International Conference on Cold Fusion

Last updated
International Conference on Cold Fusion
AbbreviationICCF
Discipline Cold fusion
Publication details
Publisher2011-present: International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science [1]
History1990–

The International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF) (also referred to as Annual Conference on Cold Fusion in 1990-1991 and mostly as International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science since 2007) is an annual or biennial conference on the topic of cold fusion. An international conference on cold fusion was held in Santa Fe, New Mexico US in 1989. [2] However, the first ICCF conference (ICCF1) took place in 1990 in Salt Lake City, Utah, under the title "First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion". [3] Its location has since rotated between Russia, US, Europe, and Asia. It was held in India for the first time in 2011. [4]

Contents

The conferences have been criticized as events which attract "crackpots" and "pseudo-scientists". [3]

Reception

The First Annual Conference on Cold Fusion was held in March 1990 in Salt Lake City, Utah, United States. Robert L. Park of the American Physical Society derisively referred to it as a "seance of true believers." [5] The conference was attended by more than 200 researchers from the United States, Italy, Japan, India and Taiwan [6] and dozens of reporters [7] from all over the U.S. and abroad. [8]

The Third International Conference on Cold Fusion was held in 1992 in Nagoya, Japan. It was described by The New York Times , "depending on one's point of view" as "either a turning point in which evidence was presented that will convince the skeptics that cold fusion exists or a religious revival where claims of miracles were lapped up by ardent believers." [9] The conference was sponsored by seven Japanese scientific societies, it was attended by 200 Japanese scientists and more than 100 from abroad. Tomohiro Taniguchi, then director of the Electric Power Technology Division at Japan's Ministry of International Trade and Industry, reportedly said that the Ministry of International Trade and Industry was willing to finance research in the field in view of "encouraging evidence, especially after the conference." [9] The conference was also covered by the Associated Press. [10]

A journalist for the Wired magazine attended the 1998 conference in Vancouver—apparently the only mainstream journalist who attended—and reported that he found there "about 200 extremely conventional-looking scientists, almost all of them male and over 50" with some apparently over 70. He then inferred that "[the] younger ones had bailed years ago, fearing career damage from the cold fusion stigma." He reported seeing "highly technical presentations" and "was amazed by the quantity of the work, its quality, and the credentials of the people pursuing it", whereas "[a] few obvious pseudoscientists, promoting their ideas in an adjoining room used for poster sessions, were politely ignored." [11]

By 1999, attendance by researchers at the ICCF meetings drew comment from the field of science studies. Although scientific debate over cold fusion had effectively ended in 1990, attendance at the ICCF meetings for the next 8 years had been relatively stable at between 100 and 300. Sociologist Bart Simon of Concordia University described the state of the field as "undead", and considered that the conference evidenced that "as far as normal science is concerned, [cold fusion] is of interest to crackpots, pseudo-scientists, frauds and a few sociologists of science". [3]

David Goodstein has written that although an ICCF event had "all the trappings of a normal scientific meeting", it was in fact "no normal scientific conference" since "cold fusion was a pariah field, cast out by the scientific establishment". It was an environment, he added, "...in which crackpots flourished, and this made matters worse for those who were at least willing to entertain the notion that there might have been some serious science going on." [12]

Conferences

The conference is organized by The International Society for Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. Conference attendees include "a mix of professional scientists, along with retired, semi-retired and amateur scientists, engineers and technicians, and a number of entrepreneurs, inventors, and interested lay people." [3]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cold fusion</span> Hypothetical type of nuclear reaction

Cold fusion is a hypothesized type of nuclear reaction that would occur at, or near, room temperature. It would contrast starkly with the "hot" fusion that is known to take place naturally within stars and artificially in hydrogen bombs and prototype fusion reactors under immense pressure and at temperatures of millions of degrees, and be distinguished from muon-catalyzed fusion. There is currently no accepted theoretical model that would allow cold fusion to occur.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon</span> Explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion reactions, producing a nuclear explosion. Both bomb types release large quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.

Pathological science is an area of research where "people are tricked into false results ... by subjective effects, wishful thinking or threshold interactions." The term was first used by Irving Langmuir, Nobel Prize-winning chemist, during a 1953 colloquium at the Knolls Research Laboratory. Langmuir said a pathological science is an area of research that simply will not "go away"—long after it was given up on as "false" by the majority of scientists in the field. He called pathological science "the science of things that aren't so."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry Eyring (chemist)</span> Mexican-born American chemist (1901–1981)

Henry Eyring was a Mexico-born United States theoretical chemist whose primary contribution was in the study of chemical reaction rates and intermediates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of nuclear weapons</span> Chronicle of the development of nuclear weapons

Nuclear weapons possess enormous destructive power from nuclear fission or combined fission and fusion reactions. Building on scientific breakthroughs made during the 1930s, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and free France collaborated during World War II, in what was called the Manhattan Project, to build a fission weapon, also known as an atomic bomb. In August 1945, the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were conducted by the United States against Japan at the close of that war, standing to date as the only use of nuclear weapons in hostilities. The Soviet Union started development shortly after with their own atomic bomb project, and not long after, both countries were developing even more powerful fusion weapons known as hydrogen bombs. Britain and France built their own systems in the 1950s, and the list of states with nuclear weapons has gradually grown larger in the decades since. Russia has the strongest nuclear arsenal, the USA is in second

Bobby Stanley Pons is an American electrochemist known for his work with Martin Fleischmann on cold fusion in the 1980s and 1990s.

Bernhardt Patrick John O’Mara Bockris was a South African professor of chemistry, latterly at Texas A&M University. During his long and prolific career he published some 700 papers and two dozen books. His best known work is in electrochemistry but his output also extended to environmental chemistry, photoelectrochemistry and bioelectrochemistry. In the 1990s he experimented with cold fusion and transmutation, topics on which his unorthodox views provoked controversy.

Steven Earl Jones is an American physicist. Among scientists, Jones became known for his research into muon-catalyzed fusion and geo-fusion. Jones is also known for his association with 9/11 conspiracy theories. Jones has claimed that mere airplane crashes and fires could not have resulted in so rapid and complete a fall of the World Trade Center Towers and 7 World Trade Center, suggesting controlled demolition instead. In late 2006, some time after Brigham Young University (BYU) officials placed him on paid leave, he elected to retire in an agreement with BYU. Jones continued research and writing following his early retirement from BYU, including a paper published in Europhysics News in August 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Blinc</span>

Robert Blinc was a prominent Slovene physicist a full professor of physics and, with more than 650 articles in prestigious international journals and two extensive monographs published abroad, a highly regarded and quoted researcher in condensed matter physics.

Giuliano Preparata was an Italian physicist.

ICCF may stand for:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rajagopala Chidambaram</span> Indian Physicist

Rajagopala Chidambaram is an Indian Physicist who is known for his integral role in India's nuclear weapons program; he coordinated test preparation for the Pokhran-I (1975) and Pokhran-II (1998).

The Patterson power cell is an electrolysis device invented by chemist James A. Patterson, which he said created 200 times more energy than it used, and neutralize radioactivity without emitting any harmful radiation. It is one of several cells that some observers classified as cold fusion; cells which were the subject of an intense scientific controversy in 1989, before being discredited in the eyes of mainstream science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Martin Fleischmann</span> British chemist (1927–2012)

Martin Fleischmann FRS was a British chemist who worked in electrochemistry. Premature announcement of his cold fusion research with Stanley Pons, regarding excess heat in heavy water, caused a media sensation and elicited skepticism and criticism from many in the scientific community.

Padmanabhan Krishnagopala Iyengar, was an Indian nuclear physicist who is widely known for his central role in the development of the nuclear program of India. Iyengar previously served as the director of BARC and former chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission of India, he raised his voice and opposition against the nuclear agreement between India and the United States and expressed that the deal favoured the United States.

George H. Miley is a professor emeritus of physics from the University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign. Miley is a Guggenheim Fellow and Fellow of the American Nuclear Society, the American Physical Society and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. He was Senior NATO Fellow from 1994 to 1995, received the Edward Teller Medal in 1995, the IEEE Nuclear and Plasma Science Award in Fusion Technology in 2003 and the Radiation Science and Technology Award in 2004. He holds several patents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tadahiko Mizuno</span> Japanese nuclear-chemist (born 1945)

Tadahiko Mizuno is a Japanese nuclear-chemist known for his work on cold fusion. He was a former assistant professor teaching the Atomic Power Environmental Materials program at Hokkaido University. He was also a member of Energy Environmental Institute of Engineering at Hokkaido University until 2009.

Satinder Kumar Sikka is an Indian nuclear condensed matter physicist, crystallographer and a former Scientific Secretary to the Principal Scientific Advisor of the Government of India. He is known to have played a crucial role, along with Raja Ramanna, Rajagopala Chidambaram and Basanti Dulal Nagchaudhuri, in the design and development of a Hydrogen Bomb by India, which was tested at the Pokhran Test Range in May 1998, under the code name, Operation Shakthi. He was also involved in the Smiling Buddha tests, conducted in 1974. He was awarded the fourth highest civilian award of the Padma Shri, by the Government of India, in 1999.

Edmund Storms is a nuclear chemist known for his work in cold fusion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deepak Kumar (physicist)</span> Indian physicist

Deepak Kumar was an Indian condensed matter physicist and a professor at the School of Physical Sciences of Jawaharlal Nehru University. Known for his research on quantum mechanics and other areas of condensed matter physics, Kumar was an elected fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, the apex agency of the Government of India for scientific research, awarded him the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize for Science and Technology, one of the highest Indian science awards, for his contributions to physical sciences in 1988.

References

  1. ↑ "Chennai: The Nuclear conference begins today". The Times of India. February 6, 2011. Retrieved 15 January 2015.
  2. ↑ "Lab ends talks on verifying fusion claim". The Milwaukee Journal. 14 June 1989. Retrieved June 18, 2013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Simon, B. (1999). "Undead Science: Making Sense of Cold Fusion After the (Arti)fact". Social Studies of Science. 29 (1): 61–85. doi:10.1177/030631299029001003. JSTOR   285446. S2CID   145214518. See especially pages 68 and 73.
  4. ↑ "Our dream is a small fusion power generator in each house". The Times of India . 4 February 2011. Archived from the original on 23 September 2012. Retrieved June 18, 2013.
  5. ↑ Regarding the "true believers" quote, see also a 1990 interview of Robert L. Park: Media Coverage of ICCF1 1/6 (Local Salt Lake City, Utah news stations covered the First International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF1) from March 26-31, 1990.) (YouTube). Salt Lake City, Utah. 1990. Event occurs at 6:45. Retrieved June 22, 2013.
  6. ↑ Thomas H. Maugh II (April 9, 1990). "Cold-Fusion Faithful Still Fan the Flames of Research". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved June 21, 2013.
  7. ↑ Jacobsen-Wells, JoAnn (March 29, 1990). "Scientists Converge on S.L. in Fusion Quest". Deseret News . Retrieved June 21, 2013.
  8. ↑ Media Coverage of ICCF1 2/6 (Local Salt Lake City, Utah news stations covered the First International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF1) from March 26-31, 1990.) (YouTube). Salt Lake City, Utah. 1990. Event occurs at 3:00. Retrieved June 22, 2013. I think a hundred reporters registered for this conference. I don't know whether all hundred came, but there're a lot here from all over the country and the world.
  9. 1 2 Andrew J. Pollack (17 November 1992). "Cold Fusion, Derided in U.S., Is Hot In Japan". New York Times. Retrieved June 18, 2013.
  10. ↑ Sutel, Seth (October 26, 1992). "At International Conference, Debate Continues Over Cold Fusion Claims". Associated Press. Retrieved June 19, 2013.
  11. ↑ Platt, Charles (November 1998). "What If Cold Fusion Is Real?". Wired . Vol. 6, no. 11. Retrieved 18 June 2013.
  12. ↑ Goodstein, David (2010). "Chapter 5: The Cold Fusion Chronicles". On Fact and Fraud: Cautionary Tales from the Front Lines of Science. Princeton University Press. pp. 69–96. ISBN   978-1400834570.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.