Killing of Natalie Connolly

Last updated

Natalie Connolly died on 18 December 2016 as a result of acts of violence during sexual intercourse. [1] Her partner, John Broadhurst, pled guilty to manslaughter. Despite Broadhurst's claims that she consented to the 40 injuries she sustained, he failed to call upon emergency services to treat her thus resulting in her bleeding to death. [2]

Contents

The injuries inflicted upon Natalie Connolly included "lacerations to her vagina resulting in arterial and venous haemorrhage" from the insertion of a bottle of carpet cleaner, bruises from John Broadhurst beating her with his hand and a suede boot, a "blowout fracture to her left orbit", injuries to her breasts, alongside many others. [3]

Trial

When the trial commenced at the Crown Court at Birmingham in November 2018, John Broadhurst was accused of murdering and causing grievous bodily harm 'with intent' to Natalie Connolly, who was 26 when she died. [4] [5] Broadhurst said that Connolly had consented to 'rough sex' and that, after a pause during a sex game, he later found her at the bottom of the stairs and left her there while he went to bed and slept. [4] [5] The prosecution QC told the court "Whatever may have started willingly, there is no way that Natalie either consented or was able to consent to what John Broadhurst did to her after that, leading to her untimely, unseemly and tragic death." [4]

During the trial, the prosecution changed the charge to manslaughter by gross negligence to achieve a "realistic prospect of conviction". [6] The prosecution QC explained the decision to accept Broadhurst's plea to a lesser charge, telling the court “The evidence in this case, which is an extremely unusual case, has been very complicated." [1]

The judge, Mr Justice Julian Knowles, held John Broadhurst guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence after he pleaded guilty (to manslaughter) halfway through the trial. [5] He sentenced Broadhurst to three years and eight months in prison. [5]

The defence which John Broadhurst relied upon during his trial was ultimately the ‘rough sex’ murder defence which argues that Natalie Connolly consented to the injuries he inflicted upon her during 'consensual sexual activity'. [6] It was accepted that the beatings by hand and boot made by John Broadhurst had been consented to by Natalie Connolly. It was also accepted that some injuries would have been caused accidentally by herself due to her high intoxication levels. [7]

In November 2019, Broadhurst's bid for a reduced sentence was rejected at the Court of Appeal. Three senior judges considered the appeal, and Lord Justice Holroyde said they were "unable to accept" that Broadhurst's "gross negligence was of brief duration" and that his appeal "ignored his own role in Ms Connolly's injuries and intoxicated state." [8]

Broadhurst was released from prison after serving 22 months. [9]

Response

The case has been very controversial and has been subject to much criticism. In December 2018, Fiona Mackenzie founded the We Can't Consent To This campaign after discovering the case of Natalie Connolly. Her aim behind the campaign is to raise awareness surrounding the issues of violence during sexual intercourse whilst also campaigning to abolish any successful attempts of the "rough sex" defence. [10] In an interview, Mackenzie was astonished to hear that despite many disapproving of the verdict, there were several others accepting it as they "somehow believed it, saw it as a weird one-off and thought the victim must be to blame for the riskiness of her behaviour." [11]

Natalie Connolly's MP Mark Garnier, alongside MP Harriet Harman have since taken action to resolve the issues of the "rough sex" defence by advocating amendments to the Domestic Abuse Bill in England and Wales. Although there is case law that prevents a defence of consent whereby the injuries are serious, they believe this is not enough. [12] According to them, the Domestic Abuse Bill is important as it will be "under the noses of the Crown Prosecution service and judges." [13]

On 6 July 2020, MPs voted in favour of the Domestic Abuse Bill, which included a provision against the 'rough sex' murder defence. [14]

The law

At the time of Broadhurst's trial, the law in the United Kingdom on consent to masochism during sexual intercourse derived from the decisions of R v Brown where it was held that a defendant cannot rely upon the consent of its victim where he has caused actual or grievous bodily harm. [15]

Since then, The Domestic Abuse Bill has brought the R v Brown case law into statute and the introduction of a Director of Public Prosecutions review in cases of domestic killing when prosecutors suggest a lesser crime of manslaughter. [14] The Domestic Abuse Bill received Royal Assent on 29 April 2021, becoming the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. [16]

Related Research Articles

The gay panic defense or homosexual advance defence is a legal strategy in which a defendant claims to have acted in a state of violent, temporary insanity, committing assault or murder, because of unwanted same-sex sexual advances, typically from men. A defendant may allege to have found the same-sex sexual advances so offensive or frightening that they were provoked into reacting, were acting in self-defense, were of diminished capacity, or were temporarily insane, and that this circumstance is exculpatory or mitigating.

Louise Woodward is a British former au pair who was convicted of the involuntary manslaughter of eight-month-old Matthew Eappen in Newton, Massachusetts, United States.

Criminal transmission of HIV is the intentional or reckless infection of a person with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This is often conflated, in laws and in discussion, with criminal exposure to HIV, which does not require the transmission of the virus and often, as in the cases of spitting and biting, does not include a realistic means of transmission. Some countries or jurisdictions, including some areas of the U.S., have enacted laws expressly to criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, charging those accused with criminal transmission of HIV. Other countries charge the accused under existing laws with such crimes as murder, manslaughter, attempted murder, assault or fraud.

In criminal law, consent may be used as an excuse and prevent the defendant from incurring liability for what was done.

Murder is an offence under the common law of England and Wales. It is considered the most serious form of homicide, in which one person kills another with the intention to cause either death or serious injury unlawfully. The element of intentionality was originally termed malice aforethought, although it required neither malice nor premeditation. Baker, chapter 14 states that many killings done with a high degree of subjective recklessness were treated as murder from the 12th century right through until the 1974 decision in DPP v Hyam.

In the English law of homicide, manslaughter is a less serious offence than murder, the differential being between levels of fault based on the mens rea or by reason of a partial defence. In England and Wales, a common practice is to prefer a charge of murder, with the judge or defence able to introduce manslaughter as an option. The jury then decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of either murder or manslaughter. On conviction for manslaughter, sentencing is at the judge's discretion, whereas a sentence of life imprisonment is mandatory on conviction for murder. Manslaughter may be either voluntary or involuntary, depending on whether the accused has the required mens rea for murder.

The legal age of consent for sexual activity varies by jurisdiction across Asia. The specific activity engaged in or the gender of participants can also be relevant factors. Below is a discussion of the various laws dealing with this subject. The highlighted age refers to an age at or above which an individual can engage in unfettered sexual relations with another who is also at or above that age. Other variables, such as homosexual relations or close in age exceptions, may exist, and are noted when relevant, for example in Indonesia.

The ages of consent vary by jurisdiction across Europe. The ages of consent are between 14 and 18. The vast majority of countries set their ages in the range of 14 to 16; only three countries, Cyprus (17), Ireland (17), Turkey (18), do not fit into this pattern. The laws can also stipulate which specific activities are permitted or specify the age at which one or other sex can legally participate. The highlighted age is that from which a young person can lawfully engage in a non-commercial sexual act with an older person, regardless of their age difference, provided the older one is not in a position of power, a relative, or is committing another form of exploitation. In some jurisdictions, including Italy and Hungary, there are exemptions if the age difference is within prescribed bounds. All jurisdictions in Europe, except the Vatican City, have equal and gender-neutral age limits.

Jane Longhurst was a British special-needs teacher and musician who was murdered by Graham Coutts on 14 March 2003. Longhurst's partly decomposed body was found burning in woodland in West Sussex, England on 19 April. Coutts – who was dating Longhurst's best friend – was a guitarist and part-time salesman living in Brighton.

Kiranjit Ahluwalia is an Indian woman who fatally burned her husband in 1989 in the UK. She claimed it was in response to ten years of physical, psychological, and sexual abuse. After initially being convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison, Ahluwalia's conviction was later overturned on grounds of inadequate counsel and replaced with voluntary manslaughter. Although her submission of provocation failed, she successfully pleaded the partial defence of diminished responsibility under s.2 Homicide Act 1957 on the grounds that fresh medical evidence may indicate diminished mental responsibility.

Crimes Act 1900 Legislation of NSW, Australia that establishes a majority of criminal offences

The Crimes Act 1900 is a New South Wales statute that sets out the majority of criminal offences for the state of New South Wales in Australia. It, the Commonwealth Crimes Act 1914 and the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995 form the majority of criminal law for New South Wales.

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent. Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes.

Ages of consent in the United States U.S. law on age of consent to sexual activity

The age of consent in the United States is the age at which a person may legally consent to engage in sexual activity. Each state and territory sets the age of consent either by statute or the common law applies, and there are several federal statutes related to protecting minors from sexual predators. Depending on the jurisdiction, the legal age of consent is between 16 and 18. In some places, civil and criminal laws within the same state conflict with each other.

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

Rape by deception is a situation in which the perpetrator deceives the victim into participating in a sexual act that they would otherwise not consent to. Deception can occur in many forms, such as false statements or actions.

Lieutenant Colonel Justice John Harris Byrne, is the former Senior Judge Administrator of the Supreme Court of Queensland. Having been a judge of that court since 1989, he was one of the court's most experienced judges. He was also Chair of the National Judicial College of Australia, a body which provides programs and professional development resources to judicial officers in Australia. He is now a private Commercial Arbitrator.

Legality of BDSM Laws on BDSM

Criminalization of consensual BDSM practices is usually not with explicit reference to BDSM, but results from the fact that such behavior as spanking or cuffing someone could be considered a breach of personal rights, which in principle constitutes a criminal offense. In Germany, Netherlands, Japan and Scandinavia, such behavior is legal in principle. In Austria the legal status is not clear, while in Switzerland some BDSM practices can be considered criminal.

Rough sex murder defense, also known as the 50 Shades defense, is employed by some people accused of murdering a sexual partner, who claim that the death occurred because of injuries sustained during consensual sex. Advocacy group We Can't Consent To This has identified, between 1972 and 2020, 60 police suspects or defendants in the UK who have stated from the outset or later plead this defense, 45 percent of which resulted in a lesser charge, lighter sentence, acquittal, or the case not being pursued.

Sexual consent plays an important role in laws regarding rape, sexual assault and other forms of sexual violence. In a court of law, whether or not the alleged victim had freely given consent, and whether or not they were deemed to be capable of giving consent, can determine whether the alleged perpetrator is guilty of rape, sexual assault or some other form of sexual misconduct.

We Can't Consent To This is a campaign which aims to raise awareness surrounding the issues of violence typically committed during sexual intercourse, as well as campaigning to abolish the "rough sex" defence.

References

  1. 1 2 "Millionaire Admits Manslaughter Following 'Rough Sex' Death". HuffPost UK. 11 December 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  2. ↑ Brennan, Marion. "Natalie Connolly suffered 'potentially fatal blood loss'". www.expressandstar.com. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  3. ↑ R v Broadhurst [2019] EWCA Crim 2026, (14 November 2019), Court of Appeal (UK)
  4. 1 2 3 "Murder accused 'wanted to teach lover a lesson'". BBC News. 15 November 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  5. 1 2 3 4 "R -v- John Broadhurst: sentencing remarks of Mr Justice Julian Knowles" (PDF). www.judiciary.uk. Archived from the original on 31 May 2021. Retrieved 7 June 2021.
  6. 1 2 "Natalie Connolly: 'Rough sex' killer sentence 'disgraceful'". BBC News. 22 December 2018. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  7. ↑ R v Broadhurst [2019] EWCA Crim 2026, (14 November 2019), Court of Appeal (UK)
  8. ↑ "John Broadhurst: 'Rough sex' death sentence appeal rejected". BBC News. 14 November 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2022.
  9. ↑ Guttridge, Richard (5 October 2020). "Millionaire killer of mother walking free after 22 months 'unbelievable', says MP". Express and star . Retrieved 29 May 2021.
  10. ↑ "We Can't Consent to This". We Can't Consent to This . Retrieved 30 May 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  11. ↑ Moore, Anna (27 November 2019). "'There's a new level of anger': the women fighting to end the 'rough sex' defence". The Guardian . Retrieved 30 May 2021.
  12. ↑ R v Brown [1993] UKHL 19, 1 AC 212 (11 March 1993), House of Lords (UK)
  13. ↑ Mark Garnier, Harriet Harman (19 July 2019). "Men Are Using The Narrative Of Women's Sexual Enjoyment To Get Away With Murder, Literally". Huffington Post . Retrieved 1 June 2021.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  14. 1 2 "If the government bans the 'rough sex' defence, what would it mean?". The Independent. 7 July 2020. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
  15. ↑ R v Brown [1993] UKHL 19, 1 AC 212 (11 March 1993), House of Lords (UK)
  16. ↑ "Landmark Domestic Abuse Bill receives Royal Assent". GOV.UK. 29 April 2021. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.