J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District | |
---|---|
Court | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania |
Full case name | J. S., a minor, by and through his parents and natural guardians H. S. and I. S., v. Bethlehem Area School District, Thomas Doluisio and A. Thomas Kartsotis |
Decided | September 25, 2002 |
Citation | 807 A.2d 803 (Pa. 2002) |
Case history | |
Prior actions | Student expulsion affirmed, Northampton County Court; Affirmed, 807 A.2d 847 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2000) |
Case opinions | |
Majority: Justice Ralph J. Cappy |
J.S. v. Bethlehem Area School District, 757 A.2d 412 (Pa. 2002), [1] was a case of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, which found the Bethlehem Area School District could punish a student for derogatory and allegedly threatening comments made on a website about a teacher, even though the site was created off-campus.
Justin Swidler, a 14-year-old from Hanover Township, Northampton County, Pennsylvania, was in 1998 an eighth grade student at the Nitschmann Middle School of the Bethlehem Area School District. Some time prior to May 1998, [2] Swidler created a website called "Teacher Sux", in which he mocked then Nitschmann Principal Thomas Kartsotis and algebra teacher Kathleen Fulmer. The site included animated images of Kartsotis getting hit by a slow-moving bullet, and an image of Fulmer transforming into a picture of Adolf Hitler. One section of the website entitled "Why should she die?" listed several reasons Fulmer should be killed, followed by the sentence, "Take a good look at the diagram and the reasons I give, then give me $20 to help pay for the hitman." [3] The school district learned of the website in May 1998 and contacted local police authorities and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, both of which conducted investigations but ultimately declined to press criminal charges. [4]
The Bethlehem Area School District began disciplinary hearings against Swidler as a result of the website and, after two days of hearings in August 1998, the school board voted to permanently expel him. The board concluded the student violated the district's Student Code of Conduct by making threatening and harassing comments, and showing disrespect toward a teacher. [5] Swidler filed an appeal with the Northampton County Court seeking to reverse the expulsion, claiming the website was protected speech under the First Amendment and that the district violated his constitutional rights. [6] Swidler's attorneys also claimed the website included exaggerations and hyperbole and was never meant to be seen by his teachers or anyone other than his friends. The site could not be considered a serious threat, the lawyers claimed, and so should not have been treated as such by the school board. [7] In May 1999, radio talk show host Laura Schlessinger referred to Swidler's case on her show four times in a single month, referring to Swidler as a "little creep" and urging her audience to send money to the Bethlehem Area School District to help fight the lawsuit. [8]
On July 23, 1999, Judge Robert E. Simpson Jr. ruled in favor of the school district, claiming the website was disruptive and threatening, did not constitute protected speech and was a reasonable basis for expulsion. Simpson ruled there was ample evidence for the school board to determine that the site hindered the school's educational process, and wrote in his decision, "The federal constitution does not compel teachers, parents and elected school officials to surrender control of the American public school system to public school students." [6] Swidler appealed the decision to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, but on February 15, 2002, a three-judge panel ruled 2-1 to uphold the previous decision. [9]
On Wednesday November 29, 2000 a Northampton County, Pennsylvania jury awarded a settlement of $450,000 to teacher Kathleen Fulmer for violation of her privacy, and $50,000 to her husband for loss of consortium. The jury also found that Mr. and Mrs. Swidler were negligent in the supervision of their son, Justin. [10]
Swidler, a graduate of Duke University law school, is an employment attorney in New Jersey. [11]
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued its ruling September 25, 2002, upholding the expulsion and the two court decisions that reaffirmed it. The court had found that the website did not reflect a serious threat or expression that Swidler meant to seriously harm Fulmer or Kartsotis, describing it as "a sophomoric, crude, highly offensive and perhaps misguided attempt at humor or parody". [3] However, the court determined the site did disrupt the Bethlehem Area School District environment, and that justified the decision to expel Swidler. [3] Even though the website was created off-campus, the court found there was a "sufficient nexus between the web site and the boy school campus to consider the speech as occurring on-campus." [12]
Although the Supreme Court deemed the website not to be a serious threat, the ruling determined that it was taken seriously enough by some students that they met with counselors, and by some teachers that they voiced concerns for school safety. According to the majority opinion, which was written by Justice Ralph J. Cappy, "The atmosphere of the entire school community was described as that as if a student had died. [...] Complete chaos is not required for a school district to punish free speech." [3]
Northampton County is a county in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, United States. As of the 2020 census, the population was 312,951. Its county seat is Easton. The county was formed in 1752 from parts of Bucks County. Its namesake was the county of Northamptonshire in England, and the county seat of Easton was named for Easton Neston, a country house in Northamptonshire.
Bethlehem Township is a township in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, United States. The population of Bethlehem Township was 23,730 at the 2010 census. It is a suburb of Bethlehem and is part of the Lehigh Valley metropolitan statistical area, which had a population of 861,899 and was the 68th-most populous metropolitan area in the U.S. as of the 2020 census.
Bethlehem is a city in Northampton and Lehigh Counties in the Lehigh Valley region of eastern Pennsylvania, United States. As of the 2020 census, Bethlehem had a total population of 75,781, making it the second-largest city in the Lehigh Valley after Allentown and the seventh-largest city in the state. Among its total population as of 2020, 55,639 were in Northampton County and 19,343 were in Lehigh County. The city is located along the Lehigh River, a 109-mile-long (175 km) tributary of the Delaware River.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court that recognized the First Amendment rights of students in U.S. public schools. The Tinker test, also known as the "substantial disruption" test, is still used by courts today to determine whether a school's interest to prevent disruption infringes upon students' First Amendment rights. The Court famously opined, "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
Moravian University is a private university in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. The institution traces its founding to 1742 by Moravians, descendants of followers of the Bohemian Reformation under John Amos Comenius.
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court upheld the suspension of a high school student who delivered a sexually suggestive speech at a school assembly. The case involved free speech in public schools.
Albany High School (AHS) is a comprehensive public high school in Albany, California in the San Francisco Bay Area. Enrollment is approximately 1,300 students from grades 9 through 12.
Repent America (RA) is a Christian organization based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the United States.
The Thomas More Law Center is a Christian, conservative, nonprofit, public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and active throughout the United States. According to the Thomas More Law Center website, its goals are to "preserve America's Judeo-Christian heritage, defend the religious freedom of Christians, restore time-honored moral and family values, protect the sanctity of human life, and promote a strong national defense and a free and sovereign United States of America."
A speech code is any rule or regulation that limits, restricts, or bans speech beyond the strict legal limitations upon freedom of speech or press found in the legal definitions of harassment, slander, libel, and fighting words. Such codes are common in the workplace, in universities, and in private organizations. The term may be applied to regulations that do not explicitly prohibit particular words or sentences. Speech codes are often applied for the purpose of suppressing hate speech or forms of social discourse thought to be disagreeable to the implementers.
Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech is a national nonprofit organization that specializes in educating children who are deaf or hard of hearing using listening and spoken language (oralism) through the assistance of hearing technology such as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Clarke's five campuses serve more than 1,000 students annually in Canton, Massachusetts, Jacksonville, Florida, New York City, Northampton, Massachusetts, and Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. Clarke is the first and largest organization of its kind in the U.S. Its Northampton campus was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2022.
Northampton Area High School is a public high school in the Northampton Area School District and located in Northampton, Pennsylvania in the Lehigh Valley metropolitan area of eastern Pennsylvania.
Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from prohibiting or punishing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.
Northampton Community College is a public community college in Pennsylvania with campuses in Bethlehem in Northampton County and Tannersville in Monroe County. The college, founded in 1967, also has satellite locations in the south side of Bethlehem and Hawley. The college serves more than 34,000 students a year in credit and non-credit programs.
Bethlehem Area School District is a large public school district serving the city of Bethlehem and it surrounding boroughs of Fountain Hill and Freemansburg, and Bethlehem and Hanover townships across both Lehigh and Northampton Counties in the Lehigh Valley region of eastern Pennsylvania.
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins, 447 U.S. 74 (1980), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision issued on June 9, 1980 which affirmed the decision of the California Supreme Court in a case that arose out of a free speech dispute between the Pruneyard Shopping Center in Campbell, California, and several local high school students.
The issue of school speech or curricular speech as it relates to the First Amendment to the United States Constitution has been the center of controversy and litigation since the mid-20th century. The First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech applies to students in the public schools. In the landmark decision Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the U.S. Supreme Court formally recognized that students do not "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate".
St. Luke's University Health Network (SLUHN) is a non-profit network of 15 campuses and over 300 outpatient sites. The health network is headquartered in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L., 594 U.S. 180 (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the ability of schools to regulate student speech made off-campus, including speech made on social media. The case challenged past interpretations of Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District and Bethel School District v. Fraser in light of online communications.
Layshock v. Hermitage School District, 593 F.3d 249 (2010), was a freedom of speech case of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in which the arguments surrounded the online speech of a public school student. The appeals court affirmed the decision of the district court that the student's suspension for parodying his principal online was unconstitutional.