Jubilee Oil Field is an oil field located off the coast of Ghana's Western Region in the South Atlantic Ocean under the ownership of the Kosmos Energy, Occidental Petroleum and the Tullow Oil.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fracking</span> Fracturing bedrock by pressurized liquid

Fracking is a well stimulation technique involving the fracturing of formations in bedrock by a pressurized liquid. The process involves the high-pressure injection of "fracking fluid" into a wellbore to create cracks in the deep-rock formations through which natural gas, petroleum, and brine will flow more freely. When the hydraulic pressure is removed from the well, small grains of hydraulic fracturing proppants hold the fractures open.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of fracking</span>

The environmental impact of fracking is related to land use and water consumption, air emissions, including methane emissions, brine and fracturing fluid leakage, water contamination, noise pollution, and health. Water and air pollution are the biggest risks to human health from fracking. Research has determined that fracking negatively affects human health and drives climate change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcellus natural gas trend</span> Natural gas extraction area in the United States

The Marcellus natural gas trend is a large geographic area of prolific shale gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale or Marcellus Formation, of Devonian age, in the eastern United States. The shale play encompasses 104,000 square miles and stretches across Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and into eastern Ohio and western New York. In 2012, it was the largest source of natural gas in the United States, and production was still growing rapidly in 2013. The natural gas is trapped in low-permeability shale, and requires the well completion method of hydraulic fracturing to allow the gas to flow to the well bore. The surge in drilling activity in the Marcellus Shale since 2008 has generated both economic benefits and considerable controversy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nanette Barragán</span> American attorney & politician (born 1976)

Nanette Díaz Barragán is an American attorney and politician serving as the U.S. representative for California's 44th congressional district since 2017. A member of the Democratic Party, she was a Hermosa Beach City councilmember from 2013 to 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inglewood Oil Field</span> Oil drilling operation in California, USA

The Inglewood Oil Field in Los Angeles County, California, is the 18th-largest oil field in the state and the second-most productive in the Los Angeles Basin. Discovered in 1924 and in continuous production ever since, in 2012 it produced approximately 2.8 million barrels of oil from some five hundred wells. Since 1924 it has produced almost 400 million barrels, and the California Department of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) has estimated that there are about 30 million barrels remaining in the field's one thousand acres, recoverable with present technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">La Goleta Gas Field</span> Natural gas field in Santa Barbara County, California, United States

The La Goleta Gas Field is a natural gas field in unincorporated Santa Barbara County, California, adjacent to the city of Goleta. Discovered in 1929, and first put into production in 1932, it has been in continuous use ever since, producing approximately 12 billion cubic feet of gas. With production declining, the field was converted into a gas storage reservoir in 1941. As of 2016 it remains one of the four gas storage facilities maintained by Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas), a division of Sempra Energy, with the others being Aliso Canyon, Honor Rancho and Playa del Rey. It is the oldest storage facility of the four and the third largest, with a maximum capacity of 21.5 billion cubic feet. The storage facilities are necessary to balance load for the over ten million customers of SoCalGas: during summer months, when gas usage is at a minimum, gas is pumped into the reservoirs; and in the winter when usage is high, gas is withdrawn. The La Goleta field serves the northern portion of SoCalGas's geographic range.

References

  1. ↑ "City of Hermosa Beach: March 3, 2015 Election". www.hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on January 29, 2015.
  2. ↑ "Proposed Oil Drilling and Production Project". Archived from the original on February 9, 2015. Retrieved January 26, 2015.
  3. ↑ "City of Hermosa Beach : Current Activities". www.hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on February 27, 2014.
  4. ↑ "City of Hermosa Beach : Proposed E & B Oil Drilling and Production Project". www.hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on February 27, 2014.
  5. ↑ "Hermosa Beach Oil Drilling Summary and Facts | E&B Natural Resources". Ebnr-hermosa.com. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved August 16, 2013.
  6. ↑ "Macpherson Settlement Fact Sheet". Hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on August 29, 2013. Retrieved August 16, 2013.
  7. 1 2 3 "Macpherson Oil Company vs. the City of Hermosa Beach:A Chronology". Hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on August 29, 2013. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
  8. ↑ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on May 27, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  9. ↑ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on May 27, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  10. ↑ "The Amount of MacPherson's Damages That Would Have Been Sought at Trial". Hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on August 29, 2013. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
  11. ↑ "Summary of Hermosa Beach Oil Drilling Proposal". Ebnr-hermosa.com. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
  12. ↑ "Key Facts". Ebnr-hermosa.com. Archived from the original on May 7, 2013. Retrieved August 13, 2013.
  13. ↑ Stitt, Eric Michael. "E&B says oil to bring millions, critics say numbers unreliable". Tbrnews.com. Archived from the original on February 29, 2016. Retrieved March 5, 2013.
  14. ↑ Hamm, William G.; Young, Jenny; Tang, Fei (March 2013). The Potential Impact of a Proposed Oil & Gas Development Project on the City of Hermosa Beach (PDF) (Report). Berkeley Research Group, LLC. Retrieved August 13, 2013.[ permanent dead link ]
  15. ↑ Mai-Duc, Christine (July 25, 2013). "Drill for oil in Hermosa Beach? No way, some residents say". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on October 11, 2016. Retrieved April 16, 2020.
  16. ↑ Mazza, Sandy (February 16, 2014). "Reports: Oil spills, smelly air and health threats possible downsides of Hermosa Beach oil-drilling proposal". Daily Breeze. Archived from the original on September 23, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2014.
  17. ↑ https://www.facebook.com/StopHermosaBeachOil Archived August 4, 2024, at the Wayback Machine [ user-generated source ]
  18. ↑ "City of Hermosa Beach : Environmental Impact Review Process". www.hermosabch.org. Archived from the original on November 28, 2012.
  19. ↑ "Hermosa Beach would earn $500 million from proposed drilling project, oil company says". Daily Breeze. March 6, 2013. Archived from the original on March 6, 2015. Retrieved April 22, 2014.
  20. ↑ Greenhut, Steven. "Oil drilling firm seeking gusher of public support". San Diego Union-Tribune . Archived from the original on August 25, 2013. Retrieved August 14, 2013.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.