James Wyckoff

Last updated

James H. Wyckoff is a U.S.-American education economist who currently serves as Memorial Professor of Education and Public Policy (formerly the Curry Memorial Professor) at the University of Virginia, where he is also the Director of the Center for Education Policy and Workforce Competitiveness. [1] His research on the impact of teacher compensation on teacher performance (together with Thomas Dee) has been awarded the Raymond Vernon Memorial Award of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management in 2015. [2]

Contents

Biography

James Wyckoff earned a B.A. in economics from Denison University in 1974 and a Ph.D. in economics from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in 1982. After his graduation, he became an assistant professor of economics at the University of Oklahoma, Norman (1982–86) before moving to the University at Albany, SUNY in 1986, where he worked as assistant professor of public administration before being promoted to associate professor and then to full professor. Intermittedly, Wyckoff also served as chair of Albany's Department of Public Administration and Policy (1996–98) and as Acting Dean of its Graduate School of Public Affairs (1998-2000). Since 2008, Wyckoff has been a professor at the University of Virginia's School of Education and Human Development and Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, where he was honored with the position of Memorial Professor of Education (formerly Curry Memorial Professor) in 2011. In 2010, he moreover became Director of EdPolicyWorks, also known as the Center on Education Policy and Workforce Competitiveness. [3]

In terms of professional activities, Wyckoff is affiliated with the Association for Education Finance and Policy, whose president he was in 2004, [4] and a member of the policy council of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (2006–10), among else. [3] Moreover, he sits on the editorial boards of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , [5] Educational Researcher [6] and Education Finance and Policy [7] and has done so in the past for the Economics of Education Review . [3]

Research

James Wyckoff's research focuses on teacher labour markets, in particular on the preparation, recruitment, assessment and retention of teachers, [1] within which he has frequently collaborated with Donald Boyd, Susanna Loeb and Hamilton Lankford. However, in the 1990s, Wyckoff has also performed research on e.g. school choice, finding (with Lankford) parents to trade-off between the relative quality of school offerings, the tuition of religious schools, the characteristics of other students in public and religious schools, and their family's socioeconomic characteristics. [8]

Analysing the sorting of teachers by qualifications in New York with Lankford and Loeb, Wyckoff found that low-income, low-achieving and non-white students, especially in urban schools, are generally taught by the least skilled teachers, with salaries rarely leaning against and sometimes even contributing to this sorting. [9] In further research with Boyd, they find teacher labor markets' spatial scope to be very small as teachers display strong preferences for proximity, which in turn makes it more difficult for urban schools to recruit new, well-qualified teachers. [10] Overall, they attribute teacher sorting to a combination of more qualified teachers being more likely to leave schools with very low-performing students and schools with such students generally experiencing higher turnover than other schools, [11] [12] though high growth in student achievement can effectively act as a retention mechanism for effective teachers in low-achieving schools. [13] In particular, effective teachers tend to leave low-achieving schools (but not high-achieving schools) within their second and third years at these schools, thereby likely contributing to the widening of the learning outcomes between students; by contrast, less effective teachers tend to leave both low- and high-performing schools within their first year. [14] Importantly, they also find that the main driver behind teachers' turnover decisions in New York City is their (negative) perception of the school administration. [15] The resulting teacher turnover evidently harms students' test scores in math and English language arts, especially in schools with many Black and low-performing students. [16]

However, narrowing the gap between the qualifications of teachers in high- and low-performing schools is possible; for example, the NYC Teaching Fellows and Teach for America initiatives were able to substantially reduce such a gap between New York City's low- and high-poverty schools over 2000-2005 by substituting uncertified teachers in high-poverty schools by academically qualified teachers. [17] Further research by Wyckoff and his co-authors on teachers' preparation and recruitment has found that teachers with reduced pre-job coursework often provide smaller initial gains in both math and English language arts when compared to teachers who completed a university-based teacher education program, though most differences disappear as the cohort matures [18] and that teacher preparation programs' vary in their impact on teachers' value added to student test score performance, with practice-based preparation being particularly effective for new teachers. [19] However, in the past, Wyckoff has been cautious to call for specific policies regarding teacher certification and preparation, arguing that the verdict on their impact on teacher quality and student achievement was still out. [20] Moreover, teachers who have the highest value-added to student test performance have distinctly different instructional practice profiles, e.g. consistently scoring better on Explicit Strategy Instruction. [21] Finally, together with Thomas Dee, Wyckoff has also evaluated IMPACT, the high-powered teacher-evaluation system introduced by Michelle Rhee in Washington D.C., and found that dismissal threats increased the voluntary attrition of low-performing teachers and improved the performance of remaining teachers, while financial incentives were effective in further improving the performance of high-performing teachers. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">No Child Left Behind Act</span> 2002 United States education reform law; repealed 2015

The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) was a U.S. Act of Congress promoted by the Presidency of George W. Bush. It reauthorized the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and included Title I provisions applying to disadvantaged students. It mandated standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals could improve individual outcomes in education. To receive federal school funding, states had to create and give assessments to all students at select grade levels.

Education policy consists of the principles and policy decisions that influence the field of education, as well as the collection of laws and rules that govern the operation of education systems. Education governance may be shared between the local, state, and federal government at varying levels. Some analysts see education policy in terms of social engineering.

Robert Edward Slavin was an American psychologist who studied educational and academic issues. He was known for the Success for All educational model. Until his death, he was a distinguished professor and director of the Center for Research and Reform in Education at Johns Hopkins University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tracking (education)</span> Separation of students by ability

Tracking is separating students by academic ability into groups for all subjects or certain classes and curriculum within a school. It may be referred to as streaming or phasing in some schools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Class-size reduction</span>

As an educational reform goal, class size reduction (CSR) aims to increase the number of individualized student-teacher interactions intended to improve student learning. A reform long holding theoretical attraction to many constituencies, some have claimed CSR as the most studied educational reform of the last century. Until recently, interpretations of these studies have often been contentious. Some educational groups like the American Federation of Teachers and National Education Association are in favor of reducing class sizes. Others argue that class size reduction has little effect on student achievement. Many are concerned about the costs of reducing class sizes.

The Woodrow Wilson Teaching Fellowship is a program of the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation that recruits, supports, and prepares individuals for teaching careers, typically in fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM).

Last in First Out is a policy often used by school districts and other employers to prioritize layoffs by seniority. Under LIFO layoff rules, junior teachers and other employees lose their jobs before senior ones. Laying off junior employees first is not exclusive to the education sector or to the United States, but is perhaps most controversial there. LIFO's proponents claim that it protects teachers with tenure and gives them job stability, and that it is an easily administered way of accomplishing layoffs following a budget cut. LIFO's critics respond that it is bad for students. They prefer that the best teachers remain regardless of how long they have been teaching.

The racial achievement gap in the United States refers to disparities in educational achievement between differing ethnic/racial groups. It manifests itself in a variety of ways: African-American and Hispanic students are more likely to earn lower grades, score lower on standardized tests, drop out of high school, and they are less likely to enter and complete college than whites, while whites score lower than Asian Americans.

The Achievement School District (ASD) is a school system in Tennessee providing academic intervention in the lowest performing schools in Tennessee, with the goal of increasing student achievement in those schools. The ASD's assigned task is to move the bottom 5% of schools in Tennessee to the top 25% of schools in the state. The Achievement School District was created to cause "school turnaround," a term meaning rapid results in poorer-performing schools. The Achievement School District is modeled after the Louisiana Recovery School District and takes elements from Michigan's state-run district for failing schools as well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">School segregation in the United States</span> Racial separation in schools

School segregation in the United States was the segregation of students based on their ethnicity. While not prohibited from having schools, various minorities were barred from most schools, schools for whites. Segregation was enforced by formal legal systems in U.S. states primarily in the Southern United States, although elsewhere segregation could be informal or customary. Segregation laws were dismantled in 1954 by the U.S. Supreme Court because of the successes being attained during the Civil Rights Movement. Segregation continued longstanding exclusionary policies in much of the Southern United States after the Civil War. Jim Crow laws codified segregation. These laws were influenced by the history of slavery and discrimination in the US. Secondary schools for African Americans in the South were called training schools instead of high schools in order to appease racist whites and focused on vocational education. School integration in the United States took place at different times in different areas and often met resistance. After the ruling of Brown v. Board of Education, which banned segregated school laws, school segregation took de facto form. School segregation declined rapidly during the late 1960s and early 1970s as the government became strict on schools' plans to combat segregation more effectively as a result of Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. Voluntary segregation by income appears to have increased since 1990. Racial segregation has either increased or stayed constant since 1990, depending on which definition of segregation is used. In general, definitions based on the amount of interaction between black and white students show increased racial segregation, while definitions based on the proportion of black and white students in different schools show racial segregation remaining approximately constant.

Teacher retention is a field of education research that focuses on how factors such as school characteristics and teacher demographics affect whether teachers stay in their schools, move to different schools, or leave the profession before retirement. The field developed in response to a perceived shortage in the education labor market in the 1990s. The most recent meta-analysis establishes that school factors, teacher factors, and external and policy factors are key factors that influence teacher attrition and retention. Teacher attrition is thought to be higher in low income schools and in high need subjects like math, science, and special education. More recent evidence suggests that school organizational characteristics has significant effects on teacher decisions to stay or leave.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Educational inequality in the United States</span>

Unequal access to education in the United States results in unequal outcomes for students. Disparities in academic access among students in the United States are the result of several factors including: government policies, school choice, family wealth, parenting style, implicit bias towards the race or ethnicity of students, and the resources available to students and their school. Educational inequality contributes to a number of broader problems in the United States, including income inequality and increasing prison populations. Educational inequalities in the United States are wide-ranging, and many potential solutions have been proposed to mitigate their impacts on students.

Thomas S. Dee is an American economist and the Barnett Family Professor of Education at Stanford University, where he also directs the John W. Gardner Center for Youth and Their Communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susanna Loeb</span> American economist

Susanna Loeb is an American education economist and director of the Annenberg Institute at Brown University. She was previously the Barnett Family Professor of Education at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, where she also served as founding director of the Center for Education Policy Analysis (CEPA). Moreover, she directs Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE). Her research interests include the economics of education and the relationship between schools and educational policies, in particular school finance and teacher labor markets.

Brian Aaron Jacob is an American economist and a professor of public policy, economics and education at the Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy of the University of Michigan. There, he also currently serves as co-director of the. In 2008, Jacob's research on education policy was awarded the David N. Kershaw Award, which is given by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management and honours persons who have made a distinguished contribution to the field of public policy analysis and management before the age of 40. His doctoral advisor at the University of Chicago was Freakonomics author Steven Levitt.

Jonah E. Rockoff is an American education economist and currently works as Professor of Finance and Economics at the Columbia Graduate School of Business. Rockoff's research interests include the economics of education and public finance. His research on the management of public schools has been awarded the 2016 George S. Eccles Research Award in Finance and Economics by Columbia Business School.

Helen F. Ladd is an education economist who currently works as the Susan B. King Professor Emeritus of Public Policy and Economics at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy. In recognition of her research on the economics of education, she has been elected to the National Academy for Education and the National Academy of Sciences.

Lynn Fuchs is an educational psychologist known for research on instructional practice and assessment, reading disabilities, and mathematics disabilities. She is the Dunn Family Chair in Psychoeducational Assessment in the Department of Special Education at Vanderbilt University.

Elizabeth Dhuey is a Canadian economist specializing in the economics of education. She is an Associate Professor of Economics at the University of Toronto Scarborough and Chairwoman of the Canadian Women Economists Committee through the Canadian Economics Association.

Mavis G. Sanders is an American research scientist studying education and Black families. She is senior research scholar of Black Children and Families with Child Trends.

References

  1. 1 2 "Faculty profile of James H. Wyckoff". Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy. University of Virginia. Retrieved 13 April 2018.
  2. ↑ APPAM (October 13th, 2015). JPAM Awards 2015 Vernon Memorial Prize. Retrieved April 13th, 2018.
  3. 1 2 3 "James H. Wyckoff Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). University of Virginia. December 2020. Retrieved 28 December 2021.
  4. ↑ List of past presidents of the AEFP. Retrieved April 13th, 2018.
  5. ↑ Editorial Board of the Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Retrieved April 13th, 2018.
  6. ↑ Editorial Board of the Educational Researcher. Retrieved April 13th, 2018.
  7. ↑ Editorial Board of Education Finance and Policy. Retrieved April 13th, 2018.
  8. ↑ Lankford, Hamilton; Wyckoff, James (1992). "Primary and secondary school choice among public and religious alternatives". Economics of Education Review. 11 (4): 317–337. doi:10.1016/0272-7757(92)90040-A.
  9. ↑ Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2002). "Teacher Sorting and the Plight of Urban Schools: A Descriptive Analysis". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 24 (1): 37–62. doi:10.3102/01623737024001037. ISSN   0162-3737.
  10. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2005). "The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 24 (1): 113–132. doi:10.1002/pam.20072. ISSN   0276-8739.
  11. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2005). "Explaining the Short Careers of High-Achieving Teachers in Schools with Low-Performing Students". American Economic Review. 95 (2): 166–171. doi:10.1257/000282805774669628. ISSN   0002-8282.
  12. ↑ Boyd, Donald J.; Grossman, Pam; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Michelli, Nicholas M.; Wyckoff, Jim (2006). "Complex by Design: Investigating Pathways Into Teaching in New York City Schools". Journal of Teacher Education. 57 (2): 155–166. doi:10.1177/0022487105285943. ISSN   0022-4871.
  13. ↑ Boyd, Don; Lankford, Hamp; Loeb, Susanna; Ronfeldt, Matthew; Wyckoff, Jim (2011). "The role of teacher quality in retention and hiring: Using applications to transfer to uncover preferences of teachers and schools". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 30 (1): 88–110. doi:10.1002/pam.20545. ISSN   0276-8739.
  14. ↑ Boyd, Donald; et al. (May 2008). "Who Leaves? Teacher Attrition and Student Achievement". NBER Working Paper No. 14022. doi: 10.3386/w14022 .
  15. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Grossman, Pam; Ing, Marsha; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2011). "The Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions". American Educational Research Journal. 48 (2): 303–333. doi:10.3102/0002831210380788. ISSN   0002-8312.
  16. ↑ Ronfeldt, Matthew; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2013). "How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement". American Educational Research Journal. 50 (1): 4–36. doi:10.3102/0002831212463813. ISSN   0002-8312.
  17. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Rockoff, Jonah; Wyckoff, James (2008). "The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 27 (4): 793–818. doi:10.1002/pam.20377. ISSN   0276-8739.
  18. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Grossman, Pamela; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2006). "How Changes in Entry Requirements Alter the Teacher Workforce and Affect Student Achievement". Education Finance and Policy. 1 (2): 176–216. doi:10.1162/edfp.2006.1.2.176. ISSN   1557-3060.
  19. ↑ Boyd, Donald J.; Grossman, Pamela L.; Lankford, Hamilton; Loeb, Susanna; Wyckoff, James (2009). "Teacher Preparation and Student Achievement". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 31 (4): 416–440. doi:10.3102/0162373709353129. ISSN   0162-3737.
  20. ↑ Boyd, Donald; Goldhaber, Daniel; Lankford, Hamilton; Wyckoff, James (2007). "The Effect of Certification and Preparation on Teacher Quality". The Future of Children. 17 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1353/foc.2007.0000. ISSN   1054-8289. JSTOR   4150019. PMID   17407922.
  21. ↑ Grossman, Pam; Loeb, Susanna; Cohen, Julie; Wyckoff, James (2013). "Measure for Measure: The Relationship between Measures of Instructional Practice in Middle School English Language Arts and Teachers' Value-Added Scores". American Journal of Education. 119 (3): 445–470. doi:10.1086/669901. ISSN   0195-6744.
  22. ↑ Dee, Thomas S.; Wyckoff, James (2015). "Incentives, Selection, and Teacher Performance: Evidence from IMPACT". Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 34 (2): 267–297. doi:10.1002/pam.21818.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.