Initiative 200

Last updated

Initiative 200 was a Washington state initiative filed by Scott Smith and Tim Eyman. [1] It sought to prohibit racial and gender preferences by state and local government. [2] It was on the Washington ballot in November 1998 and passed with 58.22% of the vote. [3] It added to Washington's law (but not its constitution) the following language:

Contents

The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public employment, public education, or public contracting. [4]

Initiative 200 effectively curtailed any form of affirmative action in the state. [5] In April 2019, the Washington Legislature passed Initiative 1000, ending the ban on affirmative action. [6] However, in November 2019, Referendum 88 blocked Initiative 1000 from going into effect. [5] [7] [8]

Background

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, as the civil rights movement came to an end, states nationwide developed policies as a form of remedy aimed to help mitigate the impact of institutionalized racism, sexism, etc. The policies were created to give special consideration to underrepresented minorities when state contracts and hiring where involved. [9] In doing so the state believed that the availability of opportunities would help in the advancement of underrepresented minorities. Chapter 49.60 RCW, which prohibited discrimination against any person on basis of race, color, creed, national origin, family and marital statute, sex, age, or disability, was the standing Washington law prior to the enactment of Initiative 200, and had been upheld previously by courts and the Human Rights Commission. Included in the statute was a provision requiring state agencies access to affirmative action strategies to increase opportunities amongst racial minorities, including women, and veterans. State funded schools and universities were granted authority to establish their own entrance and admissions program with entrance requirements. The requirements outlined in the admission program must have complied with all federal laws prohibiting discrimination. Some universities had admissions policies in which the objective was to select students who had demonstrated capacity, high quality work, and who would contribute to a diverse student body. [10]

Initiative

Initiative 200, a Washington State statute enacted by direct public vote took place in November 1998. The voting took place statewide, with approximately 1.9 million voters taking to the polls. 58.2 percent, or a grand total of 1,099,410 voters supported the measure. Statewide, all counties passed the statute, with only one exception, King County, in all places but Seattle. [11]

Following the initiative's passage, Washington Governor Gary Locke, who had opposed the initiative, [12] issued a directive to guide state agencies in its implementation. [13] The governor's directive was criticized as "timid" by the free-market think tank Washington Policy Center. [14]

Opposition

Proponents of I-200 said it was a step toward a "colorblind" society, a promise of the equality of merit and the limited role of government to make that so. However, opponents have noted that colorblind ideologies individualize conflicts and shortcomings, rather than examining the larger picture with cultural differences, stereotypes, and values placed into context. Among the outspoken opponents of the measure included former Governor Gary Locke. [12] The Seattle Post-Intelligencer's Editorial Board also noted:

Initiative 200 proponents forget where we've been and misjudge where we are. They try to equate the wretched, hateful use of government in the past with the present use of government as a tool of equality. The comparison will not wash. The former had as its goal the primacy of a single race and gender and the consolidation of power and wealth along those lines. The latter has as its goal the diffusion and sharing of power. Until the goal is met, it is a worthy role for government. [15]

Opponents have criticized Tim Eyman, the Initiative's sponsor, for diverting campaign funds meant for several ballot initiatives he sponsored for personal use. In 2000 and 2001, it was discovered that Eyman diverted as much as $200,000 in campaign funds for several of his initiatives. [16]

Outcomes

Opponents continue to point to the negative impact of I-200 on higher education, particularly in the face of the State's substantial growth of minority groups and the demand for an educated workforce. While I-200 was enacted, more than half of all American Indians who graduated from high school were college bound. In 2003, those numbers dropped to 38 percent. [17]

One year after I-200 was passed, minority enrollment fell from 8.2% to 7%. [18] In 2003 minority enrollment surpassed rates before I-200, which was partially due to an increase in the number of minorities in Washington state. [19] By 2013, minority enrollment at the University of Washington rose from 8.2% to 12.6% in 2013, [20]

In 2015, minorities represented roughly 50% of total students in each of the three University of Washington campuses, individually. [21] These numbers exclude international students and students who did not self-report race or ethnic data. In 2023, the total enrollment across University of Washington campuses was 34% White and 66% minorities, with traditionally underrepresented minorities at 17%. [22] The three campuses ranged from 55-69% non-White students, not accounting for international students or students who did not self-report racial or ethnic data.

Related Research Articles

Affirmative action refers to a set of policies and practices within a government or organization seeking to benefit marginalized groups. Historically and internationally, support for affirmative action has been justified by the idea that it may help with bridging inequalities in employment and pay, increasing access to education, and promoting diversity, social equity and redressing alleged wrongs, harms, or hindrances, also called substantive equality.

Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), was a landmark case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action in student admissions. The Court held that a student admissions process that favors "underrepresented minority groups" did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause so long as it took into account other factors evaluated on an individual basis for every applicant. The decision largely upheld the Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), which allowed race to be a consideration in admissions policy but held racial quotas to be unconstitutional. In Gratz v. Bollinger (2003), a separate case decided on the same day as Grutter, the Court struck down a points-based admissions system that awarded an automatic bonus to the admissions scores of minority applicants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tim Eyman</span> Anti-tax activist, businessman (born 1965)

Timothy Donald Eyman is an American anti-tax activist and businessman.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ward Connerly</span> American political activist and businessman (born 1939)

Wardell Anthony "Ward" Connerly is an American political and anti-affirmative action activist, businessman, and former University of California Regent (1993–2005). He is also the founder and the chairman of the American Civil Rights Institute, a national non-profit organization in opposition to racial and gender preferences, and is the president of Californians for Equal Rights, a non-profit organization active in the state of California with a similar mission. He is considered to be the man behind California's Proposition 209 prohibiting race- and gender-based preferences in state hiring, contracting and state university admissions, a program known as affirmative action.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 California Proposition 209</span> Ballot proposition that banned affirmative action in California

Proposition 209 is a California ballot proposition which, upon approval in November 1996, amended the state constitution to prohibit state governmental institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment, public contracting, and public education. Modeled on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the California Civil Rights Initiative was authored by two California academics, Glynn Custred and Tom Wood. It was the first electoral test of affirmative action policies in North America. It passed with 55% in favor to 45% opposed, thereby banning affirmative action in the state's public sector.

John Eric Carlson is an American politician and talk radio host on KVI-AM by Lotus Communications Corp from the state of Washington. He also co-hosted a show from 12:00PM to 2:00PM Pacific Time called The Commentators, with John Carlson and Ken Schram.The Commentators was discontinued in September, 2010, and starting September 20, 2010, Carlson and Schram each began hosting separate, new shows on the same station. Carlson currently hosts a morning show on KVI called The Commute with Carlson from 6-9AM.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michigan Civil Rights Initiative</span> American ballot initiative

The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (MCRI), or Proposal 2, was a ballot initiative in the U.S. state of Michigan that passed into Michigan Constitutional law by a 58% to 42% margin on November 7, 2006, according to results officially certified by the Michigan Secretary of State. By Michigan law, the Proposal became law on December 22, 2006. MCRI was a citizen initiative aimed at banning consideration of race, color, sex, or religion in admission to colleges, jobs, and other publicly funded institutions – effectively prohibiting some affirmative action by public institutions based on those factors. The Proposal's constitutionality was challenged in federal court, but its constitutionality was ultimately upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States.

Same-sex marriage has been legally recognized in the US state of Washington since December 6, 2012. On February 13, 2012, Governor Christine Gregoire signed legislation that established full marriage rights for same-sex couples in the state of Washington. Opponents mounted a challenge that required voters to approve the statute at a referendum, which they did on November 6. The law took effect on December 6, and the first marriages were performed on December 9. Within a couple of days, more than 600 marriage licenses were issued to same-sex couples in King County alone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Affirmative action in the United States</span>

In the United States, affirmative action consists of government-mandated, government-approved, and voluntary private programs granting special consideration to groups considered or classified as historically excluded, specifically racial minorities and women. These programs tend to focus on access to education and employment in order to redress the disadvantages associated with past and present discrimination. Another goal of affirmative action policies is to ensure that public institutions, such as universities, hospitals, and police forces, are more representative of the populations they serve.

Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U.S. 369 (1967), was a United States Supreme Court decision that set an important legal precedent that held that a state could not authorize invidious discrimination by private landlords without entangling itself in the ensuing discriminatory private decisions. Thus, the state constitutional amendment by referendum purporting to authorize landlord freedom was unconstitutional.

The Northwest Progressive Institute (NPI) is a left wing think tank based in Redmond, Washington, founded in 2003 and incorporated in 2005. It uses technology, public policy research, and political advocacy to advance progressive causes in the Pacific Northwest region as well as across the United States. It describes itself as "a netroots powered strategy center working to raise America's quality of life through innovative research and imaginative advocacy."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Washington Death with Dignity Act</span> Ballot measure in Washington legalizing some assisted suicide

Initiative 1000 (I-1000) of 2008 established the U.S. state of Washington's Death with Dignity Act, which legalizes medical aid in dying with certain restrictions. Passage of this initiative made Washington the second U.S. state to permit some terminally ill patients to determine the time of their own death. The effort was headed by former Governor Booth Gardner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gun laws in Washington (state)</span> Washington states gun law

Gun laws in Washington regulate the sale, possession, and use of firearms and ammunition in the state of Washington in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2012 Washington Initiative 1185</span> Ballot measure in Washington that required tax increases receive a supermajority vote

Washington Initiative 1185 was a 2012 initiative in Washington state. It passed with 63.91% of the vote, but portions were declared unconstitutional in February 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Senate Constitutional Amendment 5</span> Proposed California ballot measure

Senate Constitutional Amendment 5 was introduced by California State Senator Edward Hernandez to the California State Senate on December 3, 2012. This initiative would ask voters to consider eliminating California Proposition 209's ban on the use of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in recruitment, admissions, and retention programs at California's public universities and colleges. SCA 5 was passed in the California Senate on January 30, 2014 but was subsequently withdrawn by Hernandez due to strong opposition, mainly from Asian Americans.

Schuette v. BAMN, 572 U.S. 291 (2014), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning affirmative action and race- and sex-based discrimination in public university admissions. In a 6-2 decision, the Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmative action in education.

Affirmative action refers to activities or policies that seek to help groups that are often affected by discrimination obtain equal access to opportunities, particularly in areas such as employment and education. In the United States, in the early 2000s, the use of race, gender, and other factors in college and university admissions decisions came under attack.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2019 Washington Initiative 976</span> Ballot initiative in the state of Washington

Initiative Measure No. 976 (I-976) is a ballot initiative in the U.S. state of Washington that appeared on the ballot on November 5, 2019. The initiative was brought to the state legislature by a petition sponsored by Tim Eyman. The initiative would cap taxes on certain cars at $30 and put an end to transportation benefit districts and other local vehicle taxes. The campaign in favor of the initiative was led by Tim Eyman, Permanent Offense, and Voters Want More Choices, while the campaign against the initiative was led by the Northwest Progressive Institute. Opponents of the initiative fear that its passage would take away money from ongoing transportation projects, including voter-approved measures, such as Sound Transit 3, while supporters claim that the initiative would end assessing practices that they claim are dishonest. The practices include using out-dated fee schedules for assessing vehicles. Unsuccessful attempts were made to require the use of more recent fee schedules in the state legislature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 California Proposition 16</span> California ballot measure to undo the states ban on affirmative action

Proposition 16 is a California ballot proposition that appeared on the November 3, 2020, general election ballot, asking California voters to amend the Constitution of California to repeal Proposition 209 (1996). Proposition 209 amended the state constitution to prohibit government institutions from considering race, sex, or ethnicity, specifically in the areas of public employment, public contracting, and public education. Therefore, Proposition 209 banned the use of race- and gender-based affirmative action in California's public sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diversity, equity, and inclusion</span> Organizational equality training term

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) or Diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging (DEIB) are organizational frameworks which seek to promote the fair treatment and full participation of all people, particularly groups who have historically been underrepresented or subject to discrimination on the basis of identity or disability. These three notions together represent "three closely linked values" which organizations seek to institutionalize through DEI frameworks. Some experts say diversity and inclusion should be decoupled in some cases. Some frameworks, primarily in Britain, substitute the notion of "equity" with equality: equality, diversity, inclusion (EDI). Other variations include diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB), justice, equity, diversity and inclusion, or diversity, equity, inclusion and access.

References

  1. ↑ "Initiative 200" (PDF).
  2. ↑ Guppy, Paul. "A Citizen's Guide to Initiative 200: The Washington State Civil Rights Initiative".
  3. ↑ "I-200".
  4. ↑ "RCW 49.60.400 Discrimination, preferential treatment prohibited". Washington Revised Code.
  5. 1 2 "I-1000 passes state legislature as advocates hope to increase equality". 16 May 2019.
  6. ↑ "Not so fast: Washington lawmakers tossed out affirmative-action ban, but voters may get another say". 28 April 2019.
  7. ↑ "Washington Referendum 88, Vote on I-1000 Affirmative Action Measure (2019)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2019-11-23.
  8. ↑ "With nearly all ballots counted, voters reject Washington's affirmative-action measure". 12 November 2019.
  9. ↑ https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1841 [ bare URL ]
  10. ↑ https://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_241/ [ bare URL ]
  11. ↑ "Toward an Equal Society: Making Initiative 200 Work".
  12. 1 2 "Locke Takes to TV to Challenge I-200 | the Seattle Times".
  13. ↑ "Governor's Directive No. 98-01".
  14. ↑ "Toward an Equal Society: Making Initiative 200 Work".
  15. ↑ "Initiative 200 misread the future". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 5 November 2006.
  16. ↑ "Eyman stripped of control". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 13 February 2002.
  17. ↑ http://www.wsac.wa.gov/sites/default/files/DiversityReport_001.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  18. ↑ Brown, Susan (April 2006). "The End of Affirmative Action in Washington State and Its Impact on the Transition from High School to College". American Sociological Association. 79 (2): 106–130. Retrieved 9 April 2024.
  19. ↑ "Near-record enrollment for 2003-04 as minority percentages rise".
  20. ↑ "UW student population grows, minority enrollment continues upward trend".
  21. ↑ Kim, Gene. "State of African Americans at the University of Washington – All Campuses" (PDF). Office of Minority Affairs & Diversity, University of Washington.
  22. ↑ "Fast Facts 2023-2024".
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.