Latin verb paradigms

Last updated

A verb paradigm is a set of verbs that are selected according to features such as the number, speech role and gender of event participants.

Contents

Number
Hic Caesarem videt. (He's seeing Caesar.)
Hī Caesarem vident. (They're seeing Caesar.)
Speech role
Ego Caesarem videō. (I'm seeing Caesar.)
Tū Caesarem vidēs. (You're seeing Caesar.)
Hic Caesarem videt. (He's seeing Caesar.)
Gender
Hic ā Caesare vīsus est. (He was seen by Caesar.)
Haec ā Caesare vīsa est. (She was seen by Caesar.)
Hoc ā Caesare vīsum est. (This was seen by Caesar.)

Paradigm names

For each verb entry in a dictionary, there are multiple such agreement paradigms as shown in the table below. The names of the paradigms are taken from Langenscheidt Dictionary, [1] completed and adapted.

Completions and adaptions: The paradigms 'imperative indirect active', 'imperative indirect passive', 'supine genitive', 'supine dative' are not present in this dictionary because they are rare in the Classical Period, however they are accounted for in Grammar books and articles. The paradigms for 'supine accusative' and 'supine ablative' are called 'Supine I' and 'Supine II' in the Langenscheidt dictionary, but often called 'supine accusative' and 'supine ablative' in academic articles when compared with the other two.

Agreement paradigms
Paradigm name____1________2________3________4________5________6____
indicative future activevidēbōvidēbisvidēbitvidēbimusvidēbitisvidēbunt
indicative future passivevidēborvidēberisvidēbiturvidēbimurvidēbiminīvidēbuntur
indicative present activevideōvidēsvidetvidēmusvidētisvident
indicative present passivevideorvidērisvidēturvidēmurvidēminīvidentur
indicative imperfect activevidēbamvidēbāsvidēbatvidēbāmusvidēbātisvidēbant
indicative imperfect passivevidēbarvidēbārisvidēbāturvidēbāmurvidēbāminīvidēbantur
indicative future perfectvīderōvīderisvīderitvīderimusvīderitisvīderint
indicative perfectvīdīvīdistīvīditvīdimusvīdistisvīdērunt
indicative pluperfectvīderamvīderāsvīderatvīderāmusvīderātisvīderant
subjunctive present activevideamvideāsvideatvideāmusvideātisvideant
subjunctive present passivevidearvideārisvideāturvideāmurvideāminīvideantur
subjunctive imperfect activevidēremvidērēsvidēretvidērēmusvidērētisvidērent
subjunctive imperfect passivevidērervidērērisvidērēturvidērēmurvidērēminīvidērentur
subjunctive perfectvīderimvīderīsvīderitvīderīmusvīderītisvīderit
subjunctive pluperfectvīdissemvīdissēsvīdissetvīdissēmusvīdissētisvīdissent
imperative active––vidē––––vidēte––
imperative passive––vidēre––––vidēminī––
imperative future active––vidētō––––vidētōte––
imperative future passive––vidētor––––vidēminō––
imperative indirect active––––vidētō––––videntō
imperative indirect passive––––vidētor––––videntor
infinitive present activevidēre
infinitive present passivevidī
infinitive perfectvīdisse
participle future nominativevīsūrusvīsūravīsūrumvīsūrīvīsūraevīsūra
participle future accusativevīsūrumvīsūramvīsūrumvīsūrōsvīsūrāsvīsūra
participle future genitivevīsūrīvīsūraevīsūrīvīsūrōrumvīsūrārumvīsūrōrum
participle future dativevīsūrōvīsūraevīsūrōvīsūrīsvīsūrīsvīsūrīs
participle future ablativevīsūrōvīsūrāvīsūrīvīsūrīsvīsūrīsvīsūrīs
participle present nominativevidēnsvidēnsvidentēsvidentia
participle present accusativevidentemvidēnsvidentēsvidentia
participle present genitivevidentisvidentisvidentiumvidentium
participle present dativevidentīvidentīvidentibusvidentibus
participle present ablativevidentevidentevidentibusvidentibus
participle past nominativevīsusvīsavīsūrōvīsīvīsaevīsa
participle past accusativevīsumvīsamvīsumvīsōsvīsāsvīsa
participle past genitivevīsīvīsaevīsīvīsōrumvīsārumvīsōrum
participle past dativevīsōvīsaevīsōvīsīsvīsīsvīsīs
participle past ablativevīsōvīsāvīsōvīsīsvīsīsvīsīs
gerundive nominativevidendusvidendavidendumvidendīvidendaevidenda
gerundive accusativevidendumvidendamvidendumvidendōsvidendāsvidenda
gerundive genitivevidendīvidendaevidendīvidendōrumvidendārumvidendōrum
gerundive dativevidendōvidendaevidendōvidendīsvidendīsvidendīs
gerundive ablativevidendōvidendāvidendōvidendīsvidendīsvidendīs
supine accusativevīsum
supine genitivevīsūs
supine dativevīsuī
supine ablativevīsū
gerund accusativevidendum
gerund genitivevidendī
gerund dativevidendō
gerund ablativevidendō

Types of agreement paradigm

Latin has two major types of agreement paradigms with two or more verbs as shown in the tables below:

Number + Speech role
numberspeech roleindicative

present

active

indicative

present

passive

indicative

perfect

singularspeakeramōamoramāvī
singularaddresseeamāsamārisamāvistī
singularotheramatamāturamāvit
plural+speakeramāmusamāmuramāvimus
plural–speaker +addresseeamātisamāminīamāvistis
plural–speaker –addresseeamantamanturamāvērunt
Number + Gender
numbergenderparticiple

past

nominative

participle

past

accusative

singularmasculineamātusamātum
singularfeminineamātaamātam
singularneuteramātumamātum
plural+masculineamātīamātōs
plural–masculine +feminineamātaeamātās
plural–masculine +neuteramātaamāta

Rare supines

Some supines are rare, but they do occur althroughout the Classical Period. Following the grammatical pattern whereby supines combine with verbs of motion, we see two semantic patterns: events taking place either where the motion starts or where it ends. We also see supines as the event performed by speech acts.

Events at origin

The ablative supine represents a state change at the origin of motion.

Events at destination

The accusative supine represents a state change at the destination of motion.

Events commanded by speech acts

The dative supine represents an event commanded by a speech act.

Events in periphrases

The genitive supine may occur in periphrasis for an immediate future in the present.

And the ablative supine may occur in periphrasis for possible undesirable future in the present.

Related Research Articles

In grammar, the dative case is a grammatical case used in some languages to indicate the recipient or beneficiary of an action, as in "Maria Jacobo potum dedit", Latin for "Maria gave Jacob a drink". In this example, the dative marks what would be considered the indirect object of a verb in English.

In linguistics, declension is the changing of the form of a word, generally to express its syntactic function in the sentence, by way of some inflection. Declensions may apply to nouns, pronouns, adjectives, adverbs, and determiners to indicate number, case, gender, and a number of other grammatical categories. Meanwhile, the inflectional change of verbs is called conjugation.

A grammatical case is a category of nouns and noun modifiers that corresponds to one or more potential grammatical functions for a nominal group in a wording. In various languages, nominal groups consisting of a noun and its modifiers belong to one of a few such categories. For instance, in English, one says I see them and they see me: the nominative pronouns I/they represent the perceiver and the accusative pronouns me/them represent the phenomenon perceived. Here, nominative and accusative are cases, that is, categories of pronouns corresponding to the functions they have in representation.

Latin declension is the set of patterns according to which Latin words are declined—that is, have their endings altered to show grammatical case, number and gender. Nouns, pronouns, and adjectives are declined, and a given pattern is called a declension. There are five declensions, which are numbered and grouped by ending and grammatical gender. Each noun follows one of the five declensions, but some irregular nouns have exceptions.

In linguistics and grammar, conjugation has two basic meanings. One meaning is the creation of derived forms of a verb from basic forms, or principal parts.

In grammar, the locative case is a grammatical case which indicates a location. It corresponds vaguely to the English prepositions "in", "on", "at", and "by". The locative case belongs to the general local cases, together with the lative and separative case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin grammar</span> Grammar of the Latin language

Latin is a heavily inflected language with largely free word order. Nouns are inflected for number and case; pronouns and adjectives are inflected for number, case, and gender; and verbs are inflected for person, number, tense, aspect, voice, and mood. The inflections are often changes in the ending of a word, but can be more complicated, especially with verbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Latin</span> Latin language in the period before 75 BC

Old Latin, also known as Early, Archaic or Priscan Latin, was the Latin language in the period roughly before 75 BC, i.e. before the age of Classical Latin. A member of the Italic languages, it descends from a common Proto-Italic language; Latino-Faliscan is likely a separate branch from Osco-Umbrian. All these languages may be relatively closely related to Venetic and possibly further to Celtic; compare the Italo-Celtic hypothesis.

Russian grammar employs an Indo-European inflexional structure, with considerable adaptation.

In grammar, a supine is a form of verbal noun used in some languages. The term is most often used for Latin, where it is one of the four principal parts of a verb. The word refers to a position of lying on one's back, but there exists no widely accepted etymology that explains why or how the term came to be used to also describe this form of a verb.

Suffixaufnahme, also known as case stacking, is a linguistic phenomenon used in forming a genitive construction, whereby prototypically a genitive noun agrees with its head noun. The term Suffixaufnahme itself is literally translated as "taking up of suffixes", which can be interpreted as the identical case marking of different but referentially-related phrases, with the presumption that nominal phrases possess a flat or non-configurational syntax. Across syntactic theories, case is seen as a bundle of features, and case agreement as the identity of case features. It was first recognized in Old Georgian and some other Caucasian and ancient Middle Eastern languages as well as many Australian languages, and almost invariably coincides with agglutinativity.

Romanian nouns, under the rules of Romanian grammar, are declined, varying by gender, number, and case.

Indirect speech, also known as reported speech, indirect discourse (US), or ōrātiō oblīqua, is the practice, common in all Latin historical writers, of reporting spoken or written words indirectly, using different grammatical forms. Passages of indirect speech can extend from a single phrase to an entire paragraph, and this style was generally preferred by Roman historians to the direct speech commonly found in Greek authors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inflection</span> Process of word formation

In linguistic morphology, inflection is a process of word formation in which a word is modified to express different grammatical categories such as tense, case, voice, aspect, person, number, gender, mood, animacy, and definiteness. The inflection of verbs is called conjugation, while the inflection of nouns, adjectives, adverbs, etc. can be called declension.

In Latin grammar, the ablative case is one of the six cases of nouns. Traditionally, it is the sixth case. It has forms and functions derived from the Proto-Indo-European ablative, instrumental, and locative. It expresses concepts similar to those of the English prepositions from; with, by; and in, at. It is sometimes called the adverbial case, since phrases in the ablative can be translated as adverbs: incrēdibilī celeritāte, 'with incredible speed', or 'very quickly'.

The grammar of the Hittite language has a highly conservative verbal system and rich nominal declension. The language is attested in cuneiform, and is the earliest attested Indo-European language.

Latin syntax is the part of Latin grammar that covers such matters as word order, the use of cases, tenses and moods, and the construction of simple and compound sentences, also known as periods.

Latin word order is relatively free. The subject, object, and verb can come in any order, and an adjective can go before or after its noun, as can a genitive such as hostium "of the enemies". A common feature of Latin is hyperbaton, in which a phrase is split up by other words: Sextus est Tarquinius "it is Sextus Tarquinius".

In Latin, there are multiple periphrases for tense and mode. Here we list the most common.

In Latin, there are different modes of indicating past, present and future processes. There is the basic mode of free clauses and there are multiple dependent modes found exclusively in dependent clauses. In particular, there is the 'infinitive' mode for reported satetements and the 'subjunctive' mode for reported questions.

References

  1. Cherubini, Sabrina; Epple, Barbara (2014). Langenscheidt Schulwörterbuch Pro Latein. München: Langenscheidt GmbH & Co. KG. pp. 1142–1149. ISBN   978-3-468-11492-2.
  2. Marcus Porcius Cato, De Agri Cultura 1.5.4/5
  3. Marcus Porcius Cato, De Agri Cultura 1.5.4/5
  4. Marcus Tullius Cicero, Philippicae 12.9.1
  5. Titus Livius, Ab Urbe Condita 36.23.8.1
  6. Marcus Annaeus Lucanus, Bellum Civile 8.51-53
  7. Aulus Cornelius Celsus, De Medicina 2.1.10.1
  8. Iustinianus, Digesta Iustiniani 4.2.21.pr.1