Isogenic human disease models

Last updated December 16, 2023

Isogenic human disease models are a family of cells that are selected or engineered to accurately model the genetics of a specific patient population, in vitro . They are provided with a genetically matched 'normal cell' to provide an isogenic system to research disease biology and novel therapeutic agents.^[1] They can be used to model any disease with a genetic foundation. Cancer is one such disease for which isogenic human disease models have been widely used.

Historical models

Human isogenic disease models have been likened to 'patients in a test-tube', since they incorporate the latest research into human genetic diseases and do so without the difficulties and limitations involved in using non-human models.^[2]

Historically, cells obtained from animals, typically mice, have been used to model cancer-related pathways. However, there are obvious limitations inherent in using animals for modelling genetically determined diseases in humans. Despite a large proportion of genetic conservation between humans and mice, there are significant differences between the biology of mice and humans that are important to cancer research. For example, major differences in telomere regulation enable murine cells to bypass the requirement for telomerase upregulation, which is a rate-limiting step in human cancer formation. As another example, certain ligand-receptor interactions are incompatible between mice and humans. Additionally, experiments have demonstrated important and significant differences in the ability to transform cells, compared with cells of murine origin. For these reasons, it remains essential to develop models of cancer that employ human cells.^[3]

Targeting vectors

Isogenic cell lines are created via a process called homologous gene-targeting. Targeting vectors that utilize homologous recombination are the tools or techniques that are used to knock-in or knock-out the desired disease-causing mutation or SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) to be studied. Although disease mutations can be harvested directly from cancer patients, these cells usually contain many background mutations in addition to the specific mutation of interest, and a matched normal cell line is typically not obtained. Subsequently, targeting vectors are used to 'knock-in' or 'knock out' gene mutations enabling a switch in both directions; from a normal to cancer genotype; or vice versa; in characterized human cancer cell lines such as HCT116 or Nalm6.^[4]

There are several gene targeting technologies used to engineer the desired mutation, the most prevalent of which are briefly described, including key advantages and limitations, in the summary table below.

Technique	Gene Knock-In	Gene Knock-out
rAAV (recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors)^[5]	Targeted insertions or modifications are created within endogenous genes; and so are subject to: The correct gene-regulation mechanisms; and Accurately reflect the disease events found in real patients. rAAV can introduce subtle point mutations, SNPs as well as small insertions with high efficiency. Moreover, many peer reviewed studies have shown that rAAV does not introduce any confounding off target genomic events.^{[ citation needed ]} Appears to be the preferred method being adopted in academia, Biotech and Pharma on a precision versus time versus cost basis.^{[ citation needed ]}\|	Gene knockouts are at the endogenous locus, and thus are definitive, stable and patient relevant. No confounding off-target effects are elicited at other genomic loci. It requires a 2- step process: Generate a heterozygous KO Generate a bi-allelic knockout by targeting the second allele. This process can therefore generate 3 genotypes (+/+; -/+ and -/-); enabling therefore the analysis of haplo-insufficient gene function. Current limitation is the need to sequentially target single alleles making generation of knock-out cell lines a two-step process.\|
Plasmid-based homologous recombination	Insertion is at the endogenous locus and has all the above benefits, but it is very inefficient. It also requires a promoterless drug selection strategy entailing bespoke construct generation. A large historical bank of cell lines has been generated using this method which has been displaced by other methods since the mid-1990s.	Deletion is at endogenous locus and has all the above benefits, but it is inefficient. It also requires a promoterless drug selection strategy that entails bespoke construct generation
Flip-in	This is an efficient technique that allows the directed insertion of 'ectopic' transgenes at a single pre-defined genomic locus (integration via a FLP recombinase site). This is not a technique for modifying an endogenous locus. Transgenes will usually be under the control of an exogenous promoter, or a partially defined promoter-unit in the incorrect genomic location. Their expression will therefore not be under the same genomic and epigenetic regulation as the endogenous loci, which limits the utility of these systems for studying gene-function. They are however, good for eliciting rapid and stable exogenous gene expression.	Not applicable
Zinc-Finger Nucleases (ZFNs)	ZFNs have been reported to achieve high rates of genetic knock-outs within a target endogenous gene. If ZFNs are co-delivered with a transgene construct homologous to the target gene, genetic knock-in's or insertions can also be achieved.^[6] One potential drawback is that any off-target double strand breaks could lead to random off-target gene insertions, deletions and wider genomic instability; confounding the resulting genotype.^[7] However, no measurable increase in the rate of random plasmid integration was observed in human cells efficiently edited with ZFNs that target a composite 24 bp recognition site ^[6]	ZFNs are sequence-directed endonucleases which enable the rapid and highly efficient (up to 90% in a bulk cell population) disruption of both alleles of a target gene, although user- defined or patient relevant loss of-function alterations have not been reported at similar frequencies. Off target deletions or insertions elsewhere in the genome are a significant concern. The speed advantage of obtaining a biallelic KO in one step is also partially mitigated if one still needs to derive a clonal cell line to study gene function in a homogenous cell-population.
Meganucleases	Meganucleases are operationally analogous to ZFN's. There are limitations inherent in their use such as the meganuclease vector design which can take up to 9 months and cost tens of thousands of dollars.^{[ citation needed ]} This makes meganucleases more attractive in high-value applications such as gene therapy, agrobiotechnology and engineering of bioproducer lines.

Homologous recombination in cancer cell disease models

Homologous recombination (HR) is a kind of genetic recombination in which genetic sequences are exchanged between two similar segments of DNA. HR plays a major role in eukaryotic cell division, promoting genetic diversity through the exchange between corresponding segments of DNA to create new, and potentially beneficial combinations of genes.^{[ citation needed ]}

HR performs a second vital role in DNA repair, enabling the repair of double-strand breaks in DNA which is a common occurrence during a cell's lifecycle. It is this process which is artificially triggered by the above technologies and bootstrapped in order to engender 'knock-ins' or 'knockouts' in specific genes 5, 7.

A recent key advance was discovered using AAV-homologous recombination vectors, which increases the low natural rates of HR in differentiated human cells when combined with gene-targeting vectors-sequences.^{[ citation needed ]}

Diagram of a typical rAAV vector (source: https://www.horizondiscovery.com/gene-editing/raav)

Commercialization

Factors leading to the recent commercialization of isogenic human cancer cell disease models for the pharmaceutical industry and research laboratories are twofold.^{[ citation needed ]}

Firstly, successful patenting of enhanced targeting vector technology has provided a basis for commercialization of the cell-models which eventuate from the application of these technologies.^{[ citation needed ]}

Secondly, the trend of relatively low success rates in pharmaceutical RnD and the enormous costs have created a real need for new research tools that illicit how patient sub-groups will respond positively or be resistant to targeted cancer therapeutics based upon their individual genetic profile.^{[ citation needed ]}

Related Research Articles

Gene knockouts are a widely used genetic engineering technique that involves the targeted removal or inactivation of a specific gene within an organism's genome. This can be done through a variety of methods, including homologous recombination, CRISPR-Cas9, and TALENs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DNA repair</span> Cellular mechanism

DNA repair is a collection of processes by which a cell identifies and corrects damage to the DNA molecules that encodes its genome. In human cells, both normal metabolic activities and environmental factors such as radiation can cause DNA damage, resulting in tens of thousands of individual molecular lesions per cell per day. Many of these lesions cause structural damage to the DNA molecule and can alter or eliminate the cell's ability to transcribe the gene that the affected DNA encodes. Other lesions induce potentially harmful mutations in the cell's genome, which affect the survival of its daughter cells after it undergoes mitosis. As a consequence, the DNA repair process is constantly active as it responds to damage in the DNA structure. When normal repair processes fail, and when cellular apoptosis does not occur, irreparable DNA damage may occur, including double-strand breaks and DNA crosslinkages. This can eventually lead to malignant tumors, or cancer as per the two-hit hypothesis.

Homologous recombination is a type of genetic recombination in which genetic information is exchanged between two similar or identical molecules of double-stranded or single-stranded nucleic acids.

Bert Vogelstein is director of the Ludwig Center, Clayton Professor of Oncology and Pathology and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator at The Johns Hopkins Medical School and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center. A pioneer in the field of cancer genomics, his studies on colorectal cancers revealed that they result from the sequential accumulation of mutations in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. These studies now form the paradigm for modern cancer research and provided the basis for the notion of the somatic evolution of cancer.

Mitotic recombination is a type of genetic recombination that may occur in somatic cells during their preparation for mitosis in both sexual and asexual organisms. In asexual organisms, the study of mitotic recombination is one way to understand genetic linkage because it is the only source of recombination within an individual. Additionally, mitotic recombination can result in the expression of recessive alleles in an otherwise heterozygous individual. This expression has important implications for the study of tumorigenesis and lethal recessive alleles. Mitotic homologous recombination occurs mainly between sister chromatids subsequent to replication. Inter-sister homologous recombination is ordinarily genetically silent. During mitosis the incidence of recombination between non-sister homologous chromatids is only about 1% of that between sister chromatids.

Oncogenomics is a sub-field of genomics that characterizes cancer-associated genes. It focuses on genomic, epigenomic and transcript alterations in cancer.

DNA mismatch repair protein Msh2 also known as MutS homolog 2 or MSH2 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the MSH2 gene, which is located on chromosome 2. MSH2 is a tumor suppressor gene and more specifically a caretaker gene that codes for a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein, MSH2, which forms a heterodimer with MSH6 to make the human MutSα mismatch repair complex. It also dimerizes with MSH3 to form the MutSβ DNA repair complex. MSH2 is involved in many different forms of DNA repair, including transcription-coupled repair, homologous recombination, and base excision repair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gene targeting</span> Genetic technique that uses homologous recombination to change an endogenous gene

Gene targeting is a biotechnological tool used to change the DNA sequence of an organism. It is based on the natural DNA-repair mechanism of Homology Directed Repair (HDR), including Homologous Recombination. Gene targeting can be used to make a range of sizes of DNA edits, from larger DNA edits such as inserting entire new genes into an organism, through to much smaller changes to the existing DNA such as a single base-pair change. Gene targeting relies on the presence of a repair template to introduce the user-defined edits to the DNA. The user will design the repair template to contain the desired edit, flanked by DNA sequence corresponding (homologous) to the region of DNA that the user wants to edit; hence the edit is targeted to a particular genomic region. In this way Gene Targeting is distinct from natural homology-directed repair, during which the ‘natural’ DNA repair template of the sister chromatid is used to repair broken DNA. The alteration of DNA sequence in an organism can be useful in both a research context – for example to understand the biological role of a gene – and in biotechnology, for example to alter the traits of an organism.

DNA excision repair protein ERCC-1 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the ERCC1 gene. Together with ERCC4, ERCC1 forms the ERCC1-XPF enzyme complex that participates in DNA repair and DNA recombination.

B-cell lymphoma 3-encoded protein is a protein that in humans is encoded by the BCL3 gene.

Exonuclease 1 is an enzyme that in humans is encoded by the EXO1 gene.

Mouse models of colorectal cancer and intestinal cancer are experimental systems in which mice are genetically manipulated, fed a modified diet, or challenged with chemicals to develop malignancies in the gastrointestinal tract. These models enable researchers to study the onset, progression of the disease, and understand in depth the molecular events that contribute to the development and spread of colorectal cancer. They also provide a valuable biological system, to simulate human physiological conditions, suitable for testing therapeutics.

Synthetic lethality is defined as a type of genetic interaction where the combination of two genetic events results in cell death or death of an organism. Although the foregoing explanation is wider than this, it is common when referring to synthetic lethality to mean the situation arising by virtue of a combination of deficiencies of two or more genes leading to cell death, whereas a deficiency of only one of these genes does not. In a synthetic lethal genetic screen, it is necessary to begin with a mutation that does not result in cell death, although the effect of that mutation could result in a differing phenotype, and then systematically test other mutations at additional loci to determine which, in combination with the first mutation, causes cell death arising by way of deficiency or abolition of expression.

Fanconi anemia, complementation group M, also known as FANCM is a human gene. It is an emerging target in cancer therapy, in particular cancers with specific genetic deficiencies.

The NSG mouse is a brand of immunodeficient laboratory mice, developed and marketed by Jackson Laboratory, which carries the strain NOD.Cg-Prkdc^scid Il2rg^tm1Wjl/SzJ. NSG branded mice are among the most immunodeficient described to date. NSG branded mice lack mature T cells, B cells, and natural killer (NK) cells. NSG branded mice are also deficient in multiple cytokine signaling pathways, and they have many defects in innate immunity. The compound immunodeficiencies in NSG branded mice permit the engraftment of a wide range of primary human cells, and enable sophisticated modeling of many areas of human biology and disease. NSG branded mice were developed in the laboratory of Dr. Leonard Shultz at Jackson Laboratory, which owns the NSG trade mark.

Chromothripsis is a mutational process by which up to thousands of clustered chromosomal rearrangements occur in a single event in localised and confined genomic regions in one or a few chromosomes, and is known to be involved in both cancer and congenital diseases. It occurs through one massive genomic rearrangement during a single catastrophic event in the cell's history. It is believed that for the cell to be able to withstand such a destructive event, the occurrence of such an event must be the upper limit of what a cell can tolerate and survive. The chromothripsis phenomenon opposes the conventional theory that cancer is the gradual acquisition of genomic rearrangements and somatic mutations over time.

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) based genome engineering is a genome editing platform centered on the use of recombinant AAV vectors that enables insertion, deletion or substitution of DNA sequences into the genomes of live mammalian cells. The technique builds on Mario Capecchi and Oliver Smithies' Nobel Prize–winning discovery that homologous recombination (HR), a natural hi-fidelity DNA repair mechanism, can be harnessed to perform precise genome alterations in mice. rAAV mediated genome-editing improves the efficiency of this technique to permit genome engineering in any pre-established and differentiated human cell line, which, in contrast to mouse ES cells, have low rates of HR.

Genome instability refers to a high frequency of mutations within the genome of a cellular lineage. These mutations can include changes in nucleic acid sequences, chromosomal rearrangements or aneuploidy. Genome instability does occur in bacteria. In multicellular organisms genome instability is central to carcinogenesis, and in humans it is also a factor in some neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or the neuromuscular disease myotonic dystrophy.

Mutational signatures are characteristic combinations of mutation types arising from specific mutagenesis processes such as DNA replication infidelity, exogenous and endogenous genotoxin exposures, defective DNA repair pathways, and DNA enzymatic editing.

Alberto Bardelli is an Italian geneticist and cancer researcher, expert in the field of precision medicine. He is a full professor of histology at the Department of Oncology, University of Turin and Scientific Director of IFOM, the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology.

References

↑ Torrance CJ, Agrawal V, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (October 2001). "Use of isogenic human cancer cells for high-throughput screening and drug discovery". Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (10): 940–5. doi:10.1038/nbt1001-940. PMID 11581659. S2CID 21633547.
↑ Gupta, Piyush B.; Kuperwasser, Charlotte (2004). "Disease models of breast cancer". Drug Discovery Today. 1: 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.ddmod.2004.05.001.
↑ Hirata R, Chamberlain J, Dong R, Russell DW (July 2002). "Targeted transgene insertion into human chromosomes by adeno-associated virus vectors". Nat. Biotechnol. 20 (7): 735–8. doi:10.1038/nbt0702-735. PMID 12089561. S2CID 11572520.
↑ Masters JR (December 2000). "Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1 (3): 233–6. doi:10.1038/35043102. PMID 11252900. S2CID 21839266.
↑ Engelhardt JF (August 2006). "AAV hits the genomic bull's-eye". Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (8): 949–50. doi:10.1038/nbt0806-949. PMID 16900138. S2CID 26734696.
1 2 Urnov, Fyodor D.; Rebar, Edward J.; Holmes, Michael C.; Zhang, H. Steve; Gregory, Philip D. (2010). "Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases". Nature Reviews Genetics. 11 (9): 636–646. doi:10.1038/nrg2842. PMID 20717154. S2CID 205484701.
↑ Radecke S, Radecke F, Cathomen T, Schwarz K (April 2010). "Zinc-finger nuclease-induced gene repair with oligodeoxynucleotides: wanted and unwanted target locus modifications". Mol. Ther. 18 (4): 743–53. doi:10.1038/mt.2009.304. PMC 2862519 . PMID 20068556.

Sources

Bardelli A, Parsons DW, Silliman N, et al. (May 2003). "Mutational analysis of the tyrosine kinome in colorectal cancers". Science. 300 (5621): 949. doi:10.1126/science.1082596. PMID 12738854. S2CID 85934154.
Kohli M, Rago C, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (2004). "Facile methods for generating human somatic cell gene knockouts using recombinant adeno-associated viruses". Nucleic Acids Res. 32 (1): 3e–3. doi:10.1093/nar/gnh009. PMC 373311 . PMID 14704360.
Wang Z, Shen D, Parsons DW, et al. (May 2004). "Mutational analysis of the tyrosine phosphatome in colorectal cancers". Science. 304 (5674): 1164–6. Bibcode:2004Sci...304.1164W. doi:10.1126/science.1096096. PMID 15155950. S2CID 2974833.
Topaloglu O, Hurley PJ, Yildirim O, Civin CI, Bunz F (2005). "Improved methods for the generation of human gene knockout and knockin cell lines". Nucleic Acids Res. 33 (18): e158. doi:10.1093/nar/gni160. PMC 1255732 . PMID 16214806.
Moroni M, Sartore-Bianchi A, Benvenuti S, Artale S, Bardelli A, Siena S (November 2005). "Somatic mutation of EGFR catalytic domain and treatment with gefitinib in colorectal cancer". Ann. Oncol. 16 (11): 1848–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi356 . PMID 16012179.
Di Nicolantonio F, Bardelli A (January 2006). "Kinase mutations in cancer: chinks in the enemy's armour?". Curr Opin Oncol. 18 (1): 69–76. doi:10.1097/01.cco.0000198020.91724.48. PMID 16357567. S2CID 25857889.
Benvenuti S, Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, et al. (March 2007). "Oncogenic activation of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway impairs the response of metastatic colorectal cancers to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapies". Cancer Res. 67 (6): 2643–8. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4158 . PMID 17363584.
Arena S, Pisacane A, Mazzone M, Comoglio PM, Bardelli A (July 2007). "Genetic targeting of the kinase activity of the Met receptor in cancer cells". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104 (27): 11412–7. Bibcode:2007PNAS..10411412A. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703205104 . PMC 2040912 . PMID 17595299.
Konishi H, Karakas B, Abukhdeir AM, et al. (September 2007). "Knock-in of mutant K-ras in nontumorigenic human epithelial cells as a new model for studying K-ras mediated transformation". Cancer Res. 67 (18): 8460–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0108 . PMID 17875684.
Arena S, Isella C, Martini M, de Marco A, Medico E, Bardelli A (September 2007). "Knock-in of oncogenic Kras does not transform mouse somatic cells but triggers a transcriptional response that classifies human cancers". Cancer Res. 67 (18): 8468–76. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1126 . PMID 17875685.
Grim JE, Gustafson MP, Hirata RK, et al. (June 2008). "Isoform- and cell cycle-dependent substrate degradation by the Fbw7 ubiquitin ligase". J. Cell Biol. 181 (6): 913–20. doi:10.1083/jcb.200802076. PMC 2426948 . PMID 18559665.
Fattah FJ, Lichter NF, Fattah KR, Oh S, Hendrickson EA (June 2008). "Ku70, an essential gene, modulates the frequency of rAAV-mediated gene targeting in human somatic cells". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (25): 8703–8. Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.8703F. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712060105 . PMC 2438404 . PMID 18562296.
Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. (December 2008). "Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer". J. Clin. Oncol. 26 (35): 5705–12. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0786. hdl: 2434/349662 . PMID 19001320. Archived from the original on 2013-04-15.
Di Nicolantonio F, Arena S, Gallicchio M, et al. (December 2008). "Replacement of normal with mutant alleles in the genome of normal human cells unveils mutation-specific drug responses". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (52): 20864–9. Bibcode:2008PNAS..10520864D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808757105 . PMC 2634925 . PMID 19106301.
Gustin JP, Karakas B, Weiss MB, et al. (February 2009). "Knockin of mutant PIK3CA activates multiple oncogenic pathways". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (8): 2835–40. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.2835G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813351106 . PMC 2636736 . PMID 19196980.
Sartore-Bianchi A, Martini M, Molinari F, et al. (March 2009). "PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancer are associated with clinical resistance to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies". Cancer Res. 69 (5): 1851–7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2466 . PMID 19223544.
Sur S, Pagliarini R, Bunz F, et al. (March 2009). "A panel of isogenic human cancer cells suggests a therapeutic approach for cancers with inactivated p53". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106 (10): 3964–9. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.3964S. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813333106 . PMC 2656188 . PMID 19225112.
Yun J, Rago C, Cheong I, et al. (September 2009). "Glucose deprivation contributes to the development of KRAS pathway mutations in tumor cells". Science. 325 (5947): 1555–9. Bibcode:2009Sci...325.1555Y. doi:10.1126/science.1174229. PMC 2820374 . PMID 19661383.
Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Nichelatti M, et al. (2009). Cordes N (ed.). "Multi-determinants analysis of molecular alterations for predicting clinical benefit to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer". PLOS ONE. 4 (10): e7287. Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.7287S. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007287 . PMC 2750753 . PMID 19806185.
Endogenous Expression of Oncogenic PI3K Mutation Leads to Activated PI3K Signaling and an Invasive Phenotype Poster Presented at AACR/EORTC Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics, Boston, USA, Nov. 2009
Bardelli A, Siena S (March 2010). "Molecular mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab and panitumumab in colorectal cancer". J. Clin. Oncol. 28 (7): 1254–61. doi:10.1200/JCO.2009.24.6116. PMID 20100961. Archived from the original on 2013-04-15.
Fattah F, Lee EH, Weisensel N, Wang Y, Lichter N, Hendrickson EA (February 2010). Pearson CE (ed.). "Ku regulates the non-homologous end joining pathway choice of DNA double-strand break repair in human somatic cells". PLOS Genet. 6 (2): e1000855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000855 . PMC 2829059 . PMID 20195511.
Buron N, Porceddu M, Brabant M, et al. (2010). Aziz SA (ed.). "Use of human cancer cell lines mitochondria to explore the mechanisms of BH3 peptides and ABT-737-induced mitochondrial membrane permeabilization". PLOS ONE. 5 (3): e9924. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...5.9924B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009924 . PMC 2847598 . PMID 20360986.
Endogenous Expression of Oncogenic PI3K Mutation Leads to accumulation of anti-apoptotic proteins in mitochondria Poster Presented at AACR 2010, Washington, D.C., USA, April. 2010
The use of 'X-MAN' isogenic cell lines to define PI3-kinase inhibitor activity profiles Poster Presented at AACR 2010, Washington, D.C., USA, April. 2010
The use of 'X-MAN' mutant PI3CA increases the expression of individual tubulin isoforms and promoted resistance to anti-mitotic chemotherapy drugs Poster Presented at AACR 2010, Washington, D.C., USA, April. 2010
Di Nicolantonio F, Arena S, Tabernero J, et al. (August 2010). "Deregulation of the PI3K and KRAS signaling pathways in human cancer cells determines their response to everolimus". J. Clin. Invest. 120 (8): 2858–66. doi:10.1172/JCI37539. PMC 2912177 . PMID 20664172.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] Torrance CJ, Agrawal V, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (October 2001). "Use of isogenic human cancer cells for high-throughput screening and drug discovery". Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (10): 940–5. doi:10.1038/nbt1001-940. PMID 11581659. S2CID 21633547.

[2] Gupta, Piyush B.; Kuperwasser, Charlotte (2004). "Disease models of breast cancer". Drug Discovery Today. 1: 9–16. doi:10.1016/j.ddmod.2004.05.001.

[3] Hirata R, Chamberlain J, Dong R, Russell DW (July 2002). "Targeted transgene insertion into human chromosomes by adeno-associated virus vectors". Nat. Biotechnol. 20 (7): 735–8. doi:10.1038/nbt0702-735. PMID 12089561. S2CID 11572520.

[4] Masters JR (December 2000). "Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 1 (3): 233–6. doi:10.1038/35043102. PMID 11252900. S2CID 21839266.

[5] Engelhardt JF (August 2006). "AAV hits the genomic bull's-eye". Nat. Biotechnol. 24 (8): 949–50. doi:10.1038/nbt0806-949. PMID 16900138. S2CID 26734696.

[Urnov2010-6] 1 2 Urnov, Fyodor D.; Rebar, Edward J.; Holmes, Michael C.; Zhang, H. Steve; Gregory, Philip D. (2010). "Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases". Nature Reviews Genetics. 11 (9): 636–646. doi:10.1038/nrg2842. PMID 20717154. S2CID 205484701.

[7] Radecke S, Radecke F, Cathomen T, Schwarz K (April 2010). "Zinc-finger nuclease-induced gene repair with oligodeoxynucleotides: wanted and unwanted target locus modifications". Mol. Ther. 18 (4): 743–53. doi:10.1038/mt.2009.304. PMC 2862519 . PMID 20068556.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]