Michael Eakin

Last updated

Conrad Busch filed a timely appeal,
Trying to avoid a premarital deal
Which says appellee need not pay him support,
He brings his case, properly, before this Court.

They wanted to marry, their lives to enhance,
Not for the dollars--it was for romance.
When they said "I do," had their wedding day kiss,
It was not about money--only marital bliss.

But a deal's a deal, if fairly undertaken,
And we find disclosure was fair and unshaken.
Appellant may shun that made once upon a time,
But his appeal must fail, lacking reason (if not rhyme).

— Busch v. Busch, 732 A.2d 1274, 1275, 1278 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999)

Another example of his verse would be this rhyme he wrote regarding a contract dispute:

The emu's a bird quite large and stately,
Whose market potential was valued so greatly
That a decade ago, it was thought to be
The boom crop of the 21st century.

Our appellant decided she ought to invest
In two breeding emus, but their conjugal nest
Produced no chicks, so she tried to regain
Her purchase money, but alas in vain.

Appellant then filed a contract suit,
But the verdict gave her claim the boot;
Thus she was left with no resort
But this appeal to the Superior Court.

— Liddle v. Scholze, 768 A.2d 1183 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2001)

Perhaps his most currently commented opinion is his dissent on Noel v. Travis, where he disagreed with the majority who found that the appellant was in fact not guilty of a DUI after being found riding his horse while intoxicated. Justice Eakin wrote (in part):

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
And no one can talk to a horse of course
That is, of course, unless the horse is the famous Mr. Ed.

Go right to the source and ask the horse
He'll give you the answer that you'll endorse.
He's always on a steady course. Talk to Mr. Ed.

A horse is a horse, of course, of course,
but the Vehicle Code does not divorce
its application from, perforce,
a steed, as my colleagues said.

"It's not vague" I'll say until I'm hoarse,
and whether a car, a truck or horse
this law applies with equal force,
and I'd reverse instead.
Because I cannot agree this statute is vague or ambiguous, I respectfully dissent.

— Noel v. Travis, 857 A.2d 1283, 1289 (Pa. 2004)

Due to the unorthodox way Justice Eakin pens his opinions, he has been criticized by his fellow Justices. [10] In the 2002 New York Times article "Justices Call on Bench's Bard to Limit his Lyricism", Chief Justice Stephen A. Zappala was quoted as writing that "An opinion that expresses itself in rhyme reflects poorly on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania." Justice Ralph J. Cappy was also quoted as stating that "Every jurist has the right to express him or herself in a manner the jurist deems appropriate, [but I am concerned about] the perception that litigants and the public at large might form when an opinion of the court is reduced to rhyme." However, Justice Eakin has justified his so-called "poetic justice" by stating that "[Y]ou have an obligation as a judge to be right, but you have no obligation to be dull." [10]

Presentations

On July 7, 2007, Justice Eakin and Attorney Matthew A. Cartwright, of Munley, Munley and Cartwright, presented "Ethics Issues for Trial Lawyers" to the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Annual Convention in Hershey, Pennsylvania. [12]

On March 23, 2015, Justice Eakin gave a presentation entitled "The Piano Man as Judge, Juror and Prosecutor" as part of the Touro College of Law conference, "Billy Joel & The Law." [13]

Controversy

In 2015, racist and misogynist emails Eakin received have been released by Kathleen Kane in her dispute with the judicial system. Only four emails were forwarded by Eakin. They were examined by the Judicial Conduct Board. [14] [15]

Justice Eakin resigned on March 15, 2016. [16]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of the United States</span> Chief judicial officer of the United States

The chief justice of the United States is the chief judge of the Supreme Court of the United States and is the highest-ranking officer of the U.S. federal judiciary. Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution grants plenary power to the president of the United States to nominate, and, with the advice and consent of the United States Senate, appoint "Judges of the supreme Court", who serve until they die, resign, retire, or are impeached and convicted. The existence of a chief justice is only explicit in Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 which states that the chief justice shall preside over the impeachment trial of the president; this has occurred three times, for Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and for Donald Trump’s first impeachment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Canada</span> Highest court of Canada

The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the judicial system of Canada. It comprises nine justices, whose decisions are the ultimate application of Canadian law, and grants permission to between 40 and 75 litigants each year to appeal decisions rendered by provincial, territorial and federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court is bijural, hearing cases from two major legal traditions and bilingual, hearing cases in both official languages of Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Pennsylvania</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is the highest court in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System. It also claims to be the oldest appellate court in the United States, a claim that is disputed by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania began in 1684 as the Provincial Court, and casual references to it as the "Supreme Court" of Pennsylvania were made official in 1722 upon its reorganization as an entity separate from the control of the colonial governor.

Seamus P. McCaffery is an American retired Justice on the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. He is a member of the Democratic Party. Prior to his election to the Supreme Court, he was a judge on the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and prior to that was a municipal court judge in Philadelphia. He was the judge at "Eagles Court", an ad hoc court created to deal with unruly fans at Philadelphia Eagles games.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ronald M. Gould</span> American judge (born 1946)

Ronald Murray Gould is an American lawyer and jurist serving as a U.S. circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit since 1999.

Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), was a landmark case on the issue of religious and economic liberty decided by the United States Supreme Court. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that a Pennsylvania blue law forbidding the sale of various retail products on Sunday was not an unconstitutional interference with religion as described in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Reports, volume 2</span>

This is a list of cases reported in volume 2 U.S. of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from 1791 to 1793. Case reports from other federal and state tribunals also appear in 2 U.S..

Thomas G. Saylor is a former chief justice and associate justice of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and a former judge of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 Pennsylvania elections</span>

Pennsylvania held statewide municipal elections on November 3, 2009, to fill a number of judicial positions and to allow judicial retention votes. The necessary primary elections were held on May 19, 2009.

James Martin Munley was a United States district judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania is the unified state court system of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Rolf Larsen, a Democrat originally from Allegheny County, was first elected to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania in 1978.

<i>Commonwealth v. Matos</i>

Commonwealth v. Matos, 672 A.2d 769 (1996), is a Pennsylvania State Supreme Court case which further developed Pennsylvania Constitutional Law as affording greater privacy protections than those guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, where police possess neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion, contraband discarded by a person fleeing a police officer are the fruits of an illegal seizure. The case departs from the ruling of California v. Hodari D., 499 U.S. 621 (1991), which held that fleeing suspects cannot be considered seized for purposes of the U.S. Constitution. It is a part of a family of state case law concerning the phenomenon of "new judicial federalism." Pennsylvania criminal defense attorneys may cite the case as part of a motion to suppress physical evidence where the defendant discards drugs, weapons, or other contraband while fleeing police.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephanos Bibas</span> American judge (born 1969)

Stephanos Bibas is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Before his appointment to the bench, Bibas was a professor of law and criminology at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he also served as director of its Supreme Court clinic.

The Jordan Brown case involves Jordan Brown, who was initially charged at 11 as an adult in the fatal shooting of his father's fiancée, Kenzie Marie Houk, 26, in New Beaver, Pennsylvania, which occurred on the morning of February 20, 2009. Jordan was interviewed by Pennsylvania State Police twice that day and arrested before sunrise the next morning. The Lawrence County District Attorney's Office initially filed the charges in adult court because that is required in Pennsylvania homicide cases, regardless of a defendant's age. The Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office then took over prosecution of the case. After Brown had spent more than three years in a juvenile detention facility in Erie, Pennsylvania, while Pennsylvania courts deliberated his status, Brown was tried as a juvenile and found guilty of being delinquent by a judge on April 13, 2012.

<i>United States v. Kilbride</i>

United States v. Kilbride, 584 F.3d 1240 is a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit rejecting an appeal from two individuals convicted of violating the Can Spam Act and United States obscenity law. The defendants were appealing convictions on 8 counts from the District Court of Arizona for distributing pornographic spam via email. The second count which the defendants were found guilty of involved the falsification of the "From" field of email headers, which is illegal to do multiple times in commercial settings under 18 USC § 1037(a)(3). The case is particularly notable because of the majority opinion on obscenity, in which Judge Fletcher writes an argument endorsing the use of a national community obscenity standard for the internet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Pennsylvania elections</span>

Pennsylvania held statewide elections on November 8, 2011, to fill judicial positions and allow judicial retention votes. The necessary primary elections were held on May 17, 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matt Cartwright</span> American politician (born 1961)

Matthew Alton Cartwright is an American lawyer and politician serving as the U.S. representative from Pennsylvania's 8th congressional district since 2013. The district includes a large swath of northeastern Pennsylvania, anchored by Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, and the Poconos. He is a member of the Democratic Party. Cartwright was first elected to Congress in 2012 after defeating incumbent Tim Holden in the Democratic primary. As an attorney, Cartwright previously worked at the law firm of Munley, Munley, and Cartwright.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 Pennsylvania elections</span>

Pennsylvania held statewide elections on November 7, 2017, to fill judicial positions on the Supreme Court, Superior Court, and the Commonwealth Court, to allow judicial retention votes, and to fill numerous county, local and municipal offices.

Ralph Stanton Wettick Jr. is a retired United States judge who served on the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania's Fifth Judicial District, from 1976 to 2016. He was a leading authority on discovery under Pennsylvania's Rules of Civil Procedure, and was known for handling important and complex cases.

References

  1. ↑ "Justice J. Michael Eakin" (PDF).
  2. ↑ Who's Who in American Law, 2005-2006. Marquis Who's Who. 2005. p. 291.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "The Honorable J. Michael Eakin". Pennsylvania's Unified Judicial System. Archived from the original on 2007-05-01.
  4. ↑ "J. Michael Eakin". Ballotpedia. Archived from the original on 2018-11-08. Retrieved 2022-03-07.
  5. ↑ "Commonwealth of PA - Elections Information". Archived from the original on 10 December 2011. Retrieved 24 December 2011.
  6. ↑ "Honorable J. Michael Eakin". The Unified Judicial System of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on December 12, 2011. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  7. ↑ "Justice J. Michael Eakin". Legalspan.com. Archived from the original on February 6, 2012. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  8. ↑ "2001 Municipal Election - Justice of the Supreme Court". Pennsylvania Department of State. November 6, 2001. Archived from the original on February 10, 2012. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  9. ↑ "Sy Snyder's Politician of the Year 2001". PoliticsPA . The Publius Group. 2001. Archived from the original on 2002-08-03.
  10. 1 2 3 Liptak, Adam (December 15, 2002). "Justices Call on Bench's Bard to Limit His Lyricism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 20, 2016. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  11. ↑ "Law and Lawyers in Popular Culture". Tarlton Law Library. Archived from the original on June 7, 2010. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  12. ↑ "Attorney Matthew A. Cartwright, PA Supreme Court Judge Address Convention". Munley, Munley & Cartwright. July 7, 2007. Archived from the original on April 23, 2012. Retrieved December 23, 2011.
  13. ↑ "Billy Joel & The Law - A Touro Law Conference" (PDF). tourolaw.edu. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2020-09-11. Retrieved 2015-03-23.
  14. ↑ "New emails surface in Kathleen Kane saga". October 2, 2015. Archived from the original on March 23, 2016. Retrieved October 9, 2015.
  15. ↑ "Judicial Conduct Board Press Release" (PDF). October 9, 2015. Archived (PDF) from the original on April 16, 2016. Retrieved March 31, 2016.
  16. ↑ Couloumbis, Angela; McCoy, Craig R.; Fazlollah, Mark (2016-03-15). "Amid porn email furor, Eakin resigns from high court". The Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on 2016-03-16.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
J. Michael Eakin
Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
In office
January 6, 2002 –March 15, 2016 [1]