Igor Tuleya

Last updated

Igor Tuleya
2019 - Pol'and'Rock - Igor Tuleya (02).jpg
Tuleya in 2019 at Pol'and'Rock Festival
Born
Igor Zygmunt Tuleya

(1970-08-24) August 24, 1970 (age 53)
Łódź, Poland
Occupationjudge

Igor Zygmunt Tuleya (born 24 August 1970) is a Polish lawyer, judge at the district court of Warsaw and former spokesperson for this court. [1] He is known for his criticism on government prosecutorial practices and his protests against judicial reforms, which he sees as a threat to the independence of the Polish judiciary.

Contents

On 18 October 2020 Tuleya was stripped of his immunity by the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court of Poland and suspended. The public prosecutor is charging Tuleya for a criminal breach of the secrecy of the investigation. The alleged breach happened when Tuleya allowed the press to hear the justification of one of the verdicts he gave in court.

A poster of the Polish Judges Association "Iustitia" in front of the Supreme Court of Poland building in Warsaw calling for reinstatement of judges Igor Tuleya and Pawel Juszczyszyn Iustitia Tuleya Juszczyszyn.jpg
A poster of the Polish Judges Association "Iustitia" in front of the Supreme Court of Poland building in Warsaw calling for reinstatement of judges Igor Tuleya and Paweł Juszczyszyn

Life

Tuleya was born on 24 August 1970 in Łódź [2] and raised in Warsaw. Initially he intended to study Medicine, but continued to study law instead at the University of Warsaw. [3] His mother was Lucyna Tuleja, she has served in the years 1960-71 as Militia in Łódź in the criminal department, and until 1988 an officer of the communist Security Service in Office B. responsible for investigation of foreigners and foreign diplomats under communist regime in Poland. [4] [5]

He was a judge at the district court in Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki. In 2007, he adjudicated a complaint from former civil servant Janusz Kaczmarek, who was suspected of leaking state secrets. Teluya ruled that his arrest was unfounded and even illegal. Tuleya was then accused by the prosecutor of partiality. [1]

In 2010 he was, after a judicial career of 14 years, appointed to the bench of the district court in Warsaw. [6] In 2012 he was also spokesperson of the court, a position that would be taken away as a result of his justification of the verdict in the Mirosław Garlicki case. [7]

On 4 January 2013, he sentenced the physician Mirosław Garlicki to a year's imprisonment, two years suspension and a fine because he accepted a bribe of 17,500 zloty. [8] He acquitted him however of sexual abuse and causing the death of a patient.

In his justification of the verdict, Tuleya was very critical of the behavior of the prosecution. According to Tuleya, Garlicki was depicted as the personification of immoral behavior by physicians, and the post communist elite in general. The judge compared the behavior of the services with that of the Stalinist regime with threats, nocturnal interrogations and unjustified detention. Based on this ruling, Tuleya had to face investigations by the anti corruption agency.

In 2015, when the Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (Law and Justice, PiS) came into power, his verdict was used as support for accusations of corruption in the Polish judicial system. That would seem as a support of Law and Justice thesis that the judicial system in Poland needed a reform. [3]

In 2017, Poland ended up in a constitutional crisis around the supreme court and the disciplinary system of judges. Tuleya asked, like some other judges, the European Court of Justice to answer a prejudicial question, on whether the new laws that were supposed to reform the Polish judicial system, were in accordance with European norms around judicial independence. [9] In September 2019, the advocate-general of the European Court issued an opinion that these prejudicial questions should be dismissed. [10] According to the advocate-general, it is not sufficiently clear that the judicial independence was actually infringed upon. [11] [12]

Tuleya also criticized other changes in the judiciary that were introduced under Law and Justice. In September 2018, the disciplinary ombudsman asked him and two other judges to clarify their participation in television programs and the criticism that they stated. [13]

Involvement in Pegasus surveillance scandal

Acoording to media reports and his own testament, he, as a judge, may have consented to widespread surveillance measures by Polish authorities using the Pegasus software. He pleads to have been unaware of what he was actually signing because of intelligence provisions that allow for the concealment of technical aspects. Tuleya stated that he feels "exploited" by the PiS-era authorities. [14] [15] [16] Besides tracing the opposition's activities, the software may as well have been used to monitor governing party cadres by power brokers within the PiS via interior department ministers Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik. [17] [18] [19]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law and Justice (Poland)</span> Political party in Poland

Law and Justice is a right-wing populist and national-conservative political party in Poland. Its chairman is Jarosław Kaczyński.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Recognition of same-sex unions in Poland</span> Legal status of same-sex relationships in Poland

Poland does not legally recognize same-sex unions, either in the form of marriage or civil unions. In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples have limited legal rights in regards to the tenancy of a shared household. A few laws also guarantee certain limited rights for unmarried couples, including couples of the same sex. Same-sex spouses also have access to residency rights under EU law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Poland</span>

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Republic of Poland. It is located in the Krasiński Square, Warsaw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitutional Tribunal (Poland)</span> Constitutional court of Poland

The Constitutional Tribunal is the constitutional court of the Republic of Poland, a judicial body established to resolve disputes on the constitutionality of the activities of state institutions; its main task is to supervise the compliance of statutory law with the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stefan Michnik</span> Polish judge (1929–2021)

Stefan Michnik was a military judge of the Soviet-dominated regime in post-World War II Poland, and a captain in the communist Polish People's Army. He was involved in the politically-motivated arrest, trial, imprisonment and/or execution of a number of Polish anti-communist fighters and activists. Many of those persecuted by Michnik also fought against Nazi Germany during World War II, as members of the Polish resistance.

The judiciary of Poland are the authorities exercising the judicial power of the Polish state on the basis of Chapter 8 of the Constitution of Poland. As in almost all countries of continental Europe, the Polish judiciary operates within the framework of civil law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Szymon Marciniak</span> Polish football referee (born 1981)

Szymon Marciniak is a Polish football referee. He is considered one of the best rated international referees of his generation. He has refereed the 2022 FIFA World Cup final between Argentina and France, the 2018 UEFA Super Cup between Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid, and the 2023 UEFA Champions League final between Manchester City and Inter Milan. In 2023 and 2024, he was named "The World's Best Referee" by the International Federation of Football History & Statistics (IFFHS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Committee for the Defence of Democracy</span>

The Committee for the Defence of Democracy, CDD is a Polish-born civic organization and NGO which among its goals includes promoting the European values, especially democracy, rule of law, and human rights. It was founded in November 2015 by a group of citizens including Mateusz Kijowski, in anticipation of the Polish constitutional crisis, 2015. The organization declares its independence of any political parties and that it has no intention to transform into one. It is opposed to the actions of the government led by the Law and Justice (PiS) party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polish Constitutional Tribunal crisis (2015 – ongoing)</span>

The Polish Constitutional Tribunal crisis has been an ongoing political conflict in Poland starting in the second half of 2015 over the appointment of five of the 15 judges of the Constitutional Tribunal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Polish presidential election</span>

Presidential elections were held in Poland on 28 June 2020. As no candidate received a majority of the vote, a second round was held on 12 July, in which incumbent president Andrzej Duda, running with the support of Law and Justice, faced off against Civic Platform vice-chairman and Mayor of Warsaw Rafał Trzaskowski. In the second round Duda was re-elected for a second term with 51% of the vote, becoming the first incumbent to win re-election since Aleksander Kwaśniewski in 2000.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Dialogue Foundation</span> Open Dialogue Foundation (ODF), formerly known as the Open Dialog Foundation

The Open Dialogue Foundation (ODF), formerly known as the Open Dialog Foundation,, is an international non-governmental organization, founded in 2009 in Poland and currently headquartered in Brussels, Belgium, that conducts research and advocacy on human rights and the rule of law in the post-Soviet area and – since 2018 – within the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacek Sasin</span> Polish politician (born 1969)

Jacek Robert Sasin is a Polish politician and former local government official.

Since 2017, a series of protests against judiciary reforms have occurred in Poland. Since Law and Justice took power in Poland in 2015, its influence rapidly extended to the judicial branch, through contended nominations that produced the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The Law and Justice party argues that the reforms are needed to improve the efficiency of the judiciary, but the opposition, supported by a significant number of members of the judiciary, has been very critical of the reforms. The reforms have also been criticized by a number of international bodies. The European Commission invokes the Article 7 of the European Treaty against E.U. member Poland, denouncing recent judiciary reforms putting it under the political control of the ruling majority and citing "serious risk [to] the independence of the judiciary and the separation of powers".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 Polish parliamentary election</span>

The 2023 Polish parliamentary election took place on Sunday, 15 October 2023, per the Polish Constitution. Seats in both the lower house, the Sejm, and the Senate were contested. At the polls, a referendum - containing four questions concerning economic and immigration policy of the government - was also voted on.

Szymon Hołownia's Poland 2050 is a centrist to centre-right political party in Poland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wojciech Sadurski</span> Polish/Australian constitutional law scholar

Wojciech Sadurski is a Polish and Australian scholar of constitutional law. As of 2023, he is Challis Professor in Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney and Professor in the Centre for Europe in the University of Warsaw.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020–2021 women's strike protests in Poland</span> Anti-government protests triggered by tightening of abortion law

The 2020–2021 women's strike protests in Poland, commonly called the Women's Strike, were anti-government demonstrations and protests in Poland that began on 22 October 2020, in reaction to a ruling of the Constitutional Tribunal, mainly consisting of judges who were appointed by the ruling Law and Justice dominated United Right, which tightened the law on abortion in Poland. The ruling made almost all cases of abortion illegal, including those cases in which the foetus had a severe and permanent disability, or an incurable and life-threatening disease. All-Poland Women's Strike was charged by the authorities for having illegally organised the protests.

The Polish constitutional crisis, also known as the Polish rule-of-law crisis, is a political conflict ongoing since 2015 in which the Polish government has been accused of failing to comply with European and Polish constitutional law. The 2015 elections resulted in the Law and Justice party winning control of both the presidency and the parliament. With this government trifecta, PiS used its power to appoint judges to the Constitutional Tribunal in 2015, leading to the 2015 Polish Constitutional Court crisis. The government of Poland continued to expand its hold on the judiciary resulting in the 2017 Supreme Court crisis, and the 2019 Polish judicial disciplinary panel law. These events allowed the legislature and executive of the Polish government to have de facto control over judges and their appointments.

Presidential elections will be held in Poland by 18 May 2025, though they can be held earlier should the office become vacated as a result of death, resignation or removal from office of the incumbent. Due to constitutional term limits allowing a president to serve only two terms, incumbent president Andrzej Duda is ineligible for re-election. Presidential elections in Poland must take place on a free day between 75 and 100 days before the term's end.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2023 Polish public media crisis</span> Takeover of Polish public media

On December 19, 2023, Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz, the Minister of Culture and National Heritage in Poland, dismissed the then-current state media directors and their supervisory boards, most notably those of public broadcaster Telewizja Polska (TVP), appointing new ones in their place. The move was met with criticism and accusations of illegality by the dismissed management and the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, causing a parliamentary intervention in the TVP headquarters.

References

  1. 1 2 "Kim jest sędzia Igor Tuleya, który (znowu) postawił się PiS?". www.polityka.pl (in Polish). 19 December 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  2. ↑ "Declaration of financial interests" (PDF) (in Polish). 5 January 2017. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  3. 1 2 Berendt, Joanna (10 January 2020). "In Poland, a Stubborn Defender of Judicial Independence". The New York Times. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  4. ↑ "Kim była matka sędziego Tulei?". Fakt24.pl (in Polish). 16 January 2013. Retrieved 11 March 2023.
  5. ↑ "Prześwietlili rodzinę sędziego Tulei. Gmyz: Jego matka była w SB". wiadomosci.dziennik.pl (in Polish). 16 January 2013. Retrieved 11 March 2023.
  6. ↑ "Jestem apolityczny. Prowadziłem sprawy Macierewicza. Raz wygrał, raz przegrał". gazetapl (in Polish). 12 January 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  7. ↑ "Kim jest sędzia Igor Tuleya? Dwa powody, dla których przesłuchuje go nowa KRS". tokfm (in Polish). 21 September 2018. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  8. ↑ "Doktor Mirosław G. skazany. Ziobro: ten wyrok to zła wiadomość". Onet Wiadomości (in Polish). 4 January 2013. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  9. ↑ Baran, Violetta (6 September 2018). "Sędzia Tuleya zwrócił się z pytaniem do TSUE, proces został zawieszony. Kim są oskarżeni?". wiadomosci.wp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  10. ↑ "Rzecznik generalny TSUE odpowiada ws. pytań prejudycjalnych polskich sądów". Onet Wiadomości (in Polish). 24 September 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  11. ↑ "EU court adviser: bid for preliminary ruling on Polish disciplinary measures 'inadmissible'". PolskieRadio.pl. Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  12. ↑ "PRESS RELEASE No 114/19: Advocate General's Opinion in Joined Cases C-558/18 and C-563/18 Miasto Łowicz / Skarb Państwa". Court of Justice of the European Union. 24 September 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2020.
  13. ↑ Jastrzębski, Arkadiusz (13 September 2018). "Sędzia Igor Tuleya spodziewa się zwolnienia. "Sędziowie nie dadzą sobie zamknąć ust"". wiadomosci.wp.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 13 January 2020.
  14. ↑ Wrzosek, Ewa (25 February 2024). "System Pegasus i zgoda Igora Tulei. Ewa Wrzosek wyjaśnia". polsatnews.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 3 March 2024.
  15. ↑ "Tuleya o Pegasusie. Czy wydawał zgodę na jego użycie?". TVN24 (in Polish). 23 February 2024. Retrieved 3 March 2024.
  16. ↑ "Sędzia Igor Tuleya: Możliwe, że zgodziłem się na Pegasusa". Rzeczpospolita (in Polish). Retrieved 3 March 2024.
  17. ↑ "Sędzia Igor Tuleya podaje nowe informacje ws. inwigilacji polityków i Pegasusa". Rzeczpospolita (in Polish). Retrieved 3 March 2024.
  18. ↑ "Politolog o aferze wokół Pegasusa: To może zatopić PiS". www.rmf24.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 3 March 2024.
  19. ↑ Rzeczkowski, Grzegorz; Długosz, Dominika (19 February 2024). "Podsłuchy rozsadzają PiS od środka. "Wąsik miał straszyć, że on im pokaże" [KULISY]". Newsweek (in Polish). Retrieved 3 March 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.