Horizon of expectation

Last updated

"Horizon of expectation" (German : Erwartungshorizont) is a term fundamental to German academic Hans Robert Jauss's reception theory. The concept is a component of his theory of literary history where his intention is to minimise the gulf between the schools of literature and history which have previously relegated the reader to play only a minor role in the interpretation of literature. [1] Specifically, it is the structure by which a person comprehends, decodes and appraises any text based on cultural codes and conventions particular to their time in history. These horizons are therefore historically flexible meaning readers may interpret and value a text differently from a previous generation. [2] It emphasises the reader as an important element in the processing of texts. According to Jauss, the reader approaches a text armed with the knowledge and experience gained from interactions with other texts. These earlier texts arouse familiarity for the reader based on expectations and rules of genre and style. [3] Jauss describes it this way, 'a literary work is not an object which stands by itself and which offers the same face to each reader in each period'. [4] Thus reading is not an 'autonomous, free and individual' experience but rather a collection of mutual concepts fitting a period or a people. [5]

Contents

Horizon change

Jauss describes the reader as a functioning participant of the 'triangle' of text, writer and audience and that it is only the 'communication' between reader and text that will result in a shifting horizon of expectation. Interaction with a text can be emotive for the reader as their acquaintance with familiar features of genre can produce expectations for the 'middle and end' after the 'beginning' has provoked such anticipation. [6] The horizon of expectations and rubrics invoked for a reader from previous texts will be aroused by a new text and are adjusted, transformed or merely replicated depending on the boundaries of the genre. A 'horizon change' occurs when a reader's interaction with a new text results in invalidation of a 'familiar experience' or provides a new encounter. The 'distance' between the horizon of expectation and the element or work that causes horizon change is called the 'aesthetic distance'. [7] A text which causes no horizon change to occur fulfills all of the expectations of the reader and can be considered 'light reading'. These interactions satisfy the reader's sense of familiarity in the way of 'beauty', romanticism and the expected happy ending. If a composition challenges a reader's expectation, it can do so either with a positive result in the way of a new perception, or a negative one as in an unpleasant new experience. These expectations however may dissolve, or a negative aspect of a new text may become explicit, and thus form its own familiar expectation and become 'part of the horizon of future aesthetic experience'. [8] Texts which are not aimed at a particular readership but which still penetrate 'the familiar horizon of expectations' so that those readers acquire them to the point that they become largely conventional, can result in other formerly celebrated texts judged as passe and thus completely disregarded. [9] Liggins and Maunder (2004) use the example of the decline in regard toward the work of female Victorian writers by the start of the twentieth century by critics and audiences alike as a change in the expectation of both of these audiences occurred. [10]

History of reception

Jauss asserts that for any narrative to be suitably analysed, the horizons of expectations of the earliest 'audience' needs to be recreated. This process is based on the way in which the past text was produced and then embraced by its audience. By discovering the 'questions' which the text answered allows the analyst to determine how the readers perceived and comprehended the work at the time. [11] When an author of a past work is unknown and his purpose therefore difficult to identify, the most appropriate function to understand how the work is to be comprehended is to consider the text in comparison to the backdrop of other texts of which the modern reader may hold implied as well as overt knowledge. [12] This 'history of reception' works to determine the intertextuality and 'historical expectation of readers' as variances in readings and emphasises Jauss's primary concern of making the 'new and challenging' become 'familiar and effortless'. [13]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans-Georg Gadamer</span> German philosopher (1900–2002)

Hans-Georg Gadamer was a German philosopher of the continental tradition, best known for his 1960 magnum opus, Truth and Method, on hermeneutics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literary theory</span> Systematic study of the nature of literature

Literary theory is the systematic study of the nature of literature and of the methods for literary analysis. Since the 19th century, literary scholarship includes literary theory and considerations of intellectual history, moral philosophy, social philosophy, and interdisciplinary themes relevant to how people interpret meaning. In the humanities in modern academia, the latter style of literary scholarship is an offshoot of post-structuralism. Consequently, the word theory became an umbrella term for scholarly approaches to reading texts, some of which are informed by strands of semiotics, cultural studies, philosophy of language, and continental philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Literary criticism</span> Study, evaluation, and interpretation of literature

A genre of arts criticism, literary criticism or literary studies is the study, evaluation, and interpretation of literature. Modern literary criticism is often influenced by literary theory, which is the philosophical analysis of literature's goals and methods. Although the two activities are closely related, literary critics are not always, and have not always been, theorists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stock character</span> Literary or social stereotype used to create characters or determine their role in a story

A stock character, also known as a character archetype, is a type of character in a narrative whom audiences recognize across many narratives or as part of a storytelling tradition or convention. There is a wide range of stock characters, covering people of various ages, social classes and demeanors. They are archetypal characters distinguished by their simplification and flatness. As a result, they tend to be easy targets for parody and to be criticized as clichés. The presence of a particular array of stock characters is a key component of many genres, and they often help to identify a genre or subgenre. For example, a story with the stock characters of a knight-errant and a witch is probably a fairy tale or fantasy.

Wolfgang Iser was a German literary scholar.

Metafiction is a form of fiction that emphasizes its own narrative structure in a way that inherently reminds the audience that they are reading or viewing a fictional work. Metafiction is self-conscious about language, literary form, and story-telling, and works of metafiction directly or indirectly draw attention to their status as artifacts. Metafiction is frequently used as a form of parody or a tool to undermine literary conventions and explore the relationship between literature and reality, life, and art.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reader-response criticism</span> School of literary theory focused on writings readers

Reader-response criticism is a school of literary theory that focuses on the reader and their experience of a literary work, in contrast to other schools and theories that focus attention primarily on the author or the content and form of the work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unreliable narrator</span> Narrator whose credibility is compromised

An unreliable narrator is a narrator whose credibility is compromised. They can be found in fiction and film, and range from children to mature characters. The term was coined in 1961 by Wayne C. Booth in The Rhetoric of Fiction. While unreliable narrators are almost by definition first-person narrators, arguments have been made for the existence of unreliable second- and third-person narrators, especially within the context of film and television, and sometimes also in literature.

In literary theory and aesthetics, authorial intent refers to an author's intent as it is encoded in their work. Authorial intentionalism is the view that an author's intentions should constrain the ways in which a text is properly interpreted. Opponents, who undermined its hermeneutical importance, have labelled this position the intentional fallacy and count it among the informal fallacies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Genre studies</span> Branch of general critical theory

Genre studies is an academic subject which studies genre theory as a branch of general critical theory in several different fields, including art, literature, linguistics, rhetoric and composition studies.

Reading comprehension is the ability to process written text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows. Reading comprehension relies on two abilities that are connected to each other: word reading and language comprehension. Comprehension specifically is a "creative, multifaceted process" that is dependent upon four language skills: phonology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics.

Reception theory is a version of reader response literary theory that emphasizes each particular reader's reception or interpretation in making meaning from a literary text. Reception theory is generally referred to as audience reception in the analysis of communications models. In literary studies, reception theory originated from the work of Hans-Robert Jauss in the late 1960s, and the most influential work was produced during the 1970s and early 1980s in Germany and the US, with some notable work done in other Western European countries. A form of reception theory has also been applied to the study of historiography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hans Robert Jauss</span> German academic (1921–1997)

Hans Robert Jauss was a German academic, notable for his work in reception theory and medieval and modern French literature. His approach was derived from the hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer.

Expectancy violations theory (EVT) is a theory of communication that analyzes how individuals respond to unanticipated violations of social norms and expectations. The theory was proposed by Judee K. Burgoon in the late 1970s and continued through the 1980s and 1990s as "nonverbal expectancy violations theory", based on Burgoon's research studying proxemics. Burgoon's work initially analyzed individuals' allowances and expectations of personal distance and how responses to personal distance violations were influenced by the level of liking and relationship to the violators. The theory was later changed to its current name when other researchers began to focus on violations of social behavior expectations beyond nonverbal communication.

Identification refers to the automatic, subconscious psychological process in which an individual becomes like or closely associates themselves with another person by adopting one or more of the others' perceived personality traits, physical attributes, or some other aspect of their identity. The concept of identification was founded by psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud in the 1920’s, and has since been expanded on and applied in psychology, social studies, media studies, and literary and film criticism. In literature, identification most often refers to the audience identifying with a fictional character, however it can also be employed as a narrative device whereby one character identifies with another character within the text itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Louise Rosenblatt</span> American university professor (1904–2005)

Louise Michelle Rosenblatt was an American university professor. She is best known as a researcher into the teaching of literature.

Also known as reception analysis, audience reception theory has come to be widely used as a way of characterizing the wave of audience research which occurred within communications and cultural studies during the 1980s and 1990s. On the whole, this work has adopted a "culturalist" perspective, has tended to use qualitative methods of research and has tended to be concerned, one way or another, with exploring the active choices, uses and interpretations made of media materials, by their consumers. Can also be known as reception theory, in which producers encode with a desired response, then the audience decode.

The sublime in literature refers to the use of language and description that excites the senses of the reader to a degree that exceeds the ordinary limits of that individual's capacities.

Skopos theory is a theory in the field of translation studies that employs the prime principle of a purposeful action that determines a translation strategy. The intentionality of a translational action stated in a translation brief, the directives, and the rules guide a translator to attain the expected target text translatum.

Catherine Belsey was a British literary critic and academic.

References

  1. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 7–37. Viewed 15 March 2013.
  2. ↑ "Horizons of Expectation". The Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms (4th ed.). Retrieved 12 March 2013.
  3. ↑ Holden, Phillip. "Hans Robert Jauss and literary horizons of expectation". Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  4. ↑ Belsey, Catherine (2002). Critical Practice. Routledge. p. 30. ISBN   0-415-28006-0.
  5. ↑ Chartier, Roger (2006). "Genre between Literature and History". Modern Language Quarterly. 67 (1): 129–139. Viewed 5 March 2013.
  6. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 7–37 [12]. Viewed March 2013.
  7. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 12–14, 7–37. Viewed 13 March 2013.
  8. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 7–37 [15]. Viewed 15 March 2013.
  9. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 16, 17, 7–37. Viewed 15 March 2013.
  10. ↑ Liggins, Emma; Andrew Maunder (2004). "Reassessing nineteenth-century popular fiction by women, 1825–1880". Women's Writing. 11 (1): 3–8 [4]. Viewed 12 March 2013.
  11. ↑ Holden, Phillip. "Hans Robert Jauss and Literary Horizons of Expectations". University of Singapore. Archived from the original on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 15 March 2013.
  12. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Elizabeth Benzinger (1970). "Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory". New Literary History. 2 (1): 7–37 [19]. Viewed 15 March 2013.
  13. ↑ Belsey, Catherine (2002). Critical Practice. New York: Routledge. pp. 14–34 [30]. ISBN   0-415-28005-2.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.