Magna Carta: The True Story Behind the Charter

Last updated

Magna Carta: The True Story Behind the Charter
Magna Carta book.jpg
First edition
Author David Starkey
CountryUnited Kingdom
Subject British politics, history
GenreNon-fiction
Publisher Hodder & Stoughton
Publication date
January 1, 2015
Pages304
ISBN 978-1473610057
Preceded byIntroduction to Fatal Colours: Towton 1461 – England's Most Brutal Battle by George Goodwin (2011) 

Magna Carta: The True Story Behind the Charter is a book by historian David Starkey. It was published in 2015 by Hodder & Stoughton. The book tells the story of the writing of the royal charter of rights Magna Carta. Starkey writes about its background, its history and what he believes is so great and important about it. [1]

Contents

Background

2015 was the 800th anniversary of the first issuing of Magna Carta. To coincide with this, new academic works on the subject were published and events held to mark the anniversary. [2] Starkey presented a one-hour BBC documentary on Magna Carta, [1] and it was accompanied by a book published by Hodder and Stoughton. [2]

In the documentary, Starkey argues that Magna Carta is a foundational stone of the rule of law and a basis constitutions because he believes states tends towards being "arrogance, corruption and conflict with its people", while the citizens tend towards being “disorderly, irrational and bloody-minded”. Starkey writes that Magna Carta is essential in keeping peace and constraints on the state and the citizen population and says that it is this rather shaky 800 year old document that has led to a "constitutional edifice" developing in the UK. [1]

Synopsis

Starkey starts by describing the origins of Magna Carta. He tells the story of the warring parties and the fight involved in the creation and writing of the charter. He argues that the story of the birth of English constitutional government is much murkier and more complicated than the general view that it had been born at Runnymede on 15 June 1215. Nevertheless, Starkey writes that this symbolised a great English capacity to find peaceful compromise in politics. [3]

The book mostly focuses on telling the story behind the charter, how the barons forced King John to seal the charter. The story follows the differences between the original Magna Carta of 1215 and the subsequent Magna Carta of November 1216 which followed the death of King John a month before. [4]

Starkey concludes the book by writing about his views on the political implications of Magna Carta in present-day politics. He believes that the modern UK state appears to be fragmenting and would be helped by the core principles of the charter with a new charter of liberties or a new William Marshal figure. [5] [6]

Reception

The book received positive and negative feedback. Gerard DeGroot of The Times reviewed the book favourably, saying that Starkey is "a perceptive historian with a populist's ability to communicate... admirable for its lucidity and brevity; this book is all that most people will need to know about the epochal charter and its legacy. Starkey also has the courage and imagination to interpret Magna Carta in a manner that has profound meaning for the world of today." [3]

Frank MacGabhann of The Irish Times was very positive about the book, saying that it was "scholarly yet accessible. Analytical yet clear, it is a pleasure to read." [4]

In Speculum , medieval historian James Masschaele took a more critical review. He noted that while Starkey's 2015 book aimed to be "a short and lively account of the key events" Masschaele concluded that "A short and accessible introduction to Magna Carta suitable for lower-level undergraduate survey courses would certainly be a welcome addition to the literature, but on balance it is hard to view Starkey’s book as an entirely satisfactory option in this regard." Starkey's book included "anachronistic turns of phrase" and the review criticised Starkey's understanding of the barons as republicans and his "jarring screed against modern society". [2]

Another more critical view on the book was Marcus Tanner of The Independent . He was particularly critical of its closing chapters which he found far less persuasive than the rest of the book. This pertained to Starkey's view that the present British state is fragmenting and needed another William Marshal. Tanner contested this point, arguing that the problem in 1215 was the over-concentration of power in one person, which is not the case in present-day politics. Tanner argued on the contrary that he believed the real problem nowadays is that nobody knows who is actually in power, whether it is big corporations or parliament or the EU. This, he argued is exemplified by the fact that so many people think voting is pointless because it won't make a difference, due to power being so distributed in modern politics. [5]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Magna Carta</span> English charter of freedoms, 1215

Magna Carta Libertatum, commonly called Magna Carta or sometimes Magna Charta, is a royal charter of rights agreed to by King John of England at Runnymede, near Windsor, on 15 June 1215. First drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal Stephen Langton, to make peace between the unpopular king and a group of rebel barons, it promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift and impartial justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons. Neither side stood by their commitments, and the charter was annulled by Pope Innocent III, leading to the First Barons' War.

Civil liberties are guarantees and freedoms that governments commit not to abridge, either by constitution, legislation, or judicial interpretation, without due process. Though the scope of the term differs between countries, civil liberties may include the freedom of conscience, freedom of press, freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, the right to security and liberty, freedom of speech, the right to privacy, the right to equal treatment under the law and due process, the right to a fair trial, and the right to life. Other civil liberties include the right to own property, the right to defend oneself, and the right to bodily integrity. Within the distinctions between civil liberties and other types of liberty, distinctions exist between positive liberty/positive rights and negative liberty/negative rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Langton</span> 13th-century Archbishop of Canterbury, theologian, and cardinal

Stephen Langton was an English cardinal of the Catholic Church and Archbishop of Canterbury from 1207 until his death in 1228. The dispute between King John of England and Pope Innocent III over his election was a major factor in the crisis which produced the Magna Carta in 1215. Langton is also credited with having divided the Bible into the standard modern arrangement of chapters used today.

Due process of law is application by the state of all legal rules and principles pertaining to a case so all legal rights that are owed to a person are respected. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due process violation, which offends the rule of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Starkey</span> English constitutional historian (born 1945)

David Robert Starkey is an English historian, radio and television presenter, with views that he describes as conservative. The only child of Quaker parents, he attended Kendal Grammar School before reading history at Cambridge on a scholarship. There he specialised in Tudor history, writing a thesis on King Henry VIII's household. From Cambridge, he moved to the London School of Economics, where he was a lecturer in history until 1998. He has written several books on the Tudors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberty</span> Creation and experience of societal freedom

Liberty is the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life, behavior, or political views.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Barons' War</span> Civil war in the Kingdom of England

The First Barons' War (1215–1217) was a civil war in the Kingdom of England in which a group of rebellious major landowners led by Robert Fitzwalter waged war against King John of England. The conflict resulted from King John's disastrous wars against King Philip II of France, which led to the collapse of the Angevin Empire, and John's subsequent refusal to accept and abide by the Magna Carta, which John had sealed on 15 June 1215.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Runnymede</span> Water-meadow in England, probable location for the sealing of the Magna Carta in 1215

Runnymede is a water-meadow alongside the River Thames in the English county of Surrey, bordering Berkshire and just over 20 miles (32 km) west of central London. It is notable for its association with the sealing of Magna Carta, and as a consequence is, with its adjoining hillside, the site of memorials. Runnymede Borough is named after the area, Runnymede being at its northernmost point.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Walkern</span> Village in Hertfordshire, England

Walkern is a village and civil parish in East Hertfordshire, England. It is about two miles (3 km) from Stevenage.

David A. Carpenter is an English historian and writer, and Professor of Medieval History at King's College London where he has been working since 1988. Carpenter specialises in the life and reign of Henry III. Historian Dan Jones described him as "one of Britain's foremost medievalists".

Jocelin of Wells was a medieval Bishop of Bath. He was the brother of Hugh de Wells, who became Bishop of Lincoln. Jocelin became a canon of Wells Cathedral before 1200, and was elected bishop in 1206. During King John of England's dispute with Pope Innocent III, Jocelin at first remained with the king, but after the excommunication of John in late 1209, Jocelin went into exile. He returned to England in 1213, and was mentioned in Magna Carta in 1215.

Sir James Clarke Holt, also known as J. C. Holt and Jim Holt, was an English medieval historian, known particularly for his work on Magna Carta. He was the third Master of Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, serving between 1981 and 1988.

Alan F. Alford, was a British writer and speaker on the subjects of ancient religion, mythology, and Egyptology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of rights</span> Proclamation of fundamental rights to citizens of a polity

A bill of rights, sometimes called a declaration of rights or a charter of rights, is a list of the most important rights to the citizens of a country. The purpose is to protect those rights against infringement from public officials and private citizens.

<i>1215: The Year of Magna Carta</i> 2003 book by Danny Danziger and John Gillingham

1215: The Year of Magna Carta is a historical documentation of life in Medieval England written by author and journalist Danny Danziger and emeritus professor of history at the London School of Economics John Gillingham. It was originally published in 2003 by Hodder & Stoughton, a division of Hodder Headline. In 2004, it was published in the United States by Touchstone. This book is a sequel to Danziger's previous work, The Year 1000, which he co-authored with author Robert Lacey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominic Selwood</span>

Dominic Selwood is an English historian, author, journalist and barrister. He has written several works of history, historical fiction and historical thrillers, most notably The Sword of Moses. and Anatomy of a Nation. A History of British Identity in 50 Documents. His background is in medieval history.

Michael Arnold is a British novelist who writes historical fiction.

Magna Carta of Chester, or Cheshire, was a charter of rights issued in 1215 in the style of Magna Carta. The charter is primarily concerned with the relationship between the Earl of Chester and his barons, though the final clause states that the barons must allow similar concessions to their own tenants.

Stephen Church is a writer and professor of medieval history at the University of East Anglia and is regarded as an expert on King John. In 2015 his book King John: England, Magna Carta, and the Making of a Tyrant was one of the Financial Times best books of the year.

Modern capitalist society is a term used to describe a type of capitalist society in which a capitalist class of "new elites" and "old elites" concerned with maximizing their wealth secures a political system that serves and protects their interests, leading to the development of a wage-earning class. The term is commonly used by historians to refer to a transition from a premodern feudal society to a modern capitalist society, with consensus being that England emerged as the first modern capitalist society through the English Civil War (1642-51) and the Glorious Revolution (1688-89). Historians identify that the transition into modern capitalist society is often defined by a bourgeois revolution in which rising elites secure a system of representative democracy, rather than direct democracy, that serves their interests over the interests of the previously ruling royal aristocracy, such as in the American Revolution.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Mangan, Lucy (27 January 2015). "David Starkey's Magna Carta review – he's a far better history teacher than political pundit". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 Masschaele, James (January 2017). "David Carpenter, ed. and trans., Magna Carta. New York: Penguin Classics, 2015. Paper. Pp. 624. $17.50. ISBN: 978-0-241953372.J. C. Holt, Magna Carta . 3rd ed., ed. George Garnett and John Hudson. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015. Paper. Pp. xxii, 462; 11 black-and-white figures. $34.99. ISBN: 978-1-107-47157-3.David Starkey, Magna Carta: The True Story behind the Charter . London: Hodder and Stoughton, 2015. Pp. 285; 27 color and 14 black-and-white figures. £18.99. ISBN: 978-1-473-61005-7". Speculum. 92 (1): 224–227. doi: 10.1086/689707 .
  3. 1 2 DeGroot, Gerard (18 April 2015). "Magna Carta: The True Story Behind the Charter by David Starkey" . The Times. Archived from the original on 23 February 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  4. 1 2 MacGabhann, Frank (13 April 2016). "Magna Carta: The True Story Behind the Charter by David Starkey review". Irish Times. Archived from the original on 23 February 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2020.
  5. 1 2 Tanner, Marcus (30 April 2015). "Magna Carta, The True Story Behind the Charter by David Starkey, book review". The Independent. Retrieved 2 November 2020.
  6. Finlay, Victoria (1 May 2015). "Magna Carta: The true story behind the charter by David Starkey - book review: 1215 and all that". The Independent. Retrieved 2 November 2020.