Jane Collective

Last updated

The Jane Collective or Jane, officially known as the Abortion Counseling Service of Women's Liberation, was an underground service in Chicago, Illinois affiliated with the Chicago Women's Liberation Union that operated from 1969 to 1973, a time when abortion was illegal in most of the United States. The foundation of the organization was laid when Heather Booth helped her friend's sister obtain a safe abortion in 1965. Other women with unwanted pregnancies began to contact Booth after learning via word-of-mouth that she could help them. When the workload became more than what she could manage, she reached out to other activists in the women's liberation movement. The collective sought to address the increasing number of unsafe abortions being performed by untrained providers. Since illegal abortions were not only dangerous but very expensive, the founding members of the collective believed that they could provide women with safer and more affordable access to abortions.

Contents

Initially, the organization directed the women to male doctors. After a few years, however, they learned that one of their most-used doctors had lied about having medical credentials. This created a conflict in the group, causing some members to leave. Others realized that if a man without medical credentials could perform a safe abortion, then they could learn as well. A few of their number learned how to perform surgical abortions, with the dilation and curettage method most commonly used. Members of the group performed an estimated 11,000 abortions, mostly to low-income women who could not afford to travel to the places where abortion was legal, as well as women of color.

In 1972, one of the Jane Collective apartments was raided by the police, and seven of its members were arrested. Each was charged with eleven counts of abortion and conspiracy to commit abortion, carrying a maximum prison sentence of 110 years. Their attorney was able to delay court proceedings in anticipation of the Supreme Court's decision on Roe v. Wade . As the attorney hoped, the Court's decision in Roe in 1973 struck down many abortion restrictions in the US, and the charges against the Jane Collective members were dropped. As women now had access to legal abortion, the Collective disbanded shortly afterwards.

Historical context

By the mid-1900s, abortion was illegal in almost every US state. [1] In the state of Illinois, at the time the Jane Collective formed, abortion was considered felony homicide. [2] However, in the 1960s, it was estimated that a third of US women who wanted no more children would have at least one unintended pregnancy by the end of their childbearing years. [1] In the 1950s and 1960s, it was estimated that 200,0001.2 million illegal abortions occurred annually. [1] Women sometimes died as a result of these procedures, accounting for 17% of all deaths attributed to childbirth and pregnancy in 1965. [1] Low-income women had relatively high rates of obtaining illegal abortions, at 8% of those surveyed in New York City, with the majority attempting a self-induced abortion and only 2% involving physicians. [1] In New York City, non-white and Puerto Rican women were more at risk from illegal abortions: abortion accounted for half of all their pregnancy-related deaths, in contrast to 25% of pregnancy-related deaths for white women. [1] Nationwide, the abortion-related mortality rate for non-white women was twelve times greater than that of white women from 19721974. [1]

Abortion remained illegal in each state until Colorado was the first to decriminalize abortion in some circumstances in 1967. [3] [4] In 1970, four statesWashington, New York, Hawaii, and Alaskarepealed laws against abortion, making it generally legal before the age of viability. Traveling to obtain legal abortion became easier for the affluent, as they no longer had to travel to destinations such as the United Kingdom. Traveling to obtain an abortion was cost prohibitive for those who could not afford the procedure, let alone travel and lodging expenses. [1]

For those who could procure an illegal abortion, results were mixed. Some women experienced hemorrhaging or sepsis. Others paid for abortions only to still be pregnant afterwards from a botched procedure. [5]

Origins

Heather Booth, the founder of the Jane Collective Heather Booth in documentary.jpg
Heather Booth, the founder of the Jane Collective

In 1965, University of Chicago student Heather Booth learned that her friend's sister had an unwanted pregnancy that left her distraught and nearly suicidal. [6] [7] Booth had previously not given much thought to abortion access; her exposure to the experience of an unwanted pregnancy led her to consider abortion restrictions as unjust laws, saying, "in the face of an unjust law, you need to take action to challenge it". [6] To seek assistance for her friend's sister, Booth contacted the Medical Committee for Human Rights, who connected her with civil rights leader and surgeon T. R. M. Howard. Howard worked at the Friendship Medical Center in Chicago, and Booth sent her friend to his facility. Word spread that Booth was able to help women obtain safe abortions, and she soon began receiving calls from other women. Operating under the pseudonym "Jane", [6] Booth began taking such phone calls at her college dormitory, referring more clients to Howard, who performed the abortions for $500. [6] Booth later switched to an abortion care provider alternately referred to as "Mike" [8] or "Nick". [9]

Location of Hyde Park, Chicago, where the Jane Collective was founded US-IL-Chicago-CA41.svg
Location of Hyde Park, Chicago, where the Jane Collective was founded

Booth continued to refer patients for abortions, averaging one per week, mostly for low-income women and women of color. This continued until 1968 when she was out of college, married, pregnant, and employed full-time. With less time to devote to connecting women with abortion providers, she recruited and trained ten other women to help her. She transferred her leadership role to Ruth Surgal and Jody Parsons. [6] The organization, founded in Hyde Park, Chicago, adopted the name Abortion Counseling Service of Women's Liberation, proclaiming that they were for "every woman having exactly as many children as she wants, when she wants, if she wants." [4] They decided that the name was wordy, though; women who called should ask for "Jane", which they considered the "everywoman name". [9] The Abortion Counseling Service of Women's Liberation was a work group of the Chicago Women's Liberation Union. [10] One member of the Jane Collective was known as "Jenny". She was motivated to help provide abortion access by her past struggles to obtain a safe abortion. Jenny discovered that she was pregnant shortly after she was diagnosed with Hodgkin's lymphoma. [4] [9] She sought an abortion due to concerns about the effects of her radiation treatment on the fetus, but was denied by the hospital board. After informing two psychiatrists that she intended to kill herself if not allowed an abortion, she was allowed her request. [9]

Organization structure and services

The services of the Jane Collective spread through word of mouth. The organization also reached women through posting signs in the city that read, "Pregnant? Don't want to be? Call Jane", listing the phone number. [11] They placed ads in underground newspapers saying, "Pregnant? Worried? Call Jane." [12] The number directed the caller to an answering machine, where they were instructed to leave their name, phone number, and date of their last period. The woman would then be contacted by a member of the Collective, who would schedule a meeting to discuss the procedure. [11] The Jane Collective had patients referred to them by medical professionals, which annoyed them, as the doctors were almost always unwilling to provide any assistance. [12] If the woman decided to proceed with the abortion, she was given the address of "The Front". "The Front" was one of the many apartments that the Collective rented throughout the city. Before the abortion, the patient and a member of Jane would meet at The Front, where the patient would then be driven to a second location to undergo the abortion. [11]

"Jenny", one of the members, eventually began demanding to be in the room with the patients while the procedure was performed to ensure that the women were treated well. [9] Jenny was highly critical of how her health was managed by men when she was pregnant with cancer, saying "Through that whole experience, there wasn't one woman involved. It was men — the doctors, the hospital board — controlling my reproductive rights and condemning me to death." [4] Jenny learned about providing abortions by watching "Nick", who eventually trained her as his nurse. [9] [4]

Abortions remained cost-prohibitive for their clients, who were generally low-income. Even after guaranteeing some abortion providers ten clients per week, the per-abortion cost remained $500. [4] Members of the Collective used fundraising to help cover the costs of the procedure for those who couldn't afford it. [13] In 1971, however, the Collective discovered that "Nick" was not actually a doctor, as he had claimed. [14] This caused emotional duress for some members of the Collective, who insisted that using an abortion provider with fake credentials made them "just like the back-alleys", and that they should shutter the organization. [12] Up to half of the group's members left after learning that their abortion provider was not an actual doctor. [9] He was performing up to twenty abortions a day with skill, however, and other members realized: "If he can do it, then we can do it, too." [14] As Jenny learned to perform the procedure, she was able to teach other members. It remained a limited skill, however, with only about four members trained to perform surgical abortions. [14]

Members took over performing abortions, which enabled them to drop the price from $500–600 to $100. [9] However, they accepted whatever amount a client was able to pay. [11] The Jane Collective learned how to perform pap smears and found a laboratory to read the results for $4. [9] The drop in prices resulted in more low-income clients, as well as more black clients. One black woman, Lois, criticized the group when she came to them for an abortion for their lack of diversity, as they were nearly all white and middle-class. She stated, "You guys are the white angels that are going to save everybody and where are the black women at?" Lois decided to join the Collective to help counsel its black patients. Seeking an abortion could be especially difficult for black women, as some black nationalists decried that abortion was an agent of black genocide. [9]

The women learned several abortion methods, such as the cannula method for early stage abortions, and the super coil method used in later stage abortions which caused the women to miscarry, but the most widely used was the D&C (dilation and curettage) method. [13]

It was rumored that the police intentionally turned a blind eye to the Collective's illegal activities, possibly because unwanted pregnancies and resulting abortions also occurred in their families. [4] Some of their clients were from such families, [15] or were even policewomen themselves. [16] One of the women who was trained to perform abortions noted, "Neither the Chicago Police nor the Outfit/Mafia had previously bothered us though each knew of our work: we were clean, damn good, and made too little money to interest them." [10] Pauline Bart noted that "unlike other illegal abortionists, Jane did not leave bleeding bodies in motels for the police to deal with", which could explain the years of inaction of the Chicago police regarding the Collective's activities. [16]

In 1972, two Catholic women went to the police to report that their sister-in-law was planning on having an abortion. Two police officers arrived at one of the Collective's apartments on 3 May and asked, "where's the doctor?", looking for a male practitioner. [11] Seven of the women working for Jane were arrested and charged with eleven counts of abortion and conspiracy to commit abortion. [11] They became known as the "Abortion 7". [15] While in the police van, one woman removed a stack of index cards from her purse that had the contact information of their patients. They ripped the names and addresses off of the index cards and swallowed them to protect the information. [14] Each woman faced up to a maximum of a 110-year prison sentence, with 110 years possible on each count. [15]

Jeanne Galatzer-Levy, one of the women arrested, recalled that she felt that the police treated them, the abortion providers, better than their patients. She stated, "...there were all kinds of class and race things going on with the police. They felt more like us than like the women they were supposedly protecting from us, and they kinda wanted that relationship. So that was bizarre, just bizarre." The 7 were soon released on bail. [15]

The 7 hired an attorney, Jo-Anne Wolfson. [2] Wolfson "really wanted the case, because she was a woman and she thought a woman should handle the case". [15] She pursued a legal strategy of delaying the court proceedings as long as possible. It was known that the Supreme Court was currently deciding the Roe v. Wade case: a favorable ruling would make it easier for Wolfson to have the charges dismissed or obtain a more favorable plea deal. [15] In 1973, Roe v. Wade was decided, which struck down many abortion restrictions. [14] All of the charges against the Abortion 7 were dismissed; additionally, they were not charged with practicing without a license in exchange for not requesting the return of their medical instruments. [15]

After abortion was legalized, the Jane Collective disbanded. One doctor offered the Jane Collective abortionists a job at her office performing abortions, but was then dissuaded by her lawyer. [4] Several members were critical of the Roe v. Wade decision, with Laura Kaplan saying it was "written emphatically in terms of physician’s rights, not women’s rights". In her eyes, illegal abortion with women helping women was supplanted by a process in which men would be in charge of women's bodies once again. [9] Linnea Johnson said, "what we did was to remand women back into the realm of male law, male custom, medical custody. Bad idea then as now." [10] The women, who were burned-out with their mission and each other, according to Kaplan, had an "end-of-Jane party" after the first legal abortion clinics opened in the spring of 1973. They then went their separate ways. [12] Martha Scott was later employed at a woman's health center and remained an activist for women's rights. [11]

Outcomes and legacy

In the seven years that the group existed, they performed an estimated 11,000 abortions. [17] There were no reports of abortion-related death as a result of their work, though one member, Martha Scott, recalled that some of their patients ended up having to go to the emergency room afterwards, while others had to undergo hysterectomies. [11] One obstetrician who provided follow-up visits for the Collective's patients stated that their safety rate was comparable to legally operating clinics in New York. [14]

The story of the Jane Collective has been called a "motivational call to arms". [18] Haven Coalition, a non-profit in New York City that helps out-of-town women access abortions in the city, draws inspiration from the Jane Collective for their operations. [6] Abortion access has become increasingly restricted: By 2018, more than 1,100 abortion restrictions had been passed in the US, and the number of abortion clinics declined by nearly half since the late 1970s. [19] A volunteer with the Haven Coalition stated, "There’s an effort to sort of preserve the vestiges of what used to be an underground railroad and something that might be again", alluding to the possibility that abortion could become illegal in the US once again. [6] The Jane Collective has also been cited as inspiration to a loose network of American women who provide illegal abortions. [19]

In 2022, the US Supreme Court overruled Roe v. Wade in the decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization . Abortion became illegal or highly restricted in several US states, with commentators noting the likely rise of underground abortion organizations as a result. [20] Medical student and researcher Rainey Horwitz stated that "the Jane Collective really exemplified...that abortions are not medically complex procedures, especially now in 2022, when so many people can have the option to undergo a medication abortion and have to completely eliminate those risks of those surgical abortions." [21]

Representation in film

See also

Related Research Articles

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States generally protected a right to have an abortion. The decision struck down many abortion laws, and caused an ongoing abortion debate in the United States about whether, or to what extent, abortion should be legal, who should decide the legality of abortion, and what the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere should be. The decision also shaped debate concerning which methods the Supreme Court should use in constitutional adjudication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States abortion-rights movement</span> Support for womens right to elective abortion

The United States abortion-rights movement is a sociopolitical movement in the United States supporting the view that a woman should have the legal right to an elective abortion, meaning the right to terminate her pregnancy, and is part of a broader global abortion-rights movement. The movement consists of a variety of organizations, with no single centralized decision-making body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion in the United States</span> Termination of a pregnancy in the United States

Abortion is a divisive issue in American politics and culture wars, with widely different abortion laws in U.S. states. Since 1976, the Republican Party has generally sought to restrict abortion access based on the stage of pregnancy or to criminalize abortion, whereas the Democratic Party has generally defended access to abortion and has made contraception easier to obtain. The abortion-rights movement advocates for patient choice and bodily autonomy, while the anti-abortion movement maintains that the fetus has a right to live. Historically framed as a debate between the pro-choice and pro-life labels, most Americans agree with some positions of each side. Support for abortion gradually increased in the U.S. beginning in the early 1970s, and stabilized during the 2010s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carol Downer</span>

Carol Downer is an American feminist lawyer and non-fiction author who focused her career on abortion rights and women's health around the world. She was involved in the creation of the self-help movement and the first self-help clinic in LA, which later became a model and inspiration for dozens of self-help clinics across the United States.

Menstrual extraction (ME) is a type of manual vacuum aspiration technique developed by feminist activists Lorraine Rothman and Carol Downer to pass the entire menses at once. The non-medicalized technique has been used in small feminist self-help groups since 1971 and has a social role of allowing access to early abortion without needing medical assistance or legal approval. ME usage declined after 1973, when Roe v. Wade legalized abortion in the United States. There has been renewed interest in the technique, in the 1990s and more recently in the 2010s, due to increased restrictions on abortion. In some countries where abortion is illegal, such as Bangladesh, the terms "menstrual regulation" or "menstrual extraction" are used as euphemisms for early pregnancy terminations.

Ruth Barnett was an abortion provider operating in Portland, Oregon from 1918 to 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion law in the United States by state</span> Termination of pregnancy in states of the United States

The legality of abortion in the United States and the various restrictions imposed on the procedure vary significantly depending on the laws of each state or other jurisdiction. Some states prohibit abortion at all stages of pregnancy with few exceptions, others permit it up to a certain point in a woman's pregnancy, while others allow abortion throughout a woman's pregnancy. In states where abortion is legal, several classes of restrictios on the procedure may exist, such as parental consent or notification laws, requirements that patients be shown an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion, mandatory waiting periods, and counselling requirements. Abortion laws tend to be the most strict in the Southern United States and the most lenient in the Northeastern and Western United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chicago Abortion Fund</span> American non-profit organization

The Chicago Abortion Fund was founded in October 1985 in Chicago, Illinois. Chicago Abortion Fund is a non-profit organization which provides medical referrals and funds to people who are facing barriers in accessing abortion services. The group also may provide logistical, practical, and emotional support as needed and engages in political advocacy work and research in Illinois and beyond. This organization is affiliated with the National Network of Abortion Funds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abortion-rights movements</span> Social movement advocating for legal access to abortion

Abortion-rights movements, also self-styled as pro-choice movements, advocate for the right to have legal access to induced abortion services including elective abortion. They seek to represent and support women who wish to terminate their pregnancy without fear of legal or social backlash. These movements are in direct opposition to anti-abortion movements.

<i>Ask for Jane</i> 2018 American film

Ask for Jane is a 2018 American historical drama film created and produced by Cait Cortelyou, and written and directed by Rachel Carey. The film stars Cait Cortelyou, Cody Horn, Sarah Ramos, Sarah Steele and Sophie von Haselberg.

The women's health movementin the United States refers to the aspect of the American feminist movement that works to improve all aspects of women's healthcare. It began during the second wave of feminism as a sub-movement of the women's liberation movement. WHM activism involves increasing women's knowledge and control of their own bodies on a variety of subjects, such as fertility control and home remedies, as well as challenging traditional doctor-patient relationships, the medicalization of childbirth, misogyny in the health care system, and ensuring drug safety.

Abortion in Illinois is legal. Laws about abortion dated to the early 1800s in Illinois; the first criminal penalties related to abortion were imposed in 1827, and abortion itself became illegal in 1867. As hospitals set up barriers in the 1950s, the number of therapeutic abortions declined. Following Roe v. Wade in 1973, Illinois passed a number of restrictions on abortion, many of which have subsequently been repealed. Illinois updated its existing abortion laws in June 2019. The state has seen a decline in the number of abortion clinics over the years, going from 58 in 1982 to 47 in 1992 to 24 in 2014.

Abortion in Connecticut is legal up to the point of fetal viability, or after that if necessary to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman. A poll by the Pew Research Center found that 67 percent of adults in the state believed that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Abortions took place early in the state's history. People at that time talked about abortions using euphemisms. The death of Sarah Grosvenor following unsuccessful abortion resulted in a prosecution in colonial Connecticut. Connecticut became the first state to criminalize abortion after codifying its common law in 1821. Later, such laws were justified as trying to protect the life of the women from bad actors providing unsafe abortion services. The state was one of ten states in 2007 to have a customary informed consent provision for abortions. In 1965, the US Supreme Court heard the case of Griswold v. Connecticut, striking down laws that banned the sale, use of and prescription of contraceptives, even for married couples. The Court's later decision in 1973's Roe v. Wade ruling meant the state could no longer regulate abortion in the first trimester. In 1990, state law was amended to read, "the decision to terminate a pregnancy prior to the viability of the fetus shall be solely that of the pregnant woman in consultation with her physician", the first such law in state codifying the Court's holding in Roe, as it would be later modified by Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Abortion in Massachusetts is legal up to at least the 24th week of pregnancy, with exceptions allowing later termination of pregnancies in some circumstances. Modern Massachusetts is considered one of the most pro-choice states in the country: a PEW research poll finding that 74% of residents supported the right to an abortion in all or most cases, a higher percentage than any other state. Marches supporting abortion rights took place as part of the #StoptheBans movement in May 2019.

Abortion in Michigan is legal beyond fetal viability. A state constitutional amendment to explicitly guarantee abortion rights was placed on the ballot in 2022 as Michigan Proposal 22–3; it passed with 57 percent of the vote, adding the right to abortion and contraceptive use to the Michigan Constitution. The amendment largely prevents the regulation of abortion before fetal viability, unless said regulations are to protect the individual seeking an abortion, and it also makes it unconstitutional to make laws restricting abortions which would protect the life and health, physical and/or mental, of the pregnant individual seeking abortion.

Abortion, also known as pregnancy termination, was legalized up to the 24th week of pregnancy in New York (NY) in 1970, three years before it was decriminalized for the entire United States with the Supreme Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973. Roe v. Wade was later overturned in 2022 by the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The Reproductive Health Act, passed in 2019 in New York, further allows abortions past the 24th week of pregnancy if a woman's life or health is at risk or if the fetus is not viable.

Elective abortions in Wisconsin became illegal after the overturning of Roe v. Wade by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 24, 2022. An 1849 law bans the procedure in all cases except when the life of the mother is in danger. The enforceability of the law is disputed and being considered by the state courts.

Abortion in Maryland is legal up to the point of fetal viability or when necessary to preserve the life or health of the pregnant woman. The first laws regulating abortion in the state were passed in 1867 and 1868, banning abortion except by a physician to "secure the safety of the mother." Abortion providers continued to operate, with a robust network of referrals from regular physicians to "skilled abortionists" such as Dr. George Lotrell Timanus, who practiced from the 1920s through the 1950s in Baltimore. Medical and legal enforcement became more strict from the 1940s through 60s, with numerous police raids on abortion providers. In 1968, Maryland passed a liberalized abortion law that clarified the wording of the previous law, allowing abortion in hospital settings in cases of rape, severe fetal deformity, or when life and health were endangered.

Inez Brown Burns (1886-1976) was an underground abortion provider and socialite in San Francisco. She created an extensive West Coast abortion network in the United States, which catered to a range of clients in the early 20th century. It is estimated that her clinic provided about 50,000 abortions in San Francisco and about 150,000 abortions total. In her lifetime, Burns was widely covered in the press, due to her socially unconventional lifestyle, legal troubles, and occupation as an abortion care provider in the pre-Roe v. Wade era.

Our Bodies Our Doctors is a 2019 American documentary film directed by Portland-based clinical psychologist and documentary filmmaker Jan Haaken. It concerns the work of abortion providers in the United States and controversy and backlash often faced by those providers. The film features the work of providers local to the Pacific Northwest, including based in the Seattle metropolitan area and the Oregon Health & Science University, as well as in Kansas and Oklahoma at the South Wind Women's Center.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Benson Gold, Rachel (1 March 2003). "Lessons from Before Roe: Will Past be Prologue?". Guttmacher Institute. Archived from the original on 14 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  2. 1 2 Jacobson, R. (24 April 2018). "Meet Judith Arcana, a Pioneer of '70s-Era Underground Abortion Work". Monthly Portland. Archived from the original on 14 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  3. "It's Been 50 Years Since Colorado Passed This Groundbreaking Abortion Law". TIME. TIME USA, LLC. 25 April 2017. Archived from the original on 2 February 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Grossman, Ron (20 January 2017). "Flashback: Before Roe v. Wade, the Jane Collective served Chicago women". Chicago Tribune. Archived from the original on 12 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  5. Messer, E.; May, K. E. (1988). Back rooms: Voices from the illegal abortion era . St. Martin's Press. ISBN   9780879758769.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Lampen, Claire (29 January 2018). "The Underground Network That Helped Women Get Abortions When No One Else Would". Broadly. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  7. Baumgardner, Jennifer (2008). Abortion & Life . New York: Akashic Books. p.  24. ISBN   978-1-933354-59-0. jane collective.
  8. Stern, M. (13 November 2012). "Interview with Heather Booth of the Jane Abortion Service". Justseeds. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Smith, L. (7 July 2017). "Before Roe v. Wade, the women of the Jane collective learned to give safe abortions themselves". Timeline. Archived from the original on 24 July 2017. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  10. 1 2 3 Johnson, Linnea. "Something Real: Jane and Me. Memories and Exhortations of a Feminist Ex-Abortionist". CWLU Herstory Project. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Gilles, N.; Kramer, S.; Richman, J. (19 January 2018). "Before 'Roe v. Wade,' The Women of 'Jane' Provided Abortions For The Women Of Chicago". NPR. Archived from the original on 12 December 2018. Retrieved 12 January 2019.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Schwartz, Madeleine; Booth, Heather; Kaplan, Laura; Galatzer-Levy, Jeanne; Arcana, Judith (April 2017). "Jane Does". Harper's Magazine. April 2017. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  13. 1 2 Kaplan, Laura (1997). The Story of Jane: The Legendary Feminist Abortion Service. New York: University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226424217.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Manning, Kate (22 April 2017). "The Amateur Abortionists". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 24 July 2018. Retrieved 23 July 2018.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Galatzer-Levy, Jeanne. "On the Job with Jane". CWLU Herstory Project. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  16. 1 2 Bart, Pauline B. (1987). "Seizing the means of reproduction: An illegal feminist abortion collective—How and why it worked". Qualitative Sociology. 10 (4): 339–357. doi:10.1007/BF00988383. S2CID   144097441.
  17. Alfonso III, Fernando (4 May 2022). "The abortion underground and what lessons can be learned from the Jane Collective". NPR. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  18. O'Donnell, Kelly Suzanne (2017). "Reproducing Jane: Abortion Stories and Women's Political Histories". Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 43: 77–96. doi:10.1086/692444. S2CID   149057180.
  19. 1 2 Presser, L. (27 August 2018). "Inside the secret network providing home abortions across the US". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 January 2019. Retrieved 13 January 2019.
  20. Gilbert, Sophie (30 June 2022). "What a Story of 1970s Abortion Activism Can Teach Us Today". The Atlantic. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  21. Alfonso III, Fernando (4 May 2022). "The abortion underground and what lessons can be learned from the Jane Collective". NPR. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  22. "Inside the Starry, Timely Films of Sundance 2022". Vanity Fair. 9 December 2021. Retrieved 9 January 2022.
  23. "Feature: Call Jane". Sundance Film Festival Program. 21 January 2022. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
  24. "Jane: An Abortion Service". Variety . 25 January 1996. Archived from the original on 24 February 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  25. Swartz, Tracy (28 July 2017). "2 films to focus on Jane Collective, Chicago's underground network for abortion access". Chicago Tribune . Archived from the original on 20 January 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  26. Busch, Anita (26 July 2017). "'Ask For Jane': Competing Underground Abortion Project Underway". Deadline. Archived from the original on 15 December 2018. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
  27. McNary, Dave (22 May 2018). "Michelle Williams to Star in Underground Abortion Movie 'This Is Jane'". Variety . Archived from the original on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 24 February 2019.

Further reading