List of totalitarian regimes

Last updated

This is a list of totalitarian regimes. There are regimes that have been commonly referred to as "totalitarian", or the concept of totalitarianism has been applied to them, for which there is wide consensus among scholars to be called as such. Totalitarian regimes are usually distinguished from authoritarian regimes in the sense that totalitarianism represents an extreme version of authoritarianism. Authoritarianism primarily differs from totalitarianism in that social and economic institutions exist that are not under governmental control. [1]

Contents

Prose

Note: Because of differing opinions about the definition of totalitarianism, and the variable nature of each regime, this article first states in prose the various opinions given by sources, even when those opinions might conflict or be at angles to each other. It is followed by a convenience table of basic facts, but the table is limited by its binary nature and can not always accurately reflect the complex and nuanced nature of the sources, which are more fully described in the prose section.

Soviet Union

Stalinism

According to Encyclopedia Britannica , the Soviet Union during the period of Joseph Stalin's rule was a "modern example" of a totalitarian state, being among "the first examples of decentralized or popular totalitarianism, in which the state achieved overwhelming popular support for its leadership." This contrasted with earlier totalitarian states that were imposed on the people; [2] "every aspect of the Soviet Union's political, economic, cultural, and intellectual life came to be regulated by the Communist Party in a strict and regimented fashion that would tolerate no opposition". [3] According to Peter Rutland (1993), with the death of Stalin, "this was still an oppressive regime, but not a totalitarian one." [4] This view is echoed by Igor Krupnik (1995), "The era of 'social engineering' in the Soviet Union ended with the death of Stalin in 1953 or soon after; and that was the close of the totalitarian regime itself." [5] According to Klaus von Beyme (2014), "The Soviet Union after the death of Stalin moved from totalitarianism to authoritarian rule." [6]

Leninism

Britannica and various authors noted that the policies of Vladimir Lenin, the first leader of the Soviet Union, contributed to the establishment of a totalitarian system in the USSR, [3] [7] but while some authors, such as Leszek Kolakowski, believed Stalinist totalitarianism to be a continuation of Leninism [7] and directly called Lenin's government the first totalitarian regime to appear, [8] other authors, including Hannah Arendt, argued that there was rupture between Stalinist totaliarianism and Leninism, and that Leninism offered other various outcomes besides Stalinism, including "a mere one-party dictatorship as opposed to full-blown totalitarianism." Arendt believed Stalinist totalitarianism to be a part of a hypernational historically specific phenomenon which also included Nazism. [7]

The debate on whether Lenin's regime was totalitarian is a part of a debate between the so-called "totalitarian, or "traditionalist" (and "neo-traditionalist"), school", rooted in the early years of the Cold War and also described as "conservative" and "anti-Communist" by Ronald Suny, and the so-called "revisionists"; the former is represented by such historians as Richard Pipes. To Pipes, not just Stalinism was a mere continuation of Leninism, but more to it, "the Russia of 1917–1924 was no less 'totalitarian' than the Russia of the 1930s"; Pipes compared Lenin to Adolf Hitler and described the former as a precursor of the latter: "not only totalitarianism, but Nazism and the Holocaust has a Russian and a Leninist pedigree." The core idea of the "totalitarian approach" is that the Bolshevik Revolution was something artificial and imposed from above by a small group of intellectuals with brute force and "depended on one man", [9] [10] and that Soviet totalitarianism resulted from a "blueprint" of the ideology of the Bolsheviks, the violent culture of Russia, and supposedly deviant personalities of Bolshevik leaders. [11] The "revisionists" opposed such claims and put an emphasis on history "from below" and on the genuinely "popular" nature of the 1917 Revolution, paid much more attention to social history as opposed to the "traditional" approach which centres on politics, ideology and personalities of the leaders, and they tended to see a discontinuity between Leninism and Stalinism, with the worst excesses of the latter being explained by the economic experiments of the late 1920s, by the threat of war with Nazi Germany and by the personality of Stalin. The "traditionalists" and "neo-traditionalists", in their turn, dismissed such approach emphasising social history as Marxist. [9] [10]

Francoist Spain

During the Spanish Civil War and the early years of its existence, the regime of Francisco Franco embraced the ideal of a totalitarian state propagated by the Italian Fascists, the Nazis and the Spanish Falangists the and applied the term 'totalitarian' towards itself, when Franco's rhetoric was influenced by the one of Falangism. Franco stressed the "missionary and totalitarian" nature of the new state that was under construction "as in other countries of totalitarian regime", these being Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany; the ideologues of Francoism formed a concept of totalitarianism as an essentially Spanish method of state organization. In 1942, Franco stopped using the term towards his regime and called for struggle with "Bolshevist totalitarianism". [12]

The Franco regime was commonly defined as totalitarian and as a Spanish variation of Fascism until 1964, when Juan Linz challenged this model and instead described Francoism as "authoritarian" because of its "limited degree of political pluralism" caused by struggle between 'Francoist families' (Falangists, Carlists, etc.) within the sole legal party FET y de las JONS and the Movimiento Nacional and by other such features as lack of 'totalitarian' ideology. The definition proposed by Linz became an object of a major debate among sociologists, political scientists and historians, some critics felt that this revision could be understood as a form of acquittal of the Franco regime as it focused on the more benevolent character of the regime in its developmental phase and did not concern its early phase (often called "First Francoism"). Later debates focused on Fascism rather than arguing whether Francoism was totalitarian; some historians wrote that it was a typical conservative military dictatorship, contemporary historians stress its Fascist component and describe it as para-Fascist or a regime of unfinished fascization which evolved to a merely authoritarian regime during the Cold War. According to Enrique Moradiellos, "it is now increasingly rare to define Francoism as a truly fascist and totalitarian regime", although he writes that the debates on Francoism haven't finished yet. [13] [14]

Some contemporary historians continue to describe Francoism as totalitarian, although they usually limit such descriprion to the early ten to twenty years of the "First Francoism". Stephen J. Lee limits the totalitarian phase of Francoism to the years 1939-1949, which he describes as "functionally - but not ideologically - totalitarian", and calls Franco "the closest of authoritarian dictators" "to being totalitarian." [15] Julián Sanz Hoya refutes Linz's model of "limited pluralism" as "lame" and "practically inherent to all political systems" and writes that "considering the totalitarian vocation, it is more than evident that Franco's regime in the first twenty years had totalizing pretensions in relation to social control (including private life, morality and customs), the monopoly of politics and public space, and even the control of the economy (think of the strong interventionism of autarky)". [16]

Among the arguments introduced by Linz was the reliance of the Franco regime on Catholicism: "The heteronomous control of the ideological content of Catholic thought by a universal church and specifically by the Pope is one of the most serious obstacles to the creation of a truly totalitarian system by nondemocratic rulers claiming to implement Catholic social doctrine in their states. [17] This argument is also debated: "The frequent and saturated references to Francoist Catholic humanism, to the primordial sense of human dignity or to the centrality of the person, all coming from Christian theology, could hardly conceal the fact that the individual was only understood as a citizen to the extent of his adherence to the Catholic, hierarchical and economically privatist community that the military uprising had saved"; [18] "Catholic values ​​that permeated the conservative ideological substratum... were precisely what was wielded by the Francoist Spanish political doctrine of the late thirties and early forties to justify the need for the constitution of a totalitarian State at the service and expansion of the Catholic religion." [19]

Table

StateTotalitarianismLeader(s)Ruling party/groupIdeologyGovernmentContinent
StartEnd
Flag of the Soviet Union (1924-1936).svg Union of Soviet Socialist Republics [2] see above 1953 [2] [4] [5] [6] Vladimir Lenin (disputed, see above)
Joseph Stalin [2]
All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) Marxism–Leninism
Soviet Communism
Soviet patriotism
Stalinism
Federal one-party socialist republic Eurasia
Flag of Italy (1861-1946) crowned.svg Kingdom of Italy [20] [21] [22] [23] [a] 1925 1943 Benito Mussolini National Fascist Party Italian fascism
Militarism
Ultranationalism
Corporatism
Unitary one-party constitutional monarchy Europe
Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg German Reich / Greater German Reich [2] 1933 [2] 1945 [2] Adolf Hitler National Socialist German Workers' Party Nazism Unitary one-party Nazi fascist state [24] Europe
Flag of Spain (1945-1977).svg Spanish State [18] [ verification needed ] [15] [16] [19] [25] [26]
(disputed, see above)
1939 1949/1959 Francisco Franco FET y de las JONS Clerical fascism (Falangism)
National Catholicism
National syndicalism
Anti-communism
Anti-Masonry
Unitary one-party semi-fascist state Europe
Flag of Romania.svg Kingdom of Romania [27] [28] [29] 1940 1941 Ion Antonescu
Horia Sima
Iron Guard Clerical fascism
Monarchism
Anti-communism
Anti-semitism
Unitary one-party fascist constitutional monarchy Europe
Flag of Albania (1946-1992).svg People's Socialist Republic of Albania [30] [31] [32] 1946 1985 Enver Hoxha
(1946–1985)
Party of Labour of Albania Anti-revisionism
Hoxhaism
Marxism–Leninism
Unitary one-party republic Europe
Flag of North Korea.svg Democratic People's Republic of Korea [33] [34] [35] [2] [36] 1948 Active Kim dynasty Workers' Party of Korea Juche
Songun
Marxism–Leninism (until 2009)
Stalinism (formerly)
Unitary one-party socialist republic [37] Asia
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg People's Republic of China [38] [39] 1949 1976 Mao Zedong [2] Chinese Communist Party Chinese communism
Maoism
Marxism–Leninism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia
Flag of Haiti (1964-1986).svg Republic of Haiti [40] 19571986 François Duvalier (1957–1971)
Jean-Claude Duvalier (1971–1986)

National Unity Party
Pan-Africanism
Black nationalism
Anti-communism
Right-wing populism
Personalism
Unitary one-party presidential republic under a personalist hereditary dictatorship North America
Flag of South Korea.svg Republic of Korea [41] [42] 1961 1979 Park Chung Hee Supreme Council for National Reconstruction
Democratic Republican Party
Anti-communism
Korean nationalism
Korean conservatism [43]
Corporatism [44]
Right-wing populism [43]
Korean fascism [37] [45]
Developmentalism
Unitary semi-presidential republic under military dictatorship Asia
Flag of Burma (1948-1974).svg Flag of Myanmar (1974-2010).svg Socialist Republic of the Union of Burma [46] 1962 1988 Ne Win Burma Socialist Programme Party Burmese Way to Socialism Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia
Flag of Syria (1963-1972).svgFlag of Syria (1972-1980).svgFlag of the United Arab Republic (1958-1971), Flag of Syria (1980-2024).svg Syrian Arab Republic [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] 1963 2024 [52] Amin al-Hafiz (1963–1966)
Nureddin al-Atassi (1966–1970)
Hafez al-Assad (1970–2000)
Bashar al-Assad (2000–2024)
Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Syria Region Neo-Ba'athism
Assadism
Arab socialism
Arab nationalism
Militarism
Syrian irredentism
Unitary de facto one-party [53] presidential republic [54] (neo-Ba'athist de-jure one-party socialist republic [55] [56] until 2012) Asia
Flag of Malawi.svg Republic of Malawi [57] 19661994 Hastings Banda Malawi Congress Party Authoritarian conservatism
Pan-Africanism
Anti-colonialism
Anti-communism
Unitary one-party presidential republic Africa
Flag of Equatorial Guinea.svg Republic of Equatorial Guinea [58] 1968 1979 Francisco Macías Nguema United National Workers' Party Ultranationalism
Anti-colonialism [59]
Anti-intellectualism
Pan-Africanism
Unitary socialist one-party presidential republic Africa
1982Active Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo
Democratic Party of Equatorial Guinea
Ultranationalism
Militarism [60]
Personalism
Fang interests Right-wing populism
National conservatism
Unitary dominant-party presidential republic Africa
Flag of Somalia.svg Somali Democratic Republic [61] 19691991 Siad Barre Somali Revolutionary Socialist Party Communism
Marxism–Leninism
Left-wing nationalism
Islamic socialism
Scientific socialism
Militarism
Unitary one-party socialist republic under a military dictatorship Africa
Flag of Uganda.svg Republic of Uganda [62] 19711979 Idi Amin Military Personalism
Pan-Africanism
Militarism
Unitary presidential republic under a military dictatorship Africa
Flag of Romania (1965-1989).svg Socialist Republic of Romania [63] [64] 1971 1989 Nicolae Ceaușescu Romanian Communist Party Marxism–Leninism
National Communism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Europe
Flag of Zaire (1971-1997).svg Republic of Zaire [65] 19711997 Mobutu Sese Seko Popular Movement of the Revolution Mobutism
Anti-Communism
Third Position
Pan-Africanism
Tropical Fascism
Unitary Mobist one-party presidential republic under a military dictatorship Africa
Flag of the Philippines (light blue).svg Republic of the Philippines [66] [67] [68] 1972 1986 Ferdinand Marcos Nacionalista Party
New Society Movement
Conservatism [69]
National conservatism [70]
Anti-communism [71]
Filipino nationalism [72]
Populism [73] [74] [75] [76] [77]
Unitary presidential constitutional republic under conjugal military dictatorship Asia
Flag of Rwanda (1961-2001).svg Republic of Rwanda [78] 1973 1994 Juvénal Habyarimana National Revolutionary Movement for Development Hutu supremacy
Anti-Communism
Ultranationalism
Social Conservatism
Right-wing populism
Tropical Fascism
Unitary one-party presidential republic under a military dictatorship Africa
Flag of Democratic Kampuchea.svg Democratic Kampuchea [46] [79] 1975 1979 Pol Pot Communist Party of Kampuchea Agrarian socialism
Khmer nationalism
Maoism
Anti-intellectualism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia
Flag of Iraq (1963-1991); Flag of Syria (1963-1972).svg Flag of Iraq (1991-2004).svg Iraqi Republic / Republic of Iraq [80] [81] [82] [83] 1979 2003 Saddam Hussein Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region Iraqi Ba'athism
Saddamism
Militarism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia
Flag of Ethiopia (1987-1991).svg People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia [84] 19871991 Mengistu Haile Mariam Workers' Party of Ethiopia Communism
Marxism–Leninism
Left-wing nationalism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Africa
Flag of Turkmenistan.svg  Turkmenistan [85] [86] [87] [88] 1991 Active Saparmurat Niyazov (1991–2006)
Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow (2006–2022)
[b] Serdar Berdimuhamedow
(2022–present) [c]
Democratic Party of Turkmenistan Nationalism
Social conservatism [89]
Unitary presidential republic (one-party state until 2008) [90] Asia
Flag of Taliban (original).svgFlag of the Taliban.svg  Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan [91] [92] [93] 1996 2001 Mullah Omar [94] [95] Taliban Deobandi Islamic fundamentalism [96]
Islamism [96]
Pashtunwali [97]
Religious nationalism [97]
Unitary theocratic Islamic emirate Asia
2021 Active Hibatullah Akhundzada Unitary provisional theocratic Islamic emirate
Flag of Eritrea.svg State of Eritrea [98] [99] 2001 [100] Active Isaias Afwerki People's Front for Democracy and Justice Eritrean nationalism
Left-wing nationalism
Unitary one-party presidential republic Africa
Islamic State flag.svg Islamic State [101] [102] [103] [104] 2014 2019 Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Islamic State (Daesh) Wahhabism
Qutbism
Salafi jihadism
Unitary Salafi Jihadist proto-state Asia

List of totalitarian puppet regimes

The following is a list of puppet states of various outside states (mostly Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union), which are considered to be totalitarian.

CountryTotalitarianismLeader(s)Ruling party/groupIdeologyGovernmentContinentAdministrative status
StartEnd
Flag of the People's Republic of Mongolia (1945-1992).svg Mongolian People's Republic [105] [106] [107] [108] 1924 1953 Khorloogiin Choibalsan
(1937–1952)
Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party Marxism–Leninism
Stalinism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia Flag of the Soviet Union (1936 - 1955).svg Soviet satellite state
Flag of Manchukuo.svg Empire of Manchuria [109] 1932 1945 Zheng Xiaoxu
(1932–1935)
Zhang Jinghui
(1935–1945)
Concordia Association of Manchukuo Anti-communism
Fascism [110]
Manchurian nationalism
Pan-Asianism
one-party constitutional monarchy Asia Flag of Japan (1870-1999).svg Japanese puppet state
Flag of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.svg Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia [111] 1939 1945 Emil Hácha National Partnership Nazism
Antisemitism
Anti-communism
Unitary one-party fascist state Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state [112]
Flag of First Slovak Republic 1939-1945.svg Slovak Republic [112] 1939 1945 Jozef Tiso Slovak People’s Party Clerical fascism
Slovak nationalism
Anti-Hungarianism
Unitary one-party fascist state Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state [112]
Flag of Independent State of Croatia.svg Independent State of Croatia [113] [114] 1941 1945 Ante Pavelić Ustaše Clerical fascism
Anti-communism
Anti-Serb sentiment
Fascist one-party state Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state
Flag of Norway.svg National Government [115] [ failed verification ]19421945 Vidkun Quisling Nasjonal Samling Nazism
Norwegian nationalism
Fascist corporatism
Anti-communism
one-party fascist state Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state
Flag of the Philippines (1943-1945).svg Republic of the Philippines [116] 19431945 Jose P. Laurel KALIBAPI Fascism
Militarism
Japanophilia
National conservatism
Filipino nationalism
Unitary one-party Presidential republic under a military dictatorship Asia Flag of Japan (1870-1999).svg Japanese puppet state
Flag of Italy.svg Italian Social Republic [117] [118] 1943 1945 Benito Mussolini Republican Fascist Party Fascism
Militarism
Ultranationalism
Corporatism
Unitary one-party state Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state
Flag of Burma 1943.svg State of Burma [119] 19431945 Ba Maw Military Fascism
Militarism
Unitary Fascist state Asia Flag of Japan (1870-1999).svg Japanese puppet state
Flag of Hungary (1869-1874).svg Government of National Unity of the Kingdom of Hungary [120] 1944 1945 Ferenc Szálasi Arrow Cross Party Hungarism
Nazism
Antisemitism
Anti-communism
Hungarist one-party constitutional monarchy Europe Flag of Germany (1935-1945).svg Nazi-German puppet state
Flag of Albania (1946-1992).svg People's Socialist Republic of Albania [121] 19461992 Enver Hoxha (1946–1985)
Ramiz Alia (1985–1992)
Party of Labour of Albania Stalinism
Left-wing nationalism
Socialist patriotism
Hoxhaism
Communist state under a Hoxhaist dictatorship Europe Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet satellite state
Flag of Poland (1928-1980).svg Polish People's Republic [122] 1981 1983 Wojciech Jaruzelski Polish United Workers' Party

Military Council of National Salvation

Neo-Stalinism
Left-wing nationalism

Militarism Martial Law

Communist state Europe Flag of the Soviet Union.svg Soviet satellite state
Flag of Hungary (1949-1956; 1-2 aspect ratio).svg Hungarian People's Republic [123] [124] [125] [126] 1949 1953 Mátyás Rákosi Hungarian Working People's Party Marxism–Leninism
Stalinism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Europe Flag of the Soviet Union (1936 - 1955).svg Soviet satellite state#Soviet Union
Flag of Afghanistan (1978-1980).svgFlag of Afghanistan (1980-1987).svg Democratic Republic of Afghanistan [127] [128] [129] [130] 1978 1989 Nur Muhammad Taraki (1978–1979)
Hafizullah Amin (1979)
Babrak Karmal (1979–1986)
Mohammad Najibullah (1986–1989)
People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan Marxism-Leninism [131] [132]
Neo-Stalinism [130]
Anti-intellectualism
Unitary one-party socialist republic Asia Flag of the Soviet Union (1936 - 1955).svg Soviet satellite state [133] [134] [135]

Notes

  1. Hannah Arendt in The Origins of Totalitarianism disputes that Italy was a totalitarian state.
  2. Power-sharing with son Serdar since 2022.
  3. Power-sharing with father Gurbanguly.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dictator</span> Political leader who possesses absolute power

A dictator is a political leader who possesses absolute power. A dictatorship is a state ruled by one dictator or by a polity. The word originated as the title of a Roman dictator elected by the Roman Senate to rule the republic in times of emergency. Like the terms tyrant and autocrat, dictator came to be used almost exclusively as a non-titular term for oppressive rule. In modern usage the term dictator is generally used to describe a leader who holds or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power.

A dictatorship is an autocratic form of government which is characterized by a leader, or a group of leaders, who hold governmental powers with few to no limitations. Politics in a dictatorship are controlled by a dictator, and they are facilitated through an inner circle of elites that includes advisers, generals, and other high-ranking officials. The dictator maintains control by influencing and appeasing the inner circle and repressing any opposition, which may include rival political parties, armed resistance, or disloyal members of the dictator's inner circle. Dictatorships can be formed by a military coup that overthrows the previous government through force or they can be formed by a self-coup in which elected leaders make their rule permanent. Dictatorships are authoritarian or totalitarian, and they can be classified as military dictatorships, one-party dictatorships, personalist dictatorships, or absolute monarchies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marxism–Leninism</span> Communist ideology developed by Joseph Stalin

Marxism–Leninism is a communist ideology that became the largest faction of the communist movement in the world in the years following the October Revolution. It was the predominant ideology of most communist governments throughout the 20th century. It was developed in Russia by Joseph Stalin and drew on elements of Bolshevism, Leninism, and Marxism. It was the state ideology of the Soviet Union, Soviet satellite states in the Eastern Bloc, and various countries in the Non-Aligned Movement and Third World during the Cold War, as well as the Communist International after Bolshevization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stalinism</span> Political and economic policies implemented by Joseph Stalin

Stalinism is the totalitarian means of governing and Marxist–Leninist policies implemented in the Soviet Union (USSR) from 1924 to 1953 by dictator Joseph Stalin and in Soviet satellite states between 1944 and 1953. Stalinism included the creation of a one man totalitarian police state, rapid industrialization, the theory of socialism in one country, forced collectivization of agriculture, intensification of class conflict, a cult of personality, and subordination of the interests of foreign communist parties to those of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, which Stalinism deemed the leading vanguard party of communist revolution at the time. After Stalin's death and the Khrushchev Thaw, a period of de-Stalinization began in the 1950s and 1960s, which caused the influence of Stalin's ideology to begin to wane in the USSR.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Totalitarianism</span> Extreme form of authoritarianism

Totalitarianism is a political system and a form of government that prohibits opposition from political parties, disregards and outlaws the political claims of individual and group opposition to the state, and completely controls the public sphere and the private sphere of society. In the field of political science, totalitarianism is the extreme form of authoritarianism, wherein all socio-political power is held by a dictator, who also controls the national politics and the peoples of the nation with continual propaganda campaigns that are broadcast by state-controlled and by friendly private mass communications media.

Autocracy is a system of government in which absolute power is held by the head of state and government, known as an autocrat. It includes some forms of monarchy and all forms of dictatorship, while it is contrasted with democracy and feudalism. Various definitions of autocracy exist. They may restrict autocracy to cases where power is held by a single individual, or they may define autocracy in a way that includes a group of rulers who wield absolute power. The autocrat has total control over the exercise of civil liberties within the autocracy, choosing under what circumstances they may be exercised, if at all. Governments may also blend elements of autocracy and democracy, forming an anocracy. The concept of autocracy has been recognized in political philosophy since ancient times.

A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader, is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a glorious leader, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. Historically, it has been developed through techniques such as the manipulation of the mass media, the dissemination of propaganda, the staging of spectacles, the manipulation of the arts, the instilling of patriotism, and government-organized demonstrations and rallies. A cult of personality is similar to apotheosis, except that it is established through the use of modern social engineering techniques, it is usually established by the state or the party in one-party states and dominant-party states. Cults of personality often accompany the leaders of totalitarian or authoritarian governments. They can also be seen in some monarchies, theocracies, failed democracies, and even in liberal democracies.

In political science, a political system means the form of political organization that can be observed, recognised or otherwise declared by a society or state.

<i>The Origins of Totalitarianism</i> Book by Hannah Arendt examining Nazism and Stalinism

The Origins of Totalitarianism, published in 1951, was Hannah Arendt's first major work, where she describes and analyzes Nazism and Stalinism as the major totalitarian political movements of the first half of the 20th century.

Robert Charles Tucker was an American political scientist and historian. Tucker is best remembered as a biographer of Joseph Stalin and as an analyst of the Soviet political system, which he saw as dynamic rather than unchanging.

Communism is a sociopolitical, philosophical, and economic ideology within the socialist movement, whose goal is the creation of a communist society, a socioeconomic order centered around common ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange that allocates products to everyone in society based on need. A communist society would entail the absence of private property and social classes, and ultimately money and the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sheila Fitzpatrick</span> Australian historian

Sheila Mary Fitzpatrick is an Australian historian, whose main subjects are history of the Soviet Union and history of modern Russia, especially the Stalin era and the Great Purges, of which she proposes a "history from below", and is part of the "revisionist school" of Communist historiography. She has also critically reviewed the concept of totalitarianism and highlighted the differences between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union in debates about comparison of Nazism and Stalinism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union</span> Soviet Union Communist government

Before the perestroika Soviet era reforms of Gorbachev that promoted a more liberal form of socialism, the formal ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU) was Marxism–Leninism, a form of socialism consisting of a centralised command economy with a vanguardist one-party state that aimed to realize the dictatorship of the proletariat. The Soviet Union's ideological commitment to achieving communism included the national communist development of socialism in one country and peaceful coexistence with capitalist countries while engaging in anti-imperialism to defend the international proletariat, combat the predominant prevailing global system of capitalism and promote the goals of Bolshevism. The state ideology of the Soviet Union—and thus Marxism–Leninism—derived and developed from the theories, policies, and political praxis of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Stalin.

Authoritarianism is a political system characterized by the rejection of political plurality, the use of strong central power to preserve the political status quo, and reductions in democracy, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the rule of law. Authoritarian regimes may be either autocratic or oligarchic and may be based upon the rule of a party or the military. States that have a blurred boundary between democracy and authoritarianism have some times been characterized as "hybrid democracies", "hybrid regimes" or "competitive authoritarian" states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black Ribbon Day</span> International day of remembrance

The Black Ribbon Day, officially known in the European Union as the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism and also referred to as the Europe-wide Day of Remembrance for the victims of all totalitarian and authoritarian regimes, is an international day of remembrance for victims of totalitarianism regimes, specifically Stalinist, communist, Nazi and fascist regimes. Formally recognised by the European Union, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and some other countries, it is observed on 23 August. It symbolises the rejection of "extremism, intolerance and oppression" according to the European Union. The purpose of the Day of Remembrance is to preserve the memory of the victims of mass deportations and exterminations, while promoting democratic values to reinforce peace and stability in Europe. It is one of the two official remembrance days or observances of the European Union, alongside Europe Day. Under the name Black Ribbon Day it is an official remembrance day of Canada. The European Union has used both names alongside each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Public Hearing on Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes</span>

Crimes Committed by Totalitarian Regimes are reports and proceedings of the European public hearing organised by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union and the European Commission. The Hearing was organised in response to the request made by the Justice and Home Affairs Council of the European Union on 19 April 2007.

A right-wing dictatorship, sometimes also referred to as a rightist dictatorship or right-wing authoritarianism, is an authoritarian or sometimes totalitarian regime following right-wing policies. Right-wing dictatorships are typically characterized by appeals to traditionalism, the protection of law and order and often the advocacy of nationalism, and justify their rise to power based on a need to uphold a conservative status quo. Examples of right-wing dictatorships may include anti-communist ones, such as Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Estado Novo, Francoist Spain, the Chilean Junta, the Greek Junta, the Brazilian military dictatorship, the Argentine Junta, Republic of China under Chiang Kai-shek, South Korea when it was led by Syngman Rhee, Park Chung Hee, and Chun Doo-hwan, a number of military dictatorships in Latin America during the Cold War, and those that agitate anti-Western sentiments, such as Russia under Vladimir Putin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism</span> Comparison of totalitarian ideologies

Various historians and other authors have carried out a comparison of Nazism and Stalinism, with particular consideration to the similarities and differences between the two ideologies and political systems, the relationship between the two regimes, and why both came to prominence simultaneously. During the 20th century, comparisons of Nazism and Stalinism were made on totalitarianism, ideology, and personality cult. Both regimes were seen in contrast to the liberal democratic Western world, emphasising the similarities between the two.

Authoritarian socialism, or socialism from above, is an economic and political system supporting some form of socialist economics while rejecting political pluralism. As a term, it represents a set of economic-political systems describing themselves as "socialist" and rejecting the liberal-democratic concepts of multi-party politics, freedom of assembly, habeas corpus, and freedom of expression, either due to fear of counter-revolution or as a means to socialist ends. Journalists and scholars have characterised several countries, most notably the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, and their allies, as authoritarian socialist states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Totalitarian architecture</span> Architecture of totalitarian states

Totalitarian architecture is a term utilized to refer to "the officially approved architecture of dictatorships, over-centralized governments, or political groups intolerant of opposition, especially that of Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany, Stalin's Soviet Union, Communist China, etc. As an international style, it often drew on simplified Neoclassicism, and sculpture based on 19th century realism and Classicism for massive oversized State monuments." Such architecture was intended to support the leaders and the ideology of the regime.

References

  1. Sondrol, Paul C. (October 1991). "Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner". Journal of Latin American Studies. 23 (3): 599–620. doi:10.1017/S0022216X00015868.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Totalitarianism". Encyclopædia Britannica. 2018.
  3. 1 2 "Leninism". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 21 August 2021.
  4. 1 2 Rutland, Peter (1993). The Politics of Economic Stagnation in the Soviet Union: The Role of Local Party Organs in Economic Management. Cambridge University Press. p. 9. ISBN   978-0-521-39241-9. after 1953 ...This was still an oppressive regime, but not a totalitarian one.
  5. 1 2 Krupnik, Igor (2016). "Soviet Cultural and Ethnic Policies towards Jews: A Legacy Reassessed". In Ro'i, Yaacov (ed.). Jews and Jewish Life in Russia and the Soviet Union. doi:10.4324/9781315036205. ISBN   978-1-135-20510-2. p. 70: The era of 'social engineering' in the Soviet Union ended with the death of Stalin in 1953 or soon after; and that was the close of the totalitarian regime itself.
  6. 1 2 von Beyme, Klaus (2014). On Political Culture, Cultural Policy, Art and Politics. Springer. p. 65. ISBN   978-3-319-01559-0. The Soviet Union after the death of Stalin moved from totalitarianism to authoritarian rule.
  7. 1 2 3 Roberts, David (2006). The Totalitarian Experiment in Twentieth Century Europe. doi:10.4324/9780203087848. ISBN   978-0-203-08784-8.[ page needed ]
  8. Riley, Alexander (October 2019). "Lenin and His Revolution: The First Totalitarian". Society. 56 (5): 503–511. doi:10.1007/s12115-019-00405-1.
  9. 1 2 Mawdsley, Evan (2011). The Russian Civil War. Birlinn. ISBN   9780857901231.
  10. 1 2 Ronald Suny. Red Flag Unfurled: History, Historians and the Russian Revolution (Verso Books, 2017).
  11. Lenin's Terror: The Ideological Origins of Early Soviet State Violence. Routledge. 2012. ISBN   978-0-415-67396-9.
  12. Totalitarianism: The Inner History of the Cold War. Oxford University Press. 20 March 1997. ISBN   978-0-19-028148-9.
  13. Probing the Enigma of Franco. Cambridge Scholars. 23 October 2018. ISBN   978-1-5275-2014-1.
  14. Franco: Anatomy of a Dictator. Bloomsbury. 18 December 2017. ISBN   978-1-78672-300-0.
  15. 1 2 European Dictatorships 1918-1945. Routledge. 12 February 2016. ISBN   978-1-317-29422-1.
  16. 1 2 La construcción de la dictadura franquista en Cantabria. Ed. Universidad de Cantabria. 20 November 2020. ISBN   978-84-8102-695-5.
  17. Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers. 2000. ISBN   978-1-55587-890-0.
  18. 1 2 https://ruja.ujaen.es/jspui/bitstream/10953/1800/1/978-84-1122-139-9.pdf
  19. 1 2 González Prieto, Luis Aurelio (2021). "La voluntad totalitaria del Franquismo". Revista del Posgrado en Derecho de la Unam (14): 44. doi:10.22201/ppd.26831783e.2021.14.170.
  20. Gentile, Emilio (2008). "Fascism and the Italian Road to Totalitarianism". Constellations. 15 (3): 291–302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00492.x.
  21. Morgan, Philip (2004). "The Construction of the 'Totalitarian' State, 1925–29". Italian Fascism, 1915–1945. pp. 96–124. doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80267-4_4. ISBN   978-0-333-94998-6.
  22. Roberts, David D. (2009). "'Political Religion' and the Totalitarian Departures of Inter-War Europe: On the Uses and Disadvantages of an Analytical Category". Contemporary European History. 18 (4): 381–414. doi:10.1017/S0960777309990051. JSTOR   40542793.
  23. "Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini: Totalitarianism in the Twentieth Century, 4th Edition | Wiley". Wiley.com. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
  24. "Foundations of the Nazi State". www.ushmm.org. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
  25. El Franquismo y la apropiación del pasado: El uso de la historia, de la arqueología y de la historia del arte para la legitimación de la dictadura. Editorial Pablo Iglesias. 2 July 2016. ISBN   978-84-95886-89-7.
  26. Estado y derecho en el franquismo: El nacionalsindicalismo. F. J. Conde y Luis Legaz Lacambra. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales. 1996. ISBN   978-84-259-1008-1.
  27. Groza, Cristian Alexandru (2014). "The Fascist Phenomenon. National Legionary State between laws, journals, memoirs, and the Jewish repression between 20–23 January 1941". Journal of Education, Culture and Society. 61: 61–76 via Academia.edu.
  28. Haynes, Rebecca (December 2008). "Work Camps, Commerce, and the Education of the 'New Man' in the Romanian Legionary Movement" (PDF). The Historical Journal . 51 (4): 943–967. doi:10.1017/S0018246X08007140. JSTOR   20175210.
  29. Clark, Roland (2015). Holy Legionary Youth: Fascist Activism in Interwar Romania. Cornell University Press. pp. all. ISBN   978-0-8014-5634-3.
  30. Mullahi, Anila; Dhimitri, Jostina (2015). "Education Issues in a Totalitarian State (Case of Albania)". Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 174: 4103–4107. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1161 .
  31. Bedini, Belina (2014). "The Legitimation of the Albanian Totalitarian Regime". Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 5 (16): 500–505. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n16p500 .
  32. "Albania's EU aspirations still hampered by totalitarian past | DW &#124". Deutsche Welle . 22 March 2012.
  33. "North Korea country profile". BBC News . 9 April 2018.
  34. "Kim Jong Un's North Korea: Life inside the totalitarian state". The Washington Post .
  35. Palmier, L.H. (1992). Détente in Asia?. St Antony's Series (in French). Palgrave Macmillan UK. p. 124. ISBN   978-1-349-12480-0 . Retrieved 2023-03-10.
  36. Saxonberg, S. (2013). Transitions and Non-Transitions from Communism: Regime Survival in China, Cuba, North Korea, and Vietnam. Transitions and Non-transitions from Communism: Regime Survival in China, Cuba, North Korea and Vietnam. Cambridge University Press. p. 304. ISBN   978-1-107-02388-8 . Retrieved 2023-02-13.
  37. 1 2 "Britannica Book of the Year". Encyclopaedia Britannica . Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc. 2014. ISBN   978-1-62513-171-3.
  38. Pei, Minxin (2021). "China: Totalitarianism's Long Shadow". Journal of Democracy. 32 (2): 5–21. doi:10.1353/jod.2021.0015.
  39. Garside, Roger (May 2021). "Totalitarian China: Outwardly Strong, Inwardly Weak". Journal of Political Risk. 9 (5).
  40. Dupuy, Alex (1988). "Conceptualizing the Duvalier Dictatorship". Latin American Perspectives. 15 (4): 105–114. doi:10.1177/0094582X8801500406. JSTOR   2633641.
  41. "South Korean Dictator Dies, Western Media Resurrects a Myth". Hampton Think. 2 December 2021.
  42. "Cultures of Yusin: South Korea in the 1970s". University of British Columbia . 30 October 2018.
  43. 1 2 Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 92.
  44. Kim, B. K. & Vogel, E. F. (eds.) (2011). The Park Chung Hee Era: The Transformation of South Korea. Harvard University Press. p. 125.
  45. 한국의 파시즘은 사라졌나: 일본 극우에 사상적 뿌리둔 박정희의 유산… 무의식에 깔린 잔재마저 청산해야 [Has Korean fascism disappeared?: Park Jeong-hee's legacy is ideologically rooted in the far right of Japan... Even the remnants of unconsciousness must be cleared.]. The Hankyoreh (in Korean). 18 November 1999. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  46. 1 2 Rummel, R.J. (1994). "Democide in totalitarian states: Mortacracies and megamurderers.". In Charney, Israel W. (ed.). Widening circle of genocide. Transaction Publishers. p. 5. There is much confusion about what is meant by totalitarian in the literature, including the denial that such systems even exist. I define a totalitarian state as one with a system of government that is unlimited constitutionally or by countervailing powers in society (such as by a church, rural gentry, labor unions, or regional powers); is not held responsible to the public by periodic secret and competitive elections; and employs its unlimited power to control all aspects of society, including the family, religion, education, business, private property, and social relationships. Under Stalin, the Soviet Union was thus totalitarian, as was Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia, Hitler's Germany, and U Ne Win's Burma
  47. Wieland, Carsten (2018). "6: De-neutralizing Aid: All Roads Lead to Damascus". Syria and the Neutrality Trap: The Dilemmas of Delivering Humanitarian Aid Through Violent Regimes. London, UK: I.B. Tauris. p. 68. ISBN   978-0-7556-4138-3. The Ba'ath regime in Syria has been a totalitarian system since 1963...
  48. Keegan, John (1979). "Syria". World Armies. New York: Facts on File Inc. pp. 683–684. ISBN   0-87196-407-4.
  49. C. Tucker, Spencer (2014). "Assad, Hafez al- (1930–2000)". Persian Gulf War Encyclopedia: A Political, Social, and Military History. Santa Barbara, California, USA: ABC-CLIO. pp. 40–41. ISBN   978-1-61069-415-5.
  50. Khamis, Sahar; Gold, Paul B.; Vaughn, Katherine (2013). "22. Propaganda in Egypt and Syria's "Cyberwars": Contexts, Actors, Tools, and Tactics". In Auerbach, Jonathan; Castronovo, Russ (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Propaganda Studies. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 422. ISBN   978-0-19-976441-9.
  51. Ahmed, Saladdin (2019). Totalitarian Space and the Destruction of Aura. State University of New York Press, Albany: Suny Press. pp. 144, 149. ISBN   9781438472911.
  52. Karam, Zeina; Sewell, Abby (7 December 2024). "The fall of Bashar Assad after 14 years of war in Syria brings to an end a decades-long dynasty". AP News. Associated Press. Retrieved 8 December 2024.
  53. A. Faksh, Mahmud (2006). "Syrian Arab Republic". In Schlager, Neil; Weisblatt, Jayne (eds.). World Encyclopedia of Political Systems and Parties (4th ed.). New York: Facts on File. p. 1300. ISBN   0-8160-5953-5.
  54. B. Heller, Peter (1974). "The Permanent Syrian Constitution of March 13, 1973". Middle East Journal. 28 (1). Middle East Institute: 53–66. JSTOR   4325185.
  55. "Hastings Kamuzu Banda | Malawi's 1st President & Nationalist Leader | Britannica".
  56. "Equatorial Guinea | EG Justice". 2012-06-22. Archived from the original on 2012-06-22. Retrieved 2022-07-22.
  57. Otabela, Joseph-Désiré; Onomo-Abena, Sosthène (2009). Entre Estética Y Compromiso. la Obra de Donato Ndongo-bidyogo (in Spanish). Editorial UNED. ISBN   978-84-362-5825-7.
  58. Otabela, Joseph-Désiré; Onomo-Abena, Sosthène (2009). Entre Estética Y Compromiso. la Obra de Donato Ndongo-bidyogo (in Spanish). Editorial UNED. ISBN   978-84-362-5825-7.
  59. "Mohamed Siad Barre | Socialist leader, military dictator, dictator | Britannica".
  60. "Idi Amin | the Dictator's Playbook". PBS .
  61. "Bulletin" (PDF). www.umk.ro. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
  62. Thompson, M. R. (1 June 2002). "Totalitarian and Post-Totalitarian Regimes in Transitions and Non-Transitions from Communism". Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 3 (1): 79–106. doi:10.1080/714005469.
  63. "Kleptocracy and Anti-Communism: When Mobutu Ruled Zaire – Association for Diplomatic Studies & Training".
  64. "GAWA commemorates martial law". SunStar . 23 September 2024.
  65. "Martial law Philippine-style". Philippine Daily Inquirer . 24 September 2015.
  66. "REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, V. RODOLFO M. CUENCA, FERDINAND E. MARCOS, IMELDA R. MARCOS, ROBERTO S. CUENCA, MANUEL I. TINIO, VICTOR AFRICA, MARIO K. ALFELOR, DON M. FERRY AND OSCAR BELTRAN, RESPONDENTS". Supreme Court of the Philippines . 4 April 2018.
  67. Guillermo A. Historical Dictionary of the Philippines . Maryland, USA: Scarecrow Press. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  68. Teehankee, Julio (2016). "Weak State, Strong Presidents: Situating the Duterte Presidency in Philippine Political Time". Journal of Developing Societies. 3 (3).
  69. Celoza, A. (1997). Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism . Connecticut, USA: Praeger Publishers.
  70. Dayley, Robert (August 2, 2016). Southeast Asia in the New International Era. Avalon. ISBN   978-0-8133-5011-0.
  71. Bertrand, J. (2013). Political Change in Southeast Asia. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Berneo, N.; Yashar, D. (2016). Parties, Movements, and Democracy in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press USA.
  73. Celoza, A. Ferdinand Marcos and the Philippines: The Political Economy of Authoritarianism. Connecticut, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group. Retrieved September 19, 2017.
  74. Simbulan, D. (2005). The Modern Principalia: The Historical Evolution of the Philippine Ruling Oligarchy. Quezon City: UP Press.
  75. Del Rosario, Simon G. (1973). An Integrated Course on Communism and Democracy. SGR Research & Pub.
  76. Moore, Allan T. (30 November 2020). "Words and power in conflict - Rwanda under M.R.N.D. Rule". Peace and Conflict Studies. 27 (2).
  77. O'Kane, Rosemary H. T. (1993). "Cambodia in the zero years: rudimentary totalitarianism". Third World Quarterly. 14 (4): 735–748. doi:10.1080/01436599308420354. JSTOR   3992949.
  78. Makiya, Kanan (1993). Cruelty and Silence: War, Tyranny, Uprising, and the Arab World. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 19. ISBN   9780393311419.
  79. Bengio, Ofra (1998). Saddam's Word: The Political Discourse in Iraq. Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780195114393.
  80. Woods, Kevin M.; Stout, Mark E. (December 16, 2010). "New Sources for the Study of Iraqi Intelligence during the Saddam Era". Intelligence and National Security . 25 (4): 547–587. doi:10.1080/02684527.2010.537033.
  81. Faust, Aaron M. (2015). The Ba'thification of Iraq: Saddam Hussein's Totalitarianism. University of Texas Press. ISBN   9781477305577.
  82. "Ethiopian Dictator Mengistu Haile Mariam | Human Rights Watch". 24 November 1999.
  83. "Totalitarianism: The Case of Turkmenistan" (PDF).
  84. Cathill, Paul (2018-09-26). "Interesting Histories: Saparmurat Niyazov – The Real General Aladeen". Medium. Retrieved 2021-09-02.
  85. "The Golden Man". The New Yorker. 2007-05-21. Retrieved 2021-09-02.
  86. "Hall of infamy: Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow". 30 November 2021.
  87. Elena, Dmitrieva (2019). "Political elite of Turkmenistan. Post-Soviet period". Russia and the Moslem World. 2 (304): 49–58. ISSN   1072-6403.
  88. "New Turkmen constitution allows multipartism". 26 September 2008.
  89. Whine, Michael (1 September 2001). "Islamism and Totalitarianism: Similarities and Differences". Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 2 (2): 54–72. doi:10.1080/714005450.
  90. "David Arnett" (PDF). turkishpolicy.com. 2008. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
  91. "The Totalitarian Present – The American Interest". 1 September 2009.
  92. Gall, Carlotta (30 July 2015). "Mullah Muhammad Omar, Enigmatic Leader of Afghan Taliban, Is Dead". The New York Times .
  93. 1 2 "Did you know that there are two different Taliban groups?". www.digitaljournal.com. 1 April 2013.
  94. 1 2 "NCTC Home". www.dni.gov.
  95. Taylor, Adam (12 June 2015). "The brutal dictatorship the world keeps ignoring". The Washington Post.
  96. "UN calls Eritrea a 'totalitarian' state ruled by fear". Daily Nation. Kenya. 8 June 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2018.
  97. "Service for Life". Human Rights Watch. 16 April 2009. p. 6 of 12. Retrieved 2 January 2009.
  98. Winter, Charlie (27 March 2016). "Totalitarianism 101: The Islamic State's Offline Propaganda Strategy".
  99. Filipec, Ondrej (2020). The Islamic State From Terrorism to Totalitarian Insurgency. Routledge. ISBN   9780367457631.
  100. Peter, Bernholz (2019). "Supreme Values, Totalitarianism, and Terrorism". The Oxford Handbook of Public Choice. Vol. 1.
  101. Haslett, Allison (2021). "The Islamic State: A Political-Religious Totalitarian Regime". Scientia et Humanitas: A Journal of Student Research. Middle Tennessee State University.
  102. "Modern Mongolia: Reclaiming Genghis Khan". www.penn.museum. Retrieved 17 August 2021.
  103. Assignment – Secrets of the Steppe (22nd October 1991), 24 May 2012, retrieved 17 August 2021
  104. "Mass grave uncovered in Mongolia". RTÉ.ie . 12 June 2003.
  105. May, Timothy (May 2001), Review of Sandag, Shagdariin; Kendall, Harry H., Poisoned Arrows: The Stalin–Choibalsan Mongolian Massacres, 1921–1941, H-Russia, H-Review, retrieved 17 August 2021
  106. ANU College of Asia & the Pacific (2 May 2013). "Evolution of Manchukuo Concordia Association (1932–1945) as a Political Institution and Vanguard of Ideology". ANU College of Asia & the Pacific. Archived from the original on 5 August 2021. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
  107. Duara, Prasenjit (2004). Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN   978-0-7425-3091-1.
  108. Bryant, Chad Carl (2002). Making the Czechs German: Nationality and Nazi rule in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia, 1939–1945 (Thesis). ProQuest   251667314.[ page needed ]
  109. 1 2 3 Csomor, Gábor (2015). "Right-Wing Extremism in Hungary". In Mesežnikov, Grigorij; Kocúr, Miroslav (eds.). Extremism Vs. Democracy in Central Europe: Issues, Experiences, Challenges (PDF). Institute for Public Affairs. pp. 17–48. ISBN   978-80-89345-53-3.
  110. Ramet, Sabrina (2020). The Independent State of Croatia 1941–45 (Totalitarianism Movements and Political Religions). Routledge. pp. 54–68. ISBN   978-1-138-86811-3.
  111. Suppan, Arnold (2019). The 'Independent State of Croatia' Between the German Reich and Italy. Austrian Academy of Sciences. pp. 537–566. ISBN   978-3-7001-8410-2.
  112. "Vidkun Quisling | Biography, Nazi Collaborator, & Cause of Death | Britannica".
  113. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1946v08/d685
  114. Ganapini, Luigi (2 July 2007). "The Dark Side of Italian History 1943–1945". Modern Italy. 12 (2): 205–223. doi:10.1080/13532940701362730. In 1943 Mussolini had called for 'socialization' as a means of fighting the anti-Fascist democratic forces. In this context, the ideology of National Syndicalism became the key feature of a project for the construction of a totalitarian state.
  115. Bosworth, R.J.B. (March 1997). "Tourist Planning in Fascist Italy and the Limits of a Totalitarian Culture". Contemporary European History. 6 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S0960777300004033.
  116. Healy, David (1991). "Review of Battle for Batangas: A Philippine Province at War". The Journal of Asian Studies. 50 (3): 744–746. doi:10.2307/2057643. JSTOR   2057643.
  117. Fazekas, Csaba (November 2015). "The Genesis of 'Hungarism': Bishop Ottokár Prohászka and the Extremist Right in 1920s Hungary". Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe. 35 (5).
  118. Simons, William B. (1980). "Constitution of the People's Socialist Republic of Albania". The Constitutions of the Communist World. pp. 8–31. doi:10.1163/9789004639973_006. ISBN   978-90-04-63997-3.
  119. "Wojciech Jaruzelski". The New York Times.
  120. Bihari, Mihály (2013). "Magyarországi pártrendszerek (Történeti és analitikus bemutatás)" [Party systems of Hungary (historical and analytical presentation)]. Politológia: a politika és a modern állam: pártok és ideológiák[Political Science: Politics and the Modern State: Parties and Ideologies] (in Hungarian). Budapest: Nemzedékek Tudása Tankönyvkiadó. p. 367. ISBN   978-963-19-7628-1. OCLC   1081799738. Az egypárti diktatúra első szakasza 1949 nyarától 1953 nyaráig (az első Nagy Imre-kormány kinevezéséig) tartott. Ennek az időszaknak azegypártrendszere olyan totalitárius egypártrendszer, amely összekapcsolódott Rákosi Mátyás despotikus személyi hatalmával.[The first phase of the one-party dictatorship lasted from the summer of 1949 to the summer of 1953 (until the appointment of the first Imre Nagy government). The one-party system of this period is a totalitarian one-party system connected with the despotic personal power of Mátyás Rákosi.]
  121. Mezey, Barna; Gosztonyi, Gergely, eds. (2003). "A szovjet típusú államberendezkedés Magyarországon (1949–1956)" [The Soviet-type state system in Hungary (1949–1956)]. Magyar alkotmánytörténet[Hungarian Constitutional History] (in Hungarian). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. pp. 467–468. ISBN   963-389-532-4. OCLC   1014875954. ... a párt nemcsak megszervezni igyekezett a társadalmat, hanem megpróbálta saját képére és hasonlatosságára formálni, s ellenőrzése alá vonta a termelést és az elosztást. ... A magyar társadalom ellenállása csupán néhány évig biztosította a valóban totalitárius berendezkedést.[... the party not only sought to organize society, but also to shape it in its own image and likeness, bringing production and distribution under its control. ... The resistance of the Hungarian society ensured a truly totalitarian system for only a few years.]
  122. Körösényi, András; Tóth, Csaba; Török, Gábor (2007). "A kommunista korszak tradíciója" [The tradition of the communist era]. A magyar politikai rendszer[The Hungarian Political System] (in Hungarian). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. p. 21. ISBN   978-963-389-963-2. OCLC   1088039656. A politikai hatalom totális jellegűvé vált ... A rendszer totalitárius jellege abban ragadható meg, hogy a pártállami kontroll a politikai szférán messze túlmenően minden létszférára – a gazdaságtól a kultúrán keresztül egészen az iskolai és ifjúsági szocializációig – kiterjedt.[Political power has become total in nature ... The totalitarian nature of the system can be grasped in the fact that party-state control extended far beyond the political sphere to all spheres of existence, from the economy through culture to school and youth socialization.]
  123. Romsics, Ignác (2010). "A rákosista diktatúra" [The Rákosist dictatorship]. Magyarország története a XX. században[History of Hungary in the 20th Century] (in Hungarian). Budapest: Osiris Kiadó. p. 337. ISBN   978-963-276-179-4. OCLC   1081699371. Nem kétséges, hogy az 1949 – re kialakult magyar rendszer ... kimeríti a totalitarianizmus fogalmát.[There is no doubt that the Hungarian system formed by 1949 ... exhausts the concept of totalitarianism.]
  124. Tucker, Ernest (2019). "21: Middle East at the End of the Cold War, 1979–1993". The Middle East in Modern World History (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. p. 303. ISBN   978-1-138-49190-8. LCCN   2018043096. During their first few months in power, the Communists remade Afghanistan into a Soviet-style totalitarian state...
  125. Kirkpatrick, Jeane J (1981). "Afghanistan: Implications for Peace and Security". World Affairs. 144 (3): 243. JSTOR   20671902. ...the Communists violently seized power in Kabul and, with the help of growing numbers of Soviet "advisers," began forcibly to impose upon the people of Afghanistan a foreign ideology and a totalitarian system
  126. Roy, Olivier (2018). "3: The Sovietization of Afghanistan". In Hauner, Milan; L. Canfield, Robert (eds.). Afghanistan and the Soviet Union: Collision and Transformation. New York: Routledge. p. 51. ISBN   978-0-367-01216-8.
  127. 1 2 S.Margolis, Eric (2001). "2: The Bravest Men on Earth". War at the top of the World: The struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir, and Tibet. New York: Routledge. p. 15. ISBN   0-415-92712-9.
  128. Roy, Olivier (2018). "3: The Sovietization of Afghanistan". In Hauner, Milan; L. Canfield, Robert (eds.). Afghanistan and the Soviet Union: Collision and Transformation. New York: Routledge. p. 49. ISBN   978-0-367-01216-8.
  129. Kamrany, Nake M (1982). "Afghanistan Under Soviet Occupation". Current History. 81 (475): 222. doi:10.1525/curh.1982.81.475.219. JSTOR   45317401.
  130. Roy, Olivier (2018). "3: The Sovietization of Afghanistan". In Hauner, Milan; L. Canfield, Robert (eds.). Afghanistan and the Soviet Union: Collision and Transformation. New York: Routledge. pp. 48–57. ISBN   978-0-367-01216-8.
  131. Kamrany, Nake M (1982). "Afghanistan Under Soviet Occupation". Current History. 81 (475): 221, 222. doi:10.1525/curh.1982.81.475.219. JSTOR   45317401.
  132. Azmi, Muhammad R. (April 1986). "Soviet Politico-Military Penetration in Afghanistan 1955 to 1979". Armed Forces & Society. 12 (3): 329–349. doi:10.1177/0095327X8601200301. JSTOR   45304853.