Marine spatial planning

Last updated

Marine spatial planning (MSP) also known interchangeably as Maritime Spatial Planning, is an ocean management instrument which aids policy-makers and stakeholders in compartmentalizing sea basins within state jurisdiction according to social, ecological and economical objectives in order to make informed and coordinated decisions about how to use marine resources sustainably. [1] [2] [3] MSP generally uses maps to create a more comprehensive picture of a marine area [4] – identifying where and how an ocean area is being used and what natural resources and habitat exist. [5] It is similar to land-use planning, but for marine waters.

Contents

Example of MSP off Massachusetts MSP Mass NOAA.jpg
Example of MSP off Massachusetts

Through the planning and mapping process of a marine ecosystem, planners can consider the cumulative effect of maritime industries on our seas, seek to make industries more sustainable and proactively minimize conflicts between industries seeking to utilise the same sea area. The intended result of MSP is a more coordinated and sustainable approach to how our oceans are used – ensuring that marine resources and services are utilized, but within clear environmental limits to ensure marine ecosystems remain healthy and biodiversity is conserved.

Definition and concept

The most commonly used definition of marine spatial planning was developed by the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO:

Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) is a public process of analyzing and allocating the spatial and temporal distribution of human activities in marine areas to achieve ecological, economic and social objectives that have been specified through a political process. MSP is not an end in itself but a practical way to create and establish a more rational use of marine space and the interactions among its uses, to balance demands for development with the need to protect the environment, and to deliver social and economic outcomes in an open and planned way. [6]

The main elements of marine spatial planning include an interlinked system of plans, policies and regulations; the components of environmental management systems (e.g. setting objectives, initial assessment, implementation, monitoring, audit and review); and some of the many tools that are already used for land use planning. Whatever the building blocks, the essential consideration is that they need to work across sectors and give a geographic context in which to make decisions about the use of resources, development, conservation and the management of activities in the marine environment [7]

Effective marine spatial planning has essential attributes:

The IOC-UNESCO Marine Spatial Planning Programme helps countries implement ecosystem-based management by finding space for biodiversity, conservation and sustainable economic development in marine areas. IOC-UNESCO has developed several guides, including a 10-step guide on how to get a marine spatial plan started: "Step-by-step Approach for Marine Spatial Planning toward Ecosystem-based Management" [8] . IOC-UNESCO has also developed a world-wide inventory of MSP activities. [9]

In order for an MSP programme to be successful, there is an crucial need to secure inter- and intra-sectoral cooperations - cooperations between sectors with diverging objectives such as social, ecological and economical - in order to ensure equal fulfillment of all objectives sought to be achieved at sea. [10]

Evaluation of Spatially managed marine areas

To evaluate how well a marine spatial plan performs, the EU FP7 project MESMA (2009–2013) has developed a step-wise evaluation approach. This framework [11] provides guidance on the selection, mapping, and assessment of ecosystem components and human pressures. It also addresses the evaluation of management effectiveness and potential adaptations to management. Moreover, it provides advice on the use of spatially explicit tools for practical tasks like the assessment of cumulative impacts of human pressures or pressure-state relationships. Governance is directly linked to the framework through a governance analysis that can be performed in parallel and feeds into the different steps of the framework. To help managers, MESMA has developed a tools portal.

Tools

There are a number of useful and innovative tools that can help managers implement marine spatial planning. Some include:

Marine Spatial Planning in the European Union

Marine Spatial Planning within the context of the European Union is most often addressed as Maritime Spatial Planning - and thus for the sake of the section, the latter name will be used.

In the European Commission's 2002 Communications Report to the European Parliament called “Towards a Strategy to Protect and Conserve the Marine Environment”, the very first mentioning of the concept Maritime Spatial Planning appears. The report urged for a need to plan sectoral activities within the sea basins in order to measure the environmental impacts and integrate protective measures. [12] [13] These EU-wide statements could have derived inspiration from the 4th conference of Baltic Sea Ministers for Spatial Planning and Development seeking to establish a transnational spatial planning cooperation including the management of marine and coastal areas. [14] Maritime Spatial Planning officially became a central pillar to the European Commission's maritime policies with the publishing of the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) in October 2007. The following year, 2008, the European Commission introduced another marine focused document called a Roadmap for Maritime Spatial Planning: Achieving Common Principles – and in 2012 further development took place when the Commission adopted a Communication on Blue Growth: Opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth aiming to unlock the potentials of the blue economy. After more than a decade of MSP programs within the EU, it was decided to pass an EU-wide legislation on the matter in 2014, introducing the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive (2014/89/EU). [15] [16] [17] MSP is presented as a vital environmental protection instrument of the IMP, as one of the central aims are to secure Good Environmental Status (GES) which involves the conservation of clean, healthy and productive seas. [18] [19] [20]

The Maritime Spatial Planning Directive

According to the European Commission the MSP Directive serves as a framework to organize the many sectoral activities and industries taking place in the sea basins surrounding the European Union, such as fishing, aquaculture, nature conservation, shipping and renewable energy installations. The main objectives of the Directive are to reduce conflicts and increase border cooperation among member states with regards to improving efficient utilization of the sea basins, encourage investments and ensuring proper protection of the marine environment. [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

The MSP Directive introduced requirements for Member States to establish their own maritime spatial planning strategies and implement these by 2021 - especially targeting the 22 coastal Member States. [26]

In the context of the European Union, we can identify four central policy drivers for the implementation of Maritime Spatial Planning: environmental legislation, legislation for renewable energy, fisheries regulation and frameworks for cross-sectoral and integrated management. [27]

MSP in the EU’s marine renewable energy sector

As MSP merely is an instrument aiming to organize sectoral activities in sea bassins, a look into the renewable sector can give an understanding of the workings of MSP.

The European Commission highlights that the MSP Directive alongside the aims outlined in the Biodiversity Strategy is the primary legal framework for the achievement of the new marine renewable energy objectives within the European Union. [28]

As the EU is pioneering in offshore wind energy, [29] and is the world's leading actor in the development of marine renewable energy as well as possesses the world's largest installment of renewable energy sources, MSP poses a promising role for the development of marine renewable energy, as it can streamline licensing and installations, reduce conflicts among maritime users as well as increase legal security for stakeholders [30] [31]

Challenges of MSP in the case of EU’s marine renewable energy

While MSP Directive has the potential to simplify the balancing of renewable energy and protection of nature, as it allows actors to divide the sea basins into space with different usages, the MSP Directive itself does have its weaknesses and thus cannot stand alone. The MSP Directive requires all coastal states to work out maritime spatial policies by 2021, however much discretion is left with the member states. The current EU legislation on the protection of nature, species and habitats, such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and the Water Framework Directive, possess derogation clauses, however there are no obligations for member states to actually apply these and thus balance out the creation of marine energy sources and protection of nature (van Hees 2021: 28–31). It is largely recommended that the spatial choices feed into the nature preserving Directives such as the Habitats and Birds Directives and the Water Framework Directive [32]

The cumulative effects of offshore renewable energy are uncertain, as Cumulative Impact Assessments (CIA), Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) often are implemented independently, why they to a large extend fail to paint a full picture of the negative impacts. The EU's MSP is criticized in this regard because when results of these assessments proves inconclusive the MSP Directive lays down the precautionary principle however without giving specification other than member states are to take “preventative measures”. [33] The usage of EIA is further criticized due to it lack of abilities to create assessments for tidal and wave energy installments. [34] The ability to tackle the potential impacts of marine renewable energy sources such as tidal stream, wave energy and salinity gradient energy is a great concern due to uncertaint and the potential risks of sandbank erosions, underwater noise pollution from constructions, sediment starvation, industrial heat waste and physical damage to travelling species as well as aquatic environments. [35] However, evidence show that small-scale energy project has fewer prospects of grave environmental implications, [36] and main concerns lies with projets of large-scales. [37]

A central challenge to the MSP within the European Union is the lack of standardized data collection and integration across databases. Therefore, improving this area of concern could help paint a greater picture of the environmental impacts and statuses across Member States’ shared sea basins. [38]

To further develop and strengthen MSP with the European Union, it is vital to improve informed policy-making on the area of ocean management. Developing quantitative and comprehensive environmental sustainability assessment (QCESA) tools under the Sustainable Marine Ecosystem Services (SUMES) projects, allows for an integration of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) and Ecosystem Service Assessments (ESA), potentially simplifying decision-making process among policy makers, as QCESA highlight the trade-offs between various sectoral activities. [39]

MSP and marine renewable energy in EU-Member States

A majority of research conducted on MSP activities are case studies of each Member State as much discretion is left with the Member States, meaning that MSP varies a great deal across the EU. [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48]

Belgium and the Netherlands can be seen as some of the frontrunners i MSP, as they both implemented own MSP strategies before EU-wide obligations to do so. From 2002 to 2005 the Belgian GAURFE project sought to deal with the use of the North Sea, and the project defined spatial scenarios clearly visualizing possibilities for the sea territory. [49] Similarly in the Netherlands in 2005 the country's ministry on Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment published its first marine chapter in their national Spatial Planning Document, promoting efficient uses of marine spaces and drawing areas for shipping, military uses and ecologically valued areas. [50] [51] In 2013 Dutch ministries initiated a discussion on marine visions for the North Sea by 2050 involving cultivating the ecosystems whilst utilizing the waves and current to generate more renewable energy. In order to achieve such vision the North Sea 2030 Strategy was initiated. [52] The Netherlands also presents an interesting challenge that smaller coastal Member States can face, as a smaller coastal line simply means less maritime space to delegate, which results in stricter MSP policies at risk for deprioritizing conservation of marine environment in order to achieve economic goals. [53]

In 2009 France developed National Strategy for the Oceans, welcoming the emerging focus on blue economy and further elaborated on this approach in 2016 with an alteration of the national Environmental Code, officially implementing the concept of MSP. The tools for implementing MSP are given in the national document of the Sea Basin Strategies. [54] In France, MSP practices currently focus on strengthening the concept of participation as listed in art. 9 and 10 of the MSP Directive (2014/89/EU). [55]

Unlike the above-mentioned Member States, Spain has no overarching national maritime policy, however the country has set down sector-specific legislations clearly stating the management of marine spaces. Currently there are 72 areas which have undergone the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), and been classified as suitable for wind farm installations with the ability to be restricted based on the environmental impacts of the installations (Garcia et al. 2021: 2–3). Strengthening Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) in Spain could elevate the importance of maritime zones on the national agenda, as demonstrated by countries like the Netherlands and Belgium, where a unified, long-term vision has supported effective marine area planning. [56]

Marine spatial planning in the United Kingdom

The Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009 [57] defined arrangements for a new system of marine management, including the introduction of marine spatial planning, across the UK. Although the new system comprises the principles of marine spatial planning as articulated by the European Commission, it is commonly referred to in the UK simply as 'marine planning'.

Among the government's stated aims for the new marine planning system is to ensure that coastal areas, the activities within them and the problems they face are managed in an integrated and holistic way. This will require close interaction with town and country planning regimes and, in England and Wales, the new regime for nationally significant infrastructure projects (NSIPs) in key sectors, such as energy and transport.

The Marine Policy Statement

The cornerstone of the UK marine planning system is the Marine Policy Statement (MPS). [58] It sets out the sectoral/activity specific policy objectives that the UK Government, Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive are seeking to achieve in the marine area in securing the UK vision of 'clean, healthy, safe, productive and biologically diverse oceans and seas.'

The MPS is the framework for preparing Marine Plans and taking decisions that affect the marine environment in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will also set the direction for new marine licensing and other authorisation systems in each administration. It is proposed that the draft MPS, which was subject to consultation in 2010, will be formally adopted as Government policy in 2011.

The Marine Management Organisation

In England, the new arrangements provide for the creation of the Marine Management Organisation (MMO), which started work in April 2010. The MMO will deliver UK marine policy objectives for English waters through a series of statutory Marine Plans and other measures. The first Marine Plans will start to be prepared by the MMO on adoption of the MPS in 2011. The UK Government's Consultation on a marine planning system for England [59] document provides, for the benefit of the MMO and other interested parties, more detail on the scope, structure, content and process envisaged for each Marine Plan.

Marine Scotland (Scottish Government)

Marine Scotland is the government authority which will implement marine planning in Scottish waters under the Marine (Scotland) Act. [60] A pre-consultation National Marine Plan was prepared in 2011 and the final Plan was released in March 2015 [61]

Marine spatial planning in the United States

On June 12, 2009, President Obama created an Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force to provide recommendations on ocean policy, including MSP.

A graph showing the US marine spatial planning process MSPProcess.jpg
A graph showing the US marine spatial planning process

Some individual states have already undertaken MSP initiatives:

Massachusetts

The Massachusetts Ocean Act, enacted in May 2008, requires the secretary of the Massachusetts Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs to develop a comprehensive ocean management plan. The plan will be submitted to NOAA for incorporation into the existing coastal zone management plan and enforced through the state's regulatory and permitting processes, including the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) and Chapter 91, the state's waterways law.

The goal is to institute a comprehensive approach to ocean resource management that supports ecosystem health and economic vitality, balances current ocean uses, and considers future needs. This will be accomplished by determining where specific ocean uses will be permitted and which ocean uses are compatible.

Rhode Island

The Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, or Ocean SAMP, serves as a federally recognized coastal management and regulatory tool. It was adopted by the Coastal Resource Management Council (CRMC),the state's coastal management agency on October 19, 2010. The Ocean SAMP was then adopted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) on May 11, 2011. Using the best available science, the Ocean SAMP provides a balanced approach to the development and protection of Rhode Island's ocean-based resources.

Research projects undertaken by University of Rhode Island (URI) scientists provide the essential scientific basis for Ocean SAMP policy development. The Ocean SAMP document underwent an extensive public review process prior to adoption. [62]

California

In 1999, the California state legislature adopted the Marine Life Protection Act. This action required the state to evaluate and possibly redesign all existing state marine protected areas and to potentially create new protected areas that could, to the greatest degree possible, act as a networked system. (Marine protected area designations in California include state marine reserves, marine parks, and marine conservation areas.) This effort does not meet the full definition of marine spatial planning since its goal was to cite only protected areas, rather than all potential ocean uses, but many of its elements (such as stakeholder involvement and mapping approaches) will be of interest to marine spatial planners.

Oregon

Two controversial ocean issues led to a marine spatial planning effort: concern by fishermen over the designation of marine reserves off the Oregon coast, and proposals by industry to site wave energy facilities in Oregon ocean waters.

An executive order directed the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development to work with stakeholders and scientists to prepare a plan for ocean energy development (also known as wave energy). This plan was then to be adopted as part of the Oregon Territorial Sea Plan.

The state has appointed an advisory committee and expects to adopt the plan in early 2010. It will include mandatory policies for state and federal agency decisions with regard to locating ocean energy facilities in the Oregon Territorial Sea.

Washington

In March 2010, the Washington State Legislature enacted the Marine Waters Planning and Management Act to address resource use conflicts. A report to the legislature providing guidance and recommendations for moving forward was produced in 2011, and based on the 2012 report, the legislature authorized funds to begin the MSP process off Washington's coast.

A state law required an interagency team to provide recommendations to the Washington State Legislature about how to effectively use Marine Spatial Planning and integrate MSP into existing state management plans and authorities. The team is chaired by the Governor's office and coordinated by the Department of Ecology. Other members include the Washington Department of Natural Resources, Washington Sea Grant, the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maria Damanaki</span> Greek politician

Maria Damanaki is a Greek politician. She is a former president of the Synaspismos party of the left and former state member of the Hellenic Parliament within the Panhellenic Socialist Movement (PASOK). She served as the Global Managing Director for Oceans at The Nature Conservancy. In this capacity leads a global team focused on how the world manages its oceans, including sustainable fisheries management, large-scale protection and restoration of coral reefs and other ecosystems, coastal resilience, and mapping and quantification of the full value of the world's oceans to people.

Integrated coastal zone management (ICZM), integrated coastal management (ICM), or integrated coastal planning is a coastal management process for the management of the coast using an integrated approach, regarding all aspects of the coastal zone, including geographical and political boundaries, in an attempt to achieve sustainability. This concept was born in 1992 during the Earth Summit of Rio de Janeiro. The specifics regarding ICZM is set out in the proceedings of the summit within Agenda 21, Chapter 17.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sustainable habitat</span>

A Sustainable habitat is an ecosystem that produces food and shelter for people and other organisms, without resource depletion and in such a way that no external waste is produced. Thus the habitat can continue into the future tie without external infusions of resources. Such a sustainable habitat may evolve naturally or be produced under the influence of man. A sustainable habitat that is created and designed by human intelligence will mimic nature, if it is to be successful. Everything within it is connected to a complex array of organisms, physical resources, and functions. Organisms from many different biomes can be brought together to fulfill various ecological niches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HELCOM</span>

The Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission is an intergovernmental organization governing the Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area. A regional sea convention and a platform for environmental policy making at the regional level, HELCOM works for the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea. HELCOM consists of ten members – the nine Baltic Sea countries Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Russia and Sweden, plus the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Water Framework Directive</span> Directive

The Water Framework Directive (WFD)2000/60/EC is an EU directive to establish a framework for the protection of all water bodies (including marine waters up to one nautical mile from shore) by 2015. The WFD establishes a programme and timetable for Member States to set up River Basin Management Plans by 2009.

The Joint Ocean Commission Initiative is a bipartisan, collaborative group in the United States that aims to "accelerate the pace of change that results in meaningful ocean policy reform." The Joint Initiative was established by the members of two major U.S.-based oceans commissions: the Pew Oceans Commission and the United States Commission on Ocean Policy. It was originally co-chaired by former White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta and former Chief of Naval Operations Admiral James D. Watkins, chairs of the Pew and U.S. Ocean Commissions, respectively. Currently, the Joint Initiative is led by a Leadership Council, which is co-chaired by Christine Todd Whitman, former EPA Administrator under President George W. Bush and former governor of New Jersey, and Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Commerce under President Bill Clinton and Secretary of Transportation under President George W. Bush.

Ecosystem-based management is an environmental management approach that recognizes the full array of interactions within an ecosystem, including humans, rather than considering single issues, species, or ecosystem services in isolation. It can be applied to studies in the terrestrial and aquatic environments with challenges being attributed to both. In the marine realm, they are highly challenging to quantify due to highly migratory species as well as rapidly changing environmental and anthropogenic factors that can alter the habitat rather quickly. To be able to manage fisheries efficiently and effectively it has become increasingly more pertinent to understand not only the biological aspects of the species being studied, but also the environmental variables they are experiencing. Population abundance and structure, life history traits, competition with other species, where the stock is in the local food web, tidal fluctuations, salinity patterns and anthropogenic influences are among the variables that must be taken into account to fully understand the implementation of a "ecosystem-based management" approach. Interest in ecosystem-based management in the marine realm has developed more recently, in response to increasing recognition of the declining state of fisheries and ocean ecosystems. However, due to a lack of a clear definition and the diversity involved with the environment, the implementation has been lagging. In freshwater lake ecosystems, it has been shown that ecosystem-based habitat management is more effective for enhancing fish populations than management alternatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of shipping</span> Ocean pollution

The environmental impact of shipping include air pollution, water pollution, acoustic, and oil pollution. Ships are responsible for more than 18% of nitrogen oxides pollution, and 3% of greenhouse gas emissions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seas west of Scotland</span>

It is a central tenet of the EU maritime policy that all seas have a particular nature, defined by their geography, their ecology, their economies and their people. Most seas are nested and do not, except for specific purposes such as hydrography or fisheries management, have sharp, recognised boundaries. One important sea for purposes of fisheries management is referred to as the "seas West of Scotland". In line with the EU maritime policy, the sea does not only encompass the waters but also the people and economy of the areas bordering that sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine Management Organisation</span> UK non-departmental public body

The Marine Management Organisation (MMO) is an executive non-departmental public body in the United Kingdom established under the Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009, with responsibility for English waters. The MMO exists to make a significant contribution to sustainable development in the marine area, and to promote the UK government's vision for clean, healthy, safe, productive and biologically diverse oceans and seas. The MMO aims to focus all of its activities and resources to meet its mission of enabling sustainable growth in the UK's marine area through 5 strategic outcomes:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LIFE programme</span>

The LIFE programme is the European Union's funding instrument for the environment and climate action. The general objective of LIFE is to contribute to the implementation, updating and development of EU environmental and climate policy and legislation by co-financing projects with European added value. LIFE began in 1992 and to date there have been five phases of the programme. During this period, LIFE has co-financed some 4600 projects across the EU, with a total contribution of approximately 6.5 billion Euros to the protection of the environment and of climate. For the next phase of the programme (2021–2027) the European Commission proposed to raise the budget to 5.45 billion Euro.

The Danish Maritime Authority is the agency of the Danish Government responsible for regulating and administrating Danish maritime affairs. The Danish Maritime Authority (DMA) is part of the Ministry of Industry, Business, and Financial Affairs. The Agency consists of the central authority and eight vision offices, including the office in Nuuk and the Centre for Maritime Health on Fanø. Its headquarters are in Korsør.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental policy of the European Union</span> Environment protection policy

The European Union (EU) Environmental Policy was initiated in 1973 with the "Environmental Action Programme" at which point the Environmental Unit was formed. The policy has thereafter evolved "to cover a vast landscape of different topics enacted over many decades" (Reuters) and in 2015 the Institute for European Environmental Policy estimated that "the body of EU environmental law" amounted to 500+ directives, regulations and decisions.

"Over the past decades the European Union has put in place a broad range of environmental legislation. As a result, air, water and soil pollution has significantly been reduced. Chemicals legislation has been modernised and the use of many toxic or hazardous substances has been restricted. Today, EU citizens enjoy some of the best water quality in the world"

The Waitt Institute is a non-profit that partners with committed governments and local communities to create and implement sustainable ocean plans to benefit people, the economy, and the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine Strategy Framework Directive</span>

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive is a European Directive aimed at achieving or maintaining Good Environmental Status (GES) in European marine regions and sub-regions by the year 2020 at the latest for 11 descriptors. These descriptors include: D1 Biodiversity, D2 Non-indigenous species, D3 Commercial fish and shellfish, D4 Food webs, D5 Eutrophication, D6 Seafloor integrity, D7 Hydrographic conditions, D8 Environmental contaminants, D9 Contaminants in seafood, D10 Marine Litter, and D11 Introduction of energy, including noise.

Strategic environmental assessment (SEA) is a systematic decision support process aiming to ensure that environmental and possibly other sustainability aspects are considered effectively in policy, plan, and program making. In this context, following Fischer (2007) SEA may be seen as:

Cumulative effects, also referred to as cumulative environmental effects and cumulative impacts, can be defined as changes to the environment caused by the combined impact of past, present and future human activities and natural processes. Cumulative effects to the environment are the result of multiple activities whose individual direct impacts may be relatively minor but in combination with others result are significant environmental effects. The multiple impacts of different activities may have an additive, synergistic or antagonistic effect on one another and with natural processes. Cumulative effects can be difficult to predict and manage due to inadequate environmental baseline data, complex ecological processes, and the large scale at which human development occurs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blue economy</span> Economy based on exploitation and preservation of the marine environment

Blue economy is a term in economics relating to the exploitation, preservation and regeneration of the marine environment. Its scope of interpretation varies among organizations. However, the term is generally used in the scope of international development when describing a sustainable development approach to coastal resources and ocean development. This can include a wide range of economic sectors, from the more conventional fisheries, aquaculture, maritime transport, coastal, marine and maritime tourism, or other traditional uses, to more emergent activities such as coastal renewable energy, marine ecosystem services, seabed mining, and bioprospecting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic pollution in the Mediterranean sea</span>

The Mediterranean Sea has been defined as one of the seas most affected by marine plastic pollution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Danish Marine Strategy</span> Contemporary Danish Marine Strategy

Denmark consists of the northern part of the Jutland peninsula and an archipelago of 406 islands bordering both the Baltic Sea and North Sea, and has substantial maritime influence. This prominence is attributed to its expansive coastline, which is the 17th longest in the world, alongside a sizeable Exclusive Economic Zone and role as an Arctic power. Denmark is also home to Mærsk, the world's second largest shipping company and Ørsted, an industry leader in offshore wind, and ranks as the fifth largest seafaring nation in the world[When?].

References

  1. ↑ Kyriazi, Z.; de Almeida, L.R.; Marhadour, A.; Kelly, C.; Flannery, W.; Murillas-Maza, A.; Kalaydjian, R.; Farrell, D.; Carr, L.M.; Norton, D.; Hynes, S. (2023). "Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area". Sustainability. 15: 1–17.
  2. ↑ Qiu, W.; Jones, P.J.S. (2013). "The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe". Marine Policy. 39: 182–190.
  3. ↑ European Union (2014). "Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning" . Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  4. ↑ Harris, P.T.; Heap, A.D.; Whiteway, T.; Post, A.L. (2008). "Application of biophysical information to support Australia's representative marine protected area program". Ocean and Coastal Management. 51 (10): 701–11. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2008.07.007.
  5. ↑ Baker, E.K.; Harris, P.T. (2012). "Habitat Mapping and Marine Management". In Harris, P.T.; Baker, E.K. (eds.). Seafloor Geomorphology as Benthic Habitat: GeoHab Atlas of seafloor geomorphic features and benthic habitats. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 23–38.
  6. ↑ "IOC-UNESCO Marine Spatial Planning Programme". www.ioc.unesco.org/.
  7. ↑ Joint Marine Programme Marine Update 55, 2007[ full citation needed ]
  8. ↑ Ehler, Charles; Douvere, Fanny (2009). Marine spatial planning: a step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management (PDF). UNESCO IOC.
  9. ↑ "IOC-UNESCO Marine Spatial Planning Programme". msp.ioc-unesco.org.
  10. ↑ Kyriazi, Z.; de Almeida, L.R.; Marhadour, A.; Kelly, C.; Flannery, W.; Murillas-Maza, A.; Kalaydjian, R.; Farrell, D.; Carr, L.M.; Norton, D.; Hynes, S. (2023). "Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area". Sustainability. 15: 1–17.
  11. ↑ Stelzenmüller, Vanessa; Breen, Patricia; Stamford, Tammy; Thomsen, Frank; Badalamenti, Fabio; Borja, Ángel; Buhl-Mortensen, Lene; Carlstöm, Julia; d'Anna, Giovanni; Dankers, Norbert; Degraer, Steven; Dujin, Mike; Fiorentino, Fabio; Galparsoro, Ibon; Giakoumi, Sylvaine; Gristina, Michele; Johnson, Kate; Jones, Peter J.S.; Katsanevakis, Stelios; Knittweis, Leyla; Kyriazi, Zacharoula; Pipitone, Carlo; Piwowarczyk, Joanna; Rabaut, Marijn; Sørensen, Thomas K.; Van Dalfsen, Jan; Vassilopoulou, Vassiliki; Vega Fernández, Tomás; Vincx, Magda; et al. (2013). "Monitoring and evaluation of spatially managed areas: A generic framework for implementation of ecosystem based marine management and its application". Marine Policy. 37: 149–64. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.012.
  12. ↑ European Commission (2002). "Towards a strategy to protect the marine environment". Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 2 October 2002. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  13. ↑ Ehler, C.N. (2021). "Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 132: 1–16.
  14. ↑ Ehler, C.N. (2021). "Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 132: 1–16.
  15. ↑ European Union (2014). "Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning" . Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  16. ↑ Ehler, C.N. (2021). "Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 132: 1–16.
  17. ↑ Ramos, V.; Giannini, G.; Calheiros-Cabral, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F. (2021). "Legal framework of marine renewable energy: A review for the Atlantic region of Europe". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 137: 1–18.
  18. ↑ Maier, Nina; Markus, Till (2013). "Dividing the common pond: Regionalizing EU ocean governance". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 67: 66–74.
  19. ↑ Ramos, V.; Giannini, G.; Calheiros-Cabral, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F. (2021). "Legal framework of marine renewable energy: A review for the Atlantic region of Europe". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 137: 1–18.
  20. ↑ Christie, N.; Smyth, K.; Barnes, R.; Elliot, M. (2014). "Co-location of activities and designations: A means of solving or creating problems in marine spatial planning?". Marine Policy. 43: 254–261.
  21. ↑ European Commission (2024). "Maritime Spatial Planning". Ocean and Fisheries. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  22. ↑ Qiu, W.; Jones, P.J.S. (2013). "The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe". Marine Policy. 39: 182–190.
  23. ↑ Kyriazi, Z.; de Almeida, L.R.; Marhadour, A.; Kelly, C.; Flannery, W.; Murillas-Maza, A.; Kalaydjian, R.; Farrell, D.; Carr, L.M.; Norton, D.; Hynes, S. (2023). "Conceptualising Marine Biodiversity Mainstreaming as an Enabler of Regional Sustainable Blue Growth: The Case of the European Atlantic Area". Sustainability. 15: 1–17.
  24. ↑ Ramos, V.; Giannini, G.; Calheiros-Cabral, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F. (2021). "Legal framework of marine renewable energy: A review for the Atlantic region of Europe". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 137: 1–18.
  25. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  26. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  27. ↑ Qiu, W.; Jones, P.J.S. (2013). "The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe". Marine Policy. 39: 182–190.
  28. ↑ European Commission (2024). "Marine Renewable Energy". Oceans & Fisheries. Retrieved 2025-01-01.
  29. ↑ Declerk, M.; Trifonova, N.; Hartley, J.; Scott, B.E. (2023). "Cumulative effects of offshore renewables: From pragmatic policies to holistic marine spatial planning tools". Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 101: 1–13.
  30. ↑ Ramos, V.; Giannini, G.; Calheiros-Cabral, T.; Rosa-Santos, P.; Taveira-Pinto, F. (2021). "Legal framework of marine renewable energy: A review for the Atlantic region of Europe". Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 137: 1–18.
  31. ↑ Maier, Nina; Markus, Till (2013). "Dividing the common pond: Regionalizing EU ocean governance". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 67: 66–74.
  32. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  33. ↑ Declerk, M.; Trifonova, N.; Hartley, J.; Scott, B.E. (2023). "Cumulative effects of offshore renewables: From pragmatic policies to holistic marine spatial planning tools". Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 101: 1–13.
  34. ↑ Apolonia, M.; Fofack-Garcia, R.; Noble, D.R.; Hodges, J.; Correia da Fonseca, F.X. (2021). "Legal and Political Barriers and Enablers to the Deployment of Marine Renewable Energy". Energies. 14 (4896): 1–23.
  35. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  36. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  37. ↑ Lloret, J.; Turiel, A.; Solé, J.; Berdalet, E.; Sabatés, A.; Olivares, A.; Gili, J.M.; Vila-Subirós, J.; Sardá, R. (2022). "Unravelling the ecological impacts of large-scale offshore wind farms in the Mediterranean Sea". Science of the Total Environment. 824: 1–12.
  38. ↑ Declerk, M.; Trifonova, N.; Hartley, J.; Scott, B.E. (2023). "Cumulative effects of offshore renewables: From pragmatic policies to holistic marine spatial planning tools". Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 101: 1–13.
  39. ↑ Pena, L. V. D. L.; Dewulf, J.; Staes, J.; Moulaert, I.; Vandamme, S.; Heymans, J.J.; Taleman, S.E. (2024). "Assessing the sustainability of Blue Economy activities using an ecosystem and life cycle-based approach: Possibilities, challenges and implications for an informed policy making". Ocean and Coastal Management. 257: 1–12.
  40. ↑ Tissière, L.; Trouillet, B. (2022). "What Participation Means in Marine Spatial Planning Systems? Lessons from the French Case". Planning Practice & Research. 37 (3): 355–376.
  41. ↑ Guerreiro, José (2021). "The Blue Growth Challenge to Maritime Governance". Frontiers in Marine Science. 8: 1–16.
  42. ↑ Apolonia, M.; Fofack-Garcia, R.; Noble, D.R.; Hodges, J.; Correia da Fonseca, F.X. (2021). "Legal and Political Barriers and Enablers to the Deployment of Marine Renewable Energy". Energies. 14 (4896): 1–23.
  43. ↑ Salvador, S.; Gimeno, L.; Larruga, F.J.S. (2019). "The influence of maritime spatial planning on the development of marine renewable energies in Portugal and Spain: Legal challenges and opportunities". Energy Policy. 128: 316–328.
  44. ↑ Mohammed, K.S.; Nassani, A.A.; Sarkodie, S.A. (2024). "Assessing the effect of the aquaculture industry, renewable energy, blue R&D, and maritime transport on GHG emissions in Ireland and Norway". Aquaculture. 586: 1–14.
  45. ↑ Garcia, P.Q.; Sanabria, J.G.; Ruiz, J.A.C. (2021). "Marine renewable energy and maritime spatial planning in Spain: Main challenges and recommendations". Marine Policy. 127: 1–13.
  46. ↑ De Vrees, L. (2021). "Adaptive marine spatial planning in the Netherlands sector of the North Sea". Marine Policy. 132: 1–9.
  47. ↑ Douvere, F.; Maes, F.; Vanhulle, A.; Schrijvers, J. (2007). "The role of marine spatial planning in sea use management: The Belgian case". Marine Policy. 31: 182–191.
  48. ↑ Spenger, C.; Gonzatti, I.S.; Kröger, L.; Fleet, C.R.; Voss, R.; Rickels, W. (2024). "Strong versus weak sustainable development in the blue economy: a study of 15 EU coastal countries". Ocean Sustainability. 3 (48): 1–10.
  49. ↑ Ehler, C.N. (2021). "Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 132: 1–16.
  50. ↑ Ehler, C.N. (2021). "Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 132: 1–16.
  51. ↑ De Vrees, L. (2021). "Adaptive marine spatial planning in the Netherlands sector of the North Sea". Marine Policy. 132: 1–9.
  52. ↑ De Vrees, L. (2021). "Adaptive marine spatial planning in the Netherlands sector of the North Sea". Marine Policy. 132: 1–9.
  53. ↑ Van Hees, S. (2019). "Increased integration between innovative ocean energy and the EU habitats, species and water protection rules through Maritime Spatial Planning". Marine Policy. 100: 28–42.
  54. ↑ Guerreiro, José (2021). "The Blue Growth Challenge to Maritime Governance". Frontiers in Marine Science. 8: 1–16.
  55. ↑ Tissière, L.; Trouillet, B. (2022). "What Participation Means in Marine Spatial Planning Systems? Lessons from the French Case". Planning Practice & Research. 37 (3): 355–376.
  56. ↑ Garcia, P.Q.; Sanabria, J.G.; Ruiz, J.A.C. (2021). "Marine renewable energy and maritime spatial planning in Spain: Main challenges and recommendations". Marine Policy. 127: 1–13.
  57. ↑ "Marine and Coastal Access Act 2009" (PDF).[ full citation needed ]
  58. ↑ "UK Marine Policy Statement: A draft for consultation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-10-11. Retrieved 2010-09-20.[ full citation needed ]
  59. ↑ "Consultation on a marine planning system for England" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-10-11. Retrieved 2010-09-20.[ full citation needed ]
  60. ↑ "Scottish Government - Marine Planning". Scottish Government. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  61. ↑ "Scottish Government - Scotland's National Marine Plan". Scottish Government. Retrieved 20 July 2016.
  62. ↑ "Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan".

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.