Memory, Truth and Justice processes

Last updated

Memory, Truth and Justice processes (Spanish: Procesos de Memoria, Verdad y Justicia) is the name with which the processes that culminate in trials for crimes against humanity carried out against those responsible for human rights violations committed in the context of state terrorism during the last civil-ecclesiastical-military dictatorship in Argentina between 1976 and 1983 are referred to. These include the actions of Human Rights organizations, [1] such as Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo, Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo or HIJOS, as well as different public policies such as the creation of CONADEP, the creation of reparation laws, the restitution of appropriated children, the Trials for the Truth, the marking of Sites of Memory in Argentina in the areas where clandestine detention centers operated and the creation of Spaces of Memory. [2]

Contents

These processes, which seek to uncover the truth about historical events, [3] aim to combat impunity for Argentine repressors and genocide perpetrators. These processes of consolidation of democracy have made Argentina an international benchmark in the field of human rights. [4]

CONADEP

The National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons (CONADEP, Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas) was an advisory commission created by President Raúl Alfonsín on December 15, 1983, to investigate the serious, repeated and planned human rights violations committed during the military dictatorship. The commission traveled throughout the country in search of testimonies of survivors, relatives, repressors and buildings used as detention centers; they made an inventory of all reported disappearances and all clandestine centers; they made maps, classified the accounts and made an analysis in order to reconstruct the mode of operation of State Terrorism. The commission produced a final report, called Never Again, [5] which recorded the existence of 8,961 disappeared persons and 380 clandestine detention centers.

Trialof the Military Juntas

Nunca mas.jpg

In 1984, the Federal Chamber displaced the military court in view of the evidence of the military justice system's unjustified delay in prosecuting the military juntas, and took over the case directly. The trial was of great international importance, especially for the region, where in neighboring countries such as Chile, Uruguay and Brazil, which suffered similar crimes, it was impossible to bring the repressors to justice and their criminals were never convicted. Between April 22 and August 14, 1985, the trial was held in which 833 people testified, including former disappeared detainees, families of the victims and security forces personnel. [6] The trial demonstrated the responsibility of the junta leaders and the falsity of any hypothesis about "excesses typical of any military action" as the commanders claimed.

Sentences

Full Stop Law and Due Obedience Law

After the military trial of the juntas and the " carapintadas " uprisings, two laws were passed (Full stop law and Law of Due Obedience) that virtually halted the cases for crimes committed during the dictatorship. Law 23,492, known as "Full stop law", was enacted in 1986 by President Raúl Alfonsín, and established the suspension of judicial proceedings against those accused as criminally responsible for having committed crimes against humanity. Law 23,521 "Due Obedience" was enacted by the President and established a presumption iuris et de iure (without admitting proof to the contrary) that crimes committed by members of the Armed Forces during the State Terrorism were not punishable, since they acted under the so-called "due obedience". These legal norm were issued after the " carapintadas " uprisings, at the initiative of the Alfonsín government, in an attempt to contain the discontent of the officers of the Argentine Army, exempting military personnel below the rank of colonel from responsibility for crimes committed following the military hierarchical chain. As a result, most of the defendants in criminal cases related to State terrorism were dismissed. The only trials that were carried out were for the systematic theft of newborns, and with cases not directly linked to crimes against humanity (illicit association, falsification of public documents, etc.). [8]

Presidential pardons

In 1989 and 1990, Carlos Menem signed a series of decrees pardoning civilians and military personnel convicted of crimes during the military dictatorship, which resulted in the release of more than 1,200 people. Among those pardoned were all the indicted military chiefs who had not benefited from the Full Stop and Due Obedience laws, Leopoldo Galtieri, Jorge Isaac Anaya, Basilio Lami Dozo, Jorge Rafael Videla, Emilio Massera, Orlando Ramón Agosti, Roberto Viola, Armando Lambruschini, Ramón Camps, Ovidio Riccheri, Norma Kennedy, Duilio Brunello, José Alfredo Martínez de Hoz and Guillermo Suárez Mason.

Escraches

In April 1995, a new organization called HIJOS (Hijos e Hijas por la Identidad y la Justicia contra el Olvido y el Silencio) emerged, whose acronym expresses the basic guidelines of the organization: Sons and Daughters for Identity and Justice against Oblivion and Silence, which was originally composed of children of detainees, the disappeared and ex-convicts. In the context of the total absence of any possibility of investigation and legal condemnation for those responsible for the disappearances, kidnappings, torture and deaths of thousands of people, this organization built a new and different tool, also oriented towards condemnation, but anchored in the social and political spheres. [9]

Trials for the Truth

Mobilization for the Day of Memory for Truth and Justice 2013 in Santa Fe. Dia de la Memoria por la Verdad y la Justicia 2013 en Santa Fe 08.jpg
Mobilization for the Day of Memory for Truth and Justice 2013 in Santa Fe.

In 1998, one of the founders of the Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, Carmen Aguiar de Lapacó, appeared before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) and alleged that the Argentine State violated the right to truth and the right to justice, because the laws of impunity and the presidential pardon could not be invoked to prevent the determination of what happened to Alejandra Lapacó and the final destination of her body, since the crime of forced disappearance continued to be executed until the victim was found. In 1999, a Friendly Settlement Agreement was signed between the parties in which the Argentine State undertook to guarantee an investigation into the truth of the facts denounced in the criminal justice system, although without the possibility of charges or sentences. It also assigned exclusive jurisdiction to the National Federal Criminal and Correctional Courts throughout the country to hear all cases involving the investigation of the truth about the fate of persons who disappeared prior to December 10, 1983, with the exception of cases involving the kidnapping of minors, since they were outside the legal impediments enshrined in the laws and pardons. [10]

As from the Agreement, criminal investigations were reopened in all provinces without the possibility of indictment and sentences. At this judicial stage, the cases under investigation were called "Trials for Historical Truth". In it, the people pointed out as responsible were summoned as witnesses since they could not be prosecuted and convicted; and they had to comply with the obligation to tell the truth about everything they knew under penalty of committing the crime of false testimony. In this context, those who refused to testify were subjected to several days of arrest by the judges.

Annulment of laws and pardons

In 2003, these laws were declared null and void by the National Congress of Argentina and when they were declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Justice in 2005, many of these individuals were re-prosecuted. [11] [12]

From that moment on, new trials for crimes against humanity began to be held against those responsible for the human rights violations that were a consequence of the state terrorism that occurred during the National Reorganization Process.

These processes are not only related to the repeal of the so-called impunity laws and the reopening of trials against those responsible for State terrorism, but also to the recovery of appropriated children and the emergence of reparation laws and State policies with respect to spaces of memory. [13]

As part of these policies 106 places that had been clandestine detention centers were marked by the state and turned into spaces for memory. [14] Among others, the Haroldo Conti Cultural Memory Center and the Memory and Human Rights Space have been created.

See also

Related Research Articles

Life imprisonment is any sentence of imprisonment for a crime under which convicted criminals are to remain in prison for the rest of their lives or indefinitely until pardoned, paroled, or commuted to a fixed term. Crimes that warrant life imprisonment are usually violent and/or dangerous. Examples of crimes that result in life sentences are murder, torture, terrorism, child abuse resulting in death, rape, espionage, treason, drug trafficking, drug possession, human trafficking, severe fraud and financial crimes, aggravated criminal damage, arson, and hate crime, kidnapping, burglary, and robbery, piracy, aircraft hijacking, and genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, severe cases of child pornography, or any three felonies in the case of a three-strikes law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caravan of Death</span> Chilean army death squad

The Caravan of Death was a Chilean Army death squad that, following the Chilean coup of 1973, flew by helicopters from south to north of Chile between September 30 and October 22, 1973. During this foray, members of the squad ordered or personally carried out the execution of at least 75 individuals held in Army custody in certain garrisons. According to the NGO Memoria y Justicia, the squad killed 97 people: 26 in the South and 71 in the North. Augusto Pinochet was indicted in December 2002 in this case, but he died four years later before a verdict could be rendered. His trial, however, is ongoing since his and other military personnel and a former military chaplain have also been indicted in this case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Argentina</span> Highest court in Argentina

The Supreme Court of Argentina, officially known as the Supreme Court of Justice of the Argentine Nation, is the highest court of law of the Argentine Republic. It was inaugurated on 15 January 1863. However, during much of the 20th century, the Court and the Argentine judicial system in general, lacked autonomy from the executive power. The Court was reformed in 2003 by the decree 222/03.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luciano Benjamín Menéndez</span> Argentine Army General involved in the Falklands War and the Dirty War

Luciano Benjamín Menéndez was an Argentine general and convicted human rights violator and murderer. Commander of the Third Army Corps (1975–79), he played a prominent role in the murders of social activists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Full stop law</span>

The Full stop law, Ley de Punto Final, was passed by the National Congress of Argentina in 1986, three years after the end of the military dictatorship of the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional and restoration of democracy. Formally, this law is referred to by number, like all others in Argentine legislation, but Ley de Punto Final is the designation in common use, even in official speeches.

The Trial of the Juntas was the judicial trial of the members of the de facto military government that ruled Argentina during the dictatorship of the Proceso de Reorganización Nacional, which lasted from 1976 to 1983. It is so far the only example of such a large scale procedure by a democratic government against a former dictatorial government of the same country in Latin America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1989 attack on La Tablada barracks</span> Guerrilla attack on the Argentine Army

In 1989, 40 members of Movimiento Todos por la Patria (MTP) attacked the military barracks in La Tablada, in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. 39 people were killed and 60 injured by the time the Argentine army retook the barracks. The MTP was commanded by former ERP leader Enrique Gorriarán Merlo. It carried out the assault under the alleged pretense of preventing a military coup supposedly planned for the end of January 1989 by the Carapintadas, a group of far-right military officers who opposed the investigations and trials concerning Argentina's last civil-military dictatorship (1976-1983).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Miguel Etchecolatz</span> Argentine convicted murderer (1929–2022)

Miguel Osvaldo Etchecolatz was an Argentine police officer, who worked in the Buenos Aires Provincial Police during the first years of the military dictatorship of the 1970s, known as the National Reorganization Process, which Etchecolatz was deeply involved in. He was first convicted of crimes committed during this period in 1986; the full stop law, which passed that year and created amnesty for security officers, meant that he was released without a sentence. In 2003, Congress repealed the law and the government re-opened prosecution of crimes committed during the Dirty War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Revised Penal Code</span> Criminal code of the Philippines

The Revised Penal Code contains the general penal laws of the Philippines. First enacted in 1930, it remains in effect today, despite several amendments thereto. It does not comprise a comprehensive compendium of all Philippine penal laws. The Revised Penal Code itself was enacted as Act No. 3815, and some Philippine criminal laws have been enacted outside of the Revised Penal Code as separate Republic Acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Day of Remembrance for Truth and Justice</span> Public holiday in Argentina, 24 March

The Day of Remembrance for Truth and Justice is a public holiday in Argentina, commemorating the victims of the Dirty War. It is held on 24 March, the anniversary of the coup d'état of 1976 that brought the National Reorganization Process to power.

The history of human rights in Argentina is affected by the Dirty War and its aftermath. The Dirty War, a civic-military dictatorship comprising state-sponsored violence against Argentine citizenry from roughly 1976 to 1983, carried out primarily by Jorge Rafael Videla's military government. However, the human rights situation in Argentina has improved since.

Articles 108 through 108-C of the Penal Code of Peru define crimes similar to those known as murder in Anglophone countries. The term asesinato ("murder") is no longer used in the Penal Code since 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omar Graffigna</span> Argentine Air Force officer (1926–2019)

Omar Domingo Rubens Graffigna was an Argentine Air Force officer who served in the second military junta of the National Reorganization Process dictatorship. Along with Santiago Omar Riveros, he was one of the last two surviving members of the dictatorship. On 8 September 2016 he was sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment for crimes during the dictatorship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myriam Bregman</span> Argentine lawyer and politician (born 1972)

Myriam Bregman is an Argentine lawyer, activist, and politician. Raised in a Jewish family, Bregman joined the Socialist Workers' Party (PTS) – a Trotskyist Argentine party of which she is among the most prominent members – while studying a degree in law at the University of Buenos Aires in the 90s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Special Jurisdiction for Peace</span>

The Special Jurisdiction for Peace, also known as Special Justice for Peace, is the Colombian transitional justice mechanism through which FARC members, members of the Public Force and third parties who have participated in the Colombian armed conflict are investigated and put on trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Fernando Báez Sosa</span> 2020 murder in Villa Gesell, Argentina

Fernando José Báez Sosa, an 18-year old Argentine law student, was beaten to death at the Le Brique nightclub in Villa Gesell, Buenos Aires Province, on 18 January 2020 by a group of eight rugby players from Zárate, Buenos Aires. The case attracted significant nationwide media attention due to the violent nature of the crime and the extensive footage spread on social media. The murder has also been dubbed by Argentine media as the crime of the rugbiers and the crime of Villa Gesell.

The Juicios por la Verdad are a judicial proceeding without criminal effects that took place in Argentina due to the impossibility of criminally prosecuting those responsible for the crimes against humanity perpetrated during the last civil-military dictatorship (1976-1983), in view of the passing of the Due Obedience and Full Stop laws and the pardons granted to the members of the military juntas. These oral trials were the result of the struggle of human rights organizations that sought alternative strategies to confront impunity through the judicial search for the truth.

<i>Posadas Hospital Trial</i> Trials for crimes against humanity occurred in the Posadas Hospital

The Posadas Hospital Trial is the name given to the court case for crimes against humanity committed in the clandestine detention center (Argentina) called "El Chalet", located inside the Posadas Hospital, during the military dictatorship called the National Reorganization Process.

In Argentina, the term "impunity laws" refers to two laws and a series of presidential decrees enacted between 1986 and 1990, which prevented the prosecution or execution of convictions against perpetrators of crimes against humanity during the state terrorism carried out by the Military Junta in the 1976 civil-military coup d'état, which governed from 1976 to 1983. On May 3, 2017, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that allows the sentences of persons found guilty of crimes against humanity to be significantly reduced, by application of the so-called "two for one".

The denial of state terrorism in Argentina consists of the act of denying state terrorism during the civic-military dictatorship from 1976 to 1983 called the National Reorganization Process, which was part of the Dirty War. The denialism of state terrorism in Argentina has taken different forms over time, from denying the existence of missing persons, the justification of the acts committed, or declaring that the conflict was "between two equivalent sectors that produced symmetrical damage".

References

  1. ↑ "Organizaciones de Derechos Humanos -Organismos y proyectos de derechos humanos de Argentina" (in Spanish).
  2. ↑ "Son algunos de los sitios vinculados al terrorismo de Estado que, desafectados de su uso militar o policial, fueron reconvertidos bajo esa denominación". Argentina.gob.ar (in Spanish).
  3. ↑ "Mapa de los centros clandestinos de detención". Argentina.gob.ar/ (in Spanish).
  4. ↑ "Memoria, verdad y justicia en la Argentina". Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores y Culto (in Spanish). Archived from the original on March 26, 2016. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
  5. ↑ "El histórico alegato de Julio César Strassera en el juicio a las juntas militare". Lanacion.com.ar (in Spanish). February 27, 2015. Retrieved June 8, 2015.
  6. ↑ "Los jueces, en aquella sala". 9 December 2005. p. 12.
  7. 1 2 3 Boletín de Jurisprudencia (PDF) (in Spanish). Ministerio de Educación y Justicia. December 9, 1985.
  8. ↑ Dillon, Marta. "Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo" (PDF) (in Spanish).
  9. ↑ Antonell, Mirta (2009). ""El umbral de reconocimiento del escrache de H.I.J.O.S. en la dramaturgia societal argentina"". Libro de Actas del "Primer Congreso Nacional sobre Protesta Social, Acción Colectiva y Movimientos Sociales" (in Spanish). ISBN   978-987-24976-2-0.
  10. ↑ "INFORME N° 21/00, Caso 12.059, Cármen Aguiar De Lapacó". cidh.oas.org (in Spanish). Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. February 29, 2000. Retrieved April 17, 2016.
  11. ↑ "A diez años del fallo "Simón" . Un balance sobre el estado actual del proceso de justicia por crímenes de lesa humanidad" (PDF). fiscales.gob.ar (in Spanish). MInisterio Público Fiscal. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
  12. ↑ Chillier, Gastón (June 4, 2014). "Un proceso de verdad y justicia". La Nación (in Spanish). Retrieved March 18, 2016.
  13. ↑ Jozami, Eduardo. "Memoria, verdad y justicia. La singularidad del caso argentino". Cuadernos del INADI (in Spanish) (11 ed.). Archived from the original on March 24, 2016. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
  14. ↑ "Memoria, Verdad y Justicia". Secretaría de Derechos Humanos (in Spanish). Archived from the original on March 27, 2016. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.