Mars Design Reference Mission

Last updated
Mars Ascent Vehicle for six people from DRA5 6-crew-habitable-MAV-NASA-Mars-DRA-5-A2.png
Mars Ascent Vehicle for six people from DRA5

The NASA Mars Design Reference Mission ("DRM") refer to a series of NASA conceptual design studies of the missions to send humans to Mars. [1] [2] The related term, Design Reference Architecture (DRA), refers to the entire sequences of missions and supporting infrastructure.

Contents

These are a reference baseline studies summarizing the current technology and possible approaches for a human mission to Mars, and are not actual mission program. According to NASA, the documents "represent a 'snapshot' of work in progress in support of planning for future human exploration of the Martian surface." [3] The design reference missions are used for technology trade studies, to analyze the effect of different approaches to the mission.

Reference Design Mission (1993)

Artist concept of a Mars habitat, 1993 Mars design reference mission 3.jpg
Artist concept of a Mars habitat, 1993

The first Mars Design Reference Mission [4] was a NASA study completed in May 1993, under the auspices of the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). [5] The objective [6] was to develop a "Reference Mission" based on previous studies and data, where the Reference Mission serves as a basis for comparing different approaches and criteria from future studies.

The study was based on Robert Zubrin's Mars Direct mission design. Thus dubbed Mars Semi-Direct by Zubrin, it also made several significant changes, for instance accounting for a larger crew and a dedicated Mars Ascent Vehicle that was to do an Apollo-style Mars-orbit rendezvous with the Earth Return Vehicle, which was to remain in orbit. [7] [8] The Design Reference Mission replaced the preceding SEI as the standing mission plan.

Approach and results

The conclusions of the study were that the total mission mass was approximately 900 metric tons for the first crew (3 cargo vehicles, 1 piloted vehicle). The study pointed out that development of the large launch vehicle is a long-lead and expensive system, and approaches using smaller launch vehicles should be investigated. [6]

Design Reference Mission 2.0

In 1997 a NASA Mars Exploration Study Team was put together and made a more detailed version of the original design reference mission. The plan describes the first human missions to Mars with concept of operations and technologies to be used as a first cut at an architecture. According to the report:

Personnel representing several NASA field centers have formulated a "Reference Mission" addressing human exploration of Mars. This report summarizes their work and describes a plan for the first human missions to Mars, using approaches that are technically feasible, have reasonable risks, and have relatively low costs. The architecture for the Mars Reference Mission builds on previous work of the Synthesis Group (1991) and Zubrin's (1991) concepts for the use of propellants derived from the Martian Atmosphere. In defining the Reference Mission, choices have been made. In this report, the rationale for each choice is documented; however, unanticipated technology advances or political decisions might change the choices in the future. [9]

According to Portree [1] "Subsequent DRM evolution focused on minimizing spacecraft weight in an effort to reduce estimated mission cost." Although not officially given a designation "2.0", the 1997 "scrubbed" (that is, mass reduced) version is referred to by the designation 2.0 in later documents. [10]

Design Reference Mission 3.0

Design Reference Mission 3.0 ReferenceMissionSequenceVersion3.0.gif
Design Reference Mission 3.0

Design Reference Mission 3.0 [11] was a continuation of the 1997 study performed by the NASA Mars Exploration Team, with the report published in June 1998 as an addendum to the 1997 study. The stated purpose of the Reference Mission was to stimulate further thought and development of alternative approaches: "It is intended to identify and clarify system "drivers", or significant sources of cost, performance, risk, and schedule variation. It does not represent a final or recommended approach to human Mars missions. Several alternative scenarios, including human exploration missions to the Moon, Asteroids, or other targets beyond Earth orbit as well as employing different technical approaches to solving mission and technology challenges, are currently under study by the Exploration Team. Comparing alternative approaches provides the basis for continual improvement to technology investment plans and general understanding of future human exploration missions. The Addendum represents a "snapshot" of work in progress in support of planning for future human exploration missions through May 1998. [12]

The report of the Reference Mission Version 3.0 states:

From the work of the original Reference Mission (Version 1.0), the strategy for the human exploration of Mars has evolved from its original form to one of reduced system mass, use of a smaller, more reasonable launch vehicle, and use of more current technology. The steps which have been taken by the Exploration Team are motivated by the need to reduce the mass of the payload delivery flights, as well as the overall mission cost, without introducing additional mission risk. By eliminating the need for a large heavy-lift launch vehicle and deleting the redundant habitat delivery flight in Version 3.0, two launches from the Earth were eliminated. The net result is a current Version 3.0 Reference Mission which requires an injected mass of approximately one-half that of the 1993/94 Reference Mission." [12]

Design Reference Mission 4.0

The objective of Design Reference Mission 4 in 1998 was to refine DRM 3.0 to improve identified weaknesses, provide further refinement of systems design and concepts, and improve risk abatement strategy. [6]

DRM 4.0 examined both nuclear thermal propulsion [10] [13] and solar electric propulsion [14] variants of the Mars transportation system.

Principal results

Principal results of the study were [6]

Design Reference Architecture 5.0

Concept for NASA Design Reference Mission Architecture 5.0 (2009) Mars-manned-mission-NASA-V5.jpg
Concept for NASA Design Reference Mission Architecture 5.0 (2009)

NASA Design Reference Mission 5.0 [15] was done in 2009. [16] with an addendum in July 2009, [17] and a second addendum in March 2014 [18]

There is also a version of DRA5 called Austere Human Missions to Mars, produced in 2009 that has a reduced amount of hardware and goals.

As of 2017, 5.0 is the most recent version of the Design Reference mission. [19]

Diagram of some Earth and Mars mission designs NasaManned mission to Mars.jpg
Diagram of some Earth and Mars mission designs

See also

Related Research Articles

Mars Direct Proposal for a crewed Mars mission

Mars Direct is a proposal for a human mission to Mars which purports to be both cost-effective and possible with current technology. It was originally detailed in a research paper by Martin Marietta engineers Robert Zubrin and David Baker in 1990, and later expanded upon in Zubrin's 1996 book The Case for Mars. It now serves as a staple of Zubrin's speaking engagements and general advocacy as head of the Mars Society, an organization devoted to the colonization of Mars.

Robert Zubrin American aerospace engineer

Robert Zubrin is an American aerospace engineer, author, and advocate for human exploration of Mars. He and his colleague at Martin Marietta, David Baker, were the driving force behind Mars Direct, a proposal in a 1990 research paper intended to produce significant reductions in the cost and complexity of such a mission. The key idea was to use the Martian atmosphere to produce oxygen, water, and rocket propellant for the surface stay and return journey. A modified version of the plan was subsequently adopted by NASA as their "design reference mission". He questions the delay and cost-to-benefit ratio of first establishing a base or outpost on an asteroid or another Apollo program-like return to the Moon, as neither would be able to provide all of its own oxygen, water, or energy; these resources are producible on Mars, and he expects people would be there thereafter.

Colonization of Mars Proposed concepts for the human colonization of Mars

The hypothetical colonization of Mars has received interest from public space agencies and private corporations, and has received extensive treatment in science fiction writing, film, and art.

NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts NASA program

The NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) is a NASA program for development of far reaching, long term advanced concepts by "creating breakthroughs, radically better or entirely new aerospace concepts". The program operated under the name NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts from 1998 until 2007, and was reestablished in 2011 under the name NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts and continues to the present. The NIAC program funds work on revolutionary aeronautics and space concepts that can dramatically impact how NASA develops and conducts its missions.

Free-return trajectory Trajectory when an object launched from a body is returned to it by gravity from another body

In orbital mechanics, a free-return trajectory is a trajectory of a spacecraft traveling away from a primary body where gravity due to a secondary body causes the spacecraft to return to the primary body without propulsion.

Mars sample-return mission Mars mission to collect rock and dust samples

A Mars Sample-Return (MSR) mission is a proposed spaceflight mission to collect rock and dust samples on Mars and then return them to Earth. Sample-return would be a very powerful type of exploration, because the analysis is freed from the time, budget, and space constraints of spacecraft sensors.

Ares V Canceled NASA rocket key to Project Constellation

The Ares V was the planned cargo launch component of the cancelled NASA Constellation program, which was to have replaced the Space Shuttle after its retirement in 2011. Ares V was also planned to carry supplies for a human presence on Mars. Ares V and the smaller Ares I were named after Ares, the Greek god of war.

DIRECT was a late-2000s proposed alternative super heavy lift launch vehicle architecture supporting NASA's Vision for Space Exploration that would replace the space agency's planned Ares I and Ares V rockets with a family of Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles named "Jupiter".

NASA Design Reference Mission 3.0 NASA study

NASA Design Reference Mission 3.0 was a NASA study for a human space mission to the planet Mars in the 1990s. It was a plan for a human exploration architecture for Mars, and was released in 1998 as an addendum to the early design plans released in 1994. The plan is for a series of multiple launches to send various space transpiration, surface exploration hardware, and human crew to Mars, and to return the crew to Earth in the early 21st century. Various technologies are explored to launch the payloads into space, to send them to Mars, and to reduce overall weight of the mission by various technologies or techniques including nuclear, solar, aerobraking, and in-situ resource use.

Human mission to Mars Various proposed crewed mission concepts to Mars

A human mission to Mars has been the subject of science fiction since the 1880s, and of aerospace engineering and scientific proposals since the late 1940s. Plans include landing on Mars for exploration at a minimum, with some considering exploring its moons Phobos and Deimos. Longterm proposals have included sending settlers and starting terraforming of the planet.

Propellant depot Cache of propellant that is placed in orbit to allow spacecraft to refuel in space

An orbital propellant depot is a cache of propellant that is placed in orbit around Earth or another body to allow spacecraft or the transfer stage of the spacecraft to be fueled in space. It is one of the types of space resource depots that have been proposed for enabling infrastructure-based space exploration. Many different depot concepts exist depending on the type of fuel to be supplied, location, or type of depot which may also include a propellant tanker that delivers a single load to a spacecraft at a specified orbital location and then departs. In-space fuel depots are not necessarily located near or at a space station.

Space architecture Architecture

Space architecture is the theory and practice of designing and building inhabited environments in outer space. This mission statement for space architecture was developed at the World Space Congress in Houston in 2002 by members of the Technical Aerospace Architecture Subcommittee of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA). The architectural approach to spacecraft design addresses the total built environment. It is mainly based on the field of engineering, but also involves diverse disciplines such as physiology, psychology, and sociology. Like architecture on Earth, the attempt is to go beyond the component elements and systems and gain a broad understanding of the issues that affect design success. Space architecture borrows from multiple forms of niche architecture to accomplish the task of ensuring human beings can live and work in space. These include the kinds of design elements one finds in “tiny housing, small living apartments/houses, vehicle design, capsule hotels, and more.”

Mars orbit rendezvous

Mars orbit rendezvous (MOR) is a space travel concept where two spacecraft meet up and/or dock in Mars orbit. For example, one vehicle takes off from Mars, such as a Martian ascent stage, and does a rendezvous in Mars orbit with another spacecraft. Applied to a Mars sample return or human mission to Mars, it allows much less weight to be sent to the surface and back into orbit, because the fuel needed to travel back to Earth is not landed on the planet. It has also been proposed for uncrewed Mars sample return plans.

SpaceX <i>Red Dragon</i> Modified SpaceX Dragon spacecraft design for a proposed sample return mission to Mars

The SpaceX Red Dragon was a 2011–2017 concept for using an uncrewed modified SpaceX Dragon 2 for low-cost Mars lander missions to be launched using Falcon Heavy rockets.

Asteroid Redirect Mission Proposed NASA space mission

The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), also known as the Asteroid Retrieval and Utilization (ARU) mission and the Asteroid Initiative, was a space mission proposed by NASA in 2013. The Asteroid Retrieval Robotic Mission (ARRM) spacecraft would rendezvous with a large near-Earth asteroid and use robotic arms with anchoring grippers to retrieve a 4-meter boulder from the asteroid.

Austere Human Missions to Mars NASA concept for a human Mars mission

Austere Human Missions to Mars is a concept for a human mission to Mars by the United States space agency, NASA. Released in 2009, it proposed a modified and even less costly version of Design Reference Architecture (DRA) 5.0, itself a combination of nearly 20 years of Mars planning design work. The mission profile was for a conjunction class with a long surface stay, pre-deployed cargo, aerocapture and propulsive capture, and some in-situ resource production. As of 2015, the concept had not yet been adapted to the Space Launch System that replaced NASA's Constellation program in 2011.

Crewed Mars rover

Crewed Mars rovers are Mars rovers for transporting people on the planet Mars, and have been conceptualized as part of human missions to that planet.

Mars Base Camp Concept Mars orbiter

Mars Base Camp (MBC) is a crewed Mars laboratory orbiter concept under study that was commissioned by NASA from Lockheed Martin in US. It would use both future and proven concepts as well as the Orion MPCV, also built by Lockheed Martin.

Compass, is a collaborative engineering team founded in 2006 in support of the LSAM Design Study at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio. The team primarily performs integrated vehicle systems analyses. The team is a logical extension of Glenn's long history of analysis and design of spacecraft. Compass conducts "studies," in which the team receives a request from a contractor to analyze a space system design. The group reviews the parameters of the design, conducts simulations, details the design, and drafts a final report. Working in real time among engineers and scientists with a wide breath of experience allows designs to come together quite rapidly. Compass designs spacecraft with lofty goals in mind; many of their projects seem like they have come out of a sci-fi film. An example of this is a nuclear-powered robot designed to burrow into Europa. Early success of the team allows it to continue to produce preliminary designs of spacecraft. The name "Compass" was originally based on an acronym that has since been deprecated.

References

  1. 1 2 Portree, David, Humans To Mars: Fifty Years of Mission Planning, NASA-SP-2001-4521, Monographs in Aerospace History Number 2; Chapter 10, "Design Reference Mission", page 89-99 (accessed 29 Sept 2015).
  2. ↑ Weaver, David B., and Michael B. Duke, "Mars Exploration Strategies: A Reference Program and Comparison of Alternative Architectures, AIAA Conference Paper AIAA-93-4212, (1993)
  3. ↑ Stephen J. Hoffman (ed.), The Mars Surface Reference Mission: A Description of Human and Robotic Surface Activities Archived 2006-10-05 at the Wayback Machine , NASA/TP-2001-209371 (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  4. ↑ Weaver, David B., Michael B. Duke, and Barney B. Roberts, "Mars Exploration Strategies: A Reference Design Mission," International Astronautical Congress 1993, Paper IAF-93-Q.1.383 (1993)
  5. ↑ Design Reference Mission 1 Archived 2005-10-30 at the Wayback Machine , Encyclopedia Astronautica (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Douglas R. Cooke, An Overview of Recent Coordinated Human Exploration Studies, Advanced Development Office, NASA Johnson Space Center, January 2000 (accessed 30 Sept 2015)
  7. ↑ Zubrin, Robert (1996). The case for Mars : the plan to settle the red planet and why we must . New York: Free Press. ISBN   978-0-684-83550-1.
  8. ↑ Portree, David S. F. "NASA's Mars Design Reference Mission Goes Nuclear (2001)".
  9. ↑ S. J. Hoffman and D. I. Kaplan (eds.), "|Collection|NASA%2520STI||17|Collection|NACA%26Ntx%3Dmode%2520matchallpartial%26Ntk%3DAll%26Ns%3DDocument-ID|0%26N%3D0%26Ntt%3DSP-6107 Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team," NASA SP-6107, NASA JSC Exploration Office, July 1997. (accessed 30 Sept 2015) Available on the University of Maryland website: http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu/design_lib/NASA-SP6107.Mars_DRM.pdf (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  10. 1 2 David S. F. Portree, "NASA’s Mars Design Reference Mission Goes Nuclear (2001)", Wired, Jan 18 2014 (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  11. ↑ Design Reference Mission 3 Archived 2007-02-02 at the Wayback Machine , Encyclopedia Astronautica (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  12. 1 2 Drake, Bret G. (ed.), Reference Mission Version 3.0: Addendum to Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team, NASA JSC Exploration Office, June 1998. Also available as NASA Report NASA/SP-6107-ADD Archived 2007-07-14 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ Design Reference Mission 4 NTP Archived 2006-06-14 at the Wayback Machine , Encyclopedia Astronautica (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  14. ↑ Design Reference Mission 4 SEP Archived 2006-03-16 at the Wayback Machine , Encyclopedia Astronautica (accessed 29 Sept 2015)
  15. ↑ Drake, B.G., "Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0", IEEE Aerospace Conference 2010, Big Sky, MT, 6–13 March 2010, pp. 1-24; DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2010.5446736 (accessed 29 Sept. 2015)
  16. ↑ Mars Architecture Steering Group (Bret G. Drake, ed.), Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , NASA/SP–2009–566, NASA Headquarters, July 2009 (accessed 29 Sept. 2015)
  17. ↑ Mars Architecture Steering Group (Bret G. Drake, ed.), "Reference Mission Version 5.0 Addendum", NASA/SP–2009–566-ADD, NASA Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, July 2009 (accessed 29 Sept. 2015)
  18. ↑ Bret G. Drake and Kevin D. Watts (eds.) Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5.0, Addendum #2, NASA/SP-2009-566-ADD2, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, March 2014 (accessed 29 Sept. 2015)
  19. ↑ Foust, Jeff (January 23, 2015). "NASA Not Ready To Update Mars Mission Architecture". Space News. Retrieved September 29, 2015.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.