Marital rape immunity in Singapore

Last updated

Marital rape generally refers to non-consensual sexual intercourse between married spouses. In Singapore, there used to be a partial immunity for marital rape first introduced during British colonial rule because it was deemed not a criminal offence except when the wife is below 13 years of age or when any of the specific circumstances provided under section 375(4) of the Singapore Penal Code are satisfied. [1] Since 1 January 2020, the law was repealed and its immunity lifted under the Criminal Law Reform Act 2019, criminalising marital rape.

Contents

Marital rape has been identified by the United Nations General Assembly to be a form of violence against women in the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women (DEVAW). [2] The DEVAW is said to complement and strengthen the implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), which Singapore ratified on 5 October 1995. [3]

Marital rape immunity under Singapore law

Origins of the immunity

The marital rape immunity under Singapore law is believed to have originated from an extrajudicial remark by English jurist Sir Matthew Hale in “The History of the Pleas of the Crown”, where he stated that a husband cannot be guilty of marital rape against his wife because the latter had irrevocably consented to sexual relations during the marriage. [4] This principle of irrevocable consent was later cited in several English cases as justification for immunity against marital rape. [5] The immunity was eventually imported into Singapore law as part of the English common law by the application of English Law Act 1993. [6]

Legislative reform in 2007

The marital rape immunity was the subject of legislative amendments in the Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2007. [7] Prior to the amendments, section 375(e) provided blanket immunity to husbands who had non-consensual sexual intercourse with their wives as long as the latter was not below 13 years of age. [8] The proposed amendment to section 375(e) did not seek to abolish the immunity altogether but, instead, sought to introduce exceptions to the immunity such that it would be lifted when there is some evidence of breakdown in the marriage concerned, [9] such as when:

Introducing the proposed amendments at the Second Reading debate of the Penal Code (Amendment) Bill 2007, then Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Assoc. Prof Ho Peng Kee described the proposed section 375(4) as a “calibrated approach” that balances the “needs of women who require protection, general concerns about conjugal rights and the expression of intimacy in a marriage”. [15] To this end, total abolition of the immunity was precluded as the Ministry was concerned that such a radical step would “change the whole complexion of marriage” in the Singaporean society. [16]

Whilst the Members of Parliament (MPs) were unequivocal in their condemnation of marital rape in principle, reactions to the extent of the proposed amendments were mixed. On the one hand, MP Dr Teo Ho Pin supported the Ministry's calibrated approach, recognising the difficulties inherent in determining lack of consent in sexual relations between married spouses. [17] It was suggested that women in strained marriages should express their non-consent by taking out legal proceedings, as outlined in the proposed section 375(4), from which the intention of non-consent for sexual intercourse with their husbands may be more clearly inferred. [18]

On the other hand, several MPs spoke in support of the total abolition of the marital rape immunity. [19] MP Ellen Lee questioned the lack of safeguards in cases where the wife has not yet commenced the legal processes required to lift the immunity or is unable to do so because of financial or emotional reasons. [20] MP Ho Geok Choo criticised the proposed amendments as being insufficient to protect women who are “most dependent on their husbands as well as those who will have the least access to legal counsel”. [21] Several MPs also expressed concern at the presumption of the wife's consent to have sexual intercourse in the proposed section 375(4), suggesting that there should not be a difference drawn between rape occurring within the context of a marriage and outside of one. [22]

Eventually, the Bill was passed without modification and came into force on 1 January 2008.

Calls for total abolition

Since the 2007 legislative amendments, there have been ongoing calls for the total abolition of the marital rape immunity both domestically and internationally. In 2009, a Singapore-based online petition "No to Rape" [23] was set up to specifically campaign for the total abolition of the immunity. A total of 3,618 individuals signed the petition to the Prime Minister of Singapore for the repeal of section 375(4). [24]

In the international arena, the Canadian delegation recommended the introduction of legislation to criminalise marital rape in all circumstances during Singapore's Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2011. It was noted that this recommendation did not enjoy the support of the Singapore Government. [25] In the Stakeholder's Report to the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review, a joint submission by several non-governmental organisations [26] also called for the partial immunity for marital rape to be repealed. [27]

At Singapore's UPR in 2016, the need for the abolition of the marital rape immunity was reiterated. [28] In response, Ambassador-at-Large Chan Heng Chee noted that Singapore “would actively review the need to repeal the marital rape immunity”. [29] While no definitive answer has been given to the question of whether or when the marital rape immunity will be repealed, [30] some believe that Singapore's response at the 2016 UPR indicates that the abolition of the marital rape immunity is forthcoming. [31] In April 2017, then Minister of Social and Family Development, Mr Tan Chuan-Jin confirmed in Parliament that review of the marital rape immunity is underway. [32] To this end, he expressed the view that “married women should have the same access to protection as unmarried women” and “although married persons have conjugal rights over each other, such rights should be exercised within reasonable behaviour”. [33]

Law repealed and immunity lifted

The Criminal Law Reform Act 2019 was passed on 6 May 2019, which includes repealing marital rape immunity. [34] The new laws came into force on 1 January 2020. [35]

Singapore’s obligations under CEDAW

Marital rape, and by extension legal immunities to marital rape, are contrary to human rights as a recognised form of violence against women in the DEVAW. [36] Article 2 of the CEDAW, which Singapore has ratified, ‘condemns discrimination against woman in all its forms’. [37] Further, Article 16 of the CEDAW requires state parties “to eliminate discrimination against woman in all matters relating to marriage and family relations” to ensure equality between men and women. [38] The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW Committee) in their General Recommendation 19 has also identified family violence, including marital rape, as a form of discrimination under Article 16. [39] It has also been suggested that the non-criminalisation of marital rape amounts to discriminatory treatment in two ways – first, by discriminating between violence directed at women specifically from other types of violence, and, second, by discriminating between violence inflicted in the private sphere and public sphere. [40]

Singapore has made reservations to a number of provisions in the CEDAW, including Article 2 paragraphs (a) to (f), and Article 16 paragraphs 1(a), (c), (h) and (2). [41] Noting this at Singapore's fourth periodic report to the CEDAW Committee in 2011, the Committee called for the State to withdraw these reservations which “are impermissible, since those articles are fundamental to the implementation” of the Convention. [42]

Furthermore, the Committee also highlighted the limited effectiveness of section 375(4) in safeguarding women against domestic and sexual violence given that the immunity is only lifted in specific circumstances – that the perpetrator and the victim are living apart and are in the midst of terminating their marriage or that the victim has applied for a protective order against the perpetrator. [43] Hence, the Committee urged for the criminalisation of marital rape and for the definition of rape to cover every non-consensual sexual act. [44]

Related Research Articles

Marital rape or spousal rape is the act of sexual intercourse with one's spouse without the spouse's consent. The lack of consent is the essential element and need not involve physical violence. Marital rape is considered a form of domestic violence and sexual abuse. Although, historically, sexual intercourse within marriage was regarded as a right of spouses, engaging in the act without the spouse's consent is now widely classified as rape by many societies around the world, and increasingly criminalized. However it is repudiated by some more conservative cultures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women</span> International bill of rights for women

The Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is an international treaty adopted in 1979 by the United Nations General Assembly. Described as an international bill of rights for women, it was instituted on 3 September 1981 and has been ratified by 189 states. Over fifty countries that have ratified the convention have done so subject to certain declarations, reservations, and objections, including 38 countries who rejected the enforcement article 29, which addresses means of settlement for disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the convention. Australia's declaration noted the limitations on central government power resulting from its federal constitutional system. The United States and Palau have signed, but not ratified the treaty. The Holy See, Iran, Somalia, Sudan, and Tonga are not signatories to CEDAW.

The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (OP-CEDAW) is an international treaty which establishes complaint and inquiry mechanisms for the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). Parties to the Protocol allow the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women to hear complaints from individuals or inquire into "grave or systematic violations" of the convention. The Protocol has led to a number of decisions against member states on issues such as domestic violence, parental leave and forced sterilization, as well as an investigation into the systematic killing of women in the Mexican city of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Yemen</span> Overview of the status of women in Yemen

Women in Yemen have historically been placed at a disadvantage due to their gender, with a highly patriarchal society. Although the government of Yemen has made efforts that will improve the rights of women in Yemen, many cultural and religious norms, along with poor enforcement of this legislation from the Yemeni government, have prevented Yemeni women from having equal rights to men.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Women in Malaysia</span> Overview of the status of women in Malaysia

Women in Malaysia receive support from the Malaysian government concerning their rights to advance, to make decisions, to health, education and social welfare, and to the removal of legal obstacles. The Malaysian government has ensured these factors through the establishment of Ministry of National Unity and Social Development in 1997. This was followed by the formation of the Women's Affairs Ministry in 2001 to recognise the roles and contributions of Malaysian women.

Tonga is a constitutional monarchy with a population of approximately 130,000. Politics and the economy are dominated by the king, the nobility, and a few prominent commoners. Economic, social and cultural rights are generally well respected. There are, however, a number of issues concerning protection of civil and political rights, particularly freedom of expression, and rights to political participation. Violence against women is a serious issue.

Samoa, officially the Independent State of Samoa, has a population of approximately 188,000 people. Samoa gained independence from New Zealand in 1962 and has a Westminster model of Parliamentary democracy which incorporates aspects of traditional practices. In 2016, Samoa ratified the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities CRPD and the three optional protocols to the CRC

Tuvalu is a small island nation in the South Pacific, located North of Fiji and North West of Samoa. The population at the 2012 census was 10,837. Tuvalu has a written constitution which includes a statement of rights influenced by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights. While most human rights in Tuvalu are respected, areas of concern include women’s rights and freedom of belief, as well as diminishing access to human rights in the face of global warming. The latter has played a major role in the implementation of human rights actions in Tuvalu given its geographical vulnerability and scarce resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gender inequality in El Salvador</span>

Gender inequality can be found in various areas of Salvadoran life such as employment, health, education, political participation, and family life. Although women in El Salvador enjoy equal protection under the law, they are often at a disadvantage relative to their male counterparts. In the area of politics, women have the same rights as men, but the percentage of women in office compared to men is low. Though much progress has been made since the Salvadoran Civil War ended in 1992, women in El Salvador still face gender inequality.

The Republic of Uruguay is located in South America, between Argentina, Brazil and the South Atlantic Ocean, with a population of 3,332,972. Uruguay gained independence and sovereignty from Spain in 1828 and has full control over its internal and external affairs. From 1973 to 1985 Uruguay was governed by a civil-military dictatorship which committed numerous human rights abuses.

Domestic violence in Lithuania is a pervasive social problem.

Violence against women in Cambodia is a serious issue. Cambodia has had a history of violence against women especially due to its past conflicts. During the Pol Pot regime, women were exposed to several different violent acts against them such as forced marriages and rape by the Khmer Rouge officials in Cambodia and refugee camps in Thailand. Presently, there is still a number of different forms of exploitation and discrimination against women in Cambodia such as rape, domestic violence, and human trafficking as the country is recovering from the history of conflict.

Violence against women in New Zealand is described as the kinds of violence disproportionately affecting women compared to men, due to factors of ongoing gender inequality in society. The New Zealand government and justice system view efforts to prevent and deal with violence against women as a priority of New Zealand legislation and the criminal justice system.

A marry-your-rapist law, marry-the-rapist law, or rape-marriage law is a rule of rape law in a jurisdiction under which a man who commits rape, sexual assault, statutory rape, abduction or other similar act is exonerated if he marries his female victim, or in some jurisdictions at least offers to marry her. The "marry-your-rapist" law is a legal way for the accused to avoid prosecution or punishment.

Forced marriage is the marriage of one person to another person without the consent of one or both of the parties. It is to be distinguished from an arranged marriage, where the parties do not select their partners but there is free choice to accept or decline the marriage. Forced marriage is widely recognised as a human rights abuse, with some commentators considering it a form of slavery.

Examples of Gender inequality Papua New Guinea includes poverty, violence, limited access to education and health care, and witch hunts. Cases of violence against women in PNG are under reported. There is also a lack of services for women who experience violence. There are reports of sexual abuse by police officers, on arrest and whilst in police custody. These incidents lack documentation or investigation, consequently, perpetrators are rarely prosecuted or punished. The government of Papua New Guinea (PNG) has introduced legislation to combat these issues, though with limited success.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marital rape laws by country</span>

This article provides an overview of marital rape laws by country.

Chbab Srey is a Cambodian code of conduct for women. Written in the form of a poem, it is a pendant to Chbab Pros which applies for men. Chbab Srey details a mother's advice to her recently married daughter. The mother, as narrator, advises her daughter to maintain peace within the home, walk and talk softly, and obey and respect her husband. It has been at the center of debate and controversy in recent years in Cambodia.

Sexual consent plays an important role in laws regarding rape, sexual assault and other forms of sexual violence. In a court of law, whether or not the alleged victim had freely given consent, and whether or not they were deemed to be capable of giving consent, can determine whether the alleged perpetrator is guilty of rape, sexual assault or some other form of sexual misconduct.

References

  1. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4).
  2. ↑ Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women GA Res 48/104, A/Res/48/104 (1994) at Article 2(a).
  3. ↑ United Nations Treaty Collection website (accessed 26 August 2017).
  4. ↑ 1 Hale, Pleas of the Crown, at p. 629.
  5. ↑ R v Clarence (1888) 22 QBD 23; R v Clarke [1949] 2 All ER 448
  6. ↑ Application of English Law Act (Cap 7A, 1994 Rev Ed) s 3.
  7. ↑ Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2007 (No. 51 of 2007) (Singapore).
  8. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 1985 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(e). See also Chan Wing Cheong, “Penal Code (Amendment) Act 2007: Rape within marriage” [2009] Sing JLS 257-271 at 257.
  9. ↑ UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Singapore, 11 July 2011, A/HRC/18/11 at [49]. See also Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (4 February 2013) vol 90 (S Iswaran, Second Minister for Home Affairs).
  10. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4)(a).
  11. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4)(b).
  12. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4)(c).
  13. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4)(d).
  14. ↑ Penal Code (Cap 224, 2008 Rev Ed) (Singapore) s 375(4)(e).
  15. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Ho Peng Kee, Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs).
  16. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Eunice Elizabeth Olsen, Nominated Member).
  17. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Teo Ho Pin, Bukit Panjang).
  18. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Teo Ho Pin, Bukit Panjang).
  19. ↑ See generally the speeches of Members of Parliament Eunice Elizabeth Olsen, Siew Kum Hong, Ho Geok Choo, Charles Chong.
  20. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (23 October 2007) vol 83 (Ellen Lee, Sembawang).
  21. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (23 October 2007) vol 83 (Ho Geok Choo, West Coast GRC).
  22. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Siew Kum Hong, Nominated Member); Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (22 October 2007) vol 83 (Indranee Rajah, Tanjong Pagar).
  23. ↑ "NoToRape" . Retrieved 2019-07-30.
  24. ↑ Petition submitted by No to Rape (accessed 26 August 2017).
  25. ↑ UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Singapore, 11 July 2011, A/HRC/18/11 at [97.13].
  26. ↑ The non-governmental organisations were the Association of Women for Action and Research, Challenged People's Alliance and Network (CAN!), Deaf and Hard of Hearing Federation, Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics, MARUAH (Working Group for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism, Singapore), People Like Us; Singaporeans for Democracy, and Transient Workers Count Too.
  27. ↑ UN Human Rights Council, Summary prepared by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in accordance with paragraph 15(c) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1: Singapore, 21 February 2011, A/HRC/WG.6/11/SGP/3 at [17].
  28. ↑ UN Human Rights Council, Compilation prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in accordance with paragraph 15(b) of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 and paragraph 5 of the annex to Council resolution 16/21: Singapore, 20 November 2015, A/HRC/WG.6/24/SGP/2 at [16]; UN Human Rights Council, Addendum to the Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Singapore, 13 June 2016, A/HRC/32/17/Add.1 at [17].
  29. ↑ UN Human Rights Council, Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review: Singapore, 15 April 2016, A/HRC/32/17 at [163].
  30. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (15 August 2016) vol 94 (Louis Ng Kok Kwang, Nee Soon GRC).
  31. ↑ Melissa Zhu, “Behind closed doors: Rape and marriage in Singapore” (20 August 2016) (accessed 26 August 2017).
  32. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (4 April 2017) vol 94 (Tan Chuan-Jin, Minister for Social and Family Development).
  33. ↑ Singapore Parliamentary Debates, Official Report (4 April 2017) vol 94 (Tan Chuan-Jin, Minister for Social and Family Development).
  34. ↑ "Criminal Law Reform Bill: A look at key changes in the Penal Code". Today. 6 May 2019. Retrieved 13 June 2019.
  35. ↑ Ng, Charmaine (27 December 2019). "Watch that cigarette butt and BBQ embers - firestarters to feel more heat from the law from Jan 1". The Straits Times. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
  36. ↑ Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women GA Res 48/104, A/Res/48/104 (1994) at Article 2(a).
  37. ↑ UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 18 December 1979, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13 at Article 2.
  38. ↑ UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, 18 December 1979, United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 1249, p. 13 at Article 16.
  39. ↑ UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendations No. 19, adopted at the Eleventh Session, 1992 (contained in Document A/47/38), 1992, A/47/38 at [23].
  40. ↑ Melanie Randall & Vasanthi Venkatesh, “The right to no: the crime of marital rape, women’s human rights, and international law” [2015] 41:1 Brook J Int’l L 153 at 189.
  41. ↑ Singapore's reservations to CEDAW (accessed 26 August 2017).
  42. ↑ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Singapore, 16 January 2012, CEDAW/C/SGP/CO/4/Rev.1 at [13].
  43. ↑ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Singapore, 16 January 2012, CEDAW/C/SGP/CO/4/Rev.1 at [23].
  44. ↑ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Singapore, 16 January 2012, CEDAW/C/SGP/CO/4/Rev.1 at [24(a)].
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.