Rough sex murder defense

Last updated

Rough sex murder defense, also known as the 50 Shades defense (after Fifty Shades of Grey ), is employed by some people accused of murdering a sexual partner, who claim that the death occurred because of injuries sustained during consensual sex. [1] [2] [3] [4] Advocacy group We Can't Consent To This has identified, between 1972 and 2020, 60 police suspects or defendants in the UK who have stated from the outset or later plead this defense, 45 percent of which resulted in a lesser charge, lighter sentence, acquittal, or the case not being pursued.

Contents

In the UK, legislative amendments were proposed in 2020 and passed in April 2021 (in the Domestic Abuse Act 2021) to tackle the rough sex defence. [5] [6]

Definition

According to American jurist George Buzash:

The "rough sex" defense to the charge of murder asserts that the victim literally "asked for" the conduct that led to the homicide and that the homicide was the result of sexual practices to which the victim consented, and may have even demanded. [2]

The defendant frequently is convicted for a lesser offense, such as voluntary manslaughter or criminally negligent homicide. [7]

History

The earliest known use of the defense in the UK was after the death of Carole Califano in 1972; her abusive partner was able to get the criminal charge reduced to manslaughter. [3] In the United States, the defense began to be used in the 1980s. [7] In 1988, it was reported that the rough sex defense was becoming more popular in the US among men suspected of murdering their female partners because of the 1986 case of Robert Chambers. [8] Also in 1986, 17-year-old Kathleen Holland from Long Island was killed by her boyfriend, Joseph Porto. He later claimed that she had died during a "rough sex" accident due to erotic asphyxiation gone awry. In 1988, he was acquitted of murder and manslaughter but convicted on a lesser charge and served 30 months in jail. [7] [9] [10] In 1989, American jurist Buzash recommended a "strict liability approach to 'rough sex' homicides" in order to prevent defendants from claiming the rough sex defense; he felt that it rewarded perjury. [2] In 2014, Denzil Wells II from Toledo, Ohio, pled guilty to reckless homicide and obstructing justice after his girlfriend died in what he claimed was an erotic asphyxiation-related accident, but avoided murder charges. [11]

The defense was brought to wider public attention by cases such as the killing of Cindy Gladue in Canada in 2011, [12] the killing of Natalie Connolly in the United Kingdom in 2018, [13] and the murder of Grace Millane, a British tourist in New Zealand, in 2018. [14] New Zealand Detective Inspector Scott Beard said that he opposes the defense: "I don't believe that rough sex should be a defence ... If people are going to use that as a defence, all it's going to do is revictimise the victim and their family." [15]

Advocacy group We Can't Consent To This has noted 60 police suspects or defendants in the UK having used the defense from 1972 to 2020, and 45 percent of these resulted in a lesser charge, lighter sentence, acquittal, or the case not being pursued. [12] According to experts, its use became more frequent during the same period. [12] [16]

Legislative proposals

Some campaigners, such as We Can't Consent to This [13] and Toni Van Pelt of the National Organization for Women, [16] consider the defense a form of victim blaming and advocate for it to be banned. [13]

In the UK, the Domestic Abuse Bill 2019, which included a provision against the 'rough sex' murder defence, was debated before the 2019 prorogation of Parliament. [3] Labour MP Harriet Harman and Conservative MP Mark Garnier advocated the bill; Harman believes that men should be prosecuted for murder even if they did not intend to kill their partner. Boris Johnson, prime minister of the United Kingdom, said "I agree with Harriet Harman that the '50 Shades defence' is unacceptable and we'll make sure the law is clear on this." [13] Jeremy Corbyn, former leader of the Labour party, said that he would re-introduce the time-lapsed bill if elected: "We will make sure that the ‘50 Shades defence’ is banned, including it directly in our bill." Former Liberal Democrat leader Jo Swinson also said that her party supports a statutory ban on the use of the defense. [17] On 6 July 2020, MPs voted in favour of the Domestic Abuse Bill, which brought into statute R v Brown case law, (a decision of 1993 of the highest UK court that holds that a person cannot consent to harm amounting to actual bodily harm during sado-masochism, as the criminal law in general abhors harm to that degree); [13] the Bill included the introduction of a Director of Public Prosecutions review in cases of domestic killing when prosecutors suggest a lesser crime of manslaughter. [3] The Domestic Abuse Bill received Royal Assent on 29 April 2021, becoming the Domestic Abuse Act 2021. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder</span> Unlawful killing of a human with malice aforethought

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse, especially the unlawful killing of another human with malice aforethought. This state of mind may, depending upon the jurisdiction, distinguish murder from other forms of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is killing committed in the absence of malice, brought about by reasonable provocation, or diminished capacity. Involuntary manslaughter, where it is recognized, is a killing that lacks all but the most attenuated guilty intent, recklessness.

The gay panic defense or homosexual advance defence is a strategy of legal defense, which refers to a situation in which a heterosexual individual charged with a violent crime against a homosexual individual claims they lost control and reacted violently because of an unwanted sexual advance that was made upon them. A defendant will use available legal defenses against assault and murder, with the aim of seeking an acquittal, a mitigated sentence, or a conviction of a lesser offense. A defendant may allege to have found the same-sex sexual advances so offensive or frightening that they were provoked into reacting, were acting in self-defense, were of diminished capacity, or were temporarily insane, and that this circumstance is exculpatory or mitigating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homicide</span> Killing of a human by another human

Homicide is an act in which a person kills another person. A homicide requires only a volitional act or an omission that causes the death of another, and thus a homicide may result from accidental, reckless, or negligent acts even if there is no intent to cause harm. Homicides can be divided into many overlapping legal categories, such as murder, manslaughter, justifiable homicide, assassination, killing in war, euthanasia, and capital punishment, depending on the circumstances of the death. These different types of homicides are often treated very differently in human societies; some are considered crimes, while others are permitted or even ordered by the legal system.

In law, provocation is when a person is considered to have committed a criminal act partly because of a preceding set of events that might cause a reasonable individual to lose self control. This makes them less morally culpable than if the act was premeditated (pre-planned) and done out of pure malice. It "affects the quality of the actor's state of mind as an indicator of moral blameworthiness."

The concept of justifiable homicide in criminal law is a defense to culpable homicide. Generally, there is a burden to produce exculpatory evidence in the legal defense of justification.

Articles related to criminology and law enforcement.

Battered woman syndrome (BWS) is a psychological trauma that results from ongoing physical, psychological, and/or sexual abuse, typically at the hands of an intimate partner. This syndrome is one of a group of conditions known as Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) and can lead to symptoms of depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and even physical health problems. BWS can also result in the development of a “survival personality”, in which the person acts out of fear and attempts to avoid further harm. The symptoms of BWS are often divided into three categories: physical, psychological, and behavioral. Physically, victims of BWS may display signs of physical injury or illness, such as bruises, broken bones, or chronic fatigue. Psychologically, they may experience depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and feelings of helplessness, guilt, and fear. Behaviorally, victims may exhibit a range of behaviors, including self-isolation, suicidal thoughts, and substance abuse. It is important to recognize that the effects of BWS may vary from person to person. Treatment for BWS typically includes individual and group therapy, as well as support from family and friends. Treatment may focus on helping the victim to develop healthy coping mechanisms, identify triggers for abusive behavior, and build self-esteem. In addition, it is important to ensure that the victim has access to safe housing and other resources, such as legal aid and counseling. Battered woman syndrome (BWS) is a pattern of signs and symptoms displayed by a woman who has suffered persistent intimate partner violence: whether psychological, physical, or sexual, from her male partner. It is classified in the ICD-9 (code 995.81) as battered person syndrome, but is not in the DSM-5. It may be diagnosed as a subcategory of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

In the criminal law of Australia, self-defence is a legal defence to a charge of causing injury or death in defence of the person or, to a limited extent, property, or a partial defence to murder if the degree of force used was excessive.

Murder is an offence under the common law of England and Wales. It is considered the most serious form of homicide, in which one person kills another with the intention to cause either death or serious injury unlawfully. The element of intentionality was originally termed malice aforethought, although it required neither malice nor premeditation. Baker, chapter 14 states that many killings done with a high degree of subjective recklessness were treated as murder from the 12th century right through until the 1974 decision in DPP v Hyam.

In English law, provocation was a mitigatory defence to murder which had taken many guises over generations many of which had been strongly disapproved and modified. In closing decades, in widely upheld form, it amounted to proving a reasonable total loss of control as a response to another's objectively provocative conduct sufficient to convert what would otherwise have been murder into manslaughter. It only applied to murder. It was abolished on 4 October 2010 by section 56(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, but thereby replaced by the superseding—and more precisely worded—loss of control defence.

In English law, diminished responsibility is one of the partial defenses that reduce the offense from murder to manslaughter if successful. This allows the judge sentencing discretion, e.g. to impose a hospital order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 to ensure treatment rather than punishment in appropriate cases. Thus, when the actus reus of death is accompanied by an objective or constructive version of mens rea, the subjective evidence that the defendant did intend to kill or cause grievous bodily harm because of a mental incapacity will partially excuse his conduct. Under s.2(2) of the Homicide Act 1957 the burden of proof is on the defendant to the balance of probabilities. The M'Naghten Rules lack a volitional limb of "irresistible impulse"; diminished responsibility is the volitional mental condition defense in English criminal law.

In the English law of homicide, manslaughter is a less serious offence than murder, the differential being between levels of fault based on the mens rea or by reason of a partial defence. In England and Wales, a common practice is to prefer a charge of murder, with the judge or defence able to introduce manslaughter as an option. The jury then decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of either murder or manslaughter. On conviction for manslaughter, sentencing is at the judge's discretion, whereas a sentence of life imprisonment is mandatory on conviction for murder. Manslaughter may be either voluntary or involuntary, depending on whether the accused has the required mens rea for murder.

Manslaughter is a common law legal term for homicide considered by law as less culpable than murder. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is sometimes said to have first been made by the ancient Athenian lawmaker Draco in the 7th century BC.

People v. Berry is a voluntary manslaughter case that is widely taught in American law schools for the appellate court's unusual interpretation of heat of passion doctrine. Although the defendant had time to "cool down" between his wife's verbal admission of infidelity and the killing, the California Supreme Court held that the provocation in this case was adequate to reduce a murder charge to manslaughter. The lower court had relied on the traditional definition of "adequate provocation" in its jury instructions. The California Supreme Court reversed Berry's murder conviction, while affirming Berry's conviction for assault using deadly force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law of the United States</span>

Criminal law is a system of laws that is connected with crimes and punishments of an individual who commits crimes. In comparison, civil law is where the case argues their issues with one entity to another entity with support of the law. Crimes can vary in definition by jurisdiction but the basis for a crime are fairly consistent regardless.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legality of BDSM</span> Laws on BDSM

Criminalization of consensual BDSM practices is usually not with explicit reference to BDSM, but results from the fact that such behavior as spanking or cuffing someone could be considered a breach of personal rights, which in principle constitutes a criminal offense. In Germany, Netherlands, Japan and Scandinavia, such behavior is legal in principle. In Austria the legal status is not clear, while in Switzerland some BDSM practices can be considered criminal.

English law contains homicide offences – those acts involving the death of another person. For a crime to be considered homicide, it must take place after the victim's legally recognised birth, and before their legal death. There is also the usually uncontroversial requirement that the victim be under the "Queen's peace". The death must be causally linked to the actions of the defendant. Since the abolition of the year and a day rule, there is no maximum time period between any act being committed and the victim's death, so long as the former caused the latter.

Manslaughter is a crime in the United States. Definitions can vary among jurisdictions, but manslaughter is invariably the act of causing the death of another person in a manner less culpable than murder. Three types of unlawful killings constitute manslaughter. First, there is voluntary manslaughter which is an intentional homicide committed in "sudden heat of passion" as the result of adequate provocation. Second, there is the form of involuntary manslaughter which is an unintentional homicide that was committed in a criminally negligent manner. Finally, there is the form of involuntary manslaughter which is an unintentional homicide that occurred during the commission or attempted commission of an unlawful act which does not amount to a felony.

We Can't Consent To This is a campaign which aims to raise awareness surrounding the issues of violence typically committed during sexual intercourse, as well as campaigning to abolish the "rough sex" defence.

Natalie Connolly was killed on 18 December 2016 during acts of very violent sexual intercourse. Her partner, John Broadhurst, pleaded guilty to manslaughter. Despite Broadhurst's claims that she consented to the 40 injuries she sustained, he failed to call upon emergency services to treat her thus resulting in her bleeding to death.

References

  1. ↑ Bows, Hannah; Herring, Jonathan (2020). "Getting Away With Murder? A Review of the 'Rough Sex Defence'". The Journal of Criminal Law. 84 (6): 525–538. doi: 10.1177/0022018320936777 .
  2. 1 2 3 Buzash, George E. (1989). "The Rough Sex Defense". The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology . 80 (2): 557–584. doi:10.2307/1143805. JSTOR   1143805.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Gallagher, Sophie (4 March 2020). "If the government bans the 'rough sex' defence, what would it mean?". The Independent. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  4. ↑ Urwin, Shanti Das and Rosamund (24 November 2019). "Killers go free thanks to 'Fifty Shades' defence". The Times . Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  5. ↑ "'Rough sex' defence will be banned, says justice minister". BBC News. 2020-06-17. Retrieved 2022-01-10.
  6. ↑ "Consent to serious harm for sexual gratification not a defence". GOV.UK. Retrieved 2022-01-10.
  7. 1 2 3 Forell, Caroline; Matthews, Donna Meredith (2001). A Law of Her Own: The Reasonable Woman as a Measure of Man. NYU Press. pp. 193–194. ISBN   978-0-8147-2677-8.
  8. ↑ Acland, Charles R. (2018). Youth, Murder, Spectacle: The Cultural Politics Of ""Youth In Crisis"". Routledge. p. 66. ISBN   978-0-429-97146-4.
  9. ↑ Milton, Pat (29 April 1988). "Teen Claims Sex Accident, Convicted of Lesser Charge". AP News. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  10. ↑ Milton, Pat (10 June 1988). "Defendant Gets Maximum Sentence in Girlfriend's Strangulation". AP NEWS. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  11. ↑ Feehan, Jennifer (7 August 2014). "Family upset over plea deal". Toledo Blade. Retrieved 24 May 2020.
  12. 1 2 3 Woodyatt, Amy. "The rise of the '50 Shades' defense in murder trials". CNN. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Lowbridge, Caroline (22 January 2020). "Why campaigners want 'rough sex' murder defence ban". BBC News. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  14. ↑ Norris, Sian (24 February 2020). "'Rough sex' as a defence for murder is grotesque victim-blaming". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  15. ↑ Leask, Anna (20 February 2020). "Grace Millane murder: Top cop slams 'rough sex' defence - 'it doesn't sit well with me'". NZ Herald. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  16. 1 2 Lampen, Claire (23 February 2020). "The Disturbing Rise of the '50 Shades' Defense for Murder". The Cut. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  17. ↑ Dearden, Lizzy (10 December 2019). "Corbyn, Swinson and Johnson back new laws to combat rising 'rough sex defence' used by killers". The Independent. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
  18. ↑ "Landmark Domestic Abuse Bill receives Royal Assent". GOV.UK. 29 April 2021. Retrieved 20 May 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.