Malik Hasan Bahri

Last updated

Malik Hasan Bahri
Malik
Prime Minister of the Bahmani Sultanate
Reign1481 – 1486
Predecessor Mahmud Gawan
Successor Qasim Barid I
Died1486
Issue Malik Ahmad Nizam Shah I
FatherBhario

Malik Hasan Bahri (died 1486) or Nizam-ul-Mulk Bahri was a noble of the Bahmani Sultanate in India who served as the prime minister from 1481 until his murder in 1486. He was the father of Malik Ahmad Nizam Shah I, founder of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, one of the secessionist kingdoms from the Bahmani Sultanate, and its ruling dynasty's primogenitor.

Contents

Originally a Hindu Brahmin, he was taken captive by Bahmani forces in the 1420s and converted to Islam. He entered the service of the sultanate as a military slave and was given further education. In 1471, he led the conquest of forts of the Gajapati Empire after he had been sent to influence a succession conflict in the state, and was given governorship over the Bahmani province of Telangana. As the leader of the Deccani faction in the conflict between them and those not native to South Asia, he helped plot the execution of Mahmud Gawan in 1481, the foreign prime minister at the time and Malik Hasan's predecessor. He then adopted the role, and in 1482 became the sole regent of Mahmood Shah, where throughout his ministership he had effective control of the state. In 1486, he was killed amidst continual internal strife.

Biography

Rise to power and reign

According to the court historian Ferishta, Malik Hasan was originally a Brahmin from Pathri, a town in the Vijayanagara Empire. He initially bore the name of Tima Bhat, and his father was named Bhario. Varying accounts of his true origin explain why his family was in the region; one claims that they were escaping persecution perpetrated by Muslims, while another purports they were fleeing their native land from famine. In 1422–23, during one of Ahmad Shah I Wali of the Bahmani Sultanate's campaigns against Vijayanagara, he was taken captive by the sultan's forces and converted to Islam, being given his name Malik Hasan Bahri. [1] [2] [3] Conscripted as a military slave of the sultanate, he was simultaneously given additional education to complement his prior schooling, where he was, at the behest of Sultan Alau'd-din Ahmad Shah, sent to an institution with then-prince Humayun Shah, and taught Persian. [1] [3] Humayun Shah's reported inability to properly pronounce Malik Hasan's surname led to his adoption of the surname "Bahri". [3] During the reign of Muhammad Shah III starting in 1463, he was made a servant of the sultan and later an amir with a rank giving him charge of 2,000 horses. [4]

In 1471, Malik Hasan led conquests in Orissa as a commander of the Bahmani army; [5] he had been sent by the sultan to sway the succession conflict in the Gajapati Empire between Hamvira Deva and Purushottama Deva in the sultanate's favour, seeking to support the former. While in the country, he seized control of and annexed the key forts of Kondaveedu and Rajahmundry. [6] Through the spoils of his conquests, he was made the tarafdar (provincial governor) of Telangana. [2] [7] His notoriety was greatly increased for his role in this and other campaigns, [8] with him receiving the title of Nizam-ul-Mulk. [9] In 1475, prime minister Mahmud Gawan, recognizing Malik Hasan's son [lower-alpha 1] Ahmad's future potential, was able to split the two by sending the younger to Malik Hasan's jagir, Mahur. [14] Malik Hasan ruled as the provincial governor of Telangana until the taraf's division with the invasion of the Gajapatis in 1478, and was subsequently made governor of the eastern of the two new provinces, Rajahmundry. The lessened significance of his new position angered him, and was a source of his hatred for Mahmud Gawan, who was of the opposing Afaqi faction. [15] [16] In 1480, Ahmad returned to his father's company as his subordinate at Rajamundry. [17] Malik Hasan, as the leader of the opposing Deccani faction, successfully plotted to have Mahmud Gawan murdered in 1481. [15] [16] Following Mahmud's execution, Malik Hasan adopted the role of prime minister, and the title of Peshwa was bestowed upon him. [18] [19]

Bahmani sultan Muhammad III died a year later in 1482, and Malik Hasan was made the sole regent and prime minister of the Deccani-favouring Mahmood Shah, then only twelve years old. [20] [21] [22] Upon his acceptance of his new role, he became known as Malik Naib . [23] Due to the absence of many prominent Bahmani nobles at Mahmood Shah's coronation, including Yusuf Adil Shah and Fathullah Imad-ul-Mulk, Malik Hasan asked for these gestures to be repeated with these nobles present at Bidar, the Bahmani capital. Upon his arrival, Yusuf proceeded to the sultan guarded with 200 soldiers, seen as improper but to him necessary for his protection. [24] [25] Malik Hasan likewise was accompanied by 500 armed men, and in the joint procession Yusuf controversially took priority over the prime minister, but no further conflict came of this. [24] [26] The next day Malik invited Yusuf to Bidar to assist in the administration of the sultanate. Soon after his arrival, however, he fled due to the ongoing massacre of Turks living in the city, where in this twenty-day period of strife he had been sought to be killed. [27] [28] [29] Upon his departure a triumvirate regency council was installed, with Nizam-ul-Mulk ruling as prime minister. [28] [29] Malik Hasan's success in seizing this role led Yusuf to take control of the taraf of Bijapur, where he would later establish a sultanate on the province's territory. [30]

Throughout his ministership, Malik Hasan exerted de facto control over the state and its affairs, with Mahmood Shah serving as a puppet under him. [31] [32] He ruled efficiently and without strife. [33] [34] During his reign, his jagir in Maharashtra was significantly expanded to encompass the territory that would become the Ahmadnagar Sultanate, by appending to his domains Beed and territories adjoining Junnar and Daulatabad. [35] [36] The administration of these estates was then handed over to Ahmad, who chose to relocate there. [34] [36]

Death and aftermath

Malik Hasan was intensely disliked by many nobles of the sultanate, both of his own faction for his role in Mahmud Gawan's death and the foreigners for his policy against them. [32] In 1486, four years into his ministership, a conspiracy akin to the one he had sown against Mahmud was developed against him: following the death of the provincial governor of Warangal, a Bahmani noble temporarily seized control of both Bahmani provinces comprising Telangana; Malik Hasan successfully made the noble relinquish control of his captured territory, but while away from Bidar, a conspiracy against him was formed, upon which the sultan was convinced to issue a decree to have Malik Hasan put to death. Days later, he was murdered by one of his own nobles at Bidar. [28] [37]

Following his death, conflict among the nobles of the sultanate persisted. From his jagir of Junnar, Malik Hasan's son Ahmad Bahri took his father's title of Nizam-ul-Mulk in 1486 and forcibly increased his autonomy and territorial control by subduing nearby forts nominally under Bahmani control but held by Marathas. He subsequently repelled attempts by the central authority to thwart his increase in power, [38] achieving de facto independence from the Bahmani Sultanate, marking him the first sultan to do so. [8] By 1490, [12] he had established the Ahmadnagar Sultanate. [8] Developments in Bidar occurred as well after Malik Hasan's death, where he was succeeded by the foreigner Qasim Barid I as prime minister, who further estranged Ahmad and the Deccanis. [30]

Related Research Articles

The Deccan sultanates is a historiographical term referring to five late medieval to early modern Indian kingdoms on the Deccan Plateau between the Krishna River and the Vindhya Range that were created from the disintegration of the Bahmani Sultanate and ruled by Muslim dynasties: namely Ahmadnagar, Berar, Bidar, Bijapur, and Golconda. The five sultanates owed their existence to the declaration of independence of Ahmadnagar in 1490, followed by Bijapur and Berar in the same year. Bidar became independent in c. 1492, and Golconda in 1518.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bahmani Kingdom</span> Kingdom in Deccan India (1347–1527)

The Bahmani Kingdom or the Bahmani Sultanate was a late medieval kingdom that ruled the Deccan plateau in India. The first independent Muslim sultanate of the Deccan, the Bahmani Kingdom came to power in 1347 during the rebellion of Ismail Mukh against Muhammad bin Tughlaq, the Sultan of Delhi. Ismail Mukh then abdicated in favour of Zafar Khan, who established the Bahmani Sultanate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sultanate of Bijapur</span> Indian kingdom in the Deccan (1490–1686)

The Sultanate of Bijapur was an early modern kingdom in the western Deccan and South India, ruled by the Adil Shahi or Adilshahi dynasty. Bijapur had been a taraf (province) of the Bahmani Sultanate prior to its independence in 1490 and before the former's political decline in the last quarter of the 15th century. It was one of the Deccan sultanates, the collective name of the five successor states of the Bahmani Sultanate. At its peak, the Sultanate of Bijapur was one of the most powerful states in South Asia, second to the Mughal Empire, which conquered it in 1686 under Aurangzeb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yusuf Adil Shah</span> Founder of the Adil Shahi dynasty

Yusuf Adil Shah, referred as Yusuf Adil Khan or Hidalcão by the Portuguese, was the founder of the Adil Shahi dynasty that ruled the Sultanate of Bijapur for nearly two centuries. As the founder of the Adil Shahi dynasty, Yusuf Adil Shah is credited with developing the town of Bijapur and elevating it to significant status.

The Berar sultanate was an early modern Indian kingdom in the Deccan, ruled by the Imad Shahi dynasty. It was one of the Deccan sultanates, and was established in 1490 following the disintegration of the Bahmani Sultanate by Fathullah Imad-ul-Mulk. It was annexed by the Ahmadnagar Sultanate in 1574 following an invasion.

The Sultanate of Bidar was an early modern Indian polity that ruled a territory in the central Deccan centred at Bidar. As one of the Deccan sultanates, the sultanate's initial territory corresponded to that of one of the five provinces of the Bahmani Sultanate, and under the rule of Qasim Barid I in 1492 assumed de facto control of state affairs of the Bahmani Sultanate. Leadership passed to his sons; Amir Barid I in 1504 and Ali Barid Shah I in 1542. Starting from the 1580s as a result of Ali's death, a wave of successions occurred in the rulership of the dynasty which ended in 1609 under the last sultan, Amir Barid III. He was eventually defeated in 1619 by Ibrahim Adil Shah II of the Sultanate of Bijapur, who annexed the territory of the Bidar Sultanate into his realm.

The Farooqi dynasty or the Farooq Shahi was the ruling dynasty of the Khandesh Sultanate from its inception in 1382 till its annexation by the Mughal emperor Akbar in 1601. The founder of the dynasty, Malik Ahmad participated in a rebellion against the Bahmani ruler Muhmmad Shah I in his early years. When he was compelled to flee from Deccan, he established in Thalner on the Tapti River. After receiving the grant of the fiefdoms of Thalner and Karanda from Firuz Shah Tughluq in 1370, he conquered the region around Thalner, which later became known as Khandesh. By 1382, he started ruling independently.

Qasim Barid I was prime-minister of the Bahmani Sultanate and the founder of the Bidar Sultanate, one of the five late medieval Indian kingdoms together known as the Deccan sultanates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ahmadnagar Sultanate</span> Deccan Indian kingdom (1490–1636)

The Sultanate of Ahmednagar or the Nizam Shahi Sultanate was a late medieval Indian Muslim kingdom located in the northwestern Deccan, between the sultanates of Gujarat and Bijapur, ruled by the Nizam Shahi or Bahri dynasty. It was established when Malik Ahmed, the Bahmani governor of Junnar, after defeating the Bahmani army led by general Jahangir Khan on 28 May 1490, declared independence and established the Ahmadnagar Sultanate.

Mahmud Gawan (1411–1481) was a Persian statesman who served as the chief minister, or Peshwa of the Bahmani Sultanate from 1458 and de facto ruler as prime minister from 1466 until his death in 1481. Mahmud Gawan, from the village of Gawan in Persia, was well-versed in Islamic theology, Persian, and the sciences and was a poet and a prose writer of repute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taj ud-Din Firuz Shah</span> Royalty in India

Taj ud-Din Firoz Shah, also known as Firoz Shah Bahmani, was the ruler of the Bahmani Sultanate from 16 November 1397 to 22 September 1422. Firuz Shah is considered an important ruler of the Bahamani Sultanate. He expanded his kingdom and even succeeded in conquering the Raichur Doab from Vijaynagara kingdoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deccanis</span> Ethnoreligious community in India

The Deccanis or Deccani people are an Indo-Aryan ethno-religious community of Deccani-speaking Muslims who inhabit or are from the Deccan region of South India. The community traces its origins to the shifting of the Delhi Sultanate's capital from Delhi to Daulatabad in 1327 during the reign of Muhammad bin Tughluq. Further ancestry can also be traced from immigrant Muslims referred to as Afaqis, also known as Pardesis who came from Central Asia, Iraq and Iran and had settled in the Deccan region during the Bahmani Sultanate (1347). The migration of Muslim Hindavi-speaking people to the Deccan and intermarriage with the local Hindus who converted to Islam, led to the creation of a new community of Hindustani-speaking Muslims, known as the Deccani, who would come to play an important role in the politics of the Deccan. Their language, Deccani, emerged as a language of linguistic prestige and culture during the Bahmani Sultanate, further evolving in the Deccan Sultanates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fathullah Imad-ul-Mulk</span> 1st Sultan of Berar

Fathullah Imad-ul-Mulk was the founder of the Imad Shahi Dynasty and the Berar Sultanate. Originally a Hindu captive from Vijayanagara, Fathullah was brought up as a Deccani Muslim and rose to command the army of Berar under the Bahmani Sultanate. In 1490, he declared himself Sultan of Berar, which he ruled until his death in 1504. He was succeeded by his son Aladdin Imad Shah.

Mahmood Shah or Shihab-Ud-Din Mahmud was the sultan of the Bahmani Sultanate from 1482 until his death in 1518. His long rule is noted for the disintegration of the sultanate and the creation of the independent Deccan sultanates.

Malik Ahmad Nizam Shah was the founder of the Nizam Shahi dynasty and the Ahmadnagar Sultanate.

Muhammad Shah III Lashkari or Shamsuddin Muhammad Shah III was the sultan of the Bahmani Sultanate from 1463 to 1482. During his reign, he successfully invaded Orissa and made their Gajapati Purushottam Deva to surrender. He also made his brother Hamvira Deva surrender by besieging Kondavidu fort.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alau'd-din Ahmad Shah</span> 10th Bahmani Sultan

Alau’d-din Ahmad Shah was the tenth sultan of the Bahmani Sultanate. He was considered a benevolent ruler, albeit weak in administration. His reign is marked by rebellions.

Alauddin Humayun Shah Bahmani was the sultan of the Bahmani Sultanate, who reigned between 1458 and 1461. Also known as Humayun Shah Zalim, he is described as a cruel ruler, known for executing people in torturous ways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bahmani invasion of Orissa</span> Gajapati invasion of Bahmani

The Bahmani invasion of Orissa refers to a series of historical events in the 15th century, marked by conflicts and diplomatic maneuvers between the Gajapati Empire and the Bahmani Sultanate. In 1475, a rebel officer of Bahmani named Bhimraj, revolted at Kondavidu, a Bahmani territory, prompting a complex alliance between Gajapatis and chiefs of Telangana and Jajnagar. Tensions escalated further in 1478 when Muhammad Shah III invaded Orissa, and Purushottama Dev, alarmed by the invasion, offered homage, disarming and presenting gifts. The Sultan accepted the homage, confirming Purushottam as the ruler of his patrimony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Krishnadevaraya's Bahmani expedition</span> Campaign of Krishnadevaraya of the Vijayanagara Empire

The Krishnadevaraya's Bahmani Expedition was a pivotal event in the history of the Bahmani Sultanate and the Vijayanagara Empire. It marked a significant escalation in tensions between the powers in Deccan.

References

Notes

  1. An alternative, but generally considered false [10] theory states that Ahmad was rather the son of the sultan and a Hindu woman of royal lineage, and that after an astrological map had predicted his future aptitude, he was given into the care of Malik Hasan, then residing far from the capital in Maharashtra. [11] [12] However, this theory is contradictory to the one presented by Ferishta, and is proved false by a contemporary letter which uses Ahmad's full name, Malik Ahmad Nizam-ul-Mulk b. Malik Naib. [13]

Citations

  1. 1 2 Fischel 2020, pp. 71–72.
  2. 1 2 Flatt 2019, p. 104.
  3. 1 2 3 Shyam 1966, p. 13.
  4. Shyam 1966, pp. 13–14.
  5. Haig 1925, p. 415.
  6. Fischel 2020, p. 51.
  7. Haig 1925, p. 416.
  8. 1 2 3 Mitchell & Zebrowski 1999, p. 10.
  9. Sherwani 1946, p. 309.
  10. Shyam 1966, p. 26 "Sober history records that Malik Ahmad [...] was the son of Malik Hasan"
  11. Fischel 2020, p. 71.
  12. 1 2 Fischel, Roy S. (2017). "Niẓām Shāhīs" . In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Rowson, Everett (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam (3rd ed.). Brill Online. ISSN   1873-9830.
  13. Fischel 2020, p. 98 n. 29.
  14. Shyam 1966, p. 26.
  15. 1 2 Haig 1925, pp. 417–418.
  16. 1 2 Sherwani 1973, p. 192.
  17. Shyam 1966, pp. 26–27.
  18. Shyam 1966, p. 17.
  19. Sherwani 1946, p. 342.
  20. Sherwani 1946, p. 361.
  21. Haig 1925, pp. 421–422.
  22. Sherwani 1973, p. 194.
  23. Shyam 1966, pp. 17–18.
  24. 1 2 Sherwani 1942, p. 204.
  25. Sherwani 1946, pp. 361–362.
  26. Sherwani 1946, p. 362.
  27. Sherwani 1942, p. 205.
  28. 1 2 3 Sherwani 1946, pp. 361–365.
  29. 1 2 Shyam 1966, pp. 18–19.
  30. 1 2 Fischel 2020, p. 67.
  31. Eaton 2019, p. 151.
  32. 1 2 Majumdar 1967, p. 267.
  33. Sherwani 1946, p. 364.
  34. 1 2 Shyam 1966, p. 19.
  35. Fischel 2020, pp. 209, 229 n. 80.
  36. 1 2 Shyam 1966, p. 27.
  37. Sherwani 1973, p. 195.
  38. Sherwani 1946, pp. 368–369.

Sources