Independent Press Standards Organisation

Last updated

Independent Press Standards Organisation
AbbreviationIPSO
Predecessor Press Complaints Commission
Formation8 September 2014;9 years ago (2014-09-08)
Type Self-regulatory organisation
PurposeRegulation of UK newspaper and magazine industry
Key people
Charlotte Dewar (chief executive)
Website ipso.co.uk

The Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) is the largest independent regulator of the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK. It was established on 8 September 2014 [1] after the windup of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), which had been the main industry regulator of the press in the United Kingdom since 1990.

Contents

IPSO exists to promote and uphold the highest professional standards of journalism, and to support members of the public in seeking redress where they believe that the Editors' Code of Practice [2] has been breached. However, its effectiveness is questioned by some critics, including Hacked Off, and it has been called a "pointless so-called regulator" by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ). [3]

The Editors' Code deals with issues such as accuracy, invasion of privacy, intrusion into grief or shock and harassment. IPSO considers concerns about editorial content in newspapers and magazines, and about the conduct of journalists. IPSO handles complaints and conducts its own investigations into editorial standards and compliance. It also undertakes monitoring work, including by requiring publications to submit annual compliance reports. [4] IPSO has the power, where necessary, to require the publication of prominent corrections and critical adjudications, and may ultimately fine publications in cases where failings are particularly serious and systemic. [5]

Report of the Leveson Inquiry

The Leveson Inquiry reported in November 2012, recommending the establishment of a new independent body. The PCC had received extensive criticism for its lack of action in the News International phone hacking scandal, including from MPs and Prime Minister David Cameron, who called for it to be replaced with a new system in July 2011. [6] The Leveson Inquiry concluded that a legal framework was necessary to give a new regulatory body powers of enforcement such as exemplary damages and suggested the possibility of a Royal Charter to provide this. [7]

This route was accepted by David Cameron and, following extensive political discussion, a Royal Charter on self-regulation of the press was granted by the Privy Council in October 2013, despite legal challenges by newspaper publishers (Pressbof) to prevent it. The publishers characterised the Charter as "deeply illiberal" and presented their own alternative proposals, which the High Court did not accept as they did not comply with the principles set out in the Leveson report, including independence and access to arbitration. [8]

The industry therefore continued with its own proposals, despite fears that industry representatives would still have powers of veto over the chairman and other board members. [9] The Media Standards Trust also published a critique analysing in detail where the proposals met and fell short of Leveson's recommendations. [10]

One of the government's commitments in implementing the Inquiry's recommendations related to the idea that, while the industry should regulate itself, there should be some independent verification (or "recognition") of the regulatory arrangements the press put in place. The Press Recognition Panel was created on 3 November 2014 as a fully independent body with the purpose of carrying out activities in relation to the recognition of press regulators. IPSO has said that it will not seek approval from the Press Recognition Panel (PRP), [11] which has officially recognised the regulator IMPRESS. [12]

Membership

Several of the broadsheet newspapers, including the Financial Times , The Independent and The Guardian , have declined to take part in IPSO. The Financial Times and The Guardian have established their own independent complaints systems instead. [13] [14]

IPSO regulates more than 1,500 print titles and more than 1,100 online titles, including most of the UK's national newspapers. [15] [16]

Funding

IPSO is a self-regulator paid for by its member publishers though the Regulatory Funding Company. [17]

Criticism

The Hacked Off campaign group described IPSO as a "sham" and "the illusion of reform". [18] [19] Hacked Off state that IPSO is "owned and controlled by the very newspapers it is supposed to regulate", and it "does nothing to stop them. Its code says papers must not publish inaccurate material, but it has neither the will nor the power to enforce this and never takes action to deal with repeated and systematic breaches of the code". [20] Hacked Off argue that IPSO should be replaced by a properly independent regulator as called for by the Leveson Report. In 2021, Hacked Off criticised IPSO's handling of complaints against The Jewish Chronicle made over a period of three years, saying IPSO was made aware of the complaints in November 2019 but had not provided a response as of August 2021. [21]

The Transparency Project stated that the remedy IPSO applies when publishers breach regulations is often inadequate, because a correction is "usually hidden away somewhere on an inside page". [22]

The National Union of Journalists said that journalists “still have little or no protection from editors seeking saleable stories regardless of ethical considerations”. In 2016 the NUJ announced that it was backing the regulator IMPRESS, as it believed “it represents the best opportunity we have for independent press regulation” and it provided an alternative “to those national newspapers and their publishers who continue to fail to take their responsibilities seriously”. [3]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "Judgement on IPSO". The Guardian. 5 September 2014.[ clarification needed ]
  2. ↑ Editors' Code of Practice
  3. 1 2 Greenslade, Roy (29 April 2016). "NUJ backs Impress, calling Ipso a 'pointless so-called regulator'". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 11 May 2021.
  4. ↑ "Annual statements". www.ipso.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  5. ↑ "About standards investigations". www.ipso.co.uk. Archived from the original on 7 November 2017. Retrieved 6 November 2017.
  6. ↑ "Phone hacking: Cameron and Miliband demand new watchdog". BBC News. 8 July 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  7. ↑ Leveson, Brian (November 2012), An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press, Volume 1 (PDF)
  8. ↑ "Press regulation: Privy Council grants royal charter". BBC News. 30 October 2013. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  9. ↑ Ponsford, Dominic (15 November 2013). "Independent Press Standards Organisation is not independent, but it is probably the best solution we are going to get". Press Gazette . Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  10. ↑ IPSO: An assessment by the Media Standards Trust, Media Standards Trust, November 2013, archived from the original on 5 September 2014, retrieved 5 September 2014
  11. ↑ Ponsford, Dominic (19 October 2016). "Sir Alan Moses: Free press in the UK is 'doomed' if it allows Government to 'corral' it into state-backed regulator". Press Gazette.
  12. ↑ "First official UK press regulator, Impress, approved". BBC News.
  13. ↑ "Financial Times opts out of IPSO regulator in favour of its own system". Press Gazette. 17 April 2014. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  14. ↑ Greenslade, Roy (4 September 2014). "Why the Guardian's decision not to sign up to Ipso makes sense". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 September 2014.
  15. ↑ Independent Press Standards Organisation (2020). "UK regulated publications" . Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  16. ↑ "IPSO annual report 2016" (PDF).
  17. ↑ Independent Press Standards Organisation (2020). "About IPSO" . Retrieved 21 May 2021.
  18. ↑ Jackson, Jasper (7 September 2015). "Ipso denounced as 'sham body' controlled by member newspapers". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  19. ↑ "The men behind IPSO, Part 2: Paul Dacre". Hacked Off. 6 May 2014. Retrieved 25 March 2019.
  20. ↑ "White supremacism, the press, and the absence of regulation". Hacked Off. 9 October 2020. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  21. ↑ "IPSO caught with its pants down". Hacked Off. 17 August 2021. Retrieved 18 August 2021.
  22. ↑ M, Paul. "Press regulation: why we are unimpressed by IPSO | The Transparency Project" . Retrieved 15 November 2020.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ofcom</span> British government agency

The Office of Communications, commonly known as Ofcom, is the government-approved regulatory and competition authority for the broadcasting, telecommunications and postal industries of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Piers Morgan</span> British journalist and television host (born 1965)

Piers Stefan Pughe-Morgan is an English broadcaster, journalist, writer, and television personality. He began his career in 1988 at the tabloid The Sun. In 1994, aged 29, he was appointed editor of the News of the World by Rupert Murdoch, which made him the youngest editor of a British national newspaper in more than half a century. From 1995, Morgan edited the Daily Mirror, but was fired in 2004. He was the editorial director of First News from 2006 to 2007. In 2014, Morgan became the first editor-at-large of the MailOnline website's US operation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Press Complaints Commission</span> British voluntary regulatory body, 1991–2014

The Press Complaints Commission (PCC) was a voluntary regulatory body for British printed newspapers and magazines, consisting of representatives of the major publishers. The PCC closed on Monday 8 September 2014, and was replaced by the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), chaired by Sir Alan Moses. Unlike the UK's only 'Approved Regulator' Independent Monitor for the Press (IMPRESS) who are fully compliant with the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry, IPSO has refused to seek approval to the Press Recognition Panel (PRP).

<i>The Jewish Chronicle</i> London-based Jewish weekly newspaper

The Jewish Chronicle is a London-based Jewish weekly newspaper. Founded in 1841, it is the oldest continuously published Jewish newspaper in the world. Its editor is Jake Wallis Simons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mass media in the United Kingdom</span> Overview of mass media in the United Kingdom

There are several different types of mass media in the United Kingdom: television, radio, newspapers, magazines and websites. The United Kingdom is known for its large music industry, along with its new and upcoming artists. The country also has a large broadcasting, film, video games and book publishing industries.

Southport Reporter is an online newspaper started by Patrick Trollope. It was the UK's first online-only regional newspaper. It is based in Southport on Merseyside, and was quickly recognised by the National Union of Journalists as well as other media groups, authorities and organizations as a newspaper. This recognition was due to the fact it was only run by certificated professional journalists. As a result, they had to follow and run under the rules of the UK Press Complaints Commission's Code of Practice and the NUJ Code of Conduct.

The Mail on Sunday is a British conservative newspaper, published in a tabloid format. It is the biggest-selling Sunday newspaper in the UK and was founded in 1982 by Lord Rothermere. Its sister paper, the Daily Mail, was first published in 1896.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is the regulatory body for solicitors in England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Harding (journalist)</span> British journalist

James Paul Harding is a British journalist, and a former Director of BBC News who was in the post from August 2013 until 1 January 2018. He is the co-founder of Tortoise Media.

Peter Wright is a British newspaper editor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trans Media Watch</span> British charity

Trans Media Watch (TMW) is a British charity founded in 2009 to improve media coverage of transgender and intersex issues. By improving media coverage, TMW strives to "foster social acceptance and civil recognition for trans persons", and to prevent the "material consequences" of misrepresentation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leveson Inquiry</span> 2011 judicial public inquiry into the British press

The Leveson Inquiry was a judicial public inquiry into the culture, practices and ethics of the British press following the News International phone hacking scandal, chaired by Lord Justice Leveson, who was appointed in July 2011. A series of public hearings were held throughout 2011 and 2012. The Inquiry published the Leveson Report in November 2012, which reviewed the general culture and ethics of the British media, and made recommendations for a new, independent, body to replace the existing Press Complaints Commission, which would have to be recognised by the state through new laws. Prime Minister David Cameron, under whose direction the inquiry had been established, said that he welcomed many of the findings, but declined to enact the requisite legislation. Part 2 of the inquiry was to be delayed until after criminal prosecutions regarding events at the News of the World, but the Conservative Party's 2017 manifesto stated that the second part of the inquiry would be dropped entirely, and this was confirmed by Culture Secretary Matt Hancock in a statement to the House of Commons on 1 March 2018.

Mass media regulations are rules enforced by the jurisdiction of law. Guidelines for media use differ across the world. This regulation, via law, rules or procedures, can have various goals, for example intervention to protect a stated "public interest", or encouraging competition and an effective media market, or establishing common technical standards.

The Royal Charter on self-regulation of the press is a United Kingdom royal charter approved in 2013. The Queen set her seal on the document at a meeting of the Privy Council after the failure of two High Court actions by Pressbof to prevent it. The operation of the Charter comes under two Acts of Parliament, the Crime and Courts Act 2013 and the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.

The Press Recognition Panel (PRP) was created on 3 November 2014 by the Royal Charter on self-regulation of the press.

Mark(ing) your own homework is a British expression used in political discourse, the study of organisational behaviour and in everyday life. The expression implies that whenever a person or group self-assesses and/or self regulates their own work they will usually treat it more favorably than if it were assessed by an independent person or group.

Brian Cathcart is an Irish-born journalist, academic and media campaigner based in the United Kingdom. He is professor of journalism at Kingston University London and in 2011 was a founder of Hacked Off, which campaigns for a free and accountable press. His books include Were You Still Up for Portillo? (1997), The Case of Stephen Lawrence (1999), The Fly in the Cathedral (2004) and The News From Waterloo (2015).

The Independent Monitor for the Press (Impress) is an independent press regulator in the UK. It was the first to be recognised by the Press Recognition Panel. Unlike the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO), Impress is fully compliant with the recommendations of the Leveson Inquiry. Impress regulates over 200 titles, consisting of a variety of independent local, investigative and special interest news publications across the UK. No national newspaper has signed up to the new regulator; most continue to be members of the unrecognised IPSO. Its founder is Jonathan Heawood and its current Chief Executive is Lexie Kirkconnell-Kawana.

The Skwawkbox is a left-wing news site based in the United Kingdom, founded in 2012 by Steve Walker.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.