John Brettan or Breton (died after 1382) was an Irish judge and Crown official. [1] His petitions to the Irish Privy Council, of which he wrote five between 1376 and 1382, and which have survived (there were others, now lost); cast a valuable light on the disturbed condition of English-ruled Ireland in the late fourteenth century, and especially the situation in Carlow, his home town, which was the effective seat of English government in the latter half of the fourteenth century. [1]
His family name is English: it is generally thought to be derived from Breton, and was occasionally spelt that way. He was born in Carlow town and lived there for most of his life. [1]
He is first heard of in 1358, when he was one of three leading citizens of the town (the others being the High Sheriff of Carlow, William Valle, and Brother John, a monk of Killergy Abbey) [2] who were entrusted with organising the defence of Carlow against the imminent threat from the Irish of Leinster to burn it: "which God forbid!", in the words of the Patent Rolls. An Irish confederacy had assembled "a great army", burnt the towns near Carlow and driven off cattle, without any opposition. [2] The three citizens were given a commission of array, to muster the inhabitants of the town and put them in a proper condition for war. The defence of Carlow from raids by the Irish of Leinster was to be a preoccupation of Brettan throughout his career. Whether he had any military training, as commissioners of array usually did, is unclear. The Commission's defence of the town seems to have been successful in the short term, and Carlow suffered no major attack until 1363. [3]
In 1359, though he was not yet a judge, he sat with John de Rednesse, the Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, to hear a case of novel disseisin between Thomas Norragh and John l'Enfaunt. [2]
In 1369 he was appointed a Baron (judge) of the Court of Exchequer (Ireland) and Chief Remembrancer of the Exchequer of Ireland (the Court and the Government department also called the Exchequer were not then fully distinct). The Remembrancer's principal task was to draw up the memorandum rolls to "remind" the Barons of pending cases. As such it was rather unusual for one man to act as both Baron and Remembrancer. He received a fee of 100 shillings a year as Remembrancer. [1]
Both the Exchequer and the Court of Common Pleas (Ireland) had moved from Dublin to Carlow in 1361, [4] as Carlow was closer to the centre of the Pale (that part of Ireland which was under secure English rule). Dublin by contrast was near the border of the Pale and was frequently raided by hostile Irish clans from County Wicklow (Norman Ireland had no capital city or central seat of government as such). [4] However the Courts returned to Dublin in 1393, as Carlow had become as dangerous as Dublin: it was subject to frequent attack by Irish clans, [3] and was burnt on at least three occasions, in 1363, 1376 and 1391-2, with heavy casualties in the 1376 attack. [5] Brettan himself had helped organise the defence of Carlow against a similar threat of attack in 1358. [2] The Exchequer had already moved back to Dublin temporarily in the 1360s. [3] William de Karlell, another of the Barons, was sitting in Carlow in 1374, when he complained to the Crown that his horse had been stolen, and received compensation for the theft. [6]
A petition from Brettan to the English Crown in 1376 speaks eloquently of the dangers of living and working in Carlow. [7] He wrote that he had "continued the pleas of the Court (of Exchequer) in diverse places", and journeyed to the town of Carlow "where the Exchequer was", even in time of war when the other Barons dared not go there. [7] In addition, he wrote that he had served as Remembrancer for many years at his own expense with no salary or other rewards from the Crown "to his immense charge". [7] Brettan, a native of the town, had a house in Carlow, which was burnt, along with most of his possessions, "to his manifest impoverishment" [6] in the recent destruction of the town by the Irish of Leinster. This was a reference to the attack of 1376, in which there were heavy casualties; [7] there had been other raids, including a very serious one in 1363. [3] The Crown granted him 100 shillings by way of compensation. [7]
This and two later surviving petitions suggest that he was a hard-working and conscientious official: by his own account (which is perfectly plausible, given the times he lived in) at times he was the only Exchequer judge sitting in Carlow. Having been entrusted with the defence of the town as early as 1358, he was no doubt something of an expert on attacks by the Irish. It should be said that another Baron of the Exchequer, John de Shriggeley, did manage to hold the assizes in Carlow for several terms in 1382-5, and received two extra payments of 10 marks each as a result. [8]
In 1377 he petitioned for reimbursement of the cost of his horse, whose value he put at 100 shillings. The horse was lost at Youghal, where he had travelled "on the King's business", as he attempted to cross the River Blackwater on his own, apparently because he was unable to pay the toll to the ferryman. [7] The Council, being satisfied as to the truth of the claim, granted him 5 marks compensation. On the other hand, it refused his request to cross to England to report on his official business in Cork to King Edward III and the English Privy Council: their reasons for this refusal are unclear. [7]
In 1378 he was awarded a further 100 shillings for his services to the Crown in levying and collecting debts in Leinster, thereby according to his own account gaining much profit for the Crown. [9]
His fourth and fifth surviving petitions to the King and Council in 1381 and 1382 are almost identical in content, except that Thomas Bache, the Chancellor of the Exchequer of Ireland, and Richard Walsh, Chamberlain of the Exchequer, joined in the 1381 petition. Both state that Brettan in his capacity as Remembrancer had been employed to levy the King's debts in seven counties of Munster and Leinster over a six-month period in 1381-1382, at great expense and labour, without any reward. [10] On foot of the petition of 1381 Brettan and Walsh were awarded £4 (Bache got slightly more). On foot of the petition of 1382, King Richard II, being yet again satisfied by the Council of the truth of his claim, awarded him 40 marks compensation. [10] Brettan himself refers to several petitions on the subject to the Justiciar of Ireland where his claims for compensation were upheld and payment ordered, but he was unable to prove these claims as the petitions had been lost. [10]
The details of his subsequent career are unknown. John Brekdene (also called Brakden or Brecden) replaced him as Remembrancer of the Exchequer on an unspecified date, [11] and held that office until 1386 when he became a Baron for the second time, [1] having first been appointed "during pleasure" in 1368. [12]
Thomas Taillour replaced Brekdene as Remembrancer. [11] Taillour, then a royal clerk, was like Brettan living in Carlow during the Irish attack of 1376, "at the first killing of the men of Carlow", and he also petitioned the Crown for redress. [7] He apparently died in 1407, having stepped down as Remembrancer in 1392, when Thomas Gower succeeded him. [13]
The Exchequer of Ireland was a body in the Kingdom of Ireland tasked with collecting royal revenue. Modelled on the English Exchequer, it was created in 1210 after King John of England applied English law and legal structure to his Lordship of Ireland. The Exchequer was divided into two parts; the Superior Exchequer, which acted as a court of equity and revenue in a way similar to the English Exchequer of Pleas, and the Inferior Exchequer, which directly collected revenue from those who owed The Crown money, principally rents for Crown lands. The Exchequer primarily worked in a way similar to the English legal system, holding a similar jurisdiction. Following the Act of Union 1800, which incorporated Ireland into the United Kingdom, the Exchequer was merged with the English Exchequer in 1817 and ceased to function as an independent body, although the Irish Court of Exchequer, like other Irish courts, remained separate from the English equivalent.
The Court of Common Pleas was one of the principal courts of common law in Ireland. It was a mirror image of the equivalent court in England. Common Pleas was one of the four courts of justice which gave the Four Courts in Dublin, which is still in use as a courthouse, its name. Its remit as in England was to hear lawsuits between ordinary citizens.
The Court of Exchequer (Ireland), or the Irish Exchequer of Pleas, was one of the senior courts of common law in Ireland. It was the mirror image of the equivalent court in England. The Court of Exchequer was one of the four royal courts of justice which gave their name to the building in Dublin in which they were located, which is still called the Four Courts, and is in use as a courthouse.
James Cornwalsh was an Irish judge who held the office of Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer. He was a political figure of considerable importance in fifteenth-century Ireland, and a supporter of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, James Butler, 4th Earl of Ormond. He was murdered as a result of a feud over the possession of Baggotrath Castle, near Dublin.
Thomas de Thelwall was an English judge and Crown official who spent part of his career in Ireland, where he held office as Master of the Rolls in Ireland and Clerk to the Privy Council of Ireland. He was Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster 1377–78.
Thomas de Everdon was an English-born cleric and judge, who was a trusted Crown official in Ireland for several decades.
Robert le Poer was an Irish judge and Crown official who held the offices of Lord High Treasurer of Ireland and Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer.
John Keppock was an Irish judge of the late fourteenth century, who held the offices of Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer and Deputy Lord Chancellor of Ireland. He became a politician of some importance.
Robert de Holywood was an Irish judge and landowner who held the office of Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer. He was the ancestor of the Holywood family of Artane Castle, and of the St. Lawrence family, Earls of Howth. He was a substantial landowner with property in Dublin, Meath and Louth. He became extremely unpopular, and was removed from office after numerous complaints of "oppression and extortion" were made against him. These were apparently inspired ĺargely by his close association in the mid-1370s with Sir William de Windsor, the embattled Lord Lieutenant of Ireland.
William de Karlell was an English-born judge, administrator and cleric in fourteenth-century Ireland. He held numerous benefices including Archdeacon of Meath and Rector of Youghal, and sat in the Irish House of Commons. After sitting for some years as a Baron of the Court of Exchequer (Ireland) he was removed from office, following a flood of complaints about his acts of extortion and oppression committed by himself and Chief Baron Holywood, but he was later restored to favour, and served briefly as Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer. He is buried in St Canice's Cathedral, Kilkenny.
Henry Mitchell (c.1320–1384) was an Irish judge of the fourteenth century. He was one of the first recorded holders of the office of Attorney General for Ireland, and was subsequently Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer and Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas.
Sir John de Shriggeley, whose family name is also spelt Shirggeley and Shryggeley was an Irish statesman and judge who held several important judicial offices, including Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas. Although he committed two murders, he was a valued servant of the English Crown.
Robert Preston, 1st Baron Gormanston was an Anglo-Irish nobleman, statesman and judge of the fourteenth century. He held several senior judicial offices including, for a brief period, that of Lord Chancellor of Ireland. He was the founder of the leading Anglo-Irish Preston family whose titles included Viscount Gormanston and Viscount Tara.
John Tirel, or Tyrell was a prominent judge and statesman in fourteenth-century Ireland who held office as Serjeant-at-law and Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas.
John de Karlell was an English-born cleric, civil servant and judge in fourteenth-century Ireland. He served as second Baron of the Court of Exchequer, and as Chancellor of the Irish Exchequer. He became Chancellor of St Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin, after a struggle for the office with his colleague Walter de Brugge.
Thomas Bache was an Anglo-Italian cleric and judge who held high office in Ireland in the later fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries. He served one term as Lord High Treasurer of Ireland and three terms as Chief Baron of the Irish Exchequer.
John Giffard, or Gyffard was an English-born lawyer and cleric in Ireland in the late fourteenth century, who served briefly as Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas.
John Fitzadam was an Irish judge of the late fourteenth and early fifteenth century. He is notable for his very long tenure as Chief Justice of the Irish Common Pleas; he held the office for twenty-three years, in the reigns of three English Kings. Some years after his death, he was accused of judicial misconduct, in that he had unduly favoured one party in a lawsuit, but it is impossible now to determine the truth of the matter.
Stephen Roche was an Irish Crown official and Law Officer. He held office as Attorney-General for Ireland and was a member of the Privy Council of Ireland.
Sir John Cruys or Cruise was a prominent Irish military commander, diplomat and judge of the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries. He was one of the most substantial landowners in County Dublin and County Meath and built Merrion Castle near Dublin City in the 1360s. His marriage to the heiress of the powerful Verdon family of Clonmore brought him in addition substantial lands in County Louth. He sat in the Irish Parliament and was a member of the King's Council. He was a highly regarded public servant, but also a determined and acquisitive man of business, who fought a ten-year battle to establish his wife's right to her inheritance.