ICraveTV

Last updated

iCraveTV was a Canadian website, which operated from 1999 to 2000. The site offered streaming Internet broadcasts of the conventional television stations, both Canadian and American, that were available as over-the-air signals in Toronto. [1]

Contents

The site, launched by William Craig through his TVRadioNow Corporation in December 1999, was intensely controversial during its short lifespan, raising significant questions around the interpretation of copyright law. [2] Craig viewed the service as essentially equivalent to a cable television distributor, while many of the television stations whose signals were being distributed, and the producers of programming airing on those stations, viewed the site's actions as analogous to the RIAA's copyright infringement case against Napster. [3]

Although it was in operation for just three months before shutting down, the site had the effect of pressuring both Canadian and American television networks to start streaming their own programming directly on the web, [4] and thus played a disproportionately prominent role in the development of the web as it exists in the 21st century. [5]

History

Two weeks after the site's launch, it announced plans to also add television signals from the Vancouver and Seattle markets to its service. [6]

Although officially the site was geoblocked so that only Canadian viewers could use it, technology to enforce geoblocking at the server level did not yet exist; rather, the only geoblocking method available at the time was to ask site users to enter their telephone area code. No technological method existed at the time to prevent viewers in the United States from accessing the site by entering a Canadian area code, however, so this left the site vulnerable to American law despite being based in Canada. As cable television in the United States was primarily governed under the principle of retransmission consent, under which cable operators must negotiate and pay for carriage of broadcast television services, the site's methods were more clearly in violation of American law even while being at least semi-legal under Canadian law.

In February 2000, a U.S. court issued a preliminary injunction against iCraveTV in Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v. iCraveTV , enjoining it from streaming its signals into the United States. [7] However, the Canadian courts did not have the opportunity to consider the matter because, in late February, the company succumbed to legal pressure and agreed to discontinue its streaming operations in return for the withdrawal of all actions against it. [8] The company also agreed to withdraw its December 1999 request to the Canadian Copyright Board for an interim Internet retransmission tariff for the years 1999 and 2000, with a final tariff to be determined in due course.

In June 2000, Craig announced plans to relaunch iCraveTV, this time rebroadcasting the programming of Canadian specialty channels such as YTV and MuchMusic. [9] However, the relaunch never materialized in this form; instead, it was relaunched in 2002 as a platform for Herbert L. Becker's experimental EnterVision video format. [10] Craig went on to acquire PrideVision, Canada's LGBT-focused television channel, in 2003. [11]

Impact

During the controversy, television networks began investing in streaming technology, launching their own proprietary streaming options beginning in 2000. [4]

In a piece for the National Post , journalist and academic Matthew Fraser essentially agreed with William Craig's position, noting that even cable television itself had started out as "pirate" retransmission of broadcast signals before evolving into an essential part of the television broadcasting ecosystem as the legal issues were debated and ironed out. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

TVA is a Canadian French-language terrestrial television network, owned by Groupe TVA, a publicly traded subsidiary of Quebecor Media.

Bell Media Canadian media company

Bell Media Inc. is a Canadian media conglomerate that is the mass media subsidiary of BCE Inc.. Its operations include television broadcasting and production, radio broadcasting, digital media and Internet properties.

In cable television, governments apply a must-carry regulation stating that locally licensed television stations must be carried on a cable provider's system.

Crave is a Canadian premium television network and streaming service owned by the Bell Media subsidiary of BCE Inc.

Superstation is a term in North American broadcasting that has several meanings. Commonly, a "superstation" is a form of distant signal, a broadcast television signal—usually a commercially licensed station—that is retransmitted via communications satellite or microwave relay to multichannel television providers over a broad area beyond its primary terrestrial signal range.

William (Bill) Craig is a Canadian broadcaster.

News 9 Now and News on 6 Now

News 9 Now and News on 6 Now are American regional digital broadcast television networks that are owned by Griffin Communications. The channels simulcast and rebroadcast local news programming seen on Griffin-owned CBS affiliates KWTV-DT in Oklahoma City and KOTV-DT in Tulsa, Oklahoma in their respective markets, along with select other programs. News 9 Now is broadcast on KWTV digital subchannel 9.2 in the Oklahoma City market, while News on 6 Now is broadcast on KOTV digital subchannel 6.3 in the Tulsa market. On cable, the individual channels are available on Cox Communications channel 53 in their respective markets.

Retransmission consent is a provision of the 1992 United States Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act that requires cable operators and other multichannel video programming distributors (MVPDs) to obtain permission from commercial broadcasters before carrying their programming.

Starz is a Canadian English language premium television network owned by Bell Media.

OutTV is a Canadian English language specialty channel that was launched in September 2001. It broadcasts general entertainment and lifestyle programming aimed at the LGBT community.

VMedia Inc. is a Canadian telecommunications company and broadcast distribution provider. It offers VoIP telephone and home security services across Canada; DSL and cable Internet in Ontario, Quebec, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, and British Columbia; and IPTV television service in Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia.

<i>Satellite Broadcasting & Communications Assn v. FCC</i>

Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association v. FCC, 275 F.3d 337 was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Congress required satellite television carriers to carry all requesting local broadcast stations in the market where the carrier voluntarily decides to carry one local station in order to, in part, preserve a multiplicity of local broadcast outlets for over-the-air-viewers who do not subscribe either to satellite or cable service.

Aereo Technology company

Aereo was a technology company based in New York City that allowed subscribers to view live and time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices. The service opened to customers in March 2012, and was backed by Barry Diller's IAC.

A carriage dispute is a disagreement over the right to "carry", that is, retransmit, a broadcaster's signal. Carriage disputes first occurred between broadcasters and cable companies and now include direct broadcast satellite and other multichannel video programming distributors.

<i>WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc.</i> American legal case

WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc., was a copyright infringement case heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeals court affirmed the decision of the district court to grant an injunction for the plaintiffs, barring ivi, Inc. from broadcasting television programming over the Internet. This decision set a precedent that broadcast television material can be protected by copyright and cannot be re-transmitted on the Internet without permission.

American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc, 573 U.S. 431 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case. The Court ruled that the service provided by Aereo, allowing subscribers to view live and time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices, violated copyright laws.

Shomi was a Canadian subscription video on demand service jointly owned by Rogers Communications and Shaw Communications. The service was viewed as a Canadian-based competitor to Netflix, with a library of 1,200 films and 11,000 hours' worth of television programs available on launch. Shomi content could be accessed as an over-the-top service through the service's website and apps, or through the video-on-demand libraries of participating television providers. The service emphasized manually curated categories of content, in contrast to the algorithmic approach used by competing services.

<i>Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. iCraveTV</i>

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v. iCraveTV, 2000 WL 255989, was a court case in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania which enjoined iCraveTV, a Canadian TV streaming website, from operating within the US after finding it in violation of 20th Century Fox's, and several other motion picture studios and television networks, copyrights and trademarks. Granted February 8, 2000, this injunction, along with continued legal pressure, led to the iCraveTV's demise just 3 months after its debut.

Crave is a Canadian subscription video on demand service owned by Bell Media. The service competes directly with other subscription-based over-the-top streaming services operating in Canada, primarily American-based services such as Netflix, Disney+, Paramount+, Apple TV+, and Amazon Prime Video.

Locast Defunct over-the-top streaming television service

Locast was an American non-profit streaming television service that allowed users to view live streams of over-the-air television stations. The service was founded by attorney David Goodfriend under the banner of the Sports Fans Coalition.

References

  1. ↑ "Company hopes to score putting TV shots on Net". Cornwall Standard Freeholder , December 1, 1999.
  2. ↑ "CAB denounces new Internet TV service". The Telegram , December 4, 1999.
  3. ↑ "iCraveTV won't let channels rule Net". Hamilton Spectator , December 4, 1999.
  4. 1 2 "CTV poised to deliver news over the Net". Cornwall Standard Freeholder , February 2, 2000.
  5. ↑ "Webcasting ready for takeoff". The Globe and Mail , October 5, 2000.
  6. ↑ "Rebel web broadcaster expands to the West: iCraveTV creates uproar". National Post , December 16, 1999.
  7. ↑ "Court order keeps iCrave TV off air for at least three months". The Globe and Mail , February 9, 2000.
  8. ↑ "iCrave TV waves white flag in Web rebroadcasting battle". The Globe and Mail , February 29, 2000.
  9. ↑ "iCraveTV.com to relaunch in the fall". Welland Tribune , June 10, 2000.
  10. ↑ "iCraveTV, the sequel". Canadian Business , August 5, 2002.
  11. ↑ "TV maverick buys PrideVision: Bill Craig pays $2.6 million for gay digital TV channel". Barrie Examiner , December 9, 2003.
  12. ↑ "iCraveTV conflict is broadcast deja view: Outraged cable industry also started as broadcast 'pirates'". National Post , December 16, 1999.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.