Legal outsourcing

Last updated

Legal outsourcing, also known as legal process outsourcing (LPO), refers to the practice of a law firm or corporation obtaining legal support services from an outside law firm or legal support services company (LPO provider). When the LPO provider is based in another country, the practice is called offshoring and involves the practice of outsourcing any activity except those where personal presence or contact is required, e.g. appearances in court and face-to-face negotiations. When the LPO provider is based in the same country, the practice of outsourcing includes agency work and other services requiring a physical presence, such as court appearances. [1] This process is one of the incidents of the larger movement towards outsourcing. The most commonly offered services have been agency work, document review, [2] legal research and writing, [3] drafting of pleadings and briefs, [4] and patent services. [5]

Contents

Outsourcing gives a perfect job environment for the people in other nations and significantly the states with the economic issues. Additionally, it would aid the companies to save more cash. Therefore, it can also aid the interior economy. Outsourcing is explained as turning over a project to an exterior provider that will execute the project on behalf of the central companies. [6]

This phenomenon has been a part of the legal experience since the 1950s, where it was restricted only to patents. [7] Later, firms began to contract certain services to back door firms. The process of subcontracting part of the legal process to different countries is at a nascent stage, with relatively consistent market growth. [8] Legal process outsourcing has predominantly been to countries that had previously taken advantage of the business process outsourcing wave. LPO providers have established themselves in Canada, [1] South Africa, [9] India, [10] the Philippines, [11] the United States, Israel, [12] and Latin America. [13]

Overview

The concept of legal process outsourcing is based on the division of labour principle, prevalent in law firms, where various time consuming and onerous processes like due diligence are delegated to paralegals, document reviewers or interns. [14] This allows the firm to address the various legal issues that arise on a daily basis while being able to streamline productivity.

The process involves a contract, with due consideration, between both firms. The following are the various methods by which the process could be initiated: [15]

Reasons

Among the leading proponents of this process have been corporate clients concerned with rising legal expenses. The legal departments of corporations began using the services of such providers. Soon these corporations began to pressure their legal representatives to outsource certain legal processes to cut costs. [17]

Cost saving is the biggest attraction for the western firms that outsource their legal work. India's legal services are widely considered affordable, efficient, and above all, skilled. For a legal job outsourced in India, the U.S. firm pays hardly one-fourth or one-fifth of what it has to pay in the U.S. for the same work. [18]

Advantages

Most firms and corporations outsource primarily to save cash, and this is considered the biggest advantage for legal outsourcing. While an attorney in major legal markets such as the US may charge from $150 to $500 per hour when performing rote services, legal process outsourcing firms generally charge a small fraction of that price. It has attracted major corporations to outsource specific work outside their legal departments. Many destinations for outsourcing have benefited from the upsurge in bankruptcies and litigations that have occurred in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis. [19] [20] As reported in the ABA Journal, "[t]he market for outsourced legal work is booming in India. While lawyers there are doing a lot of routine work, they are also handling some interesting legal matters, including work for the makers of movies and television shows." [21] As stated in USA Today, "'[y]ou could call it "Outsourcing 2.0" or maybe even "3.0." Now firms are increasingly trying to leverage expertise,' says Saikat Chaudhuri, an assistant professor in the business school at the University of Pennsylvania. Legal Outsourcing is 'growing very, very quickly.'" [22]

LPO industry and the global financial crisis

LPO firms in India had predicted an annual growth of 200% due to recession related litigation and the increased need to save costs in the US. Their expectations have not been met. [23] The major reason for this is that US lawyers themselves have started looking at alternative fee structures due to the recession and job losses. [24] In spite of setbacks, the LPO industry has seen growth of about 40-60% in the last year.[ citation needed ] Although some areas of practice, such as real estate, have drastically collapsed due to the recession, some areas such as litigation, document review, and corporate compliance have gained ground, resulting in business directed to LPO firms in India.

Criticisms

One of the major concerns with outsourcing is the potential for breaches of client confidentiality. In legal process outsourcing the issue of client confidentiality assumes utmost importance. The attorney–client privilege is a doctrine that says anything conveyed between an attorney and his client shall be treated with utmost confidentiality and is exempted from disclosure even in a court of law. However, when either party discloses confidential information to a third party or the opposite party, the privilege is deemed to be waived. During the early years of legal process outsourcing, many law firms hesitated to outsource their work. [25] Critics and opponents state that, since communication is being sent to a country other than United States, the confidentiality is broken; hence, the attorney client privilege has been waived. However, American Bar Association clarified this in 2008, clearing the way for the development of legal process outsourcing. [26] [ full citation needed ]

Another criticism is that people performing legal work may not be bound to necessary ethical standards. [27] The process of Legal Outsourcing has come in conflict with the Model Code of Conduct issued by the American Bar Association. [28] However, there have been ethics opinions from various local bar associations (New York, [29] San Diego [30] ) and recently the American Bar Association [31] that discuss ethical legal outsourcing and how to achieve it. However, there is criticism that the use of legal outsourcing creates a breach of ABA Model Rule 5.4 which prohibits attorneys from sharing fees with non-attorneys and, also, the prohibition on the practice of law by foreign non-attorneys.

New frontiers

India is considered to be a major destination for legal outsourcing due to its availability of affordable English-speaking lawyers, some of whom are UK and/or US educated, and due to a legal system that is based on English common law. Recently, new frontiers for legal outsourcing have emerged in geographic areas closer to their target client markets. Other established LPO providers can be found in Argentina, Australia, China, France, the Philippines, Singapore, and South Korea, each offering unique advantages concomitant with their distinctive geographic location, language capabilities and regional expertise. "There is natural arbitrage between the excellent talented and low cost professionals in India, compared to the US and other developed jurisdictions, especially in the litigation management space", believes Zia Mody, managing partner AZB & Partners, one of the biggest law firms in India. [32] Argentina, for example, is an increasingly desirable LPO centre for the U.S. client market due to its proximity in terms of its western hemisphere location, time zone similarity, and cultural ties to the United States. [33] Sri Lanka, as an additional example, is an Indian competitor [34] whose success has come from a familiarity with British law, a strong economic infrastructure, online freedom, and marketing by Indian policymakers. [35] LPO providers in India and in these new frontiers are increasingly utilizing onshore and offshore US and UK-licensed attorneys as part of their outsourcing offering [36] as a means to create greater quality controls, expand into more sophisticated offerings, and instill higher confidence in the ethical treatment of client sensitive data. [37]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 "Strategic resourcing: Thinking differently about delivery of legal services" (PDF). LawPro Magazine. Retrieved 15 November 2012.
  2. "Demystifying the eDiscovery Process". elvidence.com.au. 2014-10-17. Retrieved 2014-10-19.
  3. "Legal Research". bizandlegis.com. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  4. "Online Legal Document Services". Bizandlegis.com. Archived from the original on 2012-06-25. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  5. "IP Legal Services by Intellectual Property Attorneys and Lawyers". Bizandlegis.com. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  6. Peng, M.W. Global Business. pp. 102–104.
  7. "History of CPA Global". Cpaglobal.com. Archived from the original on 2012-05-08. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  8. Spencer, Beverly (October 2000). "Legal Recruitment and Outsourcing" (PDF). Canadian Lawyer. 24 (10). Retrieved 19 June 2012.
  9. "Cape Town offers cutting-edge LPO solutions". www.investcapetown.com/.
  10. "Corporate Lawyers - Biz and Legis Law Firm - Litigation Lawyers". www.bizandlegis.com.
  11. Engardio, Pete. "Let's Offshore The Lawyers". journalist. Archived from the original on November 6, 2006. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
  12. Easton, Jonathan. "Legal Outsourcing to Israel is Professionally Wise and Economically Sound". legal, journalism. Archived from the original on 19 November 2012. Retrieved 20 June 2012.
  13. Breijer, Marieke (2 July 2012). "The Hired Help". Latin Lawyer. 11 (5): 5.
  14. "Legal Process Outsourcing and 'Fly In/Fly Out' Lawyering Addressed at Ethics 20/20 Commission Hearing in San Francisco". Abanow.org. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  15. Mark W. Heaphy; Sarvesh D. Mahajan. "The "Nuts And Bolts" of Legal Process Outsourcing". Sddglobal.com. Archived from the original on 2013-01-23. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  16. "Section of International Law". American Bar Association. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  17. Mark Ross (2007-10-30). "Legal Process Outsourcing (LPO): 2007 and Beyond". American Bar Association. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  18. "It's India for legal services". The Hindu. 26 November 2007 via www.thehindu.com.
  19. "India boom threatened by slowdown". BBC News. 2009-03-27. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  20. Triedman, Julie (2009-04-22). "SmithDehn Beats Back Libel Suit for Da Ali G Show, Channel 4". Amlawdaily.typepad.com. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  21. Debra Cassens Weiss (2008-05-12). "Indian Lawyers Handling Outsourced Work Do More Than Document Review". ABA Journal. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  22. Leinwand, Donna (2008-10-14). "More legal legwork gets outsourced to India". Usatoday.Com. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  23. "LPO industry to suffer from economic downturn for short term". Economictimes.indiatimes.com. 2009-11-29. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  24. "Legal Process Outsourcing – Outlook and Opportunities" . Retrieved 2014-10-19.
  25. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-07-16. Retrieved 2010-07-06.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) "Legal Process Offshore Outsourcing (LPO) and the Great Recession". 2010-06-03. Retrieved 2014-10-19.
  26. ABA Opinion on Legal Outsourcing
  27. Barlyn, Suzanne (2008-04-03). "Call My Lawyer ... in India". TIME. Archived from the original on April 6, 2008. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  28. "Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice Of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice Of Law" . Retrieved 20 June 2012.
  29. "The Association Of The Bar Of The City Of New York Committee On Professional And Judicial Ethics". New York City Bar. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
  30. "Ethics Opinion 2007-1". San Diego County Bar Association. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
  31. Steven J. Mintz (2008-08-28). "Ethics Opinions Allow Foreign Legal Outsourcing". American Bar Association. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  32. "Conversation with Zia Mody Senior Partner of AZB & Partners". Bar and Bench.
  33. "Destination Latin America: A Near-Shore Alternative". AT Kearney: 2. 2007.
  34. http://www.pwc.com/ca/en/media/release/2010-02-04-global-outsourcing.jhtml [ dead link ]
  35. "India's edge in legal process outsourcing". Chinadaily.com.cn. 2009-08-10. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  36. VeritasLegalWeb (2010-08-24). "VeritasLegalWeb: Expat Outsourcing: The Next India?". Veritaslegalweb.blogspot.com. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
  37. McAfee, David (30 March 2012). "More Companies are Outsourcing Legal Work". Los Angeles Daily Journal.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barrister</span> Lawyer specialised in court representation in certain jurisdictions

A barrister is a type of lawyer in common law jurisdictions. Barristers mostly specialise in courtroom advocacy and litigation. Their tasks include arguing cases in courts and tribunals, drafting legal pleadings, researching the law and giving legal opinions.

In its most general sense, the practice of law involves giving legal advice to clients, drafting legal documents for clients, and representing clients in legal negotiations and court proceedings such as lawsuits, and is applied to the professional services of a lawyer or attorney at law, barrister, solicitor, or civil law notary. However, there is a substantial amount of overlap between the practice of law and various other professions where clients are represented by agents. These professions include real estate, banking, accounting, and insurance. Moreover, a growing number of legal document assistants (LDAs) are offering services which have traditionally been offered only by lawyers and their employee paralegals. Many documents may now be created by computer-assisted drafting libraries, where the clients are asked a series of questions that are posed by the software in order to construct the legal documents. In addition, regulatory consulting firms also provide advisory services on regulatory compliance that were traditionally provided exclusively by law firms.

Outsourcing includes both foreign and domestic forms of outside contracting. It is an agreement in which one company hires another company to be responsible for a planned or existing activity which otherwise is or could be carried out internally, i.e. in-house, and sometimes involves transferring employees and assets from one firm to another. The term outsourcing, which came from the phrase outside resourcing, originated no later than 1981 at a time when industrial jobs in the United States were being moved overseas, contributing to the economic and cultural collapse of small, industrial towns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law firm</span> Business entity formed to practice law

A law firm is a business entity formed by one or more lawyers to engage in the practice of law. The primary service rendered by a law firm is to advise clients about their legal rights and responsibilities, and to represent clients in civil or criminal cases, business transactions, and other matters in which legal advice and other assistance are sought.

Attorney's fee is a chiefly United States term for compensation for legal services performed by an attorney for a client, in or out of court.

Knowledge process outsourcing (KPO) describes the outsourcing of core information-related business activities which are competitively important or form an integral part of a company's value chain. KPO requires advanced analytical and technical skills as well as a high degree of specialist expertise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">State Bar of Texas</span> Bar Association

The State Bar of Texas is an agency of the judiciary under the administrative control of the Texas Supreme Court. It is responsible for assisting the Texas Supreme Court in overseeing all attorneys licensed to practice law in Texas. With more than 100,000 active members, the State Bar of Texas is one of the largest state bars in the United States. Unlike the American Bar Association (ABA), the State Bar of Texas (SBOT) is a mandatory bar. The State Bar is headquartered in the Texas Law Center at 1414 Colorado Street in Austin.

A personal injury lawyer is a lawyer who provides legal services to those who claim to have been injured, physically or psychologically, as a result of the negligence of another person, company, government agency or any entity. Personal injury lawyers primarily practice in the area of law known as tort law. Examples of common personal injury claims include injuries from slip and fall accidents, traffic collisions, defective products, workplace injuries and professional malpractice.

According to the National Association of Legal Fee Analysis (NALFA), legal auditing is a litigation management practice and risk management tool, used by insurance and other consumers of legal services, to determine if hourly billing errors, abuses, and inefficiencies exist by carefully examining and identifying unreasonable attorney fees and expenses. Because the majority of corporate law firms charge clients on an hourly basis, and base attorney promotion and compensation almost entirely on the number of hours billed, rather than the results achieved for clients, lawyers and law firms have much incentive to bill as many hours as possible, and little incentive to work efficiently or to bill fewer hours. According to the California State Bar, most lawyers who block-bill their time inflate each client bill by 10-30 percent, and at the average national billing rate of $661 per hour that means that most big-firm lawyers overcharge clients anywhere from $150,000 to $400,000 each year. According to global e-billing standards LEDES partner, Legal Solutions Group, legal auditing must include reference to guideline non-compliance (GNC) codes, which should be established by consumers of legal services, such as enterprises and insurers. Best practices include ensuring the appropriate title of legal representation, paralegal vs. partner, handles a given task.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dechert</span> American law firm

Dechert LLP is a multinational American law firm of more than 900 lawyers with practices in corporate and securities, complex litigation, finance and real estate, financial services, asset management, and private equity. In 2021, the firm raised revenues by 25%, with a total of $1.3 billion. On Law.com's 2022 Global 200 survey, Dechert ranked as the 41st highest grossing law firm in the world.

A law firm network is a membership organization consisting of independent law firms. These networks are one type of professional services networks similar to networks found in the accounting profession. The common purpose is to expand the resources available to each member for providing services to their clients. Prominent primary law firm networks include CICERO League of International Lawyers, First Law International, Alliott Group (multidisciplinary), Lex Mundi, World Services Group (multidisciplinary), TerraLex, Meritas, Multilaw, The Network of Trial Law Firms, Inc., the State Capital Group, and Pacific Rim Advisory Council. The largest networks have more than 10,000 attorneys located in hundreds of offices worldwide.

A lawyer referral service maintains a network of lawyers, and connects people in need of lawyers with its participating attorneys. A potential client who contacts a lawyer referral service is directed to a lawyer who practices in the area of law that is most appropriate for their situation. Some lawyer referral services charge a fee for providing a referral, while others provide referrals at no cost to the prospective client. Many referral services connect prospective clients with lawyers who have agreed to provide a low-cost or free initial consultation.

The Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) is the state bar association of the U.S. state of Washington. It operates under the delegated authority of the Washington Supreme Court to license the state's nearly 41,000 active and inactive lawyers and other legal professionals. In furtherance of its obligation to protect and serve the public, the WSBA regulates lawyers and other legal professionals and serves its members as a professional association. The WSBA's mission is to serve the public and the members of the Bar, to ensure the integrity of the legal profession, and to champion justice.

Legal advertising is advertising by lawyers (attorneys), solicitors and law firms. Legal marketing is a broader term referring to advertising and other practices, including client relations, social media, and public relations. It's a type of marketing undertaken by law firms, lawyers (attorneys) and solicitors that aims to promote the services of law firms and increase their brand awareness.

Pangea3 is a legal outsourcing services provider with headquarters in New York City, Noida, Bangalore and Mumbai, India. Pangea3 provides legal services and intellectual property services to in-house counsel in U.S., European and Japanese corporations and attorneys in international law firms. Pangea3 has been recognized as a leading legal outsourcing services company repeatedly since 2007, was voted best LPO in the New York Law Journal Reader Rankings from 2011 through 2013 and awarded LPO of the Year by India Business Law Journal from 2009 through 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mindcrest</span> American legal services company

Mindcrest Inc. is a legal services provider headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, United States, with operations in India. Mindcrest specializes in litigation support, contracts, compliance, legal research, analytics, and real estate.

Law Practice Optimization, or Legal Practice Optimization, or simply LPO as it is also known, represents the practice carried out by Law Practice Optimizers of improving the efficiency and client/attorney relationships within a law firm and improves the client intake of the firm.

Cohen & Gresser LLP is an international law firm with offices in New York City, Paris, Washington D.C., and London. The firm represents clients in complex litigation and corporate transactions throughout the world. Founded in 2002, the firm has grown to seventy lawyers in eight practice groups: Corporate; Employment; Intellectual Property & Technology; Litigation and Arbitration; Privacy and Data Security; Real Estate; Tax; White Collar Defense. The firm's clients include Fortune 500 companies and major financial institutions across a broad spectrum of industries throughout the world, and it has litigated and negotiated against some of the nation's largest law firms.

Legal Bill Review (LBR) refers to process of reviewing and analyzing legal bills against any billing guidelines, service level agreements, applicable laws and other generally accepted standards. LBR plays a vital role in litigation spend management through the review and analysis of law firm invoices. LBR is typically accompanied by claims management processes, often outsourced to third parties, such as LSG. LBR is seen as a standard practice among larger insurers and third-Party administrators.

TMT Law Practice (TMT) is India’s first Technology, Media, and Telecommunications Law firm with offices in New Delhi, Chennai, Bengaluru, Kolkata, Ahmedabad, Mysuru, and Bhubaneshwar, with an associate network office in Mumbai.

References