Lucas Introna

Last updated
Lucas D. Introna
Professor Lucas Introna.jpg
Born
Lucas Daniel Introna

(1961-09-27) September 27, 1961 (age 62)
Nationality South African
CitizenshipBritish, Italian

Lucas D. Introna (born 1961) is Professor of Organisation, Technology and Ethics at the Lancaster University Management School. He is a scholar within the Social Study of Information Systems field. His research is focused on the phenomenon of technology. Within the area of technology studies he has made significant contributions to our understanding of the ethical and political implications of technology for society.

Contents

Work

Early on in his career Introna was concerned with the way managers incorporated information in support of managerial practices (such as planning, decision-making, etc.). In this work he provided an account of the manager as an always already involved and entangled actor (which is always to a greater or lesser extent already compromised and configured) in contrast to the traditional normative model of the manager as a rational objective free agent that can choose to act or not act in particular ways. Later on his work shifted to a more critical appraisal of technology itself. He, together with co-workers, published a number of critical evaluations of information technology including search engines web search engines, [1] ATMs, facial recognition systems facial recognition systems, [2] etc. His recent work focuses on the ethical and political aspects of technology as well as making contribution to a field that has become known as sociomateriality.

Management, Information and Power

In his book Management, Information and Power, [3] Introna argued that most management education is normatively based (i.e. telling managers how they ought to act), yet managers' organisational reality is mostly based on the ongoing play of power and politics, as has been shown by Henry Mintzberg [4] (See also his recent book Managing). Thus, instead of using information to inform rationality (as the traditional normative models assume) information is rather most often deployed as a resource in organisational politics. This fact, Introna argues, requires an understanding of the relationship between information and power (as suggested in the work of Michel Foucault) rather than information and rationality, as traditionally assumed in the mainstream management literature.

Phenomenological and technology

Drawing on phenomenology, especially the work of Martin Heidegger and Don Ihde, [5] Introna together with Fernando Ilharco developed a phenomenological analysis of information technology—in particular a detailed account of the phenomenology of the screen. [6] [7] They argue that in the phenomenon screen, seeing is not merely being aware of a surface. The very watching of the screen, as a screen, implies that the screen has already soaked up our attention. In screening, screens already attract and hold our attention. They continue to hold our attention as they present what is supposedly relevant—this is exactly why they have the power to attract and hold our attention. This ongoing relevance has as its necessary condition an implicit agreement, not of content, but of a way of living and a way of doing—or rather a certain agreement about the possibilities of truth. As such they argue that screens are ontological entities.

The ethics and politics of technology

Introna (with a variety of co-workers) has developed a variety of detailed empirical studies of the ethics and politics of technology—within the tradition of Science and technology studies. For example, with Helen Nissenbaum he published a paper on the politics of web search engines. [8] This research showed that the indexing and ranking algorithms of Google are producing a particular version of the internet. One which systematically exclude (in some cases by design and in some, accidentally) certain sites and certain types of sites in favour of others, systematically giving prominence to some at the expense of others. Introna also published similar political and ethical studies on Facial recognition systems, Automatic teller machines, and plagiarism detection Systems, amongst others.

Sociomateriality and the ethics of things

More recently Introna has suggested that if we are cyborgs, as argued by Donna Haraway and others, then our ethical relationships with the inanimate material world needs to be reconsidered in a fundamental way. According to him this can only be achieved if we humans abandon a human centric ethical framework and opt for an ethical framework in which all beings are considered worthy of ethical consideration. [9] [10] [11]

Selected publications

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maurice Merleau-Ponty</span> French phenomenological philosopher (1908–1961)

Maurice Jean Jacques Merleau-Ponty was a French phenomenological philosopher, strongly influenced by Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger. The constitution of meaning in human experience was his main interest and he wrote on perception, art, politics, religion, biology, psychology, psychoanalysis, language, nature, and history. He was the lead editor of Les Temps modernes, the leftist magazine he established with Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir in 1945.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of knowledge</span> Field of study

The sociology of knowledge is the study of the relationship between human thought, the social context within which it arises, and the effects that prevailing ideas have on societies. It is not a specialized area of sociology. Instead, it deals with broad fundamental questions about the extent and limits of social influences on individuals' lives and the social-cultural basis of our knowledge about the world. The sociology of knowledge has a subclass and a complement. Its subclass is sociology of scientific knowledge. Its complement is the sociology of ignorance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phenomenology (philosophy)</span> Philosophical method and schools of philosophy

Phenomenology is the philosophical study of objectivity and reality as subjectively lived and experienced. It seeks to investigate the universal features of consciousness while avoiding assumptions about the external world, aiming to describe phenomena as they appear to the subject, and to explore the meaning and significance of the lived experiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alfred Schütz</span> Austrian philosopher (1899–1959)

Alfred Schutz was an Austrian philosopher and social phenomenologist whose work bridged sociological and phenomenological traditions. Schutz is gradually being recognized as one of the 20th century's leading philosophers of social science. He related Edmund Husserl's work to the social sciences, using it to develop the philosophical foundations of Max Weber's sociology, in his major work Phenomenology of the Social World. However, much of his influence arose from the publication of his Collected Papers in the 1960s.

The ethics of technology is a sub-field of ethics addressing the ethical questions specific to the Technology Age, the transitional shift in society wherein personal computers and subsequent devices provide for the quick and easy transfer of information. Technology ethics is the application of ethical thinking to the growing concerns of technology as new technologies continue to rise in prominence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Scheler</span> German philosopher (1874–1928)

Max Ferdinand Scheler was a German philosopher known for his work in phenomenology, ethics, and philosophical anthropology. Considered in his lifetime one of the most prominent German philosophers, Scheler developed the philosophical method of Edmund Husserl, the founder of phenomenology. Given that school's utopian ambitions of re-founding all of human knowledge, Scheler was nicknamed the "Adam of the philosophical paradise" by José Ortega y Gasset.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Other (philosophy)</span> Concept in philosophy and psychology

Other is a term used to define another person or people as separate from oneself. In phenomenology, the terms the Other and the Constitutive Other distinguish other people from the Self, as a cumulative, constituting factor in the self-image of a person; as acknowledgement of being real; hence, the Other is dissimilar to and the opposite of the Self, of Us, and of the Same. The Constitutive Other is the relation between the personality and the person (body) of a human being; the relation of essential and superficial characteristics of personal identity that corresponds to the relationship between opposite, but correlative, characteristics of the Self, because the difference is inner-difference, within the Self.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don Ihde</span> American philosopher (1934–2024)

Don Ihde was an American philosopher of science and technology. In 1979 he wrote what is often identified as the first North American work on philosophy of technology, Technics and Praxis.

Architectural phenomenology is the discursive and realist attempt to understand and embody the philosophical insights of phenomenology within the discipline of architecture. The phenomenology of architecture is the philosophical study of architecture employing the methods of phenomenology.

Nicole C. Karafyllis is a German philosopher and biologist. As of 2010, she has been a Professor of Philosophy at the TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig/Brunswick Institute of Technology (Germany).

Robert L. Bernasconi is Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of Philosophy at Pennsylvania State University. He is known as a reader of Martin Heidegger and Emmanuel Levinas, and for his work on the concept of race. He has also written on the history of philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James M. Edie</span> American philosopher

James M. Edie was an American philosopher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dan Zahavi</span> Danish philosopher (born 1967)

Dan Zahavi is a Danish philosopher. He is currently a professor of philosophy at University of Copenhagen.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to ethics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jeff Malpas</span> Australian philosopher

Jeff Malpas is an Australian philosopher and emeritus distinguished professor at the University of Tasmania in Hobart. Known internationally for his work across the analytic and continental traditions, Malpas is also at the forefront of contemporary philosophical research on the concept of "place", as first and most comprehensively presented in his Place and Experience: A Philosophical Topography—now in its second edition—and further developed in numerous subsequent works.

Dermot Moran is an Irish philosopher specialising in phenomenology and in medieval philosophy, and he is also active in the dialogue between analytic and continental philosophy. He is currently the inaugural holder of the Joseph Chair in Catholic Philosophy at Boston College. He is a member of the Royal Irish Academy and a founding editor of the International Journal of Philosophical Studies.

Kristo Ivanov is a Swedish-Brazilian information scientist and systems scientist of ethnic Bulgarian origin. He is professor emeritus at the Department of informatics of Umeå University in Sweden.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Huemer</span> American philosopher (born 1969)

Michael Huemer is a professor of philosophy at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He has defended ethical intuitionism, direct realism, libertarianism, substance dualism, reincarnation, the repugnant conclusion, and philosophical anarchism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward S. Casey</span> American academic (born 1939)

Edward S. Casey is an American philosopher and university professor. He has published several volumes on phenomenology, philosophical psychology, and the philosophy of space and place. His work is widely cited in contemporary continental philosophy. He is currently distinguished professor emeritus of philosophy at Stony Brook University in New York and distinguished visiting faculty at Pacifica Graduate Institute.

The materiality turn in organization studies is the theoretical movement emphasizing objects, instruments and embodiments involved in organizations and organizing and the ontologies underpinnings theories about organizations and organizing, what deeply 'matters' in the study of organizations and organizing.

References

  1. Introna, L.D. & H. Nissenbaum (2000) Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters, The Information Society, 16(3):169-185.
  2. Introna, L.D. (2005) Disclosing the Digital Face: The ethics of facial recognition systems, Ethics and Information Technology, 7(2): 75-86.
  3. Introna, L.D. (1997) Management, Information and Power: A narrative of the involved manager, Macmillan, Basingstoke.
  4. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The Nature of Managerial Work. New. York: Harper & Row
  5. Ihde, Don. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  6. Introna, L.D & Fernando M. Ilharco (2006) "The Meaning of Screens: Towards a phenomenological account of screenness", Human Studies, 29(1): 57-76.
  7. Introna, L.D, (2005) "Phenomenological Approaches to Ethics and Information Technology", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2005 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-it-phenomenology/
  8. Introna, L.D. & H. Nissenbaum (2000) "Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters, The Information Society", 16(3):169-185.
  9. Introna, L. D. (2009) "Ethics and the speaking of things, Theory, Culture and Society", 26(4): 398-419.
  10. Introna, L.D. (2021), “Touching Tactfully: The Impossible Community”, in Olsen, B., Burström, M., DeSilvey, C. and Pétursdóttir, Þ. (Eds.), After Discourse: Things, Affects, Ethics, 1st edition., Routledge, London & New York, pp. 207–218.
  11. Introna, L. D (2014) Ethics and Flesh: Being touched by the otherness of things, In Olsen, Bjørnar and Þóra Pétursdóttir (eds.), Ruin Memories: Materialities, Aesthetics and the Archaeology of the Recent Past, Oxford: Routledge, p. 41-61.