Housing bubble

Last updated

A housing bubble (or housing price bubble) is one of several types of asset price bubbles which periodically occur in the market. The basic concept of a housing bubble is the same as for other asset bubbles, consisting of two main phases. First there is a period where house prices increase dramatically, driven more and more by speculation. In the second phase, house prices fall dramatically. Housing bubbles tend to be among the asset bubbles with the largest effect on the real economy because they are credit-fueled, [1] ,and a large number of households participate and not just investors, and because the wealth effect from housing tends to be larger than for other types of financial assets. [2]

Contents

Housing bubble definition

Most research papers on housing bubbles use standard asset price definitions. There are many definitions of bubbles. Most of them are normative definitions, like that of Joseph Stiglitz (1990), [3] that try to describe bubbles as periods involving speculation, or argue that bubbles involve prices that cannot be justified by fundamentals. Examples are Palgrave (1926), [4] Flood and Hodrick (1990), [5] Robert J. Shiller (2005), [6] Smith and Smith (2006) [7] and Cochrane (2010). [8]

Stiglitz's definition is: "...the basic intuition is straightforward: if the reason that the price is high today is only because investors believe that the selling price will be high tomorrow—when ‘fundamental' factors do not seem to justify such a price—then a bubble exists." (Stiglitz 1990, p. 13) [3]

Lind (2009) [9] argued that we needed a new definition of price bubbles in the housing market, an "anti-Stiglitz" definition. His point is that traditional definitions such as that of Stiglitz (1990), [3] in which bubbles are proposed as arising from prices not being determined by fundamentals, are problematic. This is primarily because the concept "fundamentals" is vague, but also because these type of nominal definitions typically do not refer to a bubble episode as a whole—with both an increase and a decrease of the price. Lind claims that the solution is to define a bubble by focusing only on the specific development of prices and not on why prices have developed in a certain way. The general definition of a bubble would then simply be: "There is a bubble if the (real) price of an asset first increases dramatically over a period of several months or years and then almost immediately falls dramatically." (Lind 2009, p. 80) [9]

Inspired by Lind (2009), [9] Oust and Hrafnkelsson (2017) created the following housing bubble definition: "A large housing price bubble has a dramatic increase in real prices, at least 50% during a five-year period or 35% during a three-year period, followed by an immediate dramatic fall in the prices of at least 35%. A small bubble has a dramatic increase in real prices, at least 35% during a five-year period or 20% during a three-year period, followed by an immediate dramatic fall in the prices of at least 20%." [10]

Identifying housing bubbles

Housing bubbles vs. overpricing in the housing market

Overpricing can be said to be a necessary, but insufficient indicator that a bubble exists. Overpricing is defined more widely than a bubble. An asset may be overpriced without there being a bubble, but you cannot have a (positive) bubble without overpricing. Over- or underpricing may simply be defined as a deviation from the equilibrium price. DiPasquale and Wheaton (1994) [11] say that: "Indeed, it appears to be normal for housing prices to deviate from the fundamental value or equilibrium price, since housing markets clear gradually rather than quickly in a short run."

Mayer (2011) [12] investigated house price bubbles and found that there are basically three approaches researchers take when investigating house price differ from equilibrium.

First, there is the finance-based method, where the house price equals the discounted future rents. This follows the same logic when performing a stock valuation; the stock price is equal to the discounted sum of all future dividends. The idea is that the value of equity is equal to the discounted dividends. Price rent ratio and user cost of housing are methods that fall under this method.

The second approach is to compare the costs of building new dwellings against the actual house prices today. Much of the construction cost method has its basis in the demand and supply curve theory. If demand is low, this leads to lower house prices and less construction of new homes. Glaeser and Gyourko (2005) [13] point out that the housing market is characterized by a kinked supply curve that is highly elastic when prices are at or above construction costs. Otherwise, the supply curve is highly inelastic. Housing can be built rather quickly, but since housing is a durable good, old housing does not disappear quickly. Thus, house prices in slow or negative demand growth markets are capped by construction costs. Price construction cost ratio and price building cost ratio are methods that is falls in under this method.

The last approach by Mayer (2011) [12] is to utilize a combination of house price affordability to derive an equilibrium model. Often house prices are compared to income (income is used as proxy variable for affordability). If house prices are too high, households cannot afford the same level of housing services (affordability). Symmetrically, when house prices are low, households may afford a higher level of housing services. Price income ratio, price wage ratio, price household income ratio are examples of this method. There also exist a set of different affordability measures and indexes that looks at the development in interest payments to income or the cost of the mortgage to income. In addition to using house price equilibrium based on economic measures, there are also possible to use statistical techniques to identifying the long-term price trend, for example HP-filter.

Shiller's bubble checklist (2010)

  1. Sharp increases in the price of an asset like real estate or shares
  2. Great public excitement about said increases
  3. An accompanying media frenzy
  4. Stories of people earning much money, causing envy among people who are not
  5. Growing interest in asset class among the general public
  6. "New era" theories to justify unprecedented price increases
  7. A decline in lending standards [14]

Lind's housing bubble indicator groups (2009)

  1. Interest payments in relation to income for homebuyers
    1. Nominal interest payments in relation to income have been increasing.
    2. Nominal interest payment in relation to income would have been increasing if historical interest rate levels were applied.
    3. Real interest payments in relation to income have been increasing.
    4. Real interest payments in relation to income would have been increasing if historical interest rate levels were applied.
  2. Housing supply
    1. The easier it is to increase supply, the more likely is the increased price a part of a bubble
  3. Buyer expectations about prices
    1. Buyers expect prices to continue to rise or to stabilize on a level that is much higher than historical trends.
    2. Buyers believe that even in a median term perspective (three to five years) investing in housing is almost risk‐free.
  4. Buyers risk‐taking and impatience
    1. People are entering ownership at an earlier age or at a higher quality level.
    2. Buyers tend to choose riskier financing alternatives than earlier.
    3. Buyers are amortizing less than earlier.
  5. Bank behavior
  6. Banks are increasing or at least not decreasing loan to value ratios for buyers on the housing market when prices increase.
    1. Banks become more liberal when judging the credit worthiness of households.
  7. Speculative behavior
    1. A larger share of home‐buyers than usual are planning to sell rather quickly again. [9]

Other housing bubble indicators

Historical housing bubbles

Large housing bubbles in OECD countries 1970–2015

Price change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peak
CountryPricePeaks/troughsDuration (Quarters)AggregatedAggregated 5 yearAn. 5Y averageAggregated 3 yearAn. 3Y average1 year
FinlandIncrease1989-Q21568.3 %63.3 %12.7 %65.8 %21.9 %24.1 %
FinlandFall1995-Q426-50.5 %-46.0 %-9.2 %41.0 %-13.7 %-11.9 %
Ireland Increase2007-Q156235.6 %52.9 %10.6 %30.5 %10.2 %10.1 %
Ireland Fall2013-Q124-53.6 %-51.6 %-10.3 %-31.8 %-10.6 %-7.1 %
NetherlandsIncrease1978-Q233138.9 %94.4 %18.9 %69.0 %23.0 %6.5 %
NetherlandsFall1985-Q329-52.6 %-47.9 %-9.6 %-35.5 %-11.8 %-11.8 %
New ZealandIncrease1974-Q31866.2 %*66.2 %14.7 %64.4 %21.5 %29.9 %
New ZealandFall1980-Q425-39.4 %-34.7 %-6.9 %-22.7 %-7.6 %-9.2 %
NorwayIncrease1987-Q1844.0 %37.8 %7.6 %39.8 %13.3 %25.0 %
NorwayFall1993-Q124-45.5 %-41.2 %-8.2 %-28.6 %-9.5 %-2.3 %
South AfricaIncrease1984-Q12155.1 %54.9 %11.0 %25.5 %8.5 %9.2 %
South AfricaFall1987-Q112-44.1 %-42.8 %-8.6 %-44.1 %-14.7 %-18.1 %
Spain Increase2007-Q241138.8 %69.2 %13.8 %30.1 %10.0 %9.0 %
Spain Fall2014-Q127-45.5 %-36.0 %-7.2 %-14.1 %-4.7 %-4.5 %
UKIncrease1973-Q31467.4 %*67.4 %19.3 %66.2 %22.1 %23.5 %
UKFall1977-Q316-35.6 %-29.3 %-5.9 %-28.9 %-9.6 %-11.2 %
USA Increase2006-Q13892.9 %54.1 %10.8 %35.4 %11.8 %7.8 %
USA Fall2011-Q423-39.6 %-37.1 %-7.4 %-33.0 %-11.0 %-4.3 %

The table is from Oust and Hrafnkelsson (2017) [10] and has been constructed using their bubble definition. The dataset consists of quarterly real prices for 20 OECD countries from 1970 to 2015. Duration is the number of quarters since the last turning point (or from the start of the data series). Aggregated price change is the aggregate price change for the duration. *The aggregated price change is from the start of the period to the peak.

Small housing bubbles in OECD countries 1970–2015

Price change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peakPrice change prior to/after peak
CountryPricePeaks/troughsDurationAggregatedAggregated 5 yearAn. 5Y averageAggregated 3 yearAn. 3Y average1 year
BelgiumIncrease1979-Q33159.6 %33.4 %6.7 %21.2 %7.1 %3.9 %
BelgiumFall1985-Q223-40.4 %-36.8 %-7.4 %-26.5 %-8.8 %-7.1 %
DenmarkIncrease1986-Q21455.8 %29.9 %6.0 %31.5 %10.5 %14.0 %
DenmarkFall1993-Q228-36.5 %-29.4 %-5.9 %-19.2 %-6.4 %-12.5 %
DenmarkIncrease2006-Q353180.1 %63.9 %12.8 %60.0 %20.0 %21.1 %
DenmarkFall2012-Q425-28.5 %-25.0 %-5.0 %-21.1 %-7.0 %-0.7 %
FinlandIncrease1974-Q21028.8 %*27.9 %6.6 %28.5 %9.5 %6.8 %
FinlandFall1979-Q321-34.0 %-33.8 %-6.8 %-26.6 %-8.9 %-13.5 %
IrelandIncrease1980-Q44344.3 %44.3 %8.9 %29.2 %9.7 %5.8 %
IrelandFall1987-Q226-35.3 %-29.0 %-5.8 %-25.7 %-8.6 %-7.0 %
ItalyIncrease1981-Q21340.6 %26.8 %5.4 %36.5 %12.2 %19.2 %
ItalyFall1986-Q422-27.8 %-27.6 %-5.5 %-18.5 %-6.2 %-4.8 %
JapanIncrease1973-Q41560.9 %*60.9 %16.2 %47.5 %15.8 %17.0 %
JapanFall1977-Q315-34.2 %-32.3 %-6.5 %-31.5 %-10.5 %-17.6 %
JapanIncrease1990-Q45379.6 %37.6 %7.5 %22.9 %7.6 %9.7 %
JapanFall2009-Q274-49.5 %-17.3 %-3.5 %-14.3 %-4.8 %-3.3 %
KoreaIncrease1979-Q23788.5 %88.5 %17.7 %72.3 %24.1 %5.4 %
KoreaFall1982-Q212-33.6 %-15.2 %-3.0 %-33.6 %-11.2 %-14.8 %
KoreaIncrease1991-Q11434.3 %27.0 %5.4 %25.7 %8.6 %8.1 %
KoreaFall2001-Q140-48.5 %-33.0 %-6.6 %-25.8 %-8.6 %-11.6 %
SpainIncrease1978-Q2929.7 %40.6 %8.1 %24.1 %8.0 %12.2 %
SpainFall1982-Q418-36.7 %-30.8 %-6.2 %-25.9 %-8.6 %-10.4 %
SpainIncrease1991-Q436142.3 %102.4 %20.5 %34.2 %11.4 %10.9 %
SpainFall1997-Q121-21.2 %-21.0 %-4.2 %-18.7 %-6.2 %-12.5 %
SwedenIncrease1990-Q11746.6 %42.5 %8.5 %35.9 %12.0 %8.8 %
SwedenFall1995-Q423-31.9 %-30.0 %-6.0 %-28.4 %-9.5 %-1.6 %
SwitzerlandIncrease1973-Q11227.7 %*27.7 %9.2 %27.7 %9.2 %17.7 %
SwitzerlandFall1976-Q314-28.4 %-26.6 %-5.3 %-27.8 %-9.3 %-10.6 %
SwitzerlandIncrease1989-Q45372.1 %38.1 %7.6 %28.7 %9.6 %4.6 %
SwitzerlandFall2000-Q141-38.6 %-27.6 %-5.5 %-21.6 %-7.2 %-8.0 %
UKIncrease1989-Q330103.6 %77.8 %15.6 %58.1 %19.4 %10.6 %
UKFall1995-Q425-29.3 %-26.6 %-5.3 %-24.7 %-8.2 %-9.4 %

The table is from Oust and Hrafnkelsson (2017) [10] and has been constructed using their bubble definition. The dataset consists of quarterly real prices for 20 OECD countries from 1970–2015. Duration is the number of quarters since the last turning point (or from the start of the data series). Aggregated price change is the aggregate price change for the duration. * The aggregated price change is from the start of the period to the peak.

See also

For individual countries, see:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Economic bubble</span> Temporary spike in asset prices

An economic bubble is a period when current asset prices greatly exceed their intrinsic valuation, being the valuation that the underlying long-term fundamentals justify. Bubbles can be caused by overly optimistic projections about the scale and sustainability of growth, and/or by the belief that intrinsic valuation is no longer relevant when making an investment. They have appeared in most asset classes, including equities, commodities, real estate, and even esoteric assets. Bubbles usually form as a result of either excess liquidity in markets, and/or changed investor psychology. Large multi-asset bubbles, are attributed to central banking liquidity.

Market value or OMV is the price at which an asset would trade in a competitive auction setting. Market value is often used interchangeably with open market value, fair value or fair market value, although these terms have distinct definitions in different standards, and differ in some circumstances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Household debt</span> Combined debt of all people in a household

Household debt is the combined debt of all people in a household, including consumer debt and mortgage loans. A significant rise in the level of this debt coincides historically with many severe economic crises and was a cause of the U.S. and subsequent European economic crises of 2007–2012. Several economists have argued that lowering this debt is essential to economic recovery in the U.S. and selected Eurozone countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Second mortgage</span> Additional loan

Second mortgages, commonly referred to as junior liens, are loans secured by a property in addition to the primary mortgage. Depending on the time at which the second mortgage is originated, the loan can be structured as either a standalone second mortgage or piggyback second mortgage. Whilst a standalone second mortgage is opened subsequent to the primary loan, those with a piggyback loan structure are originated simultaneously with the primary mortgage. With regard to the method in which funds are withdrawn, second mortgages can be arranged as home equity loans or home equity lines of credit. Home equity loans are granted for the full amount at the time of loan origination in contrast to home equity lines of credit which permit the homeowner access to a predetermined amount which is repaid during the repayment period.

"Irrational exuberance" is the phrase used by the then-Federal Reserve Board chairman, Alan Greenspan, in a speech given at the American Enterprise Institute during the dot-com bubble of the 1990s. The phrase was interpreted as a warning that the stock market might be overvalued.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2000s United States housing bubble</span> Economic bubble

The 2000s United States housing bubble or house price boom or 2000shousing cycle was a sharp run up and subsequent collapse of house asset prices affecting over half of the U.S. states. In many regions a real estate bubble, it was the impetus for the subprime mortgage crisis. Housing prices peaked in early 2006, started to decline in 2006 and 2007, and reached new lows in 2011. On December 30, 2008, the Case–Shiller home price index reported the largest price drop in its history. The credit crisis resulting from the bursting of the housing bubble is an important cause of the Great Recession in the United States.

A real-estate bubble or property bubble is a type of economic bubble that occurs periodically in local or global real estate markets, and it typically follows a land boom or reduce interest rates. A land boom is a rapid increase in the market price of real property such as housing until they reach unsustainable levels and then declines. This period, during the run-up to the crash, is also known as froth. The questions of whether real estate bubbles can be identified and prevented, and whether they have broader macroeconomic significance, are answered differently by schools of economic thought, as detailed below.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spanish property bubble</span> Real estate bubble

The Spanish property bubble is the collapsed overshooting part of a long-term price increase of Spanish real estate prices. This long-term price increase has happened in various stages from 1985 up to 2008. The housing bubble can be clearly divided in three periods: 1985–1991, in which the price nearly tripled; 1992–1996, in which the price remained somewhat stable; and 1996–2008, in which prices grew astonishingly again. The 2008–2014 Spanish real estate crisis caused prices to fall. In 2013, Raj Badiani, an economist at IHS Global Insight in London, estimated that the value of residential real estate has dropped more than 30 percent since 2007 and that house prices would fall at least 50 percent from the peak by 2015. Alcidi and Gros note; “If construction were to continue at the still relatively high rate of today, the process of absorption of the bubble would take more than 30 years”.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mortgage</span> Loan secured using real estate

A mortgage loan or simply mortgage, in civil law jurisdictions known also as a hypothec loan, is a loan used either by purchasers of real property to raise funds to buy real estate, or by existing property owners to raise funds for any purpose while putting a lien on the property being mortgaged. The loan is "secured" on the borrower's property through a process known as mortgage origination. This means that a legal mechanism is put into place which allows the lender to take possession and sell the secured property to pay off the loan in the event the borrower defaults on the loan or otherwise fails to abide by its terms. The word mortgage is derived from a Law French term used in Britain in the Middle Ages meaning "death pledge" and refers to the pledge ending (dying) when either the obligation is fulfilled or the property is taken through foreclosure. A mortgage can also be described as "a borrower giving consideration in the form of a collateral for a benefit (loan)".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subprime mortgage crisis</span> 2007 mortgage crisis in the United States

The American subprime mortgage crisis was a multinational financial crisis that occurred between 2007 and 2010 that contributed to the 2007–2008 global financial crisis. The crisis led to a severe economic recession, with millions losing their jobs and many businesses going bankrupt. The U.S. government intervened with a series of measures to stabilize the financial system, including the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert J. Shiller</span> American Lithuanian economist (born 1946)

Robert James Shiller is an American economist, academic, and author. As of 2022, he served as a Sterling Professor of Economics at Yale University and is a fellow at the Yale School of Management's International Center for Finance. Shiller has been a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) since 1980, was vice president of the American Economic Association in 2005, its president-elect for 2016, and president of the Eastern Economic Association for 2006–2007. He is also the co‑founder and chief economist of the investment management firm MacroMarkets LLC.

United States housing prices experienced a major market correction after the housing bubble that peaked in early 2006. Prices of real estate then adjusted downwards in late 2006, causing a loss of market liquidity and subprime defaults.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Causes of the 2000s United States housing bubble</span>

Observers and analysts have attributed the reasons for the 2001–2006 housing bubble and its 2007–10 collapse in the United States to "everyone from home buyers to Wall Street, mortgage brokers to Alan Greenspan". Other factors that are named include "Mortgage underwriters, investment banks, rating agencies, and investors", "low mortgage interest rates, low short-term interest rates, relaxed standards for mortgage loans, and irrational exuberance" Politicians in both the Democratic and Republican political parties have been cited for "pushing to keep derivatives unregulated" and "with rare exceptions" giving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac "unwavering support".

Loan modification is the systematic alteration of mortgage loan agreements that help those having problems making the payments by reducing interest rates, monthly payments or principal balances. Lending institutions could make one or more of these changes to relieve financial pressure on borrowers to prevent the condition of foreclosure. Loan modifications have been practiced in the United States since the 1930s. During the Great Depression, loan modification programs took place at the state level in an effort to reduce levels of loan foreclosures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian property bubble</span> Economic theory

The Australian property bubble is the economic theory that the Australian property market has become or is becoming significantly overpriced and due for a significant downturn. Since the early 2010s, various commentators, including one Treasury official, have claimed the Australian property market is in a significant bubble.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chinese property bubble (2005–2011)</span> Real estate bubble

The 2005 Chinese property bubble was a real estate bubble in residential and commercial real estate in China. The New York Times reported that the bubble started to deflate in 2011, while observing increased complaints that members of the middle class were unable to afford homes in large cities. The deflation of the property bubble is seen as one of the primary causes for China's declining economic growth in 2013.

Real estate in China is developed and managed by public, private, and state-owned red chip enterprises.

In finance, the capital structure substitution theory (CSS) describes the relationship between earnings, stock price and capital structure of public companies. The CSS theory hypothesizes that managements of public companies manipulate capital structure such that earnings per share (EPS) are maximized. Managements have an incentive to do so because shareholders and analysts value EPS growth. The theory is used to explain trends in capital structure, stock market valuation, dividend policy, the monetary transmission mechanism, and stock volatility, and provides an alternative to the Modigliani–Miller theorem that has limited descriptive validity in real markets. The CSS theory is only applicable in markets where share repurchases are allowed. Investors can use the CSS theory to identify undervalued stocks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affordable housing in Canada</span>

Affordable housing in Canada refers to living spaces that are deemed financially accessible to households with a median household income. Housing affordability is generally measured based on a shelter-cost-to-income ratio (STIR) of 30% by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the national housing agency of Canada. It encompasses a continuum ranging from market-based options like affordable rental housing and affordable home ownership, to non-market alternatives such as government-subsidized housing. Canada ranks among the lowest of the most developed countries for housing affordability.

The property bubble in New Zealand is a major national economic and social issue. Since the early 1990s, house prices in New Zealand have risen considerably faster than incomes, putting increasing pressure on public housing providers as fewer households have access to housing on the private market. The property bubble has produced significant impacts on inequality in New Zealand, which now has one of the highest homelessness rate in the OECD and a record-high waiting list for public housing. Government policies have attempted to address the crisis since 2013, but have produced limited impacts to reduce prices or increase the supply of affordable housing. However, prices started falling in 2022 in response to tightening of mortgage availability and supply increasing. Some areas saw drops as high as around 9% - albeit from very high prices.

References

  1. ↑ Brunnermeier, M.K. and Oehmke, M. (2012) Bubbles, Financial Crises, and Systemic Risk NBER Working Paper No. 18398
  2. ↑ see eg. Case, K.E., Quigley, J. and Shiller R. (2001). Comparing wealth effects: the stock market versus the housing market. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 8606., Benjamin, J., Chinloy, P. and Jud, D. (2004). ”Real estate versus financial wealth in consumption”. In: Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 29, pp. 341-354., and Campbell, John Y.; Cocco, João F. (October 2004). "How Do House Prices Affect Consumption? Evidence From Micro Data". Harvard Institute of Economic Research, Discussion Paper No. 2045. Harvard Institute of Economic Research. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 2, 2006.
  3. 1 2 3 Stiglitz, J.E. (1990). “Symposium on bubbles”. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 13-18.
  4. ↑ Palgrave, R.H. I. (1926), "Palgrave's Dictionary of Political Economy", MacMillan & Co., London, England, p. 181.
  5. ↑ Flood, R. P. and Hodrick, R. J. (1990), "On Testing for Speculative Bubbles", The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 85–101.
  6. ↑ Shiller, R.J. (2005). Irrational Exuberance. 3nd. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691- 12335-7.
  7. ↑ Smith, M. H. and Smith, G. (2006), "Bubble, Bubble, Where’s the Housing Bubble?", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 2006 No. 1, pp. 1–50.
  8. ↑ Cochrane, J. H. (2010), "Discount Rates", Working paper, University of Chicago, Booth School of Business, and NBER, Chicago, Illinois, 27 December.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Lind, H. (2009). “Price bubbles in housing markets: concept, theory and indicators”. In: International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 78-90.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Oust, A. and Hrafnkelsson, K. (2017) What is a housing bubble? , Economics Bulletin, Volume 37, Issue 2, pages 806-836
  11. ↑ DiPasquale, D. and Wheaton, W.C. (1994), “Housing market dynamics and the future of housing prices”, Journal of Urban Economics , Vol. 35, pp. 1-27.
  12. 1 2 Mayer, C. (2011), “Housing bubbles: a survey”, Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 559-577.
  13. ↑ Glaeser, E.L. and Gyourko, J. (2005), “Urban decline and durable housing”, Journal of Political Economy , Vol. 113 No. 2, pp. 345-375.
  14. ↑ Shiller, R.J. (2010), "Shiller's List: How to Diagnose the Next Bubble", The New York Times, By JACK EWING, 27. januar, 2010
  15. ↑ Englund, P. (2011). Svenska huspriser i ett internationellt pespektiv. Stockholm: SverigesRiksbank.
  16. ↑ Claussen, C. A., Jonsson, M., & Lagerwall, B. (2011). En makroekonomisk analyd av bostadspriserna i Sverige. Stockholm: Sveriges riksbank.
  17. ↑ Kokko, A. (1999). Asienkrisenmånga likheter med den Svensks krisen. Economisk Debatt, 81-92.
  18. ↑ Joshi, H. (2006). Identifying aset price bubbles in the housing market in India - preliminary evidence. Reserve bank of India.
  19. ↑ Finocchinaro, D., Nilsson, C., Nyberg, D., & Soultanaeva, A. (2011). Hushållens skuldsättning, bostadspriserna och makroekonomin: en genomgång av litteraturen. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksbank.
  20. ↑ Englund, P. (2011). Svenska huspriser i ett internationellt pespektiv. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksbank.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.