Illinois Public Access Opinion 16‑006 is a binding opinion of the Illinois Attorney General pursuant to the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Issued in 2016 in the aftermath of the police murder of Laquan McDonald, the opinion addressed a public records request from Cable News Network (CNN) for private emails by officers of the Chicago Police Department (CPD) related to the incident. After the CPD denied CNN's request, the Attorney General's office, led by Lisa Madigan, ruled that the police officers' private emails about McDonald's murder were subject to public disclosure, even though those emails were communicated on accounts outside of the police department's email servers.
A prior appellate court decision in City of Champaign v. Madigan had established that communications about public business on personal electronic devices may be subject to disclosure. However, the scope of that decision applied only during public meetings convened by a city council or other public body, and it was unclear how it would apply to employees. In Public Access Opinion 16‑006, the Attorney General found that the police officers were acting on behalf of the police department, making their messages public records of the police department. Nonetheless, CNN never received the emails that it had requested, even after it went to court to enforce the Attorney General's opinion.
On October 20, 2014, Laquan McDonald was fatally shot in Chicago by police officer Jason Van Dyke. Preliminary reports by the Chicago Police Department (CPD) and Van Dyke claimed that McDonald had pointed a knife and moved towards Van Dyke, forcing the officer to shoot in self defense.[1] The shooting was recorded by a CPD dashboard camera. However, the video was not initially available to the public, and a lawsuit was filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County to secure the video's release. On November 19, 2015, the court ordered CPD to release the video, and CPD complied five days later.[2] By then, thirteen months had passed since the shooting. The video revealed that McDonald had a knife in his hand, but had been walking away from police when he was shot. Van Dyke shot McDonald 16 times, most of them while McDonald was already on the ground.[1]
On January 28, 2016, Courtney Yager, a producer for Cable News Network (CNN), submitted an Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to CPD for "all emails related to Laquan McDonald from Police Department email accounts and personal email accounts where business was discussed" for twelve CPD officers, including Van Dyke and others involved in the case. The request covered emails from October 19 through October 24, 2014 (around the date of the shooting), and November 19 through November 29, 2015 (around the date of the circuit court's order, and the video's subsequent release). CPD provided a large number of emails from the police officers' CPD-issued email accounts, but CPD failed to search for the officers' private emails, despite CNN's request.[3]:2–4 The Associated Press surmised that CNN was trying to determine whether the officers coordinated efforts to cover up the true circumstances behind McDonald's death.[4]
On April 28, 2016, CNN attorney Drew Shenkman appealed CPD's omission to the Public Access Counselor, the bureau of the Illinois Attorney General responsible for enforcing FOIA.[3]:2 CNN's situation was not unique. By 2018, journalists and citizen activists would file at least 10 appeals to the Public Access Counselor after Chicago officials blocked requests for records related to the murder of McDonald.[5]
Public bodies in Illinois, including CPD, are required under FOIA to make all public records open to disclosure. Public records include all emails "pertaining to the transaction of public business, regardless of physical form or characteristics, having been prepared by or for, or having been or being used by, received by, in the possession of, or under the control of any public body".[6]
In City of Champaign v. Madigan, a 2013 case, the Illinois Appellate Court considered a FOIA dispute regarding elected officials who were observed using their cell phones during a city council meeting to communicate with each other. The court found that the communications in question must be disclosed to the public, as long as they pertained to public business, because the city council had collectively formed a public body upon convening a council meeting. Therefore, the court ruled that the communications, though stored on personal devices, must be disclosed.[7]:12 This was the first court decision in Illinois to find that private messages were subject to disclosure under FOIA.[8]:9–10,14
However, the court's decision left room for interpretation in other contexts. The court found that, while city council members collectively form a public body during council meetings, they are not individually considered a public body.[7]:12[9] Therefore, a council member would not necessarily have to disclose messages received from constituents on their private electronic devices while at home.[10] Still, the applicability of City of Champaign to employees (rather than elected officials) of a public body remained unclear. Attorney Matt Topic, a FOIA expert based in Chicago, suggested that executive branch employees may still be required to disclose their records because they act on the public body's behalf.[9]
The University of Illinois System cited such ambiguity when it revealed in 2015 that it had failed to disclose emails stored on the private accounts of Phyllis Wise, chancellor of the university at Urbana-Champaign.[9] An internal investigation had found that Wise intentionally evaded FOIA by using her personal account when discussing sensitive topics (such as the Steven Salaita hiring controversy) and subsequently deleting those emails.[11] In May 2016, the Circuit Court of Cook County cited City of Champaign when it ruled that personal emails of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel may be subject to disclosure, even when stored on private devices.[12][13]
Opinion
Lisa Madigan, Illinois Attorney General, author of the opinion
Relying on the appellate court's ruling in City of Champaign,[7]:13 CPD argued that the emails were sent by individual officers, and could not be considered public records because they were not prepared by or for CPD. Further, CPD argued that the emails were not stored on CPD's servers, and therefore were not under the police department's control.[14]
The Attorney General's office, led by Lisa Madigan, issued its ruling on August 9, 2016.[lower-alpha 1][3] It rejected CPD's arguments, ruling that officers' emails about public business are subject to disclosure, even when sent on private devices. To determine whether an email pertains to public business, the Attorney General stated that one must focus on the content of the email, not on how it is sent.[7]:13 The opinion cited a federal appellate court decision, Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Office of Science and Technology Policy,[lower-alpha 2] noting that "an agency always acts through its employees and officials. If one of them possesses what would otherwise be agency records, the records do not lose their agency character just because the official who possesses them takes them out the door." Otherwise, public employees could evade public scrutiny by storing their records on private accounts,[14] contrary to the intent of the Illinois General Assembly to ensure "public access to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government".[15]
Additionally, CPD suggested that searching the private email accounts would violate the officers' personal privacy. The Attorney General rejected this argument as well, noting FOIA's explicit statement that "the disclosure of information that bears on the public duties of public employees and officials shall not be considered an invasion of personal privacy".[14]
CPD also countered that it could not compel employees to grant CPD access to private email accounts. However, the opinion noted that CPD did not necessarily have to obtain access to the officers' private emails to perform an automated search. Instead, CPD could meet its legal obligations by ordering the officers to search their own private accounts themselves, and to turn over relevant emails to CPD.[16][17]
The ruling was a binding opinion, a rare power that is exercised by the Attorney General in only less than 0.5 percent of complaints submitted to the Public Access Counselor.[lower-alpha 3][18] CPD was required to comply by searching the officers' email accounts, or file for administrative review in the Circuit Court of Cook or Sangamon County within 35 days.[3]:13
Appeal
CPD appealed the ruling in the Circuit Court of Cook County,[lower-alpha 4] maintaining that the officers' private emails are not subject to public disclosure.[19] CPD contended that the Attorney General incorrectly considered individual police officers to be the same as the collective police department, thereby reaching the erroneous conclusion that individual officers conduct public business as a public body when communicating privately. Furthermore, CPD argued that the ruling was too broad because it obligated CPD to search the personal emails and personal devices of all employees. In CPD's view, FOIA does not impose such a requirement, as the law does not provide a way for a public body to force its employees to grant access to private email accounts.[8]:21–22
CPD lost the appeal on September 20, 2017,[10] with Judge Pamela McLean Meyerson writing, "Government operations in a free society must not be shrouded in secrecy."[5] Meyerson also found the FOIA request to be reasonable and limited in time and scope.[10] Nonetheless, CNN never received the emails that it had requested, even after it went to court a second time to enforce Meyerson's order. Each of the officers, individually or through their attorneys, either refused to provide emails, ignored the request, or denied having any relevant emails.[5]
The ruling was hailed by public access advocates as an important step towards transparency in a national debate concerning access to discussions of public business on privately held electronic devices.[16] Charles N. Davis, dean of the Grady College at the University of Georgia, commented that the opinion "correctly focuses on the question whether the communication is intended to memorialize public business... If the opinion had come down the other way, it would send a clear signal to every public official on how to avoid public records laws. All they would have to do is get a Hotmail account and start discussing public business." Davis also suggested that the state legislature could mandate that all public business be conducted on governmental email accounts.[15]
In addition to the previous court order regarding Emanuel's emails, journalists pointed towards similar public access issues during the administration of Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner and the Hillary Clinton email controversy.[9][16] However, the Information Management Journal suggested that while the ruling applies to government employees, it still does not apply to elected officials.[20] Benjamin Schuster, a Chicago-based attorney, criticized the Attorney General for not distinguishing between the dispute in City of Champaign v. Madigan and CPD's records at issue in this case. He also criticized the opinion for not clearly defining when a document is a public record, and for not specifying how much authority a public body has to compel employees to release private messages.[12]
The opinion has led to concerns about potential impacts to the boundaries of privacy at the workplace, especially with the intermingling of work on personal devices and evolving attitudes towards personal privacy. Attorney Jeffrey Brown noted that public bodies should not allow officials and employees to conduct public business on private accounts and devices. Otherwise, he warned that public bodies may have to conduct a potentially cumbersome and time-consuming search for records, or a court may order the private device or account to be searched by a third party. If officials and employees continued to conduct public business on personal devices, Brown suggested that such communications should be forwarded to government accounts, to help facilitate responses to future FOIA requests. Even when a communication involves both public business and private matters, the private portions may still be redacted.[8]:34–36
In 2017, the General Assembly considered two bills, which appeared to be in response to City of Champaign and Public Access Opinion 16‑006. One bill would have made it more difficult to obtain records not already in the control of a public body. Another bill would have amended the Local Records Act[lower-alpha 5] to explicitly state that all emails sent or received by government officials and employees are public records, even when using a personal email address. The latter bill also would have required public officials and employees to use government-issued email addresses, and forward any emails related to public business on personal accounts to their governmental accounts.[8]:33–34 Both bills expired in January 2019 without becoming law.[21][22]
Notes
↑ The opinion was signed on Madigan's behalf by Michael J. Luke, counsel to the Attorney General.
↑ Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Office of Science and Technology Policy, No. 15-5128 (D.C. Cir. July 5, 2016).
↑ Most complaints to the Public Access Counselor are resolved by advisory opinions that are not legally binding on the parties.[18]
↑ City of Chicago v. Attorney General of the State of Illinois and Cable News Network, Inc.,Docket No. 2016-CH-12085(Circuit Court, Cook County).
The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552, is the United States federal freedom of information law that requires the full or partial disclosure of previously unreleased or uncirculated information and documents controlled by the U.S. government upon request. The act defines agency records subject to disclosure, outlines mandatory disclosure procedures, and includes nine exemptions that define categories of information not subject to disclosure. The act was intended to make U.S. government agencies' functions more transparent so that the American public could more easily identify problems in government functioning and put pressure on Congress, agency officials, and the president to address them. The FOIA has been changed repeatedly by both the legislative and executive branches.
The Chicago Police Department (CPD) is the primary law enforcement agency of the city of Chicago, Illinois, United States, under the jurisdiction of the Chicago City Council. It is the second-largest municipal police department in the United States, behind the New York City Police Department. As of 2022 CPD had 11,710 sworn officers on duty, and in 2020 had over 948 other employees. Tracing its roots to 1835, the Chicago Police Department is one of the oldest modern police departments in the world.
The Illinois attorney general is the highest legal officer of the state of Illinois in the United States. Originally an appointed office, it is now an office filled by statewide election. Based in Chicago and Springfield, the attorney general is responsible for providing legal counsel for the various state agencies including the governor of Illinois and Illinois General Assembly, as well as conducting all legal affairs pertaining to the state.
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that creates a public "right of access" to information held by public authorities. It is the implementation of freedom of information legislation in the United Kingdom on a national level. Its application is limited in Scotland to UK Government offices located in Scotland. The Act implements a manifesto commitment of the Labour Party in the 1997 general election, developed by David Clark as a 1997 White Paper. The final version of the Act was criticised by freedom of information campaigners as a diluted form of what had been proposed in the White Paper. The full provisions of the act came into force on 1 January 2005. The Act was the responsibility of the Lord Chancellor's Department. However, freedom of information policy is now the responsibility of the Cabinet Office. The Act led to the renaming of the Data Protection Commissioner, who is now known as the Information Commissioner. The Office of the Information Commissioner oversees the operation of the Act.
Email privacy is a broad topic dealing with issues of unauthorized access to, and inspection of, electronic mail, or unauthorized tracking when a user reads an email. This unauthorized access can happen while an email is in transit, as well as when it is stored on email servers or on a user's computer, or when the user reads the message. In countries with a constitutional guarantee of the secrecy of correspondence, whether email can be equated with letters—therefore having legal protection from all forms of eavesdropping—is disputed because of the very nature of email.
Public records are documents or pieces of information that are not considered confidential and generally pertain to the conduct of government.
Crime in Chicago has been tracked by the Chicago Police Department's Bureau of Records since the beginning of the 20th century. The city's overall crime rate, especially the violent crime rate, is higher than the US average. Gangs in Chicago have a role in the city's crime rate. The number of homicides in Chicago hit a 25-year high in 2021.
Anita M. Alvarez is the former State's Attorney for Cook County, Illinois, United States. Alvarez was the first Hispanic woman elected to this position, after being the first Latina to win the Democratic nomination for state's attorney of Cook County.
The California Public Records Act was a law passed by the California State Legislature and signed by governor Ronald Reagan in 1968 requiring inspection or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law.
Suburban Express was a bus service that provided transport services to students between Chicago Suburbs and six universities in Illinois, Iowa, and Indiana. Airport shuttles were operated under the name "Illini Shuttle". The company owned no vehicles, instead contracting buses from other carriers.
Garry Francis McCarthy is the Chief of Police in Willow Springs, Illinois and previous Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department. He was a candidate for mayor of Chicago in the 2019 Chicago mayoral election.
During her tenure as United States Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton drew controversy by using a private email server for official public communications rather than using official State Department email accounts maintained on federal servers. After a years-long FBI investigation, it was determined that Clinton's server did not contain any information or emails that were clearly marked classified. Federal agencies did, however, retrospectively determine that 100 emails contained information that should have been deemed classified at the time they were sent, including 65 emails deemed "Secret" and 22 deemed "Top Secret". An additional 2,093 emails were retroactively designated confidential by the State Department.
The murder of Laquan McDonald took place on October 20, 2014, in Chicago, Illinois. McDonald was a 17-year-old who was fatally shot by a Chicago Police Officer, Jason Van Dyke. Police had initially reported that McDonald was behaving erratically while walking down the street, refusing to put down a knife, and that he had lunged at officers. Preliminary internal police reports described the incident similarly, leading to the shooting being judged as justifiable, and Van Dyke not being charged at the time. This was later disproved after a video of the encounter was released, showing that McDonald was walking away.
Eddie T. Johnson is an American retired police officer for the Chicago Police Department. He served as the 62nd Superintendent of the Chicago Police Department from March 2016 until December 2019.
The Chicago Police Board voted on October 17, 2019 to dismiss Chicago Police (CPD) Officer Robert Rialmo who fatally shot Quintonio LeGrier and neighbor Bettie Jones on December 26, 2015 while answering a 911 domestic violence call at the LeGrier residence in Chicago. The dismissal capped a "chaotic finish to a high-profile trial" where a judge first announced that the jury found Rialmo unjustified in his shooting of LeGrier, but erased the verdict promptly, after declaring that the jury found Rialmo feared for his life when he shot LeGrier.
16 Shots is a documentary film about the murder of Laquan McDonald. Written and directed by Richard Rowley, it is an updated and expanded version of the 2018 movie The Blue Wall. It had a limited theatrical release on June 7, 2019, and started streaming on Showtime on June 14, 2019. It was released on DVD on August 4, 2020.
The Illinois Freedom of Information Act, 5 ILCS 140/1 et seq., is an Illinois statute that grants to all persons the right to copy and inspect public records in the state. The law applies to executive and legislative bodies of state government, units of local government, and other entities defined as "public bodies". All records related to governmental business are presumed to be open for inspection by the public, except for information specifically exempted from disclosure by law. The statute is modeled after the federal Freedom of Information Act and serves a similar purpose as freedom of information legislation in the other U.S. states.
The Illinois Public Access Counselor (PAC) is an attorney in the office of the Illinois Attorney General who is responsible for enforcing the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Open Meetings Act (OMA). The PAC is the head of the Public Access Bureau, a group of more than one dozen attorneys who process complaints against public bodies and provide education to the public on Illinois' transparency laws.
City of Champaign v. Madigan, 2013 IL App (4th) 120662, 992 N.E.2d 629 (2013), is a case decided by the Illinois Appellate Court in 2013 concerning the state's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The court ruled that messages sent and received by elected officials during a city council meeting and pertaining to public business are public records subject to disclosure, even when those communications are stored on personal electronic devices. It was the first court ruling in Illinois to hold that private messages were subject to public disclosure under FOIA.
James Ewan Kalven is an American journalist, author, human rights activist, and community organizer based in Chicago, Illinois. He is the founder of the Invisible Institute, a non-profit journalism organization based in Chicago's South Side. His work in the city has included reporting on police misconduct and poor conditions of public housing. Kalven has been referred to as a "guerrilla journalist" by Chicago journalist Studs Terkel.
1 2 3 4 Uhler, Scott F. (July–August 2017). "Is your smartphone still yours?". The Illinois School Board Journal. 85 (4): 12–14. Archived from the original on February 25, 2023. Retrieved October 14, 2020.
1 2 Hudson Jr., David L. (February 2017). "Private Notes, Public Scrutiny: Public officials can't evade public records laws through personal email accounts". ABA Journal. 103: 18. ISSN0747-0088– via Academic Search Complete.
↑ "Illinois Public Employees' Private Messages May Be Made Public". Information Management Journal. 50 (6). Association of Records Managers & Administrators: 8. November–December 2016. ISSN1535-2897– via Academic Search Complete.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
