International Anti-Corruption Court

Last updated

The International Anti-Corruption Court (IACC) is a proposed international court that would strengthen the enforcement of criminal laws against corrupt leaders. [1] The effort to establish the court was first proposed by Judge Mark L. Wolf, a Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, at the 2012 St. Petersburg International Legal Forum, the 2014 World Forum on Global Governance, and in articles for the Brookings Institution and The Washington Post in 2014. [2] [3] [4]

Contents

The IACC proposal was further developed in a 2018 paper published in Daedalus, the journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, titled "The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court." [5] In 2022, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences published a paper by Judge Mark L. Wolf, Justice Richard Goldstone and Professor Robert Rotberg, titled "The Progressing Proposal for An International Anti-Corruption Court." [6]

The campaign to create the IACC has been led by Integrity Initiatives International (III), an NGO that Judge Mark L. Wolf founded in 2016 with Judge Richard Goldstone, former Justice on the Supreme Court of South Africa and chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and other colleagues. III's mission is to "strengthen the enforcement of criminal laws in order to punish and deter leaders who are corrupt and regularly violate human rights, and to create opportunities for the democratic process to replace them with leaders dedicated to serving their citizens." [7] Establishing the IACC, supporting national anti-corruption measures, and forging a network of young people committed to fighting grand corruption in their own countries are some of its main priorities.

Structure

Grand corruption – the abuse of public power for private gain by a nation's leaders (kleptocrats) – is a major barrier to responding effectively to pandemics, fighting climate change, promoting democracy and human rights, meeting the UN Sustainable Development Goals, establishing international peace and security, and securing a more just, rules-based global order.

Grand corruption does not endure due to a lack of laws. The 189 countries that are party to the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) each have laws criminalizing corrupt conduct. Yet kleptocrats enjoy impunity because they control the administration of justice in the countries that they rule.

The IACC would fill a crucial gap in the international framework for combatting grand corruption. The IACC would enforce existing national anti-corruption laws, or a new international counterpart to them, against kleptocrats and their conspirators. [8] The IACC would be a court of last resort. Operating on the principle of complementarity, it would only prosecute if a member state were unwilling or unable to prosecute a case itself. In this way, the IACC may act as incentive for domestic governments to establish adequate anti-corruption processes while ensuring that corrupt leaders are held accountable where the effective processes do not yet exist.

Prosecution in the IACC would, in many cases, result in the incarceration of convicted kleptocrats and thus create the opportunity for the democratic process to replace them with honest leaders. It is also foreseeable that kleptocrats will not permit the countries they rule to join a court that would prosecute them. In order to be effective, the IACC would need 20 to 25 representative countries to be effective as long as they include some major financial centers through which kleptocrats often launder the proceeds of corruption, and attractive countries in which kleptocrats invest and spend their wealth. The IACC would have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes if any or all elements of the crime were committed within the territory of a member state or by a national of a member state, and could therefore tackle transnational criminal networks.

Not only would successful prosecution of a kleptocrat result in his or her incarceration, but it would also result in an order of restitution or disgorgement of illicit assets or gains for the benefit of victims. The IACC would also have the potential to recover, repurpose, and repatriate stolen assets through sentences that include orders of restitution in criminal cases and possibly judgments in civil cases brought by whistleblowers, a small portion of which would be used to fund the Court itself.

The IACC's expert investigators, prosecutors, and judges would be valuable resources for strengthening their counterparts in countries striving to improve their capacity, and it would provide a forum for evidence raised by whistleblowers. In these respects, the IACC is similar to, but distinct from, the International Criminal Court (ICC), and may be designed in a way that draws on the strengths of the ICC model while avoiding some of its weaknesses.

Support

Mark L. Wolf, Robert Rotberg, and Richard Goldstone meeting at the American Academy of Arts and Sciences to discuss the International Anti-Corruption Court (2019). Internation-anticorruption-court 0.jpg
Mark L. Wolf, Robert Rotberg, and Richard Goldstone meeting at the American Academy of Arts and Sciences to discuss the International Anti-Corruption Court (2019).

Support for the IACC is growing. In June 2021, more than 125 world leaders from over 45 countries signed the Declaration in Support of the Creation of the IACC, including Nobel laureates, former heads of state and government, high court justices, former cabinet ministers, business leaders, and representatives of civil society. [11] The Declaration was drafted by Integrity Initiatives International, a non-profit organization working to support and advance anti-corruption efforts including the IACC. [11]

Many more prominent leaders continue to sign the Declaration in support of the IACC. In May 2022, Integrity Initiatives International announced that the Declaration has now been signed by nearly 300 eminent individuals from over 80 countries, including 32 Nobel laureates and 45 former presidents and prime ministers. [12]

Supporters include Gordon Brown, former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, who published an op-ed in March 2022 titled "An international anti-corruption court would bring Putin to justice". [13] The Declaration in support of the IACC has also been signed by José Ramos-Horta, current president of Timor-Leste.

For the 2021 parliamentary elections in Canada, the platforms of both the Liberal and Conservative parties included support for the IACC. [14] At the Summit for Democracy convened by President Biden in December 2021, Canada committed to convening "a national high level, multi-sectoral roundtable to explore options to strengthen the international legal framework and architecture to combat corruption globally." Also in December 2021, supporting the creation of the IACC became an official foreign policy of Canada when the new Canadian Foreign Minister was given the mandate to "[work] with international partners to help establish an International Anti-Corruption Court, to prevent corrupt officials and authoritarian governments from impeding development that should benefit their citizens." [15]

In April 2022, Dutch Foreign Minister Wopke Hoekstra announced his commitment to work towards establishing an International Anti-Corruption Court and asked his European Union counterparts to join this effort. [16] Integrity Initiatives International is working with partners in Canada and the Netherlands to assist the foreign ministries in this endeavor.  

There is also high-level interest in the IACC in Colombia, which was the first country to endorse the IACC, Moldova, Spain, and Sweden, among other countries. A growing coalition of civil society networks in many countries, including Chile, Colombia, Nigeria, North Macedonia, South Korea, and Zambia, are now urging their governments to support the creation of the IACC.

The campaign to establish the IACC is emulating other successful civil society-led international campaigns, such as International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN). The International Coordinating Committee for the IACC campaign, which is staffed by Integrity Initiatives International, is building a global coalition of civil society organizations to advocate for the IACC.

Criticisms

In a report published by The Heritage Foundation in October 2014, "Why the U.S. Should Oppose the Creation of an International Anti-Corruption Court," Brett D. Schaefer, Steven Groves, and James M. Roberts outlined a number of arguments against the establishment of an International Anti-Corruption Court. [17]

In a post for the Global Anticorruption Blog titled, "Is an International Anti-Corruption Court a Dream or a Distraction?" Matthew Stephenson argued that the IACC was idealistic. [18] In a U4 Brief, he and Sofie Arjon Schütte questioned whether the IACC would divert resources away from other, more effective, ways of combatting grand corruption. [19]

Select Speeches and Publications

See also

Related Research Articles

Transparency International e.V. (TI) is a German registered association founded in 1993 by former employees of the World Bank. Based in Berlin, its nonprofit and non-governmental purpose is to take action to combat global corruption with civil societal anti-corruption measures and to prevent criminal activities arising from corruption. Its most notable publications include the Global Corruption Barometer and the Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International serves as an umbrella organization. From 1993 to today, its membership has grown from a few individuals to more than 100 national chapters, which engage in fighting perceived corruption in their home countries. TI is a member of G20 Think Tanks, UNESCO Consultative Status, United Nations Global Compact, Sustainable Development Solutions Network and shares the goals of peace, justice, strong institutions and partnerships of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG). TI is a social partner of Global Alliance in Management Education. TI confirmed the dis-accreditation of the national chapter of United States of America in 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kleptocracy</span> Form of government

Kleptocracy, also referred to as thievocracy, is a government whose corrupt leaders (kleptocrats) use political power to expropriate the wealth of the people and land they govern, typically by embezzling or misappropriating government funds at the expense of the wider population. One feature of political-based socioeconomic thievery is that there is often no public announcement explaining or apologizing for misappropriations, nor any legal charges or punishment levied against the offenders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Goldstone</span> South African former judge

Richard Joseph Goldstone is a South African former judge. After working for 17 years as a commercial lawyer, he was appointed by the South African government to serve on the Transvaal Supreme Court from 1980 to 1989 and the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa from 1990 to 1994.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe</span> Parliamentary assembly

The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is the parliamentary arm of the Council of Europe, a 46-nation international organisation dedicated to upholding human rights, democracy and the rule of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Global Witness</span> International NGO

Global Witness is an international NGO established in 1993 that works to break the links between natural resource exploitation, conflict, poverty, corruption, and human rights abuses worldwide. The organisation has offices in London and Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples</span> Declaration adopted in 2007 by the United Nations General Assembly

The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is a legally non-binding resolution passed by the United Nations in 2007. It delineates and defines the individual and collective rights of Indigenous peoples, including their ownership rights to cultural and ceremonial expression, identity, language, employment, health, education, and other issues. Their ownership also extends to the protection of their intellectual and cultural property. The Declaration "emphasizes the rights of Indigenous peoples to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, cultures and traditions, and to pursue their development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations." It "prohibits discrimination against indigenous peoples," and it "promotes their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them and their right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic and social development".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark L. Wolf</span> American judge (born 1946)

Mark Lawrence Wolf is a Senior Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts and founder and chair of Integrity Initiatives International.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the United States</span> Institutional corruption in the United States of America

Corruption in the United States is the act of government officials abusing their political powers for private gain, typically through bribery or other methods, in the United States government. Corruption in the United States has been a perennial political issue, peaking in the Jacksonian era and the Gilded Age before declining with the reforms of the Progressive Era.

The ABA Rule of Law Initiative was established in 2007 by the American Bar Association to consolidate its five overseas rule of law programs, including the Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative, which was created in 1990 after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Today, the ABA Rule of Law Initiative implements legal reform programs in 50 countries in Africa, Asia, Europe and Eurasia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Middle East and North Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Philippines</span> State of corruption in the country

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, which developed during the Spanish colonial period. According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources. Examples of corruption in the Philippines include graft, bribery, favouritism, nepotism, impunity, embezzlement, extortion, racketeering, fraud, tax evasion, lack of transparency, lack of sufficient enforcement of laws and government policies, and consistent lack of support for human rights.

The International Anti-Corruption Conference (IACC) is a series of international conferences organised by the IACC Council, in association with local governments and organisations, with Transparency International as its secretariat. The conference was first held in 1983 in Washington D.C.,and the New York City Department of Investigation and has since been held every two years in a different country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Slovenia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Slovenia is examined on this page.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mark Ellis (lawyer)</span>

Mark Steven Ellis is an international criminal law expert and the executive director of the International Bar Association. He is the current chair of the UN-created Advisory Panel on Matters Relating to Defence Counsel of the Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals. He also serves as Chair of the Management Board of the Central and Eastern European Law Initiative (CEELI) Institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Chad</span> Political corruption

Corruption in Chad is characterized by nepotism and cronyism. Chad received a score of 19 in the 2022 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Chad ranked 164th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 12.

The National Agency on Corruption Prevention or NACP is a national anti-corruption agency of the Ukrainian government which is responsible for shaping and implementing anti-corruption policy, while creating an environment conducive to corruption prevention. It has been functioning since 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union Anti-Corruption Initiative in Ukraine</span> Technical assistance in fighting corruption by the EU and Denmark in Ukraine

The European Union Anti-Corruption Initiative, EUACI, is the largest program of technical assistance in fighting corruption in Ukraine implemented by the European Union.

Anti-corruption comprises activities that oppose or inhibit corruption. Just as corruption takes many forms, anti-corruption efforts vary in scope and in strategy. A general distinction between preventive and reactive measures is sometimes drawn. In such framework, investigative authorities and their attempts to unveil corrupt practices would be considered reactive, while education on the negative impact of corruption, or firm-internal compliance programs are classified as the former.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Basel Institute on Governance</span>

The Basel Institute on Governance is an independent, international non-profit organisation dedicated to preventing and combating corruption and other financial crimes and to strengthening governance around the world. The organisation was established in Basel, Switzerland in 2003 by Professor Mark Pieth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcia V. J. Kran</span> Canadian lawyer

Marcia Vaune Jocelyn Kran is a Canadian lawyer and expert member of the UN Human Rights Committee. Kran's career has spanned international human rights law, criminal law and political science for over forty years, and includes positions in academia and civil society. Kran has held a range of senior United Nations positions including in international human rights law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ethics Council (Ukraine)</span>

The Ukrainian Ethics Council is a legal body of three Ukrainian and three international members created in 2021 to appoint members of the High Council of Justice. Anti-corruption organisations AutoMaidan, Dejure, and Anti-Corruption Action Center criticised the council's June 2022 appointments as including "tainted" judges and for refusing a well-known anti-corruption judge and whistleblower, Larysa Golnyk.

References

  1. Mark L. Wolf, The Case for an International Anti-Corruption Court, Brookings Institution, Governance Studies at Brookings, July 2014.
  2. Recknagel, Charles (April 10, 2014). "Prague Forum Provides Anti-Corruption Platform". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.
  3. "The Case for an International Anti-Corruption Court" (PDF). Brookings. Retrieved 2021-06-18.
  4. "We need an international court to stamp out corruption". Washington Post. Retrieved 2021-06-18.
  5. Wolf, Mark L. (2018). "The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court". Daedalus. 147 (3): 144–156. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00507. S2CID   57571237.
  6. "The Progressing Proposal for An International Anti-Corruption Court". American Academy of Arts & Sciences. 24 August 2022. Retrieved 2022-11-11.
  7. 1 2 "Richard Goldstone". Integrity Initiatives International.
  8. "Declaration in Support of the Creation of an International Anti-Corruption Court". Integrity Initiatives International.
  9. "An International Anti-Corruption Court". American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 2021-06-18.
  10. Robert Rotberg. It's time for Canada to back an International Anti-Corruption Court, The Global and Mail, 25 April 2016. Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  11. 1 2 "100-plus World Leaders Call for An International Anti-Corruption Court". www.businesswire.com. 2021-06-10. Retrieved 2022-02-22.
  12. "Declaration in Support of the Creation of an International Anti-Corruption Court". Integrity Initiatives International. Retrieved 2022-11-11.
  13. Brown, Gordon. "An international anti-corruption court would bring Putin to justice". The Times . ISSN   0140-0460 . Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  14. "Canada's 2021 federal election platform guide: compare where the parties stand on top issues". The Globe and Mail. 2021-09-16. Retrieved 2022-02-22.
  15. "Minister of Foreign Affairs Mandate Letter". Prime Minister of Canada. 2021-12-15. Retrieved 2022-02-22.
  16. Zaken, Ministerie van Buitenlandse (2022-04-11). "Netherlands says more funding needed for efforts to combat impunity worldwide - News item - Government.nl". www.government.nl. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
  17. Brett D. Schaefer, Steven Groves, and James M. Roberts, Why the U.S. Should Oppose the Creation of an International Anti-Corruption Court, The Heritage Foundation, Backgrounder No. 2958, October 2014.
  18. Stephenson, Matthew (October 4, 2018). "Guest Post: Is an International Anti-Corruption Court a Dream or a Distraction?". The Global Anticorruption Blog.
  19. Stephenson, Matthew (December 2019). "An International Anti-Corruption Court? A Synopsis of the debate". U4 Anti-Corruption Center.