Lambert (nobleman of the Maasgau)

Last updated

Lambert (10th century), was a Lotharingian nobleman with lands somewhere near modern Dutch Limburg, who was associated with Gembloux Abbey in French-speaking Belgium. Its founder Wicbert was possibly a relative. Although there are other proposals, he is generally considered to be the father of Bishop Ansfried of Utrecht and he was probably a brother of Ansfried the elder and Robert, the Archbishop of Trier.

Contents

Lambert is known from one record, known from two surviving versions, one made much later in the 16th century, which has however been the subject of much published discussion. It involved the church of "Biettine" (believed to be Obbicht) in the Maasgau.

Interpretations of the evidence

Over the centuries, this Lambert has been claimed as a Count of Louvain, and an "Advocate" (Latin advocatus ) of the abbey of Gembloux. A number of historical records imply that the family group which he and Wicbert seem to be a part of were related to the Ottonian dysnasty, Robert, Archbishop of Trier, and possibly the House of Reginar.

The record which has survived says that one of the early possessions of the Abbey was half of the church at a place called Wiettine or Biettine in the Maasland district. [1] Erluin, the first abbot of Gembloux, sent the founder Wicbert himself, who had probably originally owned and granted the other half of the church which the abbey already owned. The negotiation succeeded, and possession was handed over to the advocatus of the Abbey, and this was observed by a son named Ansfried. There is debate about whether Ansfried was son of Wicbert or Lambert.

The oldest version is that found in the Gesta abbatum Gemblacensium, by Sigebert of Gembloux. Aubert Miraeus published the early modern version of this text which appears to have clarified, and maybe modified, the meaning, so that Ansfried is definitely the son of Lambert, not Wicbert. His source was a different old document, the Catalogus Abbatum Gembalcensium, which is today lost. That Lambert was count of Louvain is a statement Miraeus does not explain, and which does not appear in any of the citations he makes from old sources, so it is possibly his own conclusion.

Ansfried is normally understood to be either Ansfried the Bishop of Utrecht, who would have been quite young at this time, or Ansfried the elder, his paternal uncle, a count with 15 counties, who may have become an advocatus of Gembloux.

The name of Lambert as a Count of Louvain, is known only from later generations, starting in the eleventh century. This Biettine document is from the tenth century, and historians are suspicious of Mireaus's statement. It is not even clear if there was a county of this name, at this time. Count Lambert I of Louvain and his brother Reginar IV were exiled around 958 and began attempting to return to Lotharingia in 973 claiming some of the places their family had once held.

On the other hand, the version of Miraeus has generally been accepted concerning the fact that his text makes Ansfried the son of Lambert. More recently Jongbloed (2009) has controversially proposed that Ansfried can confidently be described as the son of Wicbert, though authors such as Karsten and Aarts think that the reading of Miraeus might still be justifiable if the text of the Gesta itself already contained an error. The reason for proposing that a faulty text is likely, is to explain what the role of Ansfried was as an observer. Typically in medieval contracts, heirs appear as witnesses, when a family is giving away something they might otherwise have inherited, in order to avoid future disputes. In this case, the man selling was clearly Lambert.

Miraeus also claimed that Lambert was the son of Ragineri I et Alberadæ, frater Ragineri II Longicolli, Hannoniæ comitis [son of Reginar I and Alberade, and brother of Reginar II, Count of Hainaut, Longneck],. However, there are no primary sources to support this statement. In his influential work of 1902, Vanderkindere made a proposal that Lambert married an unattested daughter of Ricfried, Count of Betuwe, and they were the parents of the younger Ansfried, the witness (who was however too young to be advocatus), who would later become Bishop of Utrecht. This proposed marriage was speculative, and has gained no general acceptance among historians.

Thietmar of Merseburg refers to the "paternal uncle [of Bishop Ansfrid, possibly Lambert’s son], Robert, Archbishop of Trier”, implying a sibling relationship between Lambert and Robert, if Lambert (not Wicbert) was Bishop Ansfrid's father, and not the elder Ansfried's.

Notes

  1. It is called Biettine in a falsified 946 document. Diplomata Otto I, MGH DD OI no:82 p.161 year 946

Sources

Primary sources

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ansfried of Utrecht</span>

Saint Ansfried of Utrecht sometimes called Ansfried the younger was Count of Huy and the sword-bearer for Otto I, Holy Roman Emperor. He became Bishop of Utrecht in 995. He appears to have been the son or grandson of Lambert, a nobleman of the Maasgau, the area where he later founded the Abbey of Thorn. He also appears to have been related to various important contemporaries including the royal family.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">County of Loon</span> State of the Holy Roman Empire (1040–1795)

The County of Loon was a county in the Holy Roman Empire, which corresponded approximately with the Belgian province of Limburg. It was named after the original seat of its count, Loon, which is today called Borgloon. During the middle ages the counts moved their court to a more central position in Kuringen, which is today a part of Hasselt, the modern capital of the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sigebert of Gembloux</span> Medieval author

Sigebert of Gembloux was a medieval author, known mainly as a pro-Imperial historian of a universal chronicle, opposed to the expansive papacy of Gregory VII and Pascal II. Early in his life he became a monk in the Benedictine abbey of Gembloux.

Count Richar was a 10th-century Lotharingian count. He had a well-attested county in the Luihgau, a territory between Liège and Aachen, and he is generally considered to have held comital status in the County of Hainaut, possibly in the area of Mons.

Count Lambert "the Bearded" was the first person to be described as a count of Leuven in a surviving contemporary record, being described this way relatively late in life, in 1003. He is also the patrilineal ancestor of all the future counts of Leuven and dukes of Brabant until his descendant John III, Duke of Brabant, who died in 1355.

Giselbert van Loon is the first definitely known count of the County of Loon, a territory which, at least in later times, roughly corresponded to the modern Belgian province of Limburg, and generations later became a lordship directly under the Prince-bishopric of Liège. Very little is known about him except that he had two brothers, one of whom, Bishop Balderic II of Liège, is much better attested in historical records.

Ricfried was a 9th and 10th century count in Betuwe (Batavia) now in the Netherlands, and possibly also some neighboring areas such as the Duffelgau, now in Germany. He was ancestor of a family referred to as the "Balderics" because it included several powerful bishops of this name. It is also proposed by historians such as Leon Vanderkindere that he is probably ancestor of the Counts of Loon (Looz) in modern Belgian Limburg.

Iremfrid was a 10th-century noble born to a family which had its power base in the Rhine–Meuse delta region, near the modern border of the Netherlands and Germany. He was the eldest son of Ricfrid Count of Batavia, and his wife Herensinda. The memorial of Ricfried, which now only exists in different transcriptions, referred to him as either "Rector Yrimfredus" or "Victor Yrimfredus".

Count Nibelung or Nevelung, son of Count Ricfried and his wife Herensinda. He was probably his father's heir, and like his father he was probably a count in Betuwe (Batavia), and more generally in the Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt delta region, now in the Netherlands, and the neighbouring northern Rhineland in Germany. His better-known brother was Bishop Balderic of Utrecht.

Rudolf or Rodolphe, was a Lower Lotharingian noble born into a family with connections to Utrecht. He is thought by some modern interpreters to have later had lordships in the Hesbaye region which is now in Belgium, in a part which mostly came to be incorporated into the later County of Loon. He was a son of Nevelung, Count of Betuwe, and a daughter of Reginar II, Count of Hainaut, whose name is not known. He had two uncles, one paternal and one maternal, who were both named Rudolf, and various proposal have been made about how the three Rudolfs correspond to various references to "Count Rudolf" in the 10th century "low countries". Although his paternal uncle Rudolf is sometimes considered to have become a cleric, Jongbloed (2006) argued that he must have been a count, and that he certainly had a wife and offspring. There is no contemporary record of young Rudolf, the nephew, as a count, nor indeed as an adult.

The pagus or gau of Hasbania was a large early medieval territory in what is now eastern Belgium. It is now approximated by the modern French- and Dutch-speaking region called Hesbaye in French, or Haspengouw in Dutch — both being terms derived from the medieval one. Unlike many smaller pagi of the period, Hasbania apparently never corresponded to a single county. It already contained several in the 9th century. It is therefore described as a "Groẞgau", like the Pagus of Brabant, by modern German historians such as Ulrich Nonn.

Count Rudolf, was a count in Lower Lotharingia, who apparently held possessions in the Hesbaye region and in the area of Meuse river north of Maastricht. It has been proposed that he was a son of Reginar II, Count of Hainaut, and thus a member of the so-called Regnarid dynasty.

Count Emmo, Immo or Immon, was the name of at least one important Lotharingian nobleman in the 10th century, described by medieval annalists as a cunning strategist. Various life events of a nobleman of this name were recorded, although historians differ about exactly which records refer to the same person or people. The first record claimed for him shows him as a young noble granting land to a new vassal in the Condroz region in 934, a member of the entourage of Duke Gilbert of Lotharingia. During the revolt of Gilbert which ended at the Battle of Andernach in 939, he switched sides. After the revolt he was personally associated with the fort at Chèvremont, near Liège. It becomes difficult later in Immo's life to be sure that all records mentioning a count of this name are referring to the same person.

Werner, Count in Hesbaye was a count in Hesbaye, now in Belgium. During his life he held lands in the Condroz and lands as far away as Zülpich, now in Germany. All the areas he was associated with were part of the Kingdom of Lotharingia, which during this period was no longer independent, but mainly under the control of Germany.

Renaud (or Reginald) (died 973), brother of Count Werner. According to Eduard Hlawitschka (de) they were probably members of the so-called "Matfried" noble clan (de).

Amaury (Amulric) (died after 973), was a tenth century count with territory in Hainaut, possibly a Count of Valenciennes.

The County of Duras was a medieval county with its seat at the castle of Duras. The 18th century version of this castle still stands and is a part of modern Sint-Truiden in the province of Belgian Limburg. The county was one of several counties in the Hesbaye region which covers the south of Belgian Limburg, and stretches into the neighbouring provinces. The county of Duras itself was inherited by the Counts of Montaigu, whose other holdings were further south, and then eventually became part of the neighbouring County of Loon, which was ruled by cousins of the original counts of Duras. As a distinct entity under the name Duras the county only existed within the 12th century.

Ansfried, was a Lotharingian count in the 10th century, who held 15 counties in Lotharingia, a "middle kingdom" of the Franks, which was in this period contested for by the larger eastern and western kingdoms surrounding it. He is sometimes referred to as "the elder" in order to distinguish him from his nephew, Bishop Ansfried of Utrecht, who was also a powerful count until he became a bishop.

Baldrick I was bishop of Liège and abbot of Lobbes from 955 until his death on 29 July 959.

Arnulfof Valenciennes, was a 10th and 11th century count and perhaps sometimes a margrave, who was lord of the fort of Valenciennes, which was at that time on the frontier with France, on the river Scheldt. It was part of the pagus of Hainaut, in Lower Lotharingia, within the Holy Roman Empire.