Locast

Last updated
Locast
Locast logo.svg
Developer Sports Fans Coalition
Type Streaming television
Launch dateJanuary 2018;6 years ago (2018-01)
DiscontinuedSeptember 21, 2021;2 years ago (2021-09-21)
Website Archived official website at the Wayback Machine (archived November 13, 2021)

Locast was an American non-profit streaming television service that allowed users to view live streams of over-the-air television stations. The service was founded by attorney David Goodfriend under the banner of the Sports Fans Coalition.

Contents

Launched in New York City in January 2018, Locast expanded to media markets throughout the United States as well as Puerto Rico before suspending service on September 2, 2021 after an adverse decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York centering on copyright issues.

Locast was similar to Aereo, which operated on a commercial basis with users paying to lease individual antennas placed in nearby warehouses. [1] Aereo was shut down following a copyright infringement lawsuit by the major networks over the retransmission of their programming without consent and compensation. Locast was intended as a test case for the proposition that a service of this nature would be legal if operated on a non-profit basis.

Locast cited an exception in United States copyright law that allows retransmission of television signals by non-commercial entities at no charge, aside from that required to maintain the service's operations. Viewers were restricted from viewing stations outside of their market through geofencing on their viewing platform, though if traveling to another Locast market, they could view that market's stations instead.

In July 2019, the parent companies of the four major U.S. broadcast networks sued Locast, alleging that the service violated copyright law. The plaintiffs also alleged that Locast undermined its non-profit status by accepting financial support and promotion from cable and satellite companies. The networks maintained that Locast gave the carriers an unfair negotiating advantage during carriage disputes that prevented them from retransmitting local programming. Locast filed a countersuit, arguing that its service complied with the aforementioned exceptions and accusing the networks of colluding to limit the availability of their programming via free-to-air means in order to protect the pay television industry.

On August 31, 2021, a federal judge denied Locast's request for a summary judgment. Locast suspended operations and was subsequently ordered to do so permanently.

Locast sourced its signals from antennas in each market it served. The service required a minimum donation of US$5 per month to view programming without interruption.

Features

Locast was accessible via web browsers, Android and iOS apps, some set-top boxes, as well as Apple TV, Fire TV, Roku, Vizio SmartCast TVs and Android TV devices (the latter including the TiVo Stream), and could be cast to larger screens using AirPlay and Google Cast. [2] [3] [4] After registering, viewers were presented with a programming grid from which to select a channel. Programming was periodically interrupted to solicit for donations until one was made; the suggested minimum contribution was $5.00 plus a 50¢ processing fee per month. The service offered no recording features. [5]

History

Goodfriend was a media legal adviser to an FCC commissioner and an executive at Dish Network. [6] He conceived of Locast while lecturing at Georgetown University Law Center on the demise of Aereo, which offered over-the-air television signals via streaming without negotiating with broadcasters for the privilege as required by the retransmission consent provision of the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act. Aereo attempted to justify its legality by leasing to users an individual antenna typically located in a nearby warehouse. After broadcasters sued, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2014 that the company had violated copyright law. Aereo declared bankruptcy shortly afterward. Goodfriend surmised that a non-profit organization would be exempt from the provision; Locast became his proof of concept. "Locast" is a portmanteau of "local" and "broadcast". [7] [8] [9]

Goodfriend initially funded the service via a line of credit from an undisclosed entrepreneur. [10] The site then solicited user donations. In January 2018, Locast went online in New York as a service of the Sports Fans Coalition, a non-profit advocacy group chaired by Goodfriend. [11] The city's television stations were neither notified nor compensated. [8] Broadcast signals were received by a four-foot antenna mounted on the Trump International Hotel and Tower in Manhattan. [7] Locast subsequently expanded the service to other U.S. media markets, as well as Puerto Rico. [12] [13]

Several television providers directed subscribers to Locast as a way of maintaining access to programming during carriage disputes, such as Charter Communications during a January 2019 dispute with Tribune Media, [7] and DirecTV in a July 2019 dispute affecting CBS-owned stations. Both AT&T and Dish Network added Locast apps to their set-top boxes, including devices for DirecTV, AT&T U-Verse, and Dish via its Hopper set-top. [14] [10] In 2021, Sling TV integrated Locast's channels into Sling TV's program guide listing for some devices with possible future expansion to other devices. [15]

By November 2020, viewer donations had offset expenses, sufficient to pay for operations and finance expansion into new markets. Capital costs for each location included leasing space for equipment, an antenna, servers and network services. [16]

In May 2019, New York Times reporter Edmund Lee wrote that Goodfriend's stated intention to quickly expand Locast nationwide "is basically a dare to the networks to take legal action against him. By giving away TV, Mr. Goodfriend is undercutting the licensing fees that major broadcasters charge the cable and satellite companies." In 2019, those fees exceeded $10 billion, according to the research firm Kagan S&P Global Market Intelligence, while adding about $12 to a monthly cable subscription fee. [7]

On July 31, 2019, The Walt Disney Company, CBS Corporation, NBCUniversal, and Fox Corporation – the respective parent companies of ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox – filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York seeking a permanent injunction against Locast for infringing on the copyrights of their programming by retransmitting it without permission and compensation. The suit acknowledged that U.S. copyright law (17 U.S.C.   § 111) allows non-profit organizations to freely retransmit programming, charging only for the costs of operations and maintenance of the equipment. (The exemption was originally intended to cover third-party translator stations owned by non-profits and other organizations such as municipal and county governments.) The broadcasters maintained that Locast has undermined its non-profit status, citing Goodfriend's previous ties to Dish Network, a donation of $500,000 made by AT&T, and both companies' promotion of the Locast service as complementary to their pay television services to dodge retransmission fees. [17] [18] [19]

On September 27, 2019, Locast answered the claim and filed a countersuit citing the aforementioned exception. Locast argued that it did not obtain any "direct or indirect commercial advantage" from the service, and that the networks were "[using] their copyrights improperly to construct and protect a pay-TV model that forces consumers to forgo over-the-air programming or to pay cable, satellite, and online providers for access to programming that was intended to be free." Locast accused the networks of engaging in collusion to effectively require viewers to use pay television services, including intentionally using low-end equipment on station transmitters to provide signals inadequate for serving the entirety of their market, and forbidding affiliates from streaming their programming online. Locast considered these tactics a violation of the statutory mandate for broadcasters to operate in the public interest. Locast also accused the networks of "threatening business retaliation and baseless legal claims against any current or prospective donors, supporters, or business partners", specifically alleging that YouTube TV had been threatened in this manner. [20] [21]

On October 25, 2019, the broadcasters filed a motion to dismiss Locast's antitrust claims, arguing that they were "an attempt to shift focus from Locast's wholesale infringement of the broadcast companies' copyrights". [22] On March 30, 2020, the Electronic Frontier Foundation announced it was joining law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe as defense co-counsel for Locast [23] [24] Goodfriend credited EFF, which is working pro bono, with eliminating what could have been Locast's single largest expenditure. In November 2020, Goodfriend guessed that the case could reach trial by mid-2021. [16]

On April 23, 2021, both parties sent letters to U.S District Court Judge Louis Stanton. The broadcasters asked for a summary judgement in their favor. In their letter, they argued that Locast didn't qualify for a copyright exemption for three reasons: the exemption was intended for local retransmissions, whereas Locast's use of the internet gave it global reach; the service in fact operated for commercial advantage; and that the donations it requested were in fact charges to obtain uninterrupted service. The defendants in their letter asserted that Locast's services were exempt from copyright liability because they met five conditions: they were secondary retransmissions, not made by a cable company, made by a non-profit organization, without the intent of commercial advantage, and without charge other than to defray costs. [25]

Ruling and reaction

On August 31, 2021, Stanton denied Locast's request for a summary judgment. He noted that Locast donations were used not just for system maintenance and operations, but for expansion of the service into new media markets. "Expansion is nowhere mentioned" in the law, he wrote, "and it is therefore excluded from the short, tightly-crafted grant of exemptions." He also ruled that because a donation is required to avoid service interruptions, it is therefore "not merely a recurring gift to a charitable cause." The opinion, while leaving open the possibility of a trial, represented a substantial legal setback for the service. [26] [27] [28]

On September 2, 2021, after announcing it would no longer interrupt service to request donations, [29] Locast suspended operations. [30] The Electronic Frontier Foundation said the ruling "demonstrates once again how giant entertainment companies use copyright to control when, where, and how people can receive their local TV broadcasts, and drive people to buy expensive pay-TV services to get their local news and sports. We are disappointed that the court is enabling this callous profiteering that tramples on Congress’s intent to ensure local communities have access to news that’s important to people regardless of their ability to pay. The court made a mistake, and Locast is considering its options." [31]

The broadcasters called the ruling "a victory for copyright law, vindicating our claim that Locast is illegally infringing copyrights in broadcast television content in violation of federal law." [32] On September 15, the plaintiffs won a permanent injunction requiring Locast to shut down. [33]

On October 28, 2021, the plaintiffs were awarded statutory damages of $32 million under the Copyright Act, payable by Locast's operator, Sports Fans Coalition NY. [34] [35] However, broadcasters ultimately agreed to settle for $700,000 plus the liquidation of some used computer servers. [36]

Availability

As of July 2021, the service was available to 179 million viewers in media markets representing 55 percent of the U.S. population, [37] [13] as well as across Puerto Rico. [12] To use the service, a viewer had to be in one of these markets and could only watch channels local to that market. [38]

2021 rank [39] Media market
1 New York City
2 Los Angeles
3 Chicago
4 Philadelphia
5 Dallas-Fort Worth
6 San Francisco
7 Atlanta
8 Houston
9 Washington, D.C.
10 Boston
11 Phoenix
12 Seattle
13 Tampa Bay
14 Minneapolis–Saint Paul
15 Detroit
16 Denver
17 Orlando
18 Miami
19 Cleveland
20 Sacramento
21 Portland, Oregon
22 Charlotte
24 Raleigh-Durham
25 Indianapolis
26 Pittsburgh
28 Baltimore
33 Columbus
37 Milwaukee
39 West Palm Beach
58 Scranton
81 Madison
100 Tri-Cities, TN-VA
109 Sioux Falls
148 Sioux City
169 Rapid City

See also

Related Research Articles

In cable television, governments apply a must-carry regulation stating that locally licensed television stations must be carried on a cable provider's system.

Streaming television is the digital distribution of television content, such as television shows and films, as streaming media delivered over the Internet. Streaming television stands in contrast to dedicated terrestrial television delivered by over-the-air aerial systems, cable television, and/or satellite television systems.

iCraveTV was a Canadian website, which operated from 1999 to 2000. The site offered streaming Internet broadcasts of the conventional television stations, both Canadian and American, that were available as over-the-air signals in Toronto.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xfinity</span> American cable provider

Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, doing business as Xfinity, is an American telecommunications business segment and division of Comcast Corporation used to market consumer cable television, internet, telephone, and wireless services provided by the company. The brand was first introduced in 2010; prior to that, these services were marketed primarily under the Comcast name.

Multichannel television in the United States has been available since at least 1948. The United States is served by multichannel television through cable television systems, direct-broadcast satellite providers, and various other wireline video providers; among the largest television providers in the U.S. are YouTube TV, DirecTV, Altice USA, Charter Communications, Comcast, Dish Network, Verizon Communications, and Cox Communications. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 defines a multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) as "a person such as, but not limited to, a cable operator, a multichannel multipoint distribution service, a direct broadcast satellite service, or a television receive-only satellite program distributor, who makes available for purchase, by subscribers or customers, multiple channels of video programming", where a channel is defined as a "signaling path provided by a cable television system."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TVCatchup</span> Former free UK internet TV service

TVCatchup was an Internet television service for viewing free-to-air UK channels. It operated as a cable service and retransmitted BBC, Channel 4, Channel 5, and ITV, amongst others, only in the UK. Users were able to access the service via desktop browsers as well as smartphone and tablet apps. The service was funded by advertising, with advertisements preceding the live channel stream.

Louis Lee Stanton is a senior United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">TuneIn</span> American audio streaming service

TuneIn is a global audio streaming service providing news, radio, sports, music, and podcasts to over 75 million monthly active users.

FilmOn is an Internet-based television provider owned by FilmOn.TV Networks Inc. Alki David had founded FilmOn.TV Networks in 2006. The company was involved in a prolonged legal case concerning streaming rights with CBS, Fox, and NBC between 2013 and 2017, with FilmOn ultimately settling.

Fee-for-carriage, value-for-signal, negotiation for value, or the "TV tax" all refer to a proposed Canadian television regulatory policy which would require cable and satellite television companies to compensate conventional, over-the-air television stations for the right to carry their local signals. Such a system has long existed in the United States, under the name of retransmission consent.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aereo</span> Technology company

Aereo was a technology company based in New York City that allowed subscribers to view live and time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices. The service opened to customers in March 2012, and was backed by Barry Diller's IAC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hopper (DVR)</span>

Hopper is a line of digital video recording (DVR) set-top boxes offered by the U.S. direct-broadcast satellite television provider Dish Network. First introduced at Consumer Electronics Show in January 2012, the Hopper was released in March 2012 as a component of the provider's whole-home DVR system, which networks the main Hopper unit with smaller "Joey" set-top boxes to form a client-server architecture.

A carriage dispute is a disagreement over the right to "carry", that is, retransmit, a broadcaster's signal. Carriage disputes first occurred between broadcasters and cable companies and now include direct broadcast satellite and other multichannel video programming distributors.

<i>WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc.</i> American legal case

WPIX, Inc. v. ivi, Inc., was a copyright infringement case heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeals court affirmed the decision of the district court to grant an injunction for the plaintiffs, barring ivi, Inc. from broadcasting television programming over the Internet. This decision set a precedent that broadcast television material can be protected by copyright and cannot be re-transmitted on the Internet without permission.

Dish Network has been the subject of a number of criticisms relating to management of advertising, disclosure of fees, telemarketing, employee rights and programming disputes; a number of which resulted in lawsuits. In the early 2000s, Dish Network received criticism regarding controversial technology and carriage disputes with programming providers. Most notably, when the Hopper digital video recorder provided an easy way for viewers to watch certain programming without commercials, major networks sued Dish Network.

Fox Broadcasting Co. v. Dish Network, LLC is a copyright case in which the United States District Court for the Central District of California, by granting partial summary judgment, denied most parts of the copyright claims presented by Fox Broadcasting Company (Fox) against Dish Network (Dish) for its service, a DVR-like device that allowed users to record programming that could be accessed later through any Internet-connected device. The service offered by Dish also allowed users to record any or all Fox's prime-time programs and to automatically skips commercials (AutoHop).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bally Sports app</span> Bally Sportss over-the-top service

The Bally Sports app is the video streaming service of the former Fox Sports Networks, now Bally Sports regional sports networks. The app replaces Fox Sports Go (FSGO), the app of the former Fox Sports Networks. The service is available for customers of select cable and satellite TV providers, as well as the DirecTV Stream over-the-top service.

American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc, 573 U.S. 431 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case. The Court ruled that the service provided by Aereo, which allowed subscribers to view live and time-shifted streams of over-the-air television on Internet-connected devices, violated copyright laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">FuboTV</span> American Internet television service

FuboTV Inc. is an American streaming television service serving customers in the United States, Canada, and Spain that focuses primarily on channels that distribute live sports. Depending on country, channels offered by Fubo may potentially include access to EPL, NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MLS, CPL and international football, plus news, network television series and movies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LocalBTV</span> Over-the-top streaming television service

LocalBTV is an American streaming television service based in Los Altos, California and owned by Didja. The service allows subscribers to view live and DVR recorded streams of over-the-air television as well as national channels on Internet-connected devices.

References

  1. ↑ Lagorio-Chafkin, Christine (2013-11-22). "Finally, a Company That's Really, Truly Both Innovative and Disruptive". Inc.com. Retrieved 2020-01-21.
  2. ↑ "How can I access Locast?". Locast. Retrieved 2021-08-19.
  3. ↑ Barnes, Jess (2019-09-25). "Locast Launches a TiVo App". Cord Cutters News. Retrieved 2019-09-25.
  4. ↑ Barnes, Jess (2021-08-18). "Locast is Now Available on Vizio SmartCast TVs". Cord Cutters News. Retrieved 2021-08-19.
  5. ↑ Krasnoff, Barbara (2019-02-25). "Locast review: Free local programming with a catch". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-05-31.
  6. ↑ Goodfriend, David. "David Goodfriend Profile". CNBC. Retrieved 2019-05-31.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Lee, Edmund (2019-01-31). "Locast, a Free App Streaming Network TV, Would Love to Get Sued". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2019-05-31.
  8. 1 2 Eggerton, John (11 January 2018). "Nonprofit Launches NY TV Station Streaming Service". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved 2019-05-31.
  9. ↑ Moskovciak, Matthew. "Aereo brings over-the-air TV to the cloud". CNET. Retrieved 2020-01-06.
  10. 1 2 FitzGerald, Drew (July 1, 2019). "Streaming Service Challenges Broadcasters with Free TV Feeds". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2019-07-02.
  11. ↑ "Bringing the Public Interest Back to Sports". Sports Fans Coalition. January 11, 2018. Retrieved 2019-06-01.
  12. 1 2 "Locast now streaming local TV channels in Puerto Rico" (Press release). San Juan, Puerto Rico: Locast. Globe Newswire. April 14, 2020. Retrieved 2020-04-14.
  13. 1 2 "Markets". Locast. Retrieved 2021-07-30.
  14. ↑ Al-Heeti, Abrar (May 31, 2019). "AT&T adding broadcast TV app Locast to DirecTV, U-Verse". CNET. Retrieved 2019-09-28.
  15. ↑ Barnes, Jess (April 22, 2021). "Sling TV Expands Locast Integration to Android TV and Android Mobile". Cord Cutters News. Retrieved 2021-05-03.
  16. 1 2 Baumgartner, Jeff (November 6, 2020). "Locast has achieved operational sustainability, chairman says". Light Reading. Retrieved 2021-01-17.
  17. ↑ Arbel, Tali (July 31, 2019). "ABC, CBS, Fox And NBC Sue Over Locast". TVNewsCheck. NewsCheck Media. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
  18. ↑ Brodkin, Jon (July 31, 2019). "TV networks sue nonprofit to kill free TV service". Ars Technica . Condé Nast . Retrieved August 1, 2019.
  19. ↑ American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et. al. v. David R. Goodfriend and Sports Fans Coalition NY, Inc.(United States District Court – Southern District Court of New YorkJuly 31, 2019), Text .
  20. ↑ Brodkin, Jon (2019-09-27). "Nonprofit fights TV networks in court to keep free TV service alive". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2020-01-06.
  21. ↑ Lee, Edmund (2019-09-27). "Locast, a Free Streaming Service, Sues ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 2019-09-27.
  22. ↑ Davis, Wendy (October 29, 2019). "Broadcasters Urge Judge To Throw Out Locast's Antitrust Claims". MediaPost. Retrieved 2019-11-03.
  23. ↑ Balderston, Michael (March 31, 2020). "EFF Sides With Locast in Copyright Case". TVTechnology. Retrieved 2020-03-31.
  24. ↑ "EFF Joins Locast Defense Team to Fight for TV Viewers' Right to Use Free, Legal Streaming Service". Electronic Frontier Foundation (Press release). 2020-03-30. Retrieved 2020-04-05.
  25. ↑ Gardner, Eriq (2021-04-26). "ABC, CBS, Fox and NBC Battle "Freemium"". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2021-05-07.
  26. ↑ Keys, Matthew (August 31, 2021). "Judge deals blow to Locast in suit brought by broadcasters". FierceVideo. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
  27. ↑ Gardner, Eriq (2021-08-31). "Broadcasters Score Big Legal Win Against Locast, a Popular App Streaming Network TV". The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
  28. ↑ American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et. al. v. David R. Goodfriend and Sports Fans Coalition NY, Inc.(United States District Court – Southern District Court of New YorkAugust 31, 2021), Text .
  29. ↑ Barnes, Jess (2021-09-01). "Locast Will No Longer Interrupt Programming for Donation Requests". Cord Cutters News. Retrieved 2021-09-01.
  30. ↑ Provenzano, Brianna (September 2, 2021). "Locast Shuts Down Free Online Access to TV Following Copyright Battle". Gizmodo. Retrieved 2021-09-02.
  31. ↑ Fullo, Karen; Stoltz, Mitch (2021-09-01). "Court Ruling Against Locast Gets the Law Wrong; Lets Giant Broadcast Networks Control Where and How People Watch Free TV". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 2021-09-02.
  32. ↑ Goldsmith, Jill (2021-09-01). "Broadcasters Call Anti-Locast Ruling "Victory For Copyright Law", Will Seek Permanent Injunction Against Streaming TV App – Update". Deadline. Retrieved 2021-09-02.
  33. ↑ Brodkin, Jon (2021-09-16). "Locast's free TV service ordered to shut down permanently after copyright loss". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2021-09-16.
  34. ↑ Brittain, Blake (2021-10-28). "Locast agrees to pay $32 million to resolve dispute with major TV networks". Reuters. Retrieved 2021-11-29.
  35. ↑ American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., et. al. v. David R. Goodfriend and Sports Fans Coalition NY, Inc.(United States District Court – Southern District Court of New YorkOctober 28, 2021, 2021), Text .
  36. ↑ Curi, Maria (January 26, 2022). "Biden FCC Nominee Settles Case That Spurred GOP Senator's Fight". news.bloomberglaw.com. Retrieved 2023-03-08.
  37. ↑ "Locast surpasses 2.3 million users seeking to stream their local TV channels for free". Locast. 2021-01-19. Retrieved 2021-01-27.
  38. ↑ "Locast knowledge base". helpcenter.locast.org. Retrieved 2021-07-31.
  39. ↑ "Nielsen DMA Rankings 2021". MediaTracks Communications. Retrieved 2021-07-30.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.