Iusnaturalism

Last updated
Hugo Grotius, a Dutch jurist and scholar, is an iusnaturalist author, who maintained that rights are innate potestas of the human being and do not arise out of law. Michiel Jansz van Mierevelt - Hugo Grotius.jpg
Hugo Grotius, a Dutch jurist and scholar, is an iusnaturalist author, who maintained that rights are innate potestas of the human being and do not arise out of law.

Jusnaturalism or iusnaturalism is a theory of law, which holds that legal norms follow a human universal knowledge on justice and harmony of relations. [2] Thus, it views enacted laws that contradict such universal knowledge as unjust and illegitimate. [2] Modern theorists considered as iusnaturalists include Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, and Franz von Zeiller, among others. [3]

Contents

This school of thought became popular during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance amid the attempt to identify "the relation, if any, of the ius gentium to natural law in the Aristotelian-Thomistic sense." [4] This issue had covered the role of God and the adequacy of reason without divine grace, among others particularly in the field of legal theory as it established the notion that natural law could exist without religion.

Concept

Iusnaturalism is associated with the notion of natural law proposed by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, and Samuel von Pufendorf. [5] It emerged from the view that emphasizes how the ideas of nature and divinity or reason are the sources of the validity of natural and positive laws. [5] It is also linked to the general theory of law, which has been viewed as one that has positivist character, aiming to be objective and non-normative. [6] For iusnaturalists, in order for a law to be accorded the status of legal or one that has a binding effect on people, it must be fair. [2]

Some scholars distinguish iusnaturalism from legal positivism but it is noted that both are concerned with the good law. [7] Iusnaturalism subordinates power to law as well as positive law to higher laws, giving it a more meaningful primordial metanarrative of natural law. [8] One of the fundamental notions of iusnaturalism is that man is free and no one has power over other men or moral power over another without a mutual act of will. [5] Failure to understand or recognize this would lead to conflict.

Variations

Iusnaturalism has different variations and these are based on religious and rational perspectives. Two of the most important are classical iusnaturalism and rationalist iusnaturalism. Classical iusnaturalism is associated with theorists such as Saint Thomas Aquinas, who maintained in his Treatise on Law that the universal laws of justice have a divine origin. [2] Aquinas' conceptualization was an offshoot of his development of Aristotle's practical reasoning. [9] David Hume opposed classical iusnaturalism with his "naturalistic fallacy" criticism. [9]

Rationalist or realist iusnaturalism emerged during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a consequence of the process of secularization, which affected the relationship between Christianity and international law. [10] Thinkers such as Grotius, Hobbes, and Kant maintain that the shared laws of justice are not revealed by God to humans but can be accessed by reason through an understanding of human nature. [2] This type of iusnaturalism integrates natural law and positive law as species of the same genus since they share one principle of common validity - political power. [5] There is also the case of the "iusnaturalist essentialism", which is a rationalist variant developed by Francisco Suarez. [9] The Spanish theologian maintained that the source of law is divine will rather than divine reasoning. [11] It was criticized for corrupting the structure of Aquinas' conceptualization. [9]

Moderate iusnaturalism is also another variant, which emphasizes how natural law exists together with positive law within a legal dualism that rejects all monisms as well as the so-called extreme iusnaturalism. [5] The extreme type holds that "natural law exists and all that exists is natural law". [5] It also recognizes that morality is one of the traits for characterizing what law is. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jurisprudence</span> Theoretical study of law

Jurisprudence, also known as theory of law or philosophy of law, is the examination in a general perspective of what law is and what it ought to be. It investigates issues such as the definition of law; legal validity; legal norms and values; as well as the relationship between law and other fields of study, including economics, ethics, history, sociology, and political philosophy.

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of natural order and human nature, from which values, thought by natural law's proponents to be intrinsic to human nature, can be deduced and applied independently of positive law. According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason". Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality".

Political philosophy, or political theory, is the philosophical study of government, addressing questions about the nature, scope, and legitimacy of public agents and institutions and the relationships between them. Its topics include politics, justice, liberty, property, rights, law, and authority: what they are, if they are needed, what makes a government legitimate, what rights and freedoms it should protect, what form it should take, what the law is, and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government, if any, and when it may be legitimately overthrown, if ever.

Reason is the capacity of consciously applying logic by drawing valid conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth. It is associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, religion, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a distinguishing ability possessed by humans. Reason is sometimes referred to as rationality.

Moral absolutism, commonly known as black-and-white morality, is an ethical view that most, if not all actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of context or consequence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Grotius</span> Dutch philosopher and jurist (1583–1645)

Hugo Grotius, also known as Hugo de Groot or Huig de Groot, was a Dutch humanist, diplomat, lawyer, theologian, jurist, statesman, poet and playwright. A teenage prodigy, he was born in Delft and studied at Leiden University. He was imprisoned in Loevestein Castle for his involvement in the controversies over religious policy of the Dutch Republic, but escaped hidden in a chest of books that was regularly brought to him and was transported to Gorinchem. Grotius wrote most of his major works in exile in France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine command theory</span> Meta-ethical theory of morality

Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Virtue ethics</span> Normative ethical theories

Virtue ethics is a philosophical approach that treats virtue and character as the primary subjects of ethics, in contrast to other ethical systems that put consequences of voluntary acts, principles or rules of conduct, or obedience to divine authority in the primary role.

Some philosophers distinguish two types of rights, natural rights and legal rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euthyphro dilemma</span> Ethical problem on the origin of morality posed by Socrates

The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro, "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)

Early modern philosophy The early modern era of philosophy was a progressive movement of Western thought, exploring through theories and discourse such topics as mind and matter, is a period in the history of philosophy that overlaps with the beginning of the period known as modern philosophy. It succeeded the medieval era of philosophy. Early modern philosophy is usually thought to have occurred between the 16th and 18th centuries, though some philosophers and historians may put this period slightly earlier. During this time, influential philosophers included Descartes, Locke, Hume, and Kant, all of whom contributed to the current understanding of philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Positive law</span> Laws that oblige or specify an action

Positive laws are human-made laws that oblige or specify an action. Positive law also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives from the verb to posit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Finnis</span> Australian legal scholar and philosopher

John Mitchell Finnis is an Australian legal philosopher and jurist specializing in jurisprudence and the philosophy of law. He is an original interpreter of Aristotle and Aquinas, and counts Germain Grisez as a major influence and collaborator. He has made contributions to epistemology, metaphysics, and moral philosophy.

Legal naturalism is a term coined by Olufemi Taiwo to describe a current in the social philosophy of Karl Marx which can be interpreted as one of natural law. Taiwo considered it the manifestation of Natural Law in a dialectical materialist context. The concept recognizes the existence of legal priorities or principles, which form an intrinsic part of an economic system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kantian ethics</span> Ethical theory of Immanuel Kant

Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that "I ought never to act except in such a way that I could also will that my maxim should become a universal law." It is also associated with the idea that "it is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will." The theory was developed in the context of Enlightenment rationalism. It states that an action can only be moral if it is motivated by a sense of duty, and its maxim may be rationally willed a universal, objective law.

Common sense is "knowledge, judgement, and taste which is more or less universal and which is held more or less without reflection or argument". As such, it is often considered to represent the basic level of sound practical judgement or knowledge of basic facts that any adult human being ought to possess. It is "common" in the sense of being shared by nearly all people. The everyday understanding of common sense is ultimately derived from historical philosophical discussions. Relevant terms from other languages used in such discussions include the aforementioned Latin, itself translating Ancient Greek κοινὴ αἴσθησις, and French bon sens. However, these are not straightforward translations in all contexts, and in English different shades of meaning have developed. In philosophical and scientific contexts, since the Age of Enlightenment the term "common sense" has been used for rhetorical effect both approvingly and disapprovingly. On the one hand it has been a standard for good taste, good sense, and source of scientific and logical axioms. On the other hand it has been equated to conventional wisdom, vulgar prejudice, and superstition.

<i>Natural Law and Natural Rights</i> 1980 book by John Finnis

Natural Law and Natural Rights is a book by John Finnis first published by Oxford University Press, as part of the Clarendon Law Series. Finnis develops a philosophy of Law in the tradition of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas – Natural Law. His presentation and defence of Natural Law can be explored from three perspectives. First, polemical, by contradistinction with other philosophies of Law. Second, through its particular methodology, based on practical reasoning. Third, through its substantive content in the form of basic human goods. In addition, his 2011 edition included an extensive postscript, which is briefly discussed in the fourth section. The book is written as a collection of essays on a wide range of topics guided by an overall theme.

This is an index of articles in jurisprudence.

The philosophy of human rights attempts to examine the underlying basis of the concept of human rights and critically looks at its content and justification. Several theoretical approaches have been advanced to explain how and why the concept of human rights developed.

Man-made law is law that is made by humans, usually considered in opposition to concepts like natural law or divine law.

References

  1. Falcon y Tella, María José (2010). A Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. Leiden: BRILL. p. 326. ISBN   9789004179325.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Vallejo, Catalina (2012). Plurality of Peaces in Legal Action: Analyzing Constitutional Objections to Military Services in Colombia. Berlin: LIT Verlag. p. 62. ISBN   9783643902825.
  3. Hoevel, Carlos (2013). The Economy of Recognition: Person, Market and Society in Antonio Rosmini. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 100. ISBN   9789400760578.
  4. Schaeffer, John (2019-03-20). Giambattista Vico on Natural Law: Rhetoric, Religion and Sensus Communis. Routledge. ISBN   9780429575082.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tella, María José Falcon y (2010). A Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 204, 326. ISBN   9789004179325.
  6. Husa, Jaakko; Hoecke, Mark Van (2013). Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. p. 235. ISBN   9781849464413.
  7. TAMMELO, LYNDALL LORNA (1981). "From Iusnaturalism to Eunomics via Conativist Ethics". ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. 67 (1): 92–99. ISSN   0001-2343. JSTOR   23679420.
  8. Ferreira da Cunha, Paulo (2013). Rethinking Natural Law. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 11. ISBN   9783642326592.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Martínez, Alejandro Néstor García; Šilar, Mario; Torralba, José M. (2008). Natural Law: Historical, Systematic and Juridical Approaches. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 427. ISBN   978-1-84718-643-0.
  10. de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio (2017). In the Shadow of Vitoria: A History of International Law in Spain (1770–1953). Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff. p. 106. ISBN   9789004343221.
  11. "natural law | Definition, Theory, Ethics, Examples, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-06-14.
  12. Cortina, Adela (2000). "Legislation, Law and Ethics". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 3: 3–7. doi:10.1023/A:1009926924798. S2CID   146136447 via Kluwer Academic Publishers.