Lexical set

Last updated

A lexical set is a group of words that share a particular phonological feature.

Contents

A phoneme is a basic unit of sound in a language that can distinguish one word from another. Most commonly, following the work of phonetician John C. Wells, a lexical set is a class of words in a language that share a certain vowel phoneme. As Wells himself says, lexical sets "enable one to refer concisely to large groups of words which tend to share the same vowel, and to the vowel which they share". [1] For instance, the pronunciation of the vowel in cup, luck, sun, blood, glove, and tough may vary in different English dialects but is usually consistent within each dialect and so the category of words forms a lexical set, [2] which Wells, for ease, calls the STRUT set. Meanwhile, words like bid, cliff, limb, miss, etc. form a separate lexical set: Wells's KIT set. Originally, Wells developed 24 such labelskeywordsfor the vowel lexical sets of English, which have been sometimes modified and expanded by himself or other scholars for various reasons. Lexical sets have also been used to describe the vowels of other languages, such as French, [3] Irish [4] and Scots. [5]

There are several reasons why lexical sets are useful. Scholars of phonetics often use abstract symbols (most universally today, those of the International Phonetic Alphabet) to transcribe phonemes, but they may follow different transcribing conventions or rely on implicit assumptions in their exact choice of symbols. One convenience of lexical sets is their tendency to avoid these conventions or assumptions. Instead, Wells explains, they "make use of keywords intended to be unmistakable no matter what accent one says them in". [1] That makes them useful for examining phonemes within an accent, comparing and contrasting different accents, and capturing how phonemes may be differently distributed based on accent. A further benefit is that people with no background in phonetics can identify a phoneme not by learned symbols or technical jargon but by its simple keyword (like STRUT or KIT in the above examples). [2]

Standard lexical sets for English

The standard lexical sets for English introduced by John C. Wells in his 1982 Accents of English are in wide usage. Wells defined each lexical set on the basis of the pronunciation of words in two reference accents, which he calls RP and GenAm. [6]

Wells classifies English words into 24 lexical sets on the basis of the pronunciation of the vowel of their stressed syllable in the two reference accents. Typed in small caps, each lexical set is named after a representative keyword. [9] Wells also describes three sets of words based on word-final unstressed vowels, which, though not included in the standard 24 lexical sets (the final three sets listed in the chart below) "have indexical and diagnostic value in distinguishing accents". [10]

Lexical sets, as defined in Wells (1982) , pp. xviii–ix, 120–2, 166–7
KeywordRPGAExample words
KITship, sick, bridge, milk, myth, busy
DRESSstep, neck, edge, shelf, friend, ready
TRAPtap, back, badge, scalp, hand, cancel
LOTstop, sock, dodge, romp, possible, quality
STRUTcup, suck, budge, pulse, trunk, blood
FOOTput, bush, full, good, look, wolf
BATHstaff, brass, ask, dance, sample, calf
CLOTHcough, broth, cross, long, Boston
NURSEhurt, lurk, urge, burst, jerk, term
FLEECEcreep, speak, leave, feel, key, people
FACEtape, cake, raid, veil, steak, day
PALMpsalm, father, bra, spa, lager
THOUGHTtaught, sauce, hawk, jaw, broad
GOATsoap, joke, home, know, so, roll
GOOSEloop, shoot, tomb, mute, huge, view
PRICEripe, write, arrive, high, try, buy
CHOICEadroit, noise, join, toy, royal
MOUTHout, house, loud, count, crowd, cow
NEARbeer, sincere, fear, beard, serum
SQUAREcare, fair, pear, where, scarce, vary
STARTfar, sharp, bark, carve, farm, heart
NORTHfor, war, short, scorch, born, warm
FORCEfour, wore, sport, porch, borne, story
CUREpoor, tourist, pure, plural, jury
happYcopy, scampi, taxi, sortie, committee, hockey, Chelsea
lettERəərpaper, metre, calendar, stupor, succo(u)r, martyr
commAəəabout, gallop, oblige, quota, vodka

For example, the word rod is pronounced /ˈrɒd/ in RP and /ˈrɑd/ in GenAm. It therefore belongs in the LOT lexical set. Weary is pronounced /ˈwɪərɪ/ in RP and /ˈwɪrɪ/ in GenAm and thus belongs in the NEAR lexical set.

Some English words do not belong to any lexical set. For example, the a in the stressed syllable of tomato is pronounced /ɑː/ in RP, and /eɪ/ in GenAm, a combination that is very unusual and is not covered by any of the 24 lexical sets above. [11] The GenAm pronunciation of words pronounced with /ɒ/ before a velar consonant in RP, such as mock and fog, varies between /ɔ/ and /ɑ/ and so the words belong to no particular lexical set. [12]

The GenAm FLEECE, FACE, GOOSE, and GOAT range between monophthongal [i,e,u,o] and diphthongal [ɪi,eɪ,ʊu,oʊ], and Wells chose to phonemicize three of them as monophthongs for the sake of simplicity and FACE as /eɪ/ to avoid confusion with RP DRESS, /e/. [13]

The happY set was identified phonemically as the same as KIT for both RP and GenAm, reflecting the then-traditional analysis, although realizations similar to FLEECE (happy tensing) were already taking hold in both varieties. [14] The notation i for happY has since emerged and been taken up by major pronouncing dictionaries, including Wells's, to take note of this shift. [15] Wells's model of General American is also conservative in that it lacks the cotcaught (LOTTHOUGHT) and horsehoarse (NORTHFORCE) mergers. [8]

Choice of the keywords

Wells explains his choice of keywords ("kit", "fleece", etc.) as follows:

The keywords have been chosen in such a way that clarity is maximized: whatever accent of English they are spoken in, they can hardly be mistaken for other words. Although fleece is not the commonest of words, it cannot be mistaken for a word with some other vowel; whereas beat, say, if we had chosen it instead, would have been subject to the drawback that one man's pronunciation of beat may sound like another's pronunciation of bait or bit. [9]

Wherever possible, the keywords end in a voiceless alveolar or dental consonant. [9]

Usage

The standard lexical sets of Wells are widely used to discuss the phonological and phonetic systems of different accents of English in a clear and concise manner. Although based solely on RP and GenAm, the standard lexical sets have proven useful in describing many other accents of English. This is true because, in many dialects, the words in all or most of the sets are pronounced with similar or identical stressed vowels. Wells himself uses the Lexical Sets most prominently to give "tables of lexical incidence" for all the various accents he discusses in his work. For example, here is the table of lexical incidence he gives for Newfoundland English: [16]

  • KIT: ɪ
  • DRESS: ɛ
  • TRAP: æ
  • LOT: ɑ
  • STRUT: ɔ̈
  • FOOT: ʊ
  • BATH: æː
  • CLOTH: ɑː
  • NURSE: ɜr[ɝ:]
  • FLEECE:
  • FACE: ɛː,ɛɪ
  • PALM: æ,ɑː
  • THOUGHT: ɑː
  • GOAT: ʌʊ
  • GOOSE:
  • PRICE: əi
  • CHOICE: əi
  • MOUTH: əu
  • NEAR: ɛr
  • SQUARE: ɛr
  • START: ær
  • NORTH: ɔ̈r
  • FORCE: ɔ̈r
  • CURE: ɔ̈r
  • happY: [i]
  • lettER: ər[ɚ]
  • commA: ə

The table indicates that, for example, Newfoundland English uses the /ɪ/ phoneme for words in the KIT lexical set, and that the NORTH, FORCE and CURE sets are all pronounced with the same vowel /ɔ̈r/. Note that some lexical sets, such as FACE, are given with more than one pronunciation, which indicates that not all words in the FACE lexical set are pronounced similarly (in this case, Newfoundland English has not fully undergone the pane–pain merger). /ɔ̈/ is a back vowel [ ɔ ]; Wells uses the symbol ɔ̈ so that the reader does not confuse it with the THOUGHT vowel (which, in the case of many other accents, he writes with ɔ or ɔː). [17]

Wells also uses the standard lexical sets to refer to "the vowel sound used for the standard lexical set in question in the accent under discussion": [18] Thus, for example, in describing the Newfoundland accent, Wells writes that "KIT and DRESS are reportedly often merged as [ɪ]", [19] meaning that the stressed syllables of words in the KIT lexical set and words in the DRESS lexical set are reportedly often pronounced identically with the vowel [ɪ].

Lexical sets may also be used to describe splits and mergers. For example, RP, along with most other non-rhotic accents, pronounces words such as "father" and "farther" identically. This can be described more economically as the merger of the PALM and START lexical sets. Most North American accents make "father" rhyme with "bother". This can be described as the merger of the PALM and LOT lexical sets.

Origin

In a 2010 blog post, Wells wrote:

I sometimes think that a century from now my lexical sets will be the one thing I shall be remembered for. Yet I dreamt them up over a weekend, frustrated with the incoherent mess of symbols used in such contemporary publications as Weinreich's "Is a structural dialectology possible?". [20]

He also wrote that he claimed no copyright in the standard lexical sets, and that everyone was "free to make whatever use of them they wish". [20]

Extensions

Some varieties of English make distinctions in stressed vowels that are not captured by the 24 lexical sets. For example, some Irish and Scottish accents that have not undergone the fern–fir–fur merger split the NURSE lexical set into multiple subsets. For such accents, the 24 Wells lexical sets may be inadequate. Because of this, a work devoted to Irish English may split the Wells NURSE set into two subsets, a new, smaller NURSE set and a TERM set. [21]

Some writers on English accents have introduced a GOAL set to refer to a set of words that have the GOAT vowel in standard accents but may have a different vowel in Sheffield [22] or in south-east London. [23] Wells has stated that he didn't include a GOAL set because this should be interpreted as an allophone of GOAT that is sensitive to the morpheme boundary, which he illustrates by comparing the London pronunciations of goalie and slowly. [24]

Schneider et al. (2004), which documents the phonologies of varieties of English around the world like Wells (1982), employs Wells's standard lexical sets as well as the following supplementary lexical sets, as needed to illustrate finer details of the variety under discussion: [25]

HEAD, BIRTH, BERTH, PRIZE, AFTER, NEVER, STAY, STONE, STAND, DO, ONE, SNOW, BOAR, POWER, FIRE, EARS, TUESDAY, NEW, ORANGE, KITTEN, DANCE, TOMORROW, LOUD, HAND, PIN, PEN, THINK, LENGTH, GOING, POOL, PULL, FEEL, FILL, FAIL, FELL, COW, STAR, FIT, CUP, PIECE, BROAD, LOOSE, EIGHT, metER, BEER, BARE, BACK, BED, TERM, SPHERE, ZERO, carrIER, cordIAL, cUrious, TRUER, TRUANT, About, IT, SIT, LAYER, BITE, BIDE, BYRE, BILE, BOUT, BOWED, BOWER, BOWEL, DOOR, POOR

Adaptation for Anglo-Welsh dialects

In his work for the Survey of Anglo-Welsh Dialects, David Parry adapted Wells's lexical sets for Anglo-Welsh dialects.

Lexical sets, as defined in Parry (1999) , pp. 8–9.
KeywordExample words
BRIDGEbitch, bridge, finger, shilling, squirrel, thimble, whip, with
KETTLEburied, deaf, kettle, second, twelve, yellow
APPLESapples, hand, ladder, lamb, man, rabbits, rat, saddle, that, thatch
SUCKbutter, furrow, jump, none, nothing, one, onions, suck, uncle
DOGcross, dog, fox, holly, off, porridge, quarry, trough, wash, wasps, wrong
BULLbull, butcher, foot, put, sugar, woman, wool
SHEEPcheese, geese, grease, key, pea, sheaf, sheep, weasel, weeds, wheel, yeast
GATEbacon, break, clay, drain, gate, lay (verb), potatoes, spade, tail, take, waistcoat, weigh
WORKfirst, heard, third, work (noun)
MAREchair, hare, mare, pears
ARMarm, branch, calf, chaff, draught, farmer, farthing, grass
STRAWforks, morning, saw-dust, slaughter-house, straw, walk
FOALcoal, cold, colt, comb, foal, oak, old, road, sholder, snow, spokes, toad, yolk
GOOSEdew, ewe, goose, hoof, root, stool, tooth, Tuesday, two
WHITEeye, fight, flies (noun, plural), hive, ivy, mice, white
OILboiling, oil, voice
COWcow, plough, snout, sow (noun), thousand
EARSears, hear, year
BOARboar, door, four
FIREfire, iron
HOURflour, hour

See also

Related Research Articles

Received Pronunciation (RP) is the accent traditionally regarded as the standard and most prestigious form of spoken British English. For over a century, there has been argument over such questions as the definition of RP, whether it is geographically neutral, how many speakers there are, whether sub-varieties exist, how appropriate a choice it is as a standard and how the accent has changed over time. The name itself is controversial. RP is an accent, so the study of RP is concerned only with matters of pronunciation; other areas relevant to the study of language standards such as vocabulary, grammar, and style are not considered.

In phonetics, rhotic consonants, or "R-like" sounds, are liquid consonants that are traditionally represented orthographically by symbols derived from the Greek letter rho, including ⟨R⟩, ⟨r⟩ in the Latin script and ⟨Р⟩, ⟨p⟩ in the Cyrillic script. They are transcribed in the International Phonetic Alphabet by upper- or lower-case variants of Roman ⟨R⟩, ⟨r⟩: r, ɾ, ɹ, ɻ, ʀ, ʁ, ɽ, and ɺ. Transcriptions for vocalic or semivocalic realisations of underlying rhotics include the ə̯ and ɐ̯.

The phonology of the open back vowels of the English language has undergone changes both overall and with regional variations, through Old and Middle English to the present. The sounds heard in modern English were significantly influenced by the Great Vowel Shift, as well as more recent developments in some dialects such as the cot–caught merger.

English phonology is the system of speech sounds used in spoken English. Like many other languages, English has wide variation in pronunciation, both historically and from dialect to dialect. In general, however, the regional dialects of English share a largely similar phonological system. Among other things, most dialects have vowel reduction in unstressed syllables and a complex set of phonological features that distinguish fortis and lenis consonants.

The close and mid-height front vowels of English have undergone a variety of changes over time and often vary by dialect.

There are a variety of pronunciations in modern English and in historical forms of the language for words spelled with the letter ⟨a⟩. Most of these go back to the low vowel of earlier Middle English, which later developed both long and short forms. The sound of the long vowel was altered in the Great Vowel Shift, but later a new long A developed which was not subject to the shift. These processes have produced the main four pronunciations of ⟨a⟩ in present-day English: those found in the words trap, face, father and square. Separate developments have produced additional pronunciations in words like wash, talk and comma.

This chart shows the most common applications of the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) to represent English language pronunciations.

In English, many vowel shifts affect only vowels followed by in rhotic dialects, or vowels that were historically followed by that has been elided in non-rhotic dialects. Most of them involve the merging of vowel distinctions and so fewer vowel phonemes occur before than in other positions of a word.

Most dialects of modern English have two close back vowels: the near-close near-back rounded vowel found in words like foot, and the close back rounded vowel found in words like goose. The STRUT vowel, which historically was back, is often central as well. This article discusses the history of these vowels in various dialects of English, focusing in particular on phonemic splits and mergers involving these sounds.

Australian English (AuE) is a non-rhotic variety of English spoken by most native-born Australians. Phonologically, it is one of the most regionally homogeneous language varieties in the world. Australian English is notable for vowel length contrasts which are absent from most English dialects.

In the history of English phonology, there have been many diachronic sound changes affecting vowels, especially involving phonemic splits and mergers.

This article describes those aspects of the phonological history of the English language which concern consonants.

English diphthongs have undergone many changes since the Old and Middle English periods. The sound changes discussed here involved at least one phoneme which historically was a diphthong.

One aspect of the differences between American and British English is that of specific word pronunciations, as described in American and British English pronunciation differences. However, there are also differences in some of the basic pronunciation patterns between the standard dialects of each country. The standard varieties for each are in fact generalizations: for the U.S., a loosely defined spectrum of unmarked varieties called General American and, for Britain, a collection of prestigious varieties most common in southeastern England, ranging from upper- to middle-class Received Pronunciation accents, which together here are abbreviated "RP". However, other regional accents in each country also show differences, for which see regional accents of English speakers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cardiff English</span> Regional accent of English, in Wales

The Cardiff accent, also known as Cardiff English, is the regional accent of English, and a variety of Welsh English, as spoken in and around the city of Cardiff, and is somewhat distinctive in Wales, compared with other Welsh accents. Its pitch is described as somewhat lower than that of Received Pronunciation, whereas its intonation is closer to dialects of England rather than Wales.

Barbadian English or BajanEnglish is a dialect of the English language as used by Barbadians (Bajans) and by Barbadian diasporas. It should not be confused with Bajan Creole, which is an English-based creole language.

This article covers the phonological system of New Zealand English. While New Zealanders speak differently depending on their level of cultivation, this article covers the accent as it is spoken by educated speakers, unless otherwise noted. The IPA transcription is one designed by Bauer et al. (2007) specifically to faithfully represent a New Zealand accent, which this article follows in most aspects.

Rhoticity in the English language is the pronunciation of the historical rhotic consonant in certain contexts by English speakers. The presence or absence of rhoticity is one of the most prominent distinctions by which varieties of English can be classified. In rhotic accents, the historical English sound is preserved in all pronunciation contexts. In non-rhotic accents, speakers no longer pronounce in postvocalic environments: when it is immediately after a vowel and not followed by another vowel. For example, in isolation, a rhotic English speaker pronounces the words hard and butter as /ˈhɑːrd/ and /ˈbʌtər/, but a non-rhotic speaker "drops" or "deletes" the sound and pronounces them as /ˈhɑːd/ and /ˈbʌtə/.

This article covers the phonological system of South African English (SAE) as spoken primarily by White South Africans. While there is some variation among speakers, SAE typically has a number of features in common with English as it is spoken in southern England, such as non-rhoticity and the TRAPBATH split.

Abercraf English is a dialect of Welsh English, primarily spoken in the village of Abercraf, located in the far south of the traditional county of Brecknockshire, currently administered as part of the unitary authority of Powys.

References

  1. 1 2 Wells (1982), p. xviii.
  2. 1 2 Mesthrie, Rajend (2000). "Regional Dialectology". Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press, p. 50.
  3. Armstrong, Nigel (2001). Social and stylistic variation in spoken French: a comparative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp. 100ff. ISBN   90-272-1839-0.
  4. Raymond Hickey (29 August 2011). The Dialects of Irish: Study of a Changing Landscape. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN   978-3-11-023830-3.
  5. Robert McColl Millar (2007). Northern and insular Scots. Edinburgh University Press. ISBN   978-0-7486-2316-7.
  6. Wells (1982).
  7. Wells (1982), p. 117.
  8. 1 2 Wells (1982), p. 118.
  9. 1 2 3 Wells (1982), p. 123.
  10. Wells (1982), p. 165.
  11. Wells (1982), p. 122.
  12. Wells (1982), p. 136.
  13. Wells (1982), pp. 120–1.
  14. Wells (1982), pp. 257–8, 294, 299.
  15. Cruttenden (2014), pp. 84, 349–50.
  16. Wells (1982), p. 499.
  17. Wells (1982), p. 498.
  18. Wells (1982), p. 124.
  19. Wells (1982), p. 500.
  20. 1 2 "John Wells's phonetic blog: lexical sets". 2010-02-02. Retrieved 2010-04-30.
  21. Hickey, Raymond (2004). A sound atlas of Irish English. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 54–55. ISBN   3-11-018298-X.
  22. Stoddart, Upton and Widowson in Urban Voices, Arnold, London, 1999, page 76
  23. Tollfree in Urban Voices, Arnold, London, 1999, page 165
  24. "John Wells's phonetic blog: the evidence of the vows". 2011-05-03. Retrieved 2014-02-17.
  25. Schneider et al. (2004), pp. 42–3, 53–4, 101–2, 137, 187, 236, 263–4, 273, 285, 290, 294, 303–4, 340, 359, 369, 395, 410, 460, 504–5, 515, 518, 585, 761–2, 849, 880, 893, 928, 945, 947, 956, 968, 987, 993, 1006, 1024, 1038, 1050.

Bibliography