Ingenui

Last updated

Ingenui (singular ingenuus or feminine ingenua) was a legal description of persons who were born free in ancient Rome, as distinguished from free people who had once been slaves (liberti or libertae). [1] Ingenuitas was the abstract noun for this status.

Free men were either ingenui or libertini. Ingenui indicated free men who were born free. [2] Libertini were men who were manumitted from legal slavery. Although freedmen were not ingenui, the sons of libertini were ingenui. A libertinus could not by adoption become ingenuus. [3] If a female slave (ancilla) was pregnant and was manumitted before she gave birth to the child, that child was born free and therefore was ingenuus. In other cases, also, the law favored the claim of free birth and consequently of ingenuitas. [4] If a man's ingenuitas was a matter in dispute, the dispute could be heard by a judicium ingenuitatis, [4] [5] a court to determine status with regard to patronal rights. [6]

The words ingenuus and libertinus are often opposed to one another, and the title of freeman (liber), which would comprehend libertinus, is sometimes limited by the addition of ingenuus. [7] According to Cincius, in his work on Comitia, quoted by Festus, [8] those who in his time were called ingenui were originally called patricii, which is interpreted by some scholars such as Carl Wilhelm Göttling to mean that Gentiles were originally called ingenui also, an interpretation that is the subject of some dispute. Others interpret the passage to mean that originally the name ingenuus did not exist and that the word patricius was sufficient to indicate a Roman citizen by birth. The passage from Cincius refers, under this interpretation, to a time when there were no Roman citizens except patricii, and the definition of ingenuus, if it had then been in use, would have been a sufficient definition of a patricius. But the word ingenuus was introduced, in the sense here stated, at a later time for the purpose of indicating a citizen by birth specifically. Thus, in the speech of Appius Claudius Crassus, [9] he contrasts with persons of patrician descent, "Unus Quiritium quilibet, duobus ingenuis ortus."

Further, the definition of Gentilis by Scaevola shows that a man might be ingenuus and yet not gentilis, for he might be the son of a freedman; this is consistent with Livy. [10] [11] If Cincius meant his proposition to be comprehensive, the proposition is this: All (now) ingenui comprehend all (then) patricii; which is untrue.

Under the Empire, ingenuitas, or the Jura Ingenuitatis, might be acquired by imperial favor; that is, a person not ingenuus by birth could be made so by the sovereign power. A freedman who had obtained the Jus Annulorum Aureorum, was considered ingenuus, but this did not interfere with the patronal rights. [12] The natalibus restitutio was a decree in which the princeps gave to a libertinus the rights and status of ingenuus; [13] it was a form of proceeding that involved the theory of the original freedom of all mankind, for the libertinus was restored not to the state in which he had been born but to his supposed original state of freedom. In this case, the patron lost his patronal rights as a necessary consequence, if the fiction were to have its full effect. [14] It seems that questions as to a man's ingenuitas were common at Rome.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roman censor</span> Roman magistrate and census administrator

The censor was a magistrate in ancient Rome who was responsible for maintaining the census, supervising public morality, and overseeing certain aspects of the government's finances.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Servius Tullius</span> King of Rome from c. 578 to 535 BC

Servius Tullius was the legendary sixth king of Rome, and the second of its Etruscan dynasty. He reigned from 578 to 535 BC. Roman and Greek sources describe his servile origins and later marriage to a daughter of Lucius Tarquinius Priscus, Rome's first Etruscan king, who was assassinated in 579 BC. The constitutional basis for his accession is unclear; he is variously described as the first Roman king to accede without election by the Senate, having gained the throne by popular and royal support; and as the first to be elected by the Senate alone, with support of the reigning queen but without recourse to a popular vote.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manumission</span> Act of a slave owner freeing their slaves

Manumission, or enfranchisement, is the act of freeing slaves by their owners. Different approaches to manumission were developed, each specific to the time and place of a particular society. Historian Verene Shepherd states that the most widely used term is gratuitous manumission, "the conferment of freedom on the enslaved by enslavers before the end of the slave system".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adoption in ancient Rome</span> Adoption in Roman law

Adoption in ancient Rome was primarily a legal procedure for transferring paternal power (potestas) to ensure succession in the male line within Roman patriarchal society. The Latin word adoptio refers broadly to "adoption", which was of two kinds: the transferral of potestas over a free person from one head of household to another; and adrogatio, when the adoptee had been acting sui iuris as a legal adult but assumed the status of unemancipated son for purposes of inheritance. Adoptio was a longstanding part of Roman family law pertaining to paternal responsibilities such as perpetuating the value of the family estate and ancestral rites (sacra), which were concerns of the Roman property-owning classes and cultural elite. During the Principate, adoption became a way to ensure imperial succession.

In ancient Rome, a gens was a family consisting of individuals who shared the same nomen gentilicium and who claimed descent from a common ancestor. A branch of gens, identified by the cognomen, was called a stirps. The gens was an important social structure at Rome and throughout Italia during the period of the Roman Republic. Much of individuals' social standing depended on the gens to which they belonged. Certain gentes were classified as patrician, others as plebeian; some had both patrician and plebeian branches. The importance of the gens as a social structure declined considerably in imperial times, although the gentilicium continued to define the origins and dynasties of the ancient Romans, including the Emperors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aurelia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Aurelia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome, which flourished from the third century BC to the latest period of the Empire. The first of the Aurelian gens to obtain the consulship was Gaius Aurelius Cotta in 252 BC. From then to the end of the Republic, the Aurelii supplied many distinguished statesmen, before entering a period of relative obscurity under the early emperors. In the latter part of the first century, a family of the Aurelii rose to prominence, obtaining patrician status, and eventually the throne itself. A series of emperors belonged to this family, through birth or adoption, including Marcus Aurelius and the members of the Severan dynasty.

<i>Lex Papia Poppaea</i> Ancient Roman law

The Lex Papia et Poppaea, also referred to as the Lex Iulia et Papia, was a Roman law introduced in 9 AD to encourage and strengthen marriage. It included provisions against adultery and against celibacy after a certain age and complemented and supplemented Augustus' Lex Iulia de maritandis ordinibus of 18 BC and the Lex Iulia de adulteriis coercendis of 17 BC. The law was introduced by the suffect consuls of that year, Marcus Papius Mutilus and Quintus Poppaeus Secundus, although they themselves were unmarried.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Status in Roman legal system</span> Status of a person under ancient Roman law

In Roman law, status describes a person's legal status. The individual could be a Roman citizen, unlike foreigners; or he could be free, unlike slaves; or he could have a certain position in a Roman family either as head of the family, or as a lower member.

The Lex Aelia Sentia was a law established in the Roman Empire in 4 AD. It was one of the laws that the Roman assemblies passed at the behest of the emperor Augustus. Along with the Lex Fufia Caninia of 2 BC, this law regulated the manumission of slaves.

Secessio plebis was an informal exercise of power by Rome's plebeian citizens between the 5th century BC and 3rd century BC., similar in concept to the general strike. During the secessio plebis, the plebs would abandon the city en masse in a protest emigration and leave the patrician order to themselves. Therefore, a secessio meant that all shops and workshops would shut down and commercial transactions would largely cease. This was an effective strategy in the Conflict of the Orders due to strength in numbers; plebeian citizens made up the vast majority of Rome's populace and produced most of its food and resources, while a patrician citizen was a member of the minority upper class, the equivalent of the landed gentry of later times. Authors report different numbers for how many secessions there were. M. Cary and H. H. Scullard state there were five between 494 BC and 287 BC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social class in ancient Rome</span> Roman hierarchical social status and afforded rights

Social class in ancient Rome was hierarchical, with multiple and overlapping social hierarchies. An individual's relative position in one might be higher or lower than in another, which complicated the social composition of Rome.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Slavery in ancient Rome</span>

Slavery in ancient Rome played an important role in society and the economy. Unskilled or low-skill slaves labored in the fields, mines, and mills with few opportunities for advancement and little chance of freedom. Skilled and educated slaves—including artisans, chefs, domestic staff and personal attendants, entertainers, business managers, accountants and bankers, educators at all levels, secretaries and librarians, civil servants, and physicians—occupied a more privileged tier of servitude and could hope to obtain freedom through one of several well-defined paths with protections under the law. The possibility of manumission and subsequent citizenship was a distinguishing feature of Rome's system of slavery, resulting in a significant and influential number of freedpersons in Roman society.

According to Roman tradition, the Foedus Cassianum or the Treaty of Cassius was a treaty which formed an alliance between the Roman Republic and the Latin League in 493 BC after the Battle of Lake Regillus. It ended the war between the Latin League and Rome, placing Rome as equal in power to all of the members of the League combined.

A freedman or freedwoman is a person who has been released from slavery, usually by legal means. Historically, slaves were freed by manumission, emancipation, or self-purchase. A fugitive slave is a person who escaped enslavement by fleeing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alba Longa</span> Ancient city in the Alban Hills in Latium

Alba Longa was an ancient Latin city in Central Italy in the vicinity of Lake Albano in the Alban Hills. The ancient Romans believed it to be the founder and head of the Latin League, before it was destroyed by the Roman Kingdom around the middle of the 7th century BC and its inhabitants were forced to settle in Rome. In legend, Romulus and Remus, founders of Rome, had come from the royal dynasty of Alba Longa, which in Virgil's Aeneid had been the bloodline of Aeneas, a son of Venus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mucia gens</span> Ancient Roman family

The gens Mucia was an ancient and noble patrician house at ancient Rome. The gens is first mentioned at the earliest period of the Republic, but in later times the family was known primarily by its plebeian branches.

The gens Pompilia was a plebeian family at ancient Rome during the time of the Republic. The only member of the gens to attain any prominence in the Roman state was Sextus Pompilius, who was tribune of the plebs in 420 BC; however, persons by this name are occasionally found throughout the history of the Republic.

The Roman–Latin wars were a series of wars fought between ancient Rome and the Latins, from the earliest stages of the history of Rome until the final subjugation of the Latins to Rome in the aftermath of the Latin War.

<i>Contubernium</i> Quasi-marital relationship involving slaves

In ancient Rome, contubernium was a quasi-marital relationship between two slaves or between a slave (servus) and a free person who was usually a former slave or the child of a former slave. A slave involved in such a relationship was called contubernalis, the basic and general meaning of which was "companion".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ancient Roman freedmen</span> Social class of former slaves

Freedmen in ancient Rome existed as a distinct social class (liberti or libertini), with former slaves granted freedom and rights through the legal process of manumission. The Roman practice of slavery utilized slaves for both production and domestic labour, overseen by their wealthy masters. Urban and domestic slaves especially could achieve high levels of education, acting as agents and representatives of their masters' affairs and finances. Within Roman law there was a set of practices for freeing trusted slaves, granting them a limited form of Roman citizenship or Latin rights. These freed slaves were known in Latin as liberti (freedmen), and formed a class set apart from freeborn Romans. While freedmen were barred from some forms of social mobility in Roman society, many achieved high levels of wealth and status. Liberti were an important part of the "most economically active and innovative entrepreneurial class" in the Roman Empire. The legal and social status of freedmen remained a point of cultural and legal contention throughout the Republic and Empire.

References

  1. Long, George (1870). "Ingenui". In Smith, William (ed.). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities . Boston: Little, Brown and Company. p. 637. Archived from the original on 2013-10-19. Retrieved 2008-06-06.
  2. Gaius, i. 11
  3. Aulus Gellius, v. 19
  4. 1 2 Paulus, Sent. Recept. iii. 24, and v. 1. De liberali causa
  5. Tacitus, Annales xiii. 27
  6. De Colquhoun, Patrick Mac Chombaich (1851). A Summary of the Roman Civil Law. London: V. and R. Stevens and Sons. pp.  362.
  7. liber et ingenuus, Horace ar. P. 383
  8. Sextus Pompeius Festus, s.v. Patricios
  9. Livy, vi. 40
  10. Quintus Mucius Scaevola Pontifex, quoted in Cicero, Topica 6
  11. Livy, x. 8
  12. Dig. 40. tit. 10. s. 5 and 6
  13. Morey, William C. (1884). Outlines of Roman Law: Comprising Its Historical Growth and General Principles. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons. pp.  128.
  14. Dig. 40. tit. 11

PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain :  Smith, William, ed. (1870). Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities . London: John Murray.{{cite encyclopedia}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)