Lamebook

Last updated

Lamebook
Type of site
Blog (user-generated)
OwnerJonathan Standefer, Matthew Genitempo
Created byJonathan Standefer, Matthew Genitempo
Revenue Advertising
URL Lamebook
CommercialYes
RegistrationYes
LaunchedApril 2009
Current statusActive

Lamebook is a blog that re-posts 'everything lame and funny' [1] from the social networking site Facebook. Users send in screenshots of unusual or amusing Facebook posts, which are re-posted on the site every weekday.

Contents

History

Jonathan Standefer and Matthew Genitempo, graphic designers from Austin, Texas, launched the web site in April 2009 as a Facebook parody site. [2]

The two were acquaintances at Baylor University, yet became friends after they graduated in 2005. "We started Lamebook a little [after meeting], and after a few months of doing that it got so popular that we were able to quit our jobs at the offices and do that full time," said Genitempo, who graduated in 2007 with a degree in graphic design. "That brought a lot of other different design opportunities for both of us." [3]

Privacy

Last names and faces are usually blurred out or pixellated upon upload to avoid invasion of privacy, and content can be removed on request. [4] Lamebook also discourages users from trying to contact people seen in posts. [1]

Oversharing

Sites such as Lamebook would not be in existence without the concept of oversharing. "Overshare," the Word of the Year in 2008 at Webster's New World® College Dictionary, is defined as too much information that is either intentionally or accidentally revealed. The editors of Webster's New World explain that this is a new word for an old phenomenon that has been made much easier by the emergence of modern technology. [5] This ease, combined with the wide reach that many social networking sites allow users to have, has made oversharing quite a common occurrence today. According to the Huffington Post, of online oversharers, 32% say that they have experienced "poster’s remorse" and regretted posting certain information about themselves. [6] Lamebook cocreator Jonathan Standefer, was quoted saying "People overshare on the Internet. My favorite ones used to be the mushy ones, but the fights are the funniest. It's like fighting drunk with one of your friends, but everyone else is in the room." He views Lamebook as a forum where people can vent about the inappropriate and cringe-worthy things they have inevitably seen on Facebook. [7] Glamour magazine described Facebook as, "a personal confession booth where we air our dirty laundry". [8] While sitting behind a computer screen, people often forget that "everyone else is in the room," and that on Facebook, anything posted outside of a private message will be seen by many more people than just the one being communicated with. This leads to the kinds of content people submit to Lamebook: couple fights, inappropriate pictures, embarrassing statuses, etc.

In March 2010, Facebook contacted Lamebook alleging that the website infringed and diluted the Facebook trademark, and requested that Lamebook cease and desist using the lamebook mark and change the name and look of its website. On 4 November 2010 Lamebook filed legal action against Facebook, seeking a declaration that the website does not infringe the rights of Facebook, and protection as a parody under the First Amendment. [2] In response, on 11 November Facebook sued Lamebook for trademark infringement, claiming the site was not a parody as it does not "provide any critique or comment of Facebook itself". [9]

As of 22 November 2010, Facebook confirmed they had deleted Lamebook's fan page, blocked the 'like' function on Lamebook that was powered by Facebook, and blocked Facebook users from being able to type the word "Lamebook" on Facebook. Facebook CTO Bret Taylor later conceded: "This was a mistake on our part. In the process of dealing with a routine trademark violation issue regarding some links posted to Facebook, we blocked all mentions of the phrase “lamebook” on Facebook. We are committed to promoting free expression on Facebook. We apologize for our mistake in this case, and we are working to fix the process that led to this happening." [10]

Conor Civins, one of Lamebook's lawyers, said, "[Lamebook] is a parody website; it's supposed to be social commentary, and it's protected by free speech." [3] On Lamebook's website during the litigation process, a banner asking viewers for support in their efforts against Facebook read, "We really love running Lamebook. Aside from the laughs, it represents an opportunity to work on an incredibly fun project with our buddies that makes a lot of people happy and still allows us to make rent at the end of the month … Problem is, Facebook didn’t get the joke. They’ve decided to pick on the little guys: small business owners who seem to be no match for a multi-billion dollar behemoth. But this is one website that’s not going down without a fight." [3]

This dispute came to an end when Facebook's efforts to relocate the litigation process from Austin, Texas, to Palo Alto, California were denied by a Texas federal judge. [11] In a joint statement released on 25 August 2011, the companies proclaimed, "We are pleased to arrive at an agreement that protects Facebook's brand and trademark and allows for Lamebook's continued operation. The parties are now satisfied that users are not likely to be confused." [12] Thus forth, Lamebook is permitted to continue under its name, yet must add a disclaimer to its website, which reads, "This is an unofficial parody and is not affiliated or associated with, or endorsed or approved by, Facebook." [13] Lamebook is also not allowed to seek trademark protection for its name. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Newzbin</span> Former British Usenet indexing website

Newzbin was a British Usenet indexing website, intended to facilitate access to content on Usenet. The site caused controversy over its stance on copyrighted material. Access to the Newzbin.com website was blocked by BT and Sky in late 2011, following legal action in the UK by Hollywood film studios.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ScienTOMogy</span> New Zealand organization

ScienTOMogy was a New Zealand–based parody site lampooning actor Tom Cruise's involvement with Scientology. Initially hosted at the domain name scientomogy.info, the site was created in 2005 in response to the extensive media publicity surrounding Cruise's appearances on The Oprah Winfrey Show and The Today Show.

The multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in litigation in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as actively and aggressively enforcing its intellectual property interests. From the 1980s to the present, Apple has been plaintiff or defendant in civil actions in the United States and other countries. Some of these actions have determined significant case law for the information technology industry and many have captured the attention of the public and media. Apple's litigation generally involves intellectual property disputes, but the company has also been a party in lawsuits that include antitrust claims, consumer actions, commercial unfair trade practice suits, defamation claims, and corporate espionage, among other matters.

isoHunt Torrent index site closed 2013

isoHunt was an online torrent files index and repository, where visitors could browse, search, download or upload torrents of various digital content of mostly entertainment nature. The website was taken down in October 2013 as a result of a legal action from the MPAA; by the end of October 2013 however, two sites with content presumably mirrored from isohunt.com were reported in media. One of them – isohunt.to – became a de facto replacement of the original site. It is not associated in any way with the old staff or owners of the site, and is to be understood as a separate continuation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal issues with fan fiction</span>

Fanfiction has encountered problems with intellectual property law due to usage of copyrighted characters without the original creator or copyright owner's consent.

<i>People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney</i> 2001 lawsuit over cybersquatting

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals v. Doughney, 263 F.3d 359, was an Internet domain trademark infringement decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The ruling became an early precedent on the nature of domain names as both trademarked intellectual property and free speech.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship</span> Legal control of the internet

Internet censorship is the legal control or suppression of what can be accessed, published, or viewed on the Internet. Censorship is most often applied to specific internet domains but exceptionally may extend to all Internet resources located outside the jurisdiction of the censoring state. Internet censorship may also put restrictions on what information can be made internet accessible. Organizations providing internet access – such as schools and libraries – may choose to preclude access to material that they consider undesirable, offensive, age-inappropriate or even illegal, and regard this as ethical behavior rather than censorship. Individuals and organizations may engage in self-censorship of material they publish, for moral, religious, or business reasons, to conform to societal norms, political views, due to intimidation, or out of fear of legal or other consequences.

Facebook has been the subject of criticism and legal action since it was founded in 2004. Criticisms include the outsize influence Facebook has on the lives and health of its users and employees, as well as Facebook's influence on the way media, specifically news, is reported and distributed. Notable issues include Internet privacy, such as use of a widespread "like" button on third-party websites tracking users, possible indefinite records of user information, automatic facial recognition software, and its role in the workplace, including employer-employee account disclosure. The use of Facebook can have negative psychological and physiological effects that include feelings of sexual jealousy, stress, lack of attention, and social media addiction that in some cases is comparable to drug addiction.

Lexulous is an online word game based on the commercial board game Scrabble. It is run by an Indian company of the same name on a dedicated website, and is also available within the social networking site Facebook.

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa Int'l Serv. Ass'n is a court case in which the pornography magazine Perfect 10 filed a complaint against Visa and MasterCard for copyright infringement and trademark infringement.

<i>Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc.</i> Lawsuit brought by Facebook in the United States

Facebook, Inc. v. Power Ventures, Inc. is a lawsuit brought by Facebook in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging that Power Ventures Inc., a third-party platform, collected user information from Facebook and displayed it on their own website. Facebook claimed violations of the CAN-SPAM Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act ("CFAA"), and the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act. According to Facebook, Power Ventures Inc. made copies of Facebook's website during the process of extracting user information. Facebook argued that this process causes both direct and indirect copyright infringement. In addition, Facebook alleged this process constitutes a violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). Finally, Facebook also asserted claims of both state and federal trademark infringement, as well as a claim under California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL").

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Everybody Draw Mohammed Day</span> 2010 action day

Everybody Draw Mohammed Day was a 2010 event in support of artists threatened with violence for drawing representations of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. It stemmed from a protest against censorship of the American television show South Park episode "201", led by the show's distributor Comedy Central, in response to death threats that had been made against some of those responsible for two segments broadcast in April 2010. A drawing representing Muhammad was posted on the Internet on April 20, 2010, with a message suggesting that "everybody" create a drawing depicting Muhammad on May 20 in support of free speech.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MyMFB</span>

MyMFB was a Muslim-oriented social networking website. It was launched in May 2010 in response to a controversial group on Facebook entitled Everybody Draw Mohammed Day and Pakistan's block of Facebook in response.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diaspora (social network)</span> Nonprofit, user-owned, distributed social network

Diaspora is a nonprofit, user-owned, distributed social network. It consists of a group of independently owned nodes which interoperate to form the network. The social network is not owned by any one person or entity, keeping it from being subject to corporate take-overs or advertising. According to its developer, "our distributed design means no big corporation will ever control Diaspora."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PROTECT IP Act</span> US Senate Bill

The PROTECT IP Act was a proposed law with the stated goal of giving the US government and copyright holders additional tools to curb access to "rogue websites dedicated to the sale of infringing or counterfeit goods", especially those registered outside the U.S. The bill was introduced on May 12, 2011, by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and 11 bipartisan co-sponsors. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that implementation of the bill would cost the federal government $47 million through 2016, to cover enforcement costs and the hiring and training of 22 new special agents and 26 support staff. The Senate Judiciary Committee passed the bill, but Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) placed a hold on it.

<i>Flava Works Inc. v. Gunter</i> 2012 US decision on copyright infringement

Flava Works, Inc v. Gunter, 689 F.3d 754, is a decision by the United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, authored by Judge Richard Posner, which held that Marques Gunter, the sole proprietor of the site myVidster.com, a social bookmarking website that enables its users to share videos posted elsewhere online through embedded frames, was not liable for its users' sharing and embedding of copyrighted videos. The court of appeals reversed the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, which had granted a preliminary injunction against myVidster, citing sufficient knowledge of infringement on Gunter's part, while denying safe harbor defense under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). The Court held that Gunter was not directly liable because the copyrighted content was not stored on myVidster's servers, and was not contributorily liable because there was no evidence that conduct by myVidster increased the amount of infringement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop Online Piracy Act</span> Failed United States bill

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was a proposed United States congressional bill to expand the ability of U.S. law enforcement to combat online copyright infringement and online trafficking in counterfeit goods. Introduced on October 26, 2011, by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), provisions included the requesting of court orders to bar advertising networks and payment facilities from conducting business with infringing websites, and search engines from linking to the websites, and court orders requiring Internet service providers to block access to the websites. The proposed law would have expanded existing criminal laws to include unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content, imposing a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

YouTube copyright issues relate to how the Google-owned site implements its protection methods. The systems are designed to protect the exclusivity of a given creator and owner and the rights to reproduce their work. YouTube uses automated measures such as copyright strikes, Content ID and Copyright Verification Program. These methods have been criticized for favoring companies and their use of copyright claims to limit usage of uploaded content.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">YIFY</span> Peer-to-peer movies release group

YIFY Torrents or YTS was a peer-to-peer release group known for distributing large numbers of movies as free downloads through BitTorrent. YIFY releases were characterised through their small file size, which attracted many downloaders.

Matthew Genitempo is an American photographer, living in Texas. He has produced three books of black and white photographs of landscapes and people in the Southern United States: Jasper (2018), Mother of Dogs (2022), and Dogbreath (2024).

References

  1. 1 2 "Lamebook » Frequently Asked Questions".
  2. 1 2 "Lamebook V Facebook DJ Complaint | PDF | Declaratory Judgment | Trademark". Scribd.
  3. 1 2 3 "David vs. Goliath: Web upstart battles corporate giant Facebook - The Baylor Lariat". baylorlariat.com. 28 January 2011.
  4. "Lamebook » About".
  5. Webster's New World® College Dictionary Chooses "Overshare" as the 2008 Word of the Year
  6. "Online Overshares: 32% Say They've Experienced 'Poster's Remorse'". HuffPost. 17 May 2010. Retrieved 16 June 2019.
  7. ONLINE UNLOADING Web sites such as regretsy, lamebook and septafail percolate with criticism, sarcasm and snide sniping. - Philly.com
  8. Jio, Sarah (12 October 2009). "Is Over-Sharing on Facebook Really Such a Healthy Thing?". Glamour.
  9. "Facebook Sues Lamebook for Trademark Infringement". 10 November 2010 via www.bloomberg.com.
  10. Wauters, Robin (22 November 2010). "Facebook Tries To Silence Lamebook: Removes Its Page, Blocks Links And Likes".
  11. "Facebook's frenemy: The founders of Lamebook on freedom of speech a... - CultureMap Austin".
  12. 1 2 Sinsky, Regina Hope (31 August 2011). "Facebook and Lamebook quietly settle trademark battle".
  13. "Facebook and Lamebook Bring Legal Trademark Battle to an End". Archived from the original on 24 September 2011. Retrieved 27 September 2011.