Identification (literature)

Last updated

Identification refers to the automatic, subconscious psychological process in which an individual becomes like or closely associates themselves with another person by adopting one or more of the others' perceived personality traits, physical attributes, or some other aspect of their identity. [1] The concept of identification was founded by psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud in the 1920’s, and has since been expanded on and applied in psychology, social studies, media studies, and literary and film criticism. [2] In literature, identification most often refers to the audience identifying with a fictional character, however it can also be employed as a narrative device whereby one character identifies with another character within the text itself. [3]

Contents

Varying interpretations of Freud's original concept of identification are found in literary and film theory traditions, such as psychoanalytic literary criticism, archetypal literary criticism, and Lacanian film analysis, and in the works of prominent theorists and critics such as Northrop Frye, Laura Mulvey, and Christian Metz. Acclaimed filmmaker Alfred Hitchcock used specific camera and acting techniques in his films to incite audience identification with his characters in order to create suspense. [4]

Origins

Sigmund Freud circa 1921, Austrian neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis Sigmund Freud, by Max Halberstadt (cropped).jpg
Sigmund Freud circa 1921, Austrian neurologist and the founder of psychoanalysis

Freud and psychoanalysis

Freud first introduced the concept of identification in his 1921 book Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego , where he referred to it as “the original form of emotional tie with an object”. [1] He initially detected the occurrence of identification whilst analysising his patient's dreams for therapeutic purposes. [2] In his later works, he isolated three separate modes of identification: primary identification, hysterical identification, and narcissistic identification. [1]

In Freudian psychoanalysis, identification is largely considered a process "in which something previously experienced as external becomes internal". [5] Primary identification, however, is defined by psychoanalysts as a "state" of experienced oneness with the object, where the distinction between the self and non-self is suspended. [1] According to Freud, hysterical identification is a secondary form of identification, denoting a process whereby a change occurs in the self-concept of the subject so that they become more like the object. [1] Furthermore, narcissistic identification is an aggressive form of identification which follows on from hysterical identification, in which the subject wishes to become the object in order to take its place. Freud states that narcissistic identification is the beginning of the Oedipus complex, in which the child desires to replace their same-sex parent. [6]

Freud applied psychoanalytic techniques to literary texts in the same way that he would analyse his patient’s dreams. [7] Most famously, Freud analysed the Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex by Sophocles in his 1899 book The Interpretation of Dreams , which formed the basis of his controversial theory of the Oedipus complex. [6] Freud claimed that a successful resolution to the Oedipus complex was for the patient to adopt a state of primary identification with their same-sex parent by internalising part of their personality and worldview. [3] For Freud, identification was not only a psychological process, but the way in which the human personality was formed. [8]

In literary theory

In psychoanalytic literary criticism

Psychoanalytic literary criticism is a method of reading and analysing texts through the lens of psychoanalytic principles. [3] It is largely informed by Freudian psychoanalysis, but has since grown into its own field in literary theory, influenced by the work of psychoanalysts such as Carl Jung, Melanie Klein, and Jacques Lacan. [9]

Identification is a key concept in psychoanalytic literary criticism. [9] Drawing upon the large body of psychoanalytic theory, Merav Roth identified seven forms of identification which can occur whilst reading literature. [3] Among these are; internalised identification, where parts of a character are internalised to become parts of the reader, internalised identification with ‘good’ objects or characters is part of the pleasure of reading and can repair the individuals sense of internal goodness; projective identification, where an individual projects an aspect of themselves onto an object, used to distance oneself from anxiety, readers can project traits onto a character in order to work through them; and intrusive identification, whereby a character penetrates the psyche of the reader, momentarily suspending the reader within the narrative as an extreme form of empathy. [3]

In archetypal literary criticism

Hercules Capturing Cerberus from The Labors of Hercules, by Sebald Beham (1545) depicts Hercules, the greatest of the Greek heroes, an example of a character which adheres to the hero archetype. Hercules Capturing Cerberus from The Labors of Hercules MET DP841145.jpg
Hercules Capturing Cerberus from The Labors of Hercules, by Sebald Beham (1545) depicts Hercules, the greatest of the Greek heroes, an example of a character which adheres to the hero archetype.

Archetypal literary criticism is a critical framework for literary analysis which draws on the principles of analytical psychology by interpreting texts through the lens of recurring myths and archetypes. [10] Archetypal literary criticism draws heavily on the work of psychoanalyst Carl Jung, a friend and colleague of Freud’s who branched out from Freudian psychoanalysis to establish the field of analytical psychology. [10] In archetypal criticism, identification occurs between the reader and the archetype which a character is modelled from, either knowingly or unknowingly by the author. [10] For the reader to identify with the hero archetype, for example, is a cathartic experience as they are freed from the worries and emotions of their everyday life to momentarily become a powerful hero operating inside a contained fantasy. [11]

Northrop Frye was considered to be one of the most influential literary critics of the 20th century and a pioneering figure of archetypal criticism after Jung. [10] In his 1990 book Words with Power, Frye proposed the literary device of metaphor to be a method of inciting identification in the reader. [10] Frye said that a metaphor not only identifies one thing with another, but both things with the reader, creating an experience of identification which merges the reader with the text. [12]

In film theory

In Lacanian film analysis

Narcissus by Caravaggio (1594-96) depicts Narcissus gazing at his own reflection demonstrating our fascination with our image as outlined by Lacan's mirror phase. Narcissus-Caravaggio (1594-96).jpg
Narcissus by Caravaggio (1594-96) depicts Narcissus gazing at his own reflection demonstrating our fascination with our image as outlined by Lacan's mirror phase.

Jacques Lacan was a French psychoanalyst who, building on the work of Freud, developed a post-structuralist style of psychoanalysis known as Lacanianism or Lacanian theory. [13] Lacanian theory has been adopted by critics as a lens for textual analysis, and is especially popular in film criticism as Lacanianism concerns itself with the highly visual concepts of the gaze, the imaginary and symbolic, and the logic of desire in the visual domain. [14] In traditional Lacanian film theory, the gaze represents a point of identification, where “the spectator invests her/himself in the filmic image”. [15] The spectator identifies with the camera; because they are absent from the screen they are present as the watcher. [15] Lacanian theory claims that this identification with the camera provides the spectator with a sense of imaginary mastery and is the source of the pleasure in watching film. [15]

The mirror phase is one of Lacan’s most influential concepts, and is considered to be the first occurrence of identification in a person's life. [16] It refers to the moment in childhood when an individual first encounters themselves in a mirror and identifies with the image that they see. [16] Lacan argued that this mirror-self is more attractive to the individual than their fragmented, internal sense of self, composed of fluctuating thoughts, emotions, desires, and fears. [14] Thus, in identifying with the mirror-self, the individual forms an ideal version of themselves that is whole and, according to Lacanian theory, exists only in the imaginary. [16]

In Lacanian theory, the mirror phase is the most important occurrence of identification, and is partially re-lived through all subsequent identifications, such as those experienced when watching a film or reading literature. [17] The mirror phase identification is the moment of separation of the ideal fantasy self, similar to Freud’s ego, with the real self, or in other words, the concept of self with the actual self. This concept of self is what is transformed when the spectator identifies with a fictional character. [14]

Key theorists and critics

Christian Metz

Christian Metz was a French film critic who applied principles of Saussurean semiology alongside concepts sourced from Lacanian psychoanalysis to analyse film texts. [18] [19] In his seminal work Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The Imaginary Signifier, Metz identifies the pleasure of cinema as something which arises from viewer identification. [17] He states that there are two kinds of identification that occur for the viewer; primary identification, in which the viewer identifies with the camera, and secondary identification, in which the viewer identifies with the characters onscreen. [17] Metz argues that because film can only offer representations of the world, the viewer identifies with the camera as a way to give these representations a sense of realness. [17] In occupying this position, they can experience a temporary satisfaction of their desire for wholeness. [17] Metz states that watching film recreates the initial pleasure experienced during the Lacanian mirror phase, where the viewers identity is distilled into a single image. [15] [17]

Laura Mulvey

Film theorist Laura Mulvey circa 2010 Laura Mulvey Fot Mariusz Kubik July 24 2010 06.JPG
Film theorist Laura Mulvey circa 2010

Laura Mulvey is a British film theorist who uses Freudian and Lacanian concepts to analyse and discuss cinema from a second-wave feminist perspective, citing concepts such as Freud’s idea of phallocentrism and Lacan’s concept of the gaze. [20] Mulvey’s most notable work is her 1975 essay "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema", in which she introduced the concept of gendered gaze, specifically the male gaze, to the field of film theory. [21] She argues that Hollywood films are typically structured around a primary male protagonist with whom the spectator can identify themselves with. As the viewer identifies with this active, controlling agent of the narrative, they derive pleasure from a temporary experience of omnipotence, as the external traits and perceived power of the fictional character are internalised by the viewer. [21] Mulvey states that this identification is fuelled by the ego libido, a drive for self preservation identified by Freud. [21] [22]

Examples

In the films of Alfred Hitchcock

Alfred Hitchcock the "master of suspense", circa 1955 Alfred Hitchcock 1955.jpg
Alfred Hitchcock the "master of suspense", circa 1955

Alfred Hitchcock was an English new wave filmmaker, considered to be one of the most distinguished directors in the history of cinema and nicknamed the "Master of Suspense" for his long career of making thriller films, many of which are critically regarded as masterpieces, such as Rear Window (1954), Vertigo (1958), and Psycho (1960). [23] Hitchcock used the process of viewer identification as a technique to establish suspense, stating that the more invested the audience is in the fate of the character, the more "urgent and keen" a viewing experience. [24]

One way in which Hitchcock established viewer identification in his films was through camera work. [25] Hitchcock pioneered the use of frequent protagonist point-of-view shots, combined with shot/reverse shot sequences between the protagonist's eyes or profile and the object, which worked to keep the audience inside the protagonist's consciousness, thus providing a strong basis for identification. [25] By using restrained acting during facial close-ups and during shot/reverse shot sequences, Hitchcock designed his scenes in such a way that when the camera cut to what the character was looking at, "the viewer would experience the emotion directly, through identification, rather than by observing the actor's artifice of sentiment". [25]

Hitchcock subverted traditional Hollywood films by inciting viewer identification with flawed characters. [25] [21] The "Shower Scene" in Psycho is one of the most iconic scenes in the history of cinema. [26] Critics have argued that this is due to Hitchcock's exploitation of viewer identification. [25] The audience identifies and sympathises with Marion, the female lead, up until the point of her brutal murder in the shower by Norman Bates, in which, according to critic Robin Wood, "Hitchcock uses all the resources of identification to make [the viewer] 'become' Norman". [4] Wood argues that this use of identification is central to Hitchcock's work due to his interest in the "potential for abnormality". [4] Likewise, critic Laura Mulvey stated that Hitchcock used identification to expose the perverted aspects of the audience's consciousness. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

Feminist film theory is a theoretical film criticism derived from feminist politics and feminist theory influenced by second-wave feminism and brought about around the 1970s in the United States. With the advancements in film throughout the years feminist film theory has developed and changed to analyse the current ways of film and also go back to analyse films past. Feminists have many approaches to cinema analysis, regarding the film elements analyzed and their theoretical underpinnings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacques Lacan</span> French psychoanalyst and writer (1901–1981)

Jacques Marie Émile Lacan was a French psychoanalyst and psychiatrist. Described as "the most controversial psycho-analyst since Freud", Lacan gave yearly seminars in Paris, from 1953 to 1981, and published papers that were later collected in the book Écrits. Transcriptions of his seminars, given between 1954 and 1976, were also published. His work made a significant impact on continental philosophy and cultural theory in areas such as post-structuralism, critical theory, feminist theory and film theory, as well as on the practice of psychoanalysis itself.

Psychoanalysis is a theory developed by Sigmund Freud. It describes the human mind as an apparatus that emerged along the path of evolution and consists mainly of three functionally interlocking instances: a set of innate needs, a consciousness to satisfy them by ruling the muscular apparatus, and a memory for storing experiences that arises during this. Furthermore the theory includes insights into the effects of traumatic education and a technique for bringing repressed content back into the consciousness, in particular the diagnostic interpretation of dreams. Overall, psychoanalysis is a method for the treatment of mental disorders.

Psychoanalytic literary criticism is literary criticism or literary theory that, in method, concept, or form, is influenced by the tradition of psychoanalysis begun by Sigmund Freud.

Psychoanalytic film theory is a school of academic thought that evokes the concepts of psychoanalysts Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan. The theory is closely tied to Critical theory, Marxist film theory, and Apparatus theory. The theory is separated into two waves. The first wave occurred in the 1960s and 70s. The second wave became popular in the 1980s and 90s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mirror stage</span> Psychoanalytic concept

The mirror stage is a concept in the psychoanalytic theory of Jacques Lacan. The mirror stage is based on the belief that infants recognize themselves in a mirror (literal) or other symbolic contraption which induces apperception from the age of about six months.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Laura Mulvey</span> British feminist film theorist

Laura Mulvey is a British feminist film theorist and filmmaker. She was educated at St Hilda's College, Oxford. She is currently professor of film and media studies at Birkbeck, University of London. She previously taught at Bulmershe College, the London College of Printing, the University of East Anglia, and the British Film Institute.

In psychology and psychiatry, scopophilia or scoptophilia is an aesthetic pleasure drawn from looking at an object or a person. In human sexuality, the term scoptophilia describes the sexual pleasure that a person derives from looking at prurient objects of eroticism, such as pornography, the nude body, and fetishes, as a substitute for actual participation in a sexual relationship.

In continental philosophy, the Real refers to the demarcation of reality that is correlated with subjectivity and intentionality. In Lacanianism, it is an "impossible" category because of its opposition to expression and inconceivability. The Real Order is a topological ring (lalangue) and ex-sists as an infinite homonym.

[T]he real in itself is meaningless: it has no truth for human existence. In Lacan's terms, it is speech that "introduces the dimension of truth into the real."

The Symbolic is the order in the unconscious that gives rise to subjectivity and bridges intersubjectivity between two subjects; an example is Jacques Lacan's idea of desire as the desire of the Other, maintained by the Symbolic's subjectification of the Other into speech. In the later psychoanalytic theory of Lacan, it is linked by the sinthome to the Imaginary and the Real.

Freudo-Marxism is a loose designation for philosophical perspectives informed by both the Marxist philosophy of Karl Marx and the psychoanalytic theory of Sigmund Freud. Its history within continental philosophy began in the 1920s and '30s and running since through critical theory, Lacanian psychoanalysis, and post-structuralism.

<i>The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis</i> 1973 seminar by Jacques Lacan

The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis is the 1978 English-language translation of a seminar held by Jacques Lacan. The original was published in Paris by Le Seuil in 1973. The Seminar was held at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris between January and June 1964 and is the eleventh in the series of The Seminar of Jacques Lacan. The text was published by Jacques-Alain Miller.

"The Instance of the Letter in the Unconscious, or Reason Since Freud" is an essay by the psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, originally delivered as a talk on May 9, 1957 and later published in Lacan's 1966 book Écrits.

Otto Fenichel was a psychoanalyst of the so-called "second generation". He was born into a prominent family of Jewish lawyers.

Identification is a psychological process whereby the individual assimilates an aspect, property, or attribute of the other and is transformed wholly or partially by the model that other provides. It is by means of a series of identifications that the personality is constituted and specified. The roots of the concept can be found in Freud's writings. The three most prominent concepts of identification as described by Freud are: primary identification, narcissistic (secondary) identification and partial (secondary) identification.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oedipus complex</span> Idea in psychoanalysis

In classical psychoanalytic theory, the Oedipus complex refers to a son's sexual attitude towards his mother and concomitant hostility toward his father, first formed during the phallic stage of psychosexual development. A daughter's attitude of desire for her father and hostility toward her mother is referred to as the feminine Oedipus complex. The general concept was considered by Sigmund Freud in The Interpretation of Dreams (1899), although the term itself was introduced in his paper A Special Type of Choice of Object made by Men (1910).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaze</span> Awareness and perception of others

In critical theory, philosophy, sociology, and psychoanalysis, the gaze, in the figurative sense, is an individual's awareness and perception of other individuals, other groups, or oneself. Since the 20th century, the concept and the social applications of the gaze have been defined and explained by phenomenologist, existentialist, and post-structuralist philosophers. Jean-Paul Sartre described the gaze in Being and Nothingness (1943). Michel Foucault, in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975), developed the concept of the gaze to illustrate the dynamics of socio-political power relations and the social dynamics of society's mechanisms of discipline. Jacques Derrida, in The Animal That Therefore I Am (1997), elaborated upon the inter-species relations that exist among human beings and other animals, which are established by way of the gaze.

<i>Freud and Philosophy</i> 1965 book by Paul Ricœur

Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation is a 1965 book about Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalysis, written by the French philosopher Paul Ricœur. In Freud and Philosophy, Ricœur interprets Freudian work in terms of hermeneutics, a theory that governs the interpretation of a particular text, and phenomenology, a school of philosophy founded by Edmund Husserl. Ricœur addresses questions such as the nature of interpretation in psychoanalysis, the understanding of human nature and the relationship between Freud's interpretation of culture amongst other interpretations. The book was first published in France by Éditions du Seuil, and in the United States by Yale University Press.

Lacanianism or Lacanian psychoanalysis is a theoretical system that explains the mind, behaviour, and culture through a structuralist and post-structuralist extension of classical psychoanalysis, initiated by the work of Jacques Lacan from the 1950s to the 1980s. Lacanian perspectives contend that the human mind is structured by the world of language, known as the Symbolic. They stress the importance of desire, which is conceived of as perpetual and impossible to satisfy. Contemporary Lacanianism is characterised by a broad range of thought and extensive debate among Lacanians.

Bruce Fink is an American Lacanian psychoanalyst and a major translator of Jacques Lacan. He is the author of numerous books on Lacan and Lacanian psychoanalysis, prominent among which are Lacan to the Letter: Reading Écrits Closely, The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance (1995), Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan's Seminar VIII and A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis: Theory and Technique.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Zepf, Siegfried (January 2009). "Modes of Identification: Freud's Concepts Reorganized". The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review. 32 (1): 44–55. doi:10.1080/01062301.2009.10592640. ISSN   0106-2301. S2CID   144190245.
  2. 1 2 Florence, Jean (8 March 2021). Identification in Psychoanalysis. doi:10.4324/9781003154426. ISBN   9781003154426. S2CID   243189255.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Roth, Merav (14 August 2019). A Psychoanalytic Perspective on Reading Literature. doi:10.4324/9780429422782. ISBN   9780429422782. S2CID   199173273.
  4. 1 2 3 Wood, Robin (31 December 1960). Hitchcock's Films Revisited. doi:10.7312/wood91448. ISBN   9780231883795.
  5. ↑ Moore, Burness E. Fine, Bernard D. (1995). Psychoanalysis : the major concepts. Yale University Press. ISBN   0-585-35103-1. OCLC   47011054.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. 1 2 Chase, Cynthia (1979). "Oedipal Textuality: Reading Freud's Reading of Oedipus". Diacritics. 9 (1): 54–68. doi:10.2307/464700. ISSN   0300-7162. JSTOR   464700.
  7. ↑ Freud, Sigmund (1913). The interpretation of dreams. doi:10.1037/10561-000. ISBN   0-19-210049-1.
  8. ↑ Wasserman, Martin (March 1998). "Kafka's "A Visit to a mine": The literary path to a Freudian view of identification". Neohelicon. 25 (1): 275–307. doi:10.1007/BF02572864. ISSN   0324-4652. S2CID   144027412.
  9. 1 2 Ellmann, Maud (14 January 2014). Psychoanalytic Literary Criticism (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315845074. ISBN   978-1-317-89678-4.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Gill, Glen Robert (16 April 2018), Richter, David H. (ed.), "Archetypal Criticism: Jung and Frye", A Companion to Literary Theory, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 396–407, doi:10.1002/9781118958933.ch32, ISBN   978-1-118-95893-3 , retrieved 8 May 2022
  11. ↑ Jauss, Hans Robert; Bennett, Benjamin; Bennett, Helga (1974). "Levels of Identification of Hero and Audience". New Literary History. 5 (2): 283. doi:10.2307/468397. JSTOR   468397.
  12. ↑ Ning, Wang; O'Grady, Jean, eds. (31 December 2003). Northrop Frye: Eastern and Western Perspectives. University of Toronto Press. doi:10.3138/9781442677852. ISBN   978-1-4426-7785-2.
  13. ↑ Soler, Colette (17 April 2018). Lacan—The Unconscious Reinvented (1 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780429476471. ISBN   978-0-429-47647-1.
  14. 1 2 3 Coats, Karen (16 April 2018), Richter, David H. (ed.), "Lacanian Psychoanalytic Criticism", A Companion to Literary Theory, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 385–395, doi:10.1002/9781118958933.ch31, ISBN   978-1-118-95893-3 , retrieved 8 May 2022
  15. 1 2 3 4 McGowan, Todd (2003). "Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and Its Vicissitudes". Cinema Journal. 42 (3): 27–47. doi:10.1353/cj.2003.0009. ISSN   1527-2087. S2CID   144988516.
  16. 1 2 3 Žižek, Slavoj (2006). How to read Lacan. Granta Books. ISBN   1-86207-894-7. OCLC   750689372.
  17. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Metz, Christian (1997). Psychoanalysis and cinema : the imaginary signifier. Macmillan. ISBN   0-333-27805-4. OCLC   809571210.
  18. ↑ Metz, Christian (29 March 2016), "Humanoid Enunciation", Impersonal Enunciation, or the Place of Film, Columbia University Press, pp. 2–24, doi:10.7312/columbia/9780231173674.003.0001, ISBN   9780231173674 , retrieved 24 May 2022
  19. ↑ Chandler, Daniel; Munday, Rod (2020). A Dictionary of Media and Communication. doi:10.1093/acref/9780198841838.001.0001. ISBN   978-0-19-884183-8.
  20. ↑ Chaudhuri, Shohini (27 September 2006). Feminist Film Theorists (0 ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203357026. ISBN   978-1-134-34668-4.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 Mulvey, L. (1 September 1975). "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema". Screen. 16 (3): 6–18. doi:10.1093/screen/16.3.6. ISSN   0036-9543.
  22. ↑ Freud, Sigmund (1961). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. The Hogarth Press. OCLC   895937764.
  23. ↑ Freedman, Jonathan (2015). The Cambridge companion to Alfred Hitchcock. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-107-10757-1. OCLC   931996736.
  24. ↑ Hitchcock, Alfred (1899–1980). Hitchcock on Hitchcock: selected writings and interviews. ISBN   978-0-520-27958-2. OCLC   909139700.
  25. 1 2 3 4 5 Boyd, David; Palmer, R. Barton (2021). After Hitchcock : Influence, Imitation, and Intertextuality (PDF). University of Texas Press. ISBN   978-0-292-71337-6.
  26. ↑ Kumar, Arun (28 February 2022). "50 Most Famous Movie Scenes Of All Time". Flickside. Retrieved 28 May 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.