Joint Combined Exchange Training

Forces from the Solomon Islands receive instruction on the FN FAL rifle from American Special Forces

Joint Combined Exchange Training or JCET programs are exercises designed to provide training opportunities for American Special Forces by holding the training exercises in countries that the forces may one day have to operate in, as well as providing training opportunities for the armed forces of the host countries. Typically, each JCET program involved 10–40 American special forces personnel, though the number can sometimes be as high as 100. ^[1] The United States Congress permitted the use of funds from the military budget to be used in overseas training such as JCETs in 1991, providing that the Secretary of Defense submits to Congress annually a report on overseas training activities.

Begun in the 1970s, JCET programs were expanded in 1988 to Belgium, Denmark, West Germany and Italy. A Pentagon report from 1997, the year of a JCET in Equatorial Guinea, stated that a JCET program "involves small deployments of special operations personnel—sometimes fewer than a dozen troops—that conduct exercises jointly with foreign security forces to train the participants in a variety of areas that 'sharpen critical SOF mission essential task list... skills and enhance host-nation skills." ^[2] In 1997, there were 101 JCET programs operating worldwide, with 95 operating in 1998. ^[3]

From 30 May to 30 June 2006, a JCET program was conducted by the U.S. military involving Albania, Croatia, and Macedonia. ^[4] The course involved classes on "leadership and planning, rifle marksmanship and drilling techniques, close quarter battle and military operations in urban environments, small unit tactics, basic individual troop-leading procedures, and collective war fighting skills", ^[5] with over 100 American personnel taking part.

American Special Forces training soldiers from The Philippines.

Exercise Flintlock

September 1968 marked the beginning of a long and successful FLINTLOCK exercise series. Joint/Combined Exercise FLINTLOCK I was conducted in the fall of 1968 and consisted of four sub-exercises located in West Germany, Greece, Spain, and Denmark. The 7th Special Operations Squadron was involved in the exercise.

In 1981, Exercise Flintlock was held in the United Kingdom. Elements of the 231st Combat Communications Squadron (DC ANG) took part in the exercise. On 26 April 1982, during the Flintlock 82 exercise, Sergeant First Class Clifford Strickland was picked up by a Lockheed MC-130 Combat Talon of the 7th Special Operations Squadron at CFB Lahr, Germany, using the Fulton surface-to-air recovery system. However, he fell to his death reportedly due to faulty equipment in 1400 hrs accident. This was the last ever attempt to utilize the Skyhook system in a live pick-up. ^[6]

Elements of the 1st Special Forces Group, 3rd Special Forces Group or 5th Special Forces Group conduct JCET programs twice a year in Africa. Designed to give the special forces experience of fighting on the continent, these JCET programs are known as Flintlocks and vary from search and rescue exercises, disaster management, or combat life saving. ^[7] The funding for these programs is provided by the Department of Defense, with the locale being decided by Special Operations Command. Flintlock exercises provide an integral part of a Special Forces groups' annual training program. The program is designed to increase the strength of the host nation. The SFODA will provide over 60% of the training and usually receive 40% back in country specific training.

In March/April 1999, Naval Regional Contracting Detachment Naples (NRCD Naples) deployed contingency contracting officers in support of EXERCISE FLINTLOCK IIA in Côte d'Ivoire. ^[8] This exercise, conducted by the U.S. Army's 96th Civil Affairs Battalion, included road, cafeteria and latrine construction projects, well-drilling requirements and numerous inoculations for various tropical diseases. NRCC contracting officers awarded contracts for these projects valued at $63,000. The 2003 Flintlock, held in South Africa, had a total cost of $80,000.

Flintlock 2005 ran from June 6 until June 26, having been planned since 2004 in North and West Africa, specifically Algeria, Senegal, Mauritania, Mali, Niger and Chad, with forces from Europe, the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) taking part. The primary aim of the training operation was to increase the capability of African forces to halt the trade in illicit weaponry, anti-terrorism, illegal goods and human trafficking, improving command, control and communications, marksmanship, medical skills and human rights knowledge.

The U.S. Air Force's first operational deployment of the V-22 Osprey sent four CV-22s to Mali in November 2008 for Exercise Flintlock. The CV-22s flew nonstop from Hurlburt Field, Florida with in-flight refueling.

Controversy

There is concern, however, that forces trained by American Special Forces go on to use their new skills to commit war crimes in their home countries and would pose a threat to the stability of the regions. The Leahy Amendment requires that all foreign troops trained by the US military be pre-screened by the US State Department for history of human rights violations allegations. Failure to pass this screening results in the foreign troops or their entire units being excluded from participating in the training. Furthermore, the Leahy Amendment requires that part of the military instruction that US military troops provide to any foreign soldier or unit includes training in human rights and the Law of Armed Conflict. US soldiers that provide training to foreign troops are required by the Leahy Amendment to report any evidence of human rights abuses. ^[9]

There is concern that, as one of the directives of the 1998 Special Operations Forces Posture Statement indicates, the JCETs encourage the training of paramilitary forces to help combat lawlessness and insurgency, these forces could destabilise the local governments. One report on the subject states that "Militaries strengthened by the United States could end up toppling the very democratic governments that American policy makers want to keep in power." ^[10]

Particular scrutiny has been leveled at JCETs in Colombia and Indonesia (East Timor especially), the latter in particular as there exists a ban on all other military assistance to the region, and JCETs are the only permitted contact between US and indigenous forces ^[11] as all other training programs are not permitted on order of the United States House of Representatives.

There are also concerns about full disclosure of JCET activities to the U.S. Government from the armed forces, as the current reports to Congress (known as the Section 2011 report) ^[12] are not required to mention JCET programs relating to counter-narcotic or anti-terrorism activities, however these form a large part of the worldwide JCET program, particularly in Latin America. There are also concerns that the report is incomplete due to problems with the definition of Joint Combined Exchange Training programs.

References

1. Lt. Col. Ralph E. "Butch" Saner, Jr, Joint / Combined Exchange Training Program (JCET) article Archived 2006-11-13 at the Wayback Machine retrieved on March 14, 2007
2. 1997 Pentagon report.In order for the program to be labeled a JCET, the nation to which the special operations personnel were deployed to must receive at least 55% of the training.
3. Lt. Col. Ralph E. "Butch" Saner, Jr, Joint / Combined Exchange Training Program (JCET article Archived 2006-11-13 at the Wayback Machine retrieved on March 14, 2007.
4. Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) of U.S., Albanian, Croatian, and Macedonian Armed Forces (May 30, 2006) at the U.S. Embassy Tirana, Albania Archived 2006-09-22 at the Wayback Machine retrieved on March 14, 2007.
5. Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) of U.S., Albanian, Croatian, and Macedonian Armed Forces (May 30, 2006) at the U.S. Embassy Tirana, Albania Archived 2006-09-22 at the Wayback Machine retrieved on March 14, 2007.
6. Thigpen, Jerry L., "The Praetorian STARShip: The Untold Story of Combat Talon", Air University Press, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, December 2001, ISBN   1-58566-103-1, Appendix A, page 469.
7. Flintlocks at GlobalSecurity retrieved on March 14, 2007.
8. Flintlocks at GlobalSecurity retrieved on March 14, 2007
9. http://www.ciponline.org/facts/leahy.htm
10. John Rudy and Ivan Eland, Special Operations Military Training Abroad and Its Dangers, Cato Institute, June 22, 1999
11. East Timor news article retrieved on March 14, 2007
12. The Centre for International Policy Just the facts: A civilian's guide to U.S. defense and security assistance to Latin American and the Caribbean retrieved on March 14, 2007

♯2 reference states that in order to be a JCET the receiving country must get 55% of the training. This is incorrect. A core SOF task is foreign internal defense and/or unconventional warfare. Both tasks involve training indigenous troops - which in and of itself is a perishable and trainable skill set. Thus, the creation of the JCET. It allows SOF to train foreign troops not so much because THEY need it, but because it is a training event that allows the SF folks to maintain instructional skills, develop training aids, hone best instructor practices, language skills, etc., in preparation for combat employment in a FID or UW environment. In order to be a JCET - contrary to the reference - the US Forces must receive over 50% of the benefit.