James Honeycutt

Last updated

ISBN 1-57273-414-0.
James M. Honeycutt
James Honeycutt Outdoor Headshot from LSU Bio Page.jpg
Honeycutt in 2014
Born1958 (age 6566)
OccupationProfessor
Years active1986–present
Known forImagined Interaction Theory
TitleDistinguished Professor Emeritus
SpouseElizabeth Honeycutt
Academic background
Education UT-Austin (B.S.)
Purdue University (M.S.)
Alma mater University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign (Ph.D.)
Thesis An Examination of Information Processing in Initial Interaction through Linking Input, Structure, and Outcome: Effects of Preinteraction Expectancies on Interpersonal Attraction and Interaction Structure [1]  (1988)
Doctoral advisorDean E. Hewes
Other advisorsRobert W. Norton, Master's Thesis
Robert Hopper, Undergraduate Thesis, UT-Austin
Website LSU Faculty Website

James M. Honeycutt (born 1958) is an American academic who is currently a lecturer on the faculty of Organizational Behavior, Coaching, and Consulting at the UT-Dallas Naveen Jindal School of Management. [2] A Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Communication Studies at Louisiana State University, [3] [4] he is best known for his Theory of Imagined Interactions (IIs). [5] [note 1] [6] IIs are a form of social cognition in which an individual imagines and therefore indirectly experiences themselves in anticipated and/or past communicative encounters [note 2] with others. [7] IItheory appears in communication encyclopedias, [8] [7] [6] [5] handbooks [9] [10] and graduate [11] [12] and undergraduate textbooks. [13] [14] [note 3]

Contents

Early life and education

Honeycutt was born and raised in Dallas, Texas in 1956 to Frank and Arletha Honeycutt. [note 4] [15] He attended Lloyd V. Berkner High School, [16] and graduated from UT-Austin in 1979, with a B.S. in interpersonal communication and a minor in social psychology. His honors thesis, advised by Robert Hooper, was "Matching of Interruptions, Talk Duration, Silence in Symmetrical and Complementary Dyads Based on Predispositions Toward Verbal Behavior". [17]

Honeycutt graduated in 1981 with an M.S. in interpersonal communication with a minor in statistics and research methods from Purdue University. His Master's thesis, chaired by Robert W. Norton, was "Relative Commitment of an Individual and the Discriminability of Communicator Styles Used in the Marital Relationship". He received his Ph.D. from University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 1987. His dissertation, "An Examination of Information Processing in Initial Interaction through Linking Input, Structure, and Outcome: Effects of Preinteraction Expectancies on Interpersonal Attraction and Interaction Structure", chaired by Dean E. Hewes, led tofive publications in peer-reviewed journals. [15]

Academic career and teaching

Honeycutt was hired as an assistant professor at LSU in 1986, He received tenure and was promoted to associate professor in 1991, full professor in 2001, and received the honorific Distinguished Professor in 2012. [18] In 1998, he served briefly as a visiting professor at UCSB. He retired from LSU as distinguished professor emeritus in 2019, and returned to his hometown of Dallas, Texas where he is a lecturer at the University of Texas at Dallas.

Honeycutt founded the Matchbox Interaction Lab at LSU in 2007 where individuals, couples, and groups participating in research as subjects discuss topics which are usually promoted by researchers, who then leave the room. Researchers observe the interactions in the lab through one way glass, in addition to full audio and video recording capabilities. [19] If the research requires physiological data, the lab has the capability to record variables like heart rate and galvanic skin response. The name "Matchbox" was coined by students because when fiery conflict interactions occur between subjects based on the researchers' prompt, it's like the researcher lit a match that "sparked" the conflict. [19]

Research

Honeycutt's original work focused on the conflict-linkage function of IIs, which explains why arguments are so persistent in interpersonal relationships. Individuals may ruminate about conflicts through recalling prior arguments while also imagining anticipated conflict in future interactions. Imagining conflict interactions not only keeps the argument fresh in the mind, but can cause physiological arousal and stress reactions. [10] Over time, II theory has expanded to encompass other functions and has been applied in multiple contexts. [7]

Honors

He was honored as an Outstanding Scholar in Communication Theory by the Southern States Communication Association in 2013. [20] The National Communication Association's Social Cognition Division awarded his first book on Imagined Interactions [21] the Distinguished Book Award in 2006.

Major research publications

Books

Books edited

Most cited peer review articles

Notes

  1. Full text available from author here. [5]
  2. IIs are distinct from fantasy due to their focus on actual or plausible interactions
  3. This undergraduate text uses simplified language. Ch.10 refers to "imagined conversations", citing Honeycutt's imagined interactions research (endnote 21). Ch.9 indicates "some research suggests that serial conflicts persist when people rehearse interactions in their minds prior to engaging in them," citing Honeycutt's II conflict-linkage research (endnote 6). [14]
  4. See Dedication, p.vi., for parents' names. [15]

Related Research Articles

In social psychology, an interpersonal relation describes a social association, connection, or affiliation between two or more persons. It overlaps significantly with the concept of social relations, which are the fundamental unit of analysis within the social sciences. Relations vary in degrees of intimacy, self-disclosure, duration, reciprocity, and power distribution. The main themes or trends of the interpersonal relations are: family, kinship, friendship, love, marriage, business, employment, clubs, neighborhoods, ethical values, support and solidarity. Interpersonal relations may be regulated by law, custom, or mutual agreement, and form the basis of social groups and societies. They appear when people communicate or act with each other within specific social contexts, and they thrive on equitable and reciprocal compromises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intrapersonal communication</span> Communication with oneself

Intrapersonal communication is communication with oneself or self-to-self communication. Examples are thinking to oneself "I will do better next time" after having made a mistake or imagining a conversation with one's boss in preparation for leaving work early. It is often understood as an exchange of messages in which sender and receiver are the same person. Some theorists use a wider definition that goes beyond message-based accounts and focuses on the role of meaning and making sense of things. Intrapersonal communication can happen alone or in social situations. It may be prompted internally or occur as a response to changes in the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communication theory</span> Proposed description of communication phenomena

Communication theory is a proposed description of communication phenomena, the relationships among them, a storyline describing these relationships, and an argument for these three elements. Communication theory provides a way of talking about and analyzing key events, processes, and commitments that together form communication. Theory can be seen as a way to map the world and make it navigable; communication theory gives us tools to answer empirical, conceptual, or practical communication questions.

Social cognition is a topic within psychology that focuses on how people process, store, and apply information about other people and social situations. It focuses on the role that cognitive processes play in social interactions.

Intercultural communication is a discipline that studies communication across different cultures and social groups, or how culture affects communication. It describes the wide range of communication processes and problems that naturally appear within an organization or social context made up of individuals from different religious, social, ethnic, and educational backgrounds. In this sense, it seeks to understand how people from different countries and cultures act, communicate, and perceive the world around them. Intercultural communication focuses on the recognition and respect of those with cultural differences. The goal is mutual adaptation between two or more distinct cultures which leads to biculturalism/multiculturalism rather than complete assimilation. It promotes the development of cultural sensitivity and allows for empathic understanding across different cultures.

Distributed cognition is an approach to cognitive science research that was developed by cognitive anthropologist Edwin Hutchins during the 1990s.

Communication accommodation theory (CAT) is a theory of communication, developed by Howard Giles, concerning "(1) the behavioral changes that people make to attune their communication to their partner, (2) the extent to which people perceive their partner as appropriately attuning to them". This concept was later applied to the field of sociolinguistics, in which linguistic accommodation or simply accommodation is the process of individuals adapting their style of speaking to become more like the style of their conversational partners.

Interpersonal deception theory (IDT) is one of a number of theories that attempts to explain how individuals handle actual deception at the conscious or subconscious level while engaged in face-to-face communication. The theory was put forth by David Buller and Judee Burgoon in 1996 to explore this idea that deception is an engaging process between receiver and deceiver. IDT assumes that communication is not static; it is influenced by personal goals and the meaning of the interaction as it unfolds. IDT is no different from other forms of communication since all forms of communication are adaptive in nature. The sender's overt communications are affected by the overt and covert communications of the receiver, and vice versa. IDT explores the interrelation between the sender's communicative meaning and the receiver's thoughts and behavior in deceptive exchanges.

Charles R. Berger was an American professor emeritus of communication at the University of California, Davis. Berger died on September 25, 2018, from health complications arising from cancer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social information processing (theory)</span> Theory of human interactions

Social information processing theory, also known as SIP, is a psychological and sociological theory originally developed by Salancik and Pfeffer in 1978. This theory explores how individuals make decisions and form attitudes in a social context, often focusing on the workplace. It suggests that people rely heavily on the social information available to them in their environments, including input from colleagues and peers, to shape their attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions.

Anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory is known as the high levels of anxiety one may experience as they come in contact with those of another culture. This concept was first introduced by William B. Gudykunst to further define how humans effectively communicate based on their anxiety and uncertainty in social situations. Gudykunst believed that in order for successful intercultural communication a reduction in anxiety/uncertainty must occur. This is assuming that the individuals within the intercultural encounter are strangers. AUM is a theory based on the uncertainty reduction theory (URT) which was introduced by Berger and Calabrese in 1974. URT provides much of the initial framework for AUM, and much like other theories in the communication field AUM is a constantly developing theory, based on the observations of human behaviour in social situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Face negotiation theory</span> Theory in social science

Face negotiation theory is a theory conceived by Stella Ting-Toomey in 1985, to understand how people from different cultures manage rapport and disagreements. The theory posited "face", or self-image when communicating with others, as a universal phenomenon that pervades across cultures. In conflicts, one's face is threatened; and thus the person tends to save or restore his or her face. This set of communicative behaviors, according to the theory, is called "facework". Since people frame the situated meaning of "face" and enact "facework" differently from one culture to the next, the theory poses a cross-cultural framework to examine facework negotiation. It is important to note that the definition of face varies depending on the people and their culture and the same can be said for the proficiency of facework. According to Ting-Toomey's theory, most cultural differences can be divided by Eastern and Western cultures, and her theory accounts for these differences.

Judee K. Burgoon is a professor of communication, family studies and human development at the University of Arizona, where she serves as director of research for the Center for the Management of Information and site director for the NSF-sponsored Center for Identification Technology Research. She is also involved with different aspects of interpersonal and nonverbal communication, deception, and new communication technologies. She is also director of human communication research for the Center for the Management of Information and site director for Center for Identification Technology Research at the university, and recently held an appointment as distinguished visiting professor with the department of communication at the University of Oklahoma, and the Center for Applied Social Research at the University of Oklahoma. Burgoon has authored or edited 13 books and monographs and has published nearly 300 articles, chapters and reviews related to nonverbal and verbal communication, deception, and computer-mediated communication. Her research has garnered over $13 million in extramural funding from the National Science Foundation, the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Counterintelligence Field Activity, and the National Institutes of Mental Health. Among the communication theories with which she is most notably linked are: interpersonal adaptation theory, expectancy violations theory, and interpersonal deception theory. A recent survey identified her as the most prolific female scholar in communication in the 20th century.

James Price Dillard is a distinguished professor of Communication Arts and Sciences Department at Penn State University. He has authored and co-authored over 50 manuscripts primarily on the role of emotion and persuasive influence. Dillard graduated in 1976 from the University of Kansas with a Bachelor's degree in Speech Communication and Psychology. In 1978, he earned his Master's degree in Communication from Arizona State University and in 1983, he received a Ph.D. in Communication from Michigan State University. Dillard is currently teaching Measurement in Communication Science and Persuasive Message Processing classes at Penn State University. His awards include the NCA Golden Anniversary Award for the most outstanding, Distinguished Book Award, Communication and Social Cognition Division of the National Communication Association and many others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Identity management theory</span>

Identity management theory is an intercultural communication theory from the 1990s. It was developed by William R. Cupach and Tadasu Todd Imahori on the basis of Erving Goffman's Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior (1967). Cupach and Imahori distinguish between intercultural communication and intracultural communication.

Cultural contracts refer to the degree that cultural values are exchanged between groups. They are the agreements made between two groups of people regarding how they will modify their identities in unison. Cultural contract theory investigates how identities shift and are negotiated through cross-cultural interaction. It extends identity negotiation theory and uncertainty reduction theory by focusing defining the negotiation experience from the perspective of minority groups when dealing with cultural norms set by the majority groups. Relationally coordinating with others is the main objective of a cultural contract. The three fundamental premises of the cultural contracts theory are that identities are contractual, continually transferred, and requirement for validation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interpersonal communication</span> Exchange of information among people

Interpersonal communication is an exchange of information between two or more people. It is also an area of research that seeks to understand how humans use verbal and nonverbal cues to accomplish several personal and relational goals. Communication includes utilizing communication skills within one's surroundings, including physical and psychological spaces. It is essential to see the visual/nonverbal and verbal cues regarding the physical spaces. In the psychological spaces, self-awareness and awareness of the emotions, cultures, and things that are not seen are also significant when communicating.

Joseph B. Walther is the Mark and Susan Bertelsen Presidential Chair in Technology and Society and the Director of the Center for Information Technology & Society at the University of California, Santa Barbara. His research focuses on social and interpersonal dynamics of computer-mediated communication, in groups, personal relationships, organizational and educational settings. He is noted for creating social information processing theory in 1992 and the hyperpersonal model in 1996.

Marianne Dainton is a scholar of interpersonal communication and a Professor in Communication at La Salle University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Dainton has made substantial contributions to the communication field with several publications concerning relationship maintenance and personal relationships. In addition to her research, Dainton has contributed to mainstream press stories for the CBS Morning Show, Wall Street Journal, and The Philadelphia Inquirer concerning relationship maintenance. As an author, she is widely held in libraries worldwide.

The Goals, Plans, Action theory explains how people use influence over others to accomplish their goals. This theory is prominent in the field of interpersonal communication. The theory is a model for how individuals gain compliance from others. There can be multiple goals related to the need for compliance. These goals are separated into primary and secondary categories. These goals are then translated into plans, both strategic and tactical, and finally carried out in actions. Goals motivate plans, and actions deliver the effort to accomplish goals. The model is rooted in the scientific tradition, with scientific realism, the assumption that “much of the world is patterned, knowable, and objective." The Goals, Plans, Action theory has shown application in academic and personal relationships.

References

  1. Michael, Honeycutt (May 1987). An examination of information processing in initial interaction through linking input, structure and outcome: Effects of preinteraction expectancies on interpersonal attraction and interaction structure (Thesis). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  2. "UT-Dallas Faculty Page". obcc.utdallas.edu. Retrieved July 11, 2021.
  3. "LSU Department of Communication Studies Faculty Biography" . Retrieved February 9, 2021. from College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Lsu.edu
  4. "UAH Department of Communication Arts welcomes Distinguished Speaker Dr. James M. Honeycutt". uah.edu. August 30, 2016. Retrieved February 9, 2021.
  5. 1 2 3 Honeycutt, J.M.; Hatcher, L. (2016). "Imagined Interactions". In Berger, C.; Roloff, M. (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication. Wiley. pp. 1–10. doi:10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic053. ISBN   978-1-118-30605-5.
  6. 1 2 Honeycutt, J.M. (2012). "Imagined Interactions". In Donsbach, W. (ed.). International Encyclopedia of Communication. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbieci010.pub2. ISBN   978-1-4051-3199-5.
  7. 1 2 3 Honeycutt, J.M.; McCann, R. (2017). "Imagined Interactions". In Nussbaum, J (ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.451. ISBN   978-0-19-022861-3.
  8. Vickery, A.J (2017). "Imagined Interactions". In Allen, M. (ed.). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. SAGE. pp. 684–687. doi:10.4135/9781483381411.n241. ISBN   978-1-4833-8142-8.
  9. Floyd, K.; Affifi, T. (2011), "Biological and Physiological Perspectives on Interpersonal Communication", in Knapp, M.; Daly, J. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (4th ed.), Sage, p. 791, ISBN   978-1-4129-7474-5
  10. 1 2 Honeycutt, J.M; Rasner, R. (2020). "Physiological Arousal while Ruminating about Conflict with a Quantum Application to Relational Observation". In Floyd, K.; Weber, R. (eds.). Handbook of Communication Science and Biology. Taylor and Francis. pp. 344–355. doi:10.4324/9781351235587-29. ISBN   978-1-351-23558-7. S2CID   218942909.
  11. Honeycutt, James (2014), "Ch.11:Imagined Interactions", in Berger, C. (ed.), Interpersonal Communication, De Gruyter Mouton, p. 726, ISBN   978-3-11-027679-4
  12. Honeycutt, J.H. (2014), "Chapter 6: Imagined Interaction Theory: Mental Representation of Interpersonal Communication", in Braithwaite, D.; Schrodt, P. (eds.), Engaging Theories in Interpersonal Communication: Multiple Perspectives, SAGE, p. 472, ISBN   978-1-4833-1013-8
  13. Adler, R.; Proctor, R. (2017). Looking Out, Looking In (15th ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 156. ISBN   978-1-305-85565-6.
  14. 1 2 West, R.; Turner, L. (2019). interpersonal communication (4th ed.). SAGE. pp. ch9.268, ch10.307. ISBN   978-1-5443-3666-4.
  15. 1 2 3 Honeycutt, J.M. (September 1988). "An Examination of Information Processing in Initial Interaction through Linking Input, Structure, and Outcome: Effects of Preinteraction Expectancies on Interpersonal Attraction and Interaction Structure". Dissertation Abstracts International. 49 (3): 321. hdl:2142/28594 . Retrieved January 10, 2021.
  16. "James Honeycutt, About". linkedin.com. Retrieved February 4, 2021.
  17. "Curriculum Vitae". utdallas.academia.edu. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  18. "Faculty Award History 2012". lsu.edu. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  19. 1 2 "Lab Conducts Studies in Communication". www.lsureveille.com. November 12, 2008. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
  20. "Outstanding Scholar in Communication Theory; Past Winners". ssca.net. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
  21. Honeycutt, J.M. (December 20, 2002). Imagined Interactions: Daydreaming about Communication (1st ed.). Hampton Press. ISBN   1-57273-413-2.