Microseism

Last updated

In seismology, a microseism is defined as a faint earth tremor caused by natural phenomena. [1] [2] Sometimes referred to as a "hum", [3] it should not be confused with the anomalous acoustic phenomenon of the same name. The term is most commonly used to refer to the dominant background seismic and electromagnetic noise signals on Earth, which are caused by water waves in the oceans and lakes. [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] Characteristics of microseism are discussed by Bhatt. [8] Because the ocean wave oscillations are statistically homogenous over several hours, the microseism signal is a long-continuing oscillation of the ground. [9] The most energetic seismic waves that make up the microseismic field are Rayleigh waves, but Love waves can make up a significant fraction of the wave field, and body waves are also easily detected with arrays. Because the conversion from the ocean waves to the seismic waves is very weak, the amplitude of ground motions associated to microseisms does not generally exceed 10 micrometers.

Contents

Detection and characteristics

As noted early in the history of seismology, [10] microseisms are very well detected and measured by means of a long-period seismograph, This signal can be recorded anywhere on Earth.

Power spectral density probability density function (color scale at right) for 20 years of continuous vertical component seismic velocity data recorded at Albuquerque, New Mexico by the ANMO station of the IRIS Consortium/USGS Global Seismographic Network. The high and low bounds are representative noise limits for seismographs deployed worldwide. The solid and dashed lines indicate the median and mode of the probability density function, respectively. ANMO 20 years.jpg
Power spectral density probability density function (color scale at right) for 20 years of continuous vertical component seismic velocity data recorded at Albuquerque, New Mexico by the ANMO station of the IRIS Consortium/USGS Global Seismographic Network. The high and low bounds are representative noise limits for seismographs deployed worldwide. The solid and dashed lines indicate the median and mode of the probability density function, respectively.

Dominant microseism signals from the oceans are linked to characteristic ocean swell periods, and thus occur between approximately 4 to 30 seconds. [11] Microseismic noise usually displays two predominant peaks. The weaker is for the larger periods, typically close to 16 s, and can be explained by the effect of surface gravity waves in shallow water. These microseisms have the same period as the water waves that generate them, and are usually called 'primary microseisms'. The stronger peak, for shorter periods, is also due to surface gravity waves in water, but arises from the interaction of waves with nearly equal frequencies but nearly opposite directions (the clapotis). These tremors have a period which is half of the water wave period and are usually called 'secondary microseisms'. A slight, but detectable, incessant excitation of the Earth's free oscillations, or normal modes, with periods in the range 30 to 1000 s, and is often referred to as the "Earth hum". [12] For periods up to 300 s, the vertical displacement corresponds to Rayleigh waves generated like the primary microseisms, with the difference that it involves the interaction of infragravity waves with the ocean bottom topography. [13] The dominant sources of this vertical hum component are likely located along the shelf break, the transition region between continental shelves and the abyssal plains.

As a result, from the short period 'secondary microseisms' to the long period 'hum', this seismic noise contains information on the sea states. It can be used to estimate ocean wave properties and their variation, on time scales of individual events (a few hours to a few days) to their seasonal or multi-decadal evolution. Using these signals, however, requires a basic understanding of the microseisms generation processes.

Generation of primary microseisms

The details of the primary mechanism was first given by Klaus Hasselmann, [5] with a simple expression of the microseism source in the particular case of a constant sloping bottom. It turns out that this constant slope needs to be fairly large (around 5 percent or more) to explain the observed microseism amplitudes, and this is not realistic. Instead, small-scale bottom topographic features do not need to be so steep, and the generation of primary microseisms is more likely a particular case of a wave-wave interaction process in which one wave is fixed, the bottom. To visualize what happens, it is easier to study the propagation of waves over a sinusoidal bottom topography. This easily generalizes to bottom topography with oscillations around a mean depth. [14]

Interference of ocean waves with a fixed bottom topography. Here waves with period 12 s interact with bottom undulations of 205 m wavelength and 20 m amplitude in a mean water depth of 100 m. These conditions give rise to a pressure pattern on the bottom that travels much faster than the ocean waves, and in the direction of the waves if their wavelength L1 is shorter than the bottom wavelength L2, or in the opposite direction if their wavelength is longer, which is the case here. The motion is exactly periodic in time, with the period of the ocean waves. The large wavelength in the bottom pressure is 1/(1/L1 - 1/L2). Interference of water waves with bottom topography, relevant for microseism generation.gif
Interference of ocean waves with a fixed bottom topography. Here waves with period 12 s interact with bottom undulations of 205 m wavelength and 20 m amplitude in a mean water depth of 100 m. These conditions give rise to a pressure pattern on the bottom that travels much faster than the ocean waves, and in the direction of the waves if their wavelength L1 is shorter than the bottom wavelength L2, or in the opposite direction if their wavelength is longer, which is the case here. The motion is exactly periodic in time, with the period of the ocean waves. The large wavelength in the bottom pressure is 1/(1/L1 1/L2).

For realistic seafloor topography, that has a broad spatial spectrum, seismic waves are generated with all wavelengths and in all directions. Because the dynamic pressures of ocean waves fall off exponentially with depth, the primary microseism source mechanism is restricted to shallower regions of the world ocean (e.g., less than several hundred meters for 14 - 20 s wave energy).

Generation of secondary microseisms

The interaction of two trains of surface waves of different frequencies and directions generates wave groups. For waves propagating almost in the same direction, this gives the usual sets of waves that travel at the group speed, which is slower than phase speed of water waves (see animation). For typical ocean waves with a period around 10 seconds, this group speed is close to 10 m/s.

In the case of opposite propagation direction the groups travel at a much larger speed, which is now 2π(f1 + f2)/(k1k2) with k1 and k2 the wave numbers of the interacting water waves.

Wave groups generated by waves with same directions. The blue curve is the sum of the red and black. In the animation, watch the crests with the red and black dots. These crests move with the phase speed of linear water waves, and the groups of large waves propagate slower (Animation) Wave group plus small.gif
Wave groups generated by waves with same directions. The blue curve is the sum of the red and black. In the animation, watch the crests with the red and black dots. These crests move with the phase speed of linear water waves, and the groups of large waves propagate slower (Animation)

For wave trains with a very small difference in frequency (and thus wavenumbers), this pattern of wave groups may have the same velocity as seismic waves, between 1500 and 3000 m/s, and will excite acoustic-seismic modes that radiate away.

Wave groups generated by waves with opposing directions. The blue curve is the sum of the red and black. In the animation, watch the crests with the red and black dots. These crests move with the phase speed of linear water waves, but the groups propagate much faster (Animation) Wave group minus small.gif
Wave groups generated by waves with opposing directions. The blue curve is the sum of the red and black. In the animation, watch the crests with the red and black dots. These crests move with the phase speed of linear water waves, but the groups propagate much faster (Animation)

As far as seismic and acoustic waves are concerned, the motion of ocean waves in deep water is, to the leading order, equivalent to a pressure applied at the sea surface. [5] This pressure is nearly equal to the water density times the wave orbital velocity squared. Because of this square, it is not the amplitude of the individual wave trains that matter (red and black lines in the figures) but the amplitude of the sum, the wave groups (blue line in figures).

Real ocean waves are composed of an infinite number of wave trains and there is always some energy propagating in the opposite direction. Also, because the seismic waves are much faster than the water waves, the source of seismic noise is isotropic: the same amount of energy is radiated in all directions. In practice, the source of seismic energy is strongest when there are a significant amount of wave energy traveling in opposite directions. This occurs when swell from one storm meets waves with the same period from another storm, [6] or close to the coast due coastal reflection.

Depending on the geological context, the noise recorded by a seismic station on land can be representative of the sea state close to the station (within a few hundred kilometers, for example in Central California), or a full ocean basin (for example in Hawaii). [7] In order to understand the noise properties, it is thus necessary to understand the propagation of the seismic waves.

Rayleigh waves constitute most of the secondary microseismic field. Both water and solid Earth particles are displaced by the waves as they propagate, and the water layer plays a very important role in defining the celerity, group speed and the transfer of energy from the surface water waves to the Rayleigh waves. The generation of secondary-microseism Love waves involves mode conversion by non-planar bathymetry and, internally, through seismic wavespeed heterogeneity within the Earth. [15]

Seasonal and secular microseism variations

Seasonality variation in microseisms offers valuable insights into the dynamics of the Earth's surface and subsurface processes. Globally observable microseisms are generated by ocean waves. Seasonal changes in oceanic and atmospheric conditions, such as wave height, storm activity, and wind patterns, contribute to the observed variations in microseism intensity and frequency content. For instance, during the northern and southern hemisphere winters, storm activity and wave energy are on average higher in the corresponding winter hemispheres and microseism signals become more pronounced. In contrast, during hemispherical summers, when oceanic and atmospheric conditions are relatively calmer, the microseism signal exhibits its lowest annual intensity. By studying the seasonality variation of microseisms, researchers can gain a better understanding of the underlying physical processes and their influence on the Earth's dynamic systems. [16] Because they are driven by ocean wave energy, microseism signals around the Earth also show large spatial scale variations that reflect average wave energy over large expanses of the global oceans.

Decadal scale studies have shown that microseism energy is growing as global storms, and their associated waves, increase in intensity [17] due to rising temperatures in the oceans and atmosphere attributed to anthropogenic global warming [18] [19] [20]

Body wave microseisms

Body wave microseisms are a type of seismic wave that propagates through the Earth's interior, distinct from surface waves. These microseisms are generated by various sources, including atmospheric pressure fluctuations, oceanic interactions, and anthropogenic activities. Unlike surface waves, which predominantly travel along the Earth's surface, body wave microseisms propagate through the deeper layers of the Earth. Seasonal variations in body-wave noise has been reported, consistent with differences in storm activity between the northern and southern hemisphere. [21]

As evidenced by the seismic recordings, body wave microseisms including P-, SV-, and SH-wave types, can be evident at a broad range of periods. [22] Among them, P-wave microseisms are mostly studied, typically P, PP, and PKP phases. [23] The generation of P-wave microseisms is strongly associated with distant ocean storms. [23] Theoretical modeling shows that non-linear interactions between surface ocean waves can effectively generate P-wave microseisms and can be modulated by site effect. [24] It has also been shown that the generation may be affected by local bathymetry and ocean wave heights. [25] SV-wave microseisms are observed to be excited in the same place as P-wave microseisms, [22] [26] and can be explainable in the same theory of P-wave microseisms. [26] In contrast, SH-wave microseisms have been less studied and its generation mechanism remains unresolved. [22] Recent discovery found that its formation may be related to a sedimentary layer. [27] Given the generation mechanism of body wave microseisms, they can be in turn utilized to monitor ocean wave [28] and track tropical cyclones on seismic recordings. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seismology</span> Scientific study of earthquakes and propagation of elastic waves through a planet

Seismology is the scientific study of earthquakes and the generation and propagation of elastic waves through planetary bodies. It also includes studies of the environmental effects of earthquakes such as tsunamis; other seismic sources such as volcanoes, plate tectonics, glaciers, rivers, oceanic microseisms, and the atmosphere; and artificial processes such as explosions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geophysics</span> Physics of the Earth and its vicinity

Geophysics is a subject of natural science concerned with the physical processes and physical properties of the Earth and its surrounding space environment, and the use of quantitative methods for their analysis. Geophysicists, who usually study geophysics, physics, or one of the Earth sciences at the graduate level, complete investigations across a wide range of scientific disciplines. The term geophysics classically refers to solid earth applications: Earth's shape; its gravitational, magnetic fields, and electromagnetic fields ; its internal structure and composition; its dynamics and their surface expression in plate tectonics, the generation of magmas, volcanism and rock formation. However, modern geophysics organizations and pure scientists use a broader definition that includes the water cycle including snow and ice; fluid dynamics of the oceans and the atmosphere; electricity and magnetism in the ionosphere and magnetosphere and solar-terrestrial physics; and analogous problems associated with the Moon and other planets.

Seismic tomography or seismotomography is a technique for imaging the subsurface of the Earth using seismic waves. The properties of seismic waves are modified by the material through which they travel. By comparing the differences in seismic waves recorded at different locations, it is possible to create a model of the subsurface structure. Most commonly, these seismic waves are generated by earthquakes or man-made sources such as explosions. Different types of waves, including P, S, Rayleigh, and Love waves can be used for tomographic images, though each comes with their own benefits and downsides and are used depending on the geologic setting, seismometer coverage, distance from nearby earthquakes, and required resolution. The model created by tomographic imaging is almost always a seismic velocity model, and features within this model may be interpreted as structural, thermal, or compositional variations. Geoscientists apply seismic tomography to a wide variety of settings in which the subsurface structure is of interest, ranging in scale from whole-Earth structure to the upper few meters below the surface.

The moment magnitude scale is a measure of an earthquake's magnitude based on its seismic moment. Mw was defined in a 1979 paper by Thomas C. Hanks and Hiroo Kanamori. Similar to the local magnitude/Richter scale (ML ) defined by Charles Francis Richter in 1935, it uses a logarithmic scale; small earthquakes have approximately the same magnitudes on both scales. Despite the difference, news media often use the term "Richter scale" when referring to the moment magnitude scale.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reflection seismology</span> Explore subsurface properties with seismology

Reflection seismology is a method of exploration geophysics that uses the principles of seismology to estimate the properties of the Earth's subsurface from reflected seismic waves. The method requires a controlled seismic source of energy, such as dynamite or Tovex blast, a specialized air gun or a seismic vibrator. Reflection seismology is similar to sonar and echolocation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wind wave</span> Surface waves generated by wind on open water

In fluid dynamics, a wind wave, or wind-generated water wave, is a surface wave that occurs on the free surface of bodies of water as a result of the wind blowing over the water's surface. The contact distance in the direction of the wind is known as the fetch. Waves in the oceans can travel thousands of kilometers before reaching land. Wind waves on Earth range in size from small ripples to waves over 30 m (100 ft) high, being limited by wind speed, duration, fetch, and water depth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pacific decadal oscillation</span> Recurring pattern of climate variability

The Pacific decadal oscillation (PDO) is a robust, recurring pattern of ocean-atmosphere climate variability centered over the mid-latitude Pacific basin. The PDO is detected as warm or cool surface waters in the Pacific Ocean, north of 20°N. Over the past century, the amplitude of this climate pattern has varied irregularly at interannual-to-interdecadal time scales. There is evidence of reversals in the prevailing polarity of the oscillation occurring around 1925, 1947, and 1977; the last two reversals corresponded with dramatic shifts in salmon production regimes in the North Pacific Ocean. This climate pattern also affects coastal sea and continental surface air temperatures from Alaska to California.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polar motion</span> Motion of Earths rotational axis relative to its crust

Polar motion of the Earth is the motion of the Earth's rotational axis relative to its crust. This is measured with respect to a reference frame in which the solid Earth is fixed. This variation is a few meters on the surface of the Earth.

A slow earthquake is a discontinuous, earthquake-like event that releases energy over a period of hours to months, rather than the seconds to minutes characteristic of a typical earthquake. First detected using long term strain measurements, most slow earthquakes now appear to be accompanied by fluid flow and related tremor, which can be detected and approximately located using seismometer data filtered appropriately. That is, they are quiet compared to a regular earthquake, but not "silent" as described in the past.

In acoustics, microbaroms, also known as the "voice of the sea", are a class of atmospheric infrasonic waves generated in marine storms by a non-linear interaction of ocean surface waves with the atmosphere. They typically have narrow-band, nearly sinusoidal waveforms with amplitudes up to a few microbars, and wave periods near 5 seconds. Due to low atmospheric absorption at these low frequencies, microbaroms can propagate thousands of kilometers in the atmosphere, and can be readily detected by widely separated instruments on the Earth's surface.

Episodic tremor and slip (ETS) is a seismological phenomenon observed in some subduction zones that is characterized by non-earthquake seismic rumbling, or tremor, and slow slip along the plate interface. Slow slip events are distinguished from earthquakes by their propagation speed and focus. In slow slip events, there is an apparent reversal of crustal motion, although the fault motion remains consistent with the direction of subduction. ETS events themselves are imperceptible to human beings and do not cause damage.

In seismology, a supershear earthquake is when the propagation of the rupture along the fault surface occurs at speeds in excess of the seismic shear wave velocity. This causes an effect analogous to a sonic boom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infragravity wave</span> Surface gravity waves with frequencies lower than the wind waves

Infragravity waves are surface gravity waves with frequencies lower than the wind waves – consisting of both wind sea and swell – thus corresponding with the part of the wave spectrum lower than the frequencies directly generated by forcing through the wind.

In geophysics, geology, civil engineering, and related disciplines, seismic noise is a generic name for a relatively persistent vibration of the ground, due to a multitude of causes, that is often a non-interpretable or unwanted component of signals recorded by seismometers.

An ocean-bottom seismometer (OBS) is a seismometer that is designed to record the earth's motion under oceans and lakes from man-made sources and natural sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tsunami earthquake</span> Type of earthquake which triggers a tsunami of far-larger magnitude

In seismology, a tsunami earthquake is an earthquake which triggers a tsunami of significantly greater magnitude, as measured by shorter-period seismic waves. The term was introduced by Japanese seismologist Hiroo Kanamori in 1972. Such events are a result of relatively slow rupture velocities. They are particularly dangerous as a large tsunami may arrive at a coastline with little or no warning.

Michel Campillo is a French seismologist and geophysicist who is currently a professor at Grenoble Alpes University.

Fluvial seismology is the application of seismological methods to understand river processes, such as discharge, erosion, and streambed evolution. Flowing water and the movement of sediments along the streambed generate elastic (seismic) waves that propagate into the surrounding Earth materials. Seismometers can record these signals, which can be analyzed to illuminate different fluvial processes such as turbulent water flow and bedload transport. Seismic methods have been used to observe discharge values that range from single-digits up through tens of thousands of cubic feet per second (cfs).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">MERMAID</span> Marine scientific instrument platform

MERMAID is a marine scientific instrument platform, short for Mobile Earthquake Recorder for Marine Areas by Independent Divers.

Subsurface mapping by ambient noise tomography is the mapping underground geological structures under the assistance of seismic signals. Ambient noise, which is not associated with the earthquake, is the background seismic signals. Given that the ambient noises have low frequencies in general, the further classification of ambient noise include secondary microseisms, primary microseisms, and seismic hum, based on different range of frequencies. We can utilize the ambient noise data collected by seismometers to create images for the subsurface under the following processes. Since the ambient noise is considered as diffuse wavefield, we can correlate the filtered ambient noise data from a pair of seismic stations to find the velocities of seismic wavefields. A 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional velocity map, showing the spatial velocity difference of the subsurface, can thus be created for observing the geological structures. Subsurface mapping by ambient noise tomography can be applied in different fields, such as detecting the underground void space, monitoring landslides, and mapping the crustal and upper mantle structure.

References

  1. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (Fourth ed.), Houghton Mifflin Company, 2000
  2. Ebel, John E. (2002), "Watching the Weather Using a Seismograph", Seismological Research Letters, 73 (6): 930–932, Bibcode:2002SeiRL..73..930E, doi:10.1785/gssrl.73.6.930.
  3. Ardhuin, Fabrice, Lucia Gualtieri, and Eleonore Stutzmann. "How ocean waves rock the Earth: two mechanisms explain seismic noise with periods 3 to 300 s." Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 (2015).
  4. Longuet-Higgins, M. S. (1950), "A theory of the origin of microseisms", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , 243 (857): 1–35, Bibcode:1950RSPTA.243....1L, doi:10.1098/rsta.1950.0012, S2CID   31828394
  5. 1 2 3 Hasselmann, K. (1963), "A statistical analysis of the generation of micro-seisms", Rev. Geophys., 1 (2): 177–210, Bibcode:1963RvGSP...1..177H, doi:10.1029/RG001i002p00177, hdl: 21.11116/0000-0007-DD32-8
  6. 1 2 Kedar, S.; Longuet-Higgins, M. S.; Graham, F. W. N.; Clayton, R.; Jones, C. (2008), "The origin of deep ocean microseisms in the north Atlantic ocean" (PDF), Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 464 (2091): 1–35, Bibcode:2008RSPSA.464..777K, doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.0277, S2CID   18073415
  7. 1 2 Ardhuin, F.; Stutzmann, E.; Schimmel, M.; Mangeney, A. (2011), "Ocean wave sources of seismic noise" (PDF), J. Geophys. Res., 115 (C9): C09004, Bibcode:2011JGRC..116.9004A, doi:10.1029/2011jc006952
  8. 1 2 Bhatt, Kaushalendra M (2014). "Microseisms and its impact on the marine-controlled source electromagnetic signal". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 119 (12): 2169–9356. Bibcode:2014JGRB..119.8655B. doi: 10.1002/2014JB011024 .
  9. "Microseism" . Retrieved 2008-08-25.
  10. Gutenberg, Beno (1936). "On microseisms". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 26 (2): 111–117. Bibcode:1936BuSSA..26..111G. doi:10.1785/BSSA0260020111.
  11. Ruff, L.J. "Hurricane Season & Microseisms". MichSeis. Archived from the original on 2008-05-29. Retrieved 2008-08-26.
  12. Rhie, J.; Romanowicz, B. (2004). "Excitation of Earth's continuous free oscillations by atmosphere-ocean-seafloor coupling". Nature. 431 (7008): 552–556. Bibcode:2004Natur.431..552R. doi:10.1038/nature02942. PMID   15457256.
  13. Ardhuin, F.; Gualtieri, L.; Stutzmann, E. (2015), "How ocean wagves rock the Earth: two mechanisms explain microseisms with periods 3 to 300 s", Geophys. Res. Lett., 42 (3): 765–772, Bibcode:2015GeoRL..42..765A, doi: 10.1002/2014GL062782
  14. Ardhuin, Fabrice. "Large scale forces under surface gravity waves at a wavy bottom: a mechanism for the generation of primary microseisms." Geophys. Res. Lett. 45 (2018), doi: 10.1029/2018GL078855.
  15. Gualtieri, Lucia (9 November 2020). "The origin of secondary microseism Love waves". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 117 (47): 29504–29511. Bibcode:2020PNAS..11729504G. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013806117 . PMC   7703644 . PMID   33168742.
  16. Schimmel, M.; Stutzmann, E.; Ardhuin, F.; Gallart, J. (July 2011). "Polarized Earth's ambient microseismic noise: POLARIZED MICROSEISMIC NOISE". Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems. 12 (7): n/a. doi: 10.1029/2011GC003661 . hdl: 10261/171829 . S2CID   58926177.
  17. Reguero, Borja; Losada, Inigo J.; Mendez, Fernand J. (2019). "A recent increase in global wave power as a consequence of oceanic warming". Nature Communications. 10 (1): 205. Bibcode:2019NatCo..10..205R. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08066-0 . PMC   6331560 . PMID   30643133.
  18. Aster, Richard C.; McNamara, Daniel E.; Bromirski, Peter D. (2008). "Multidecadal climate-induced variability in microseisms". Seismological Research Letters. 79 (2): 94–202. Bibcode:2008SeiRL..79..194A. doi:10.1785/gssrl.79.2.194.
  19. Bromirski, Peter (2023). "Climate-Induced Decadal Ocean Wave Height Variability From Microseisms: 1931–2021". Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 128 (8): e2023JC019722. Bibcode:2023JGRC..12819722B. doi: 10.1029/2023JC019722 .
  20. Aster, Richard C.; Ringler, Adam T.; Anthony, Robert E.; Lee, Thomas A. (2023). "Increasing ocean wave energy observed in Earth's seismic wavefield since the late 20th century". Nature Communications. 14. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42673-w . PMC   10620394 .
  21. Koper, K. D.; de Foy, B. (2008-12-01). "Seasonal Anisotropy in Short-Period Seismic Noise Recorded in South Asia". Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 98 (6): 3033–3045. Bibcode:2008BuSSA..98.3033K. doi:10.1785/0120080082. ISSN   0037-1106.
  22. 1 2 3 Liu, Qiaoxia; Koper, Keith D.; Burlacu, Relu; Ni, Sidao; Wang, Fuyun; Zou, Changqiao; Wei, Yunhao; Gal, Martin; Reading, Anya M. (2016-09-01). "Source locations of teleseismic P, SV, and SH waves observed in microseisms recorded by a large aperture seismic array in China". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 449: 39–47. Bibcode:2016E&PSL.449...39L. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.05.035. ISSN   0012-821X.
  23. 1 2 Gerstoft, Peter; Shearer, Peter M.; Harmon, Nick; Zhang, Jian (December 2008). "Global P, PP, and PKP wave microseisms observed from distant storms". Geophysical Research Letters. 35 (23). Bibcode:2008GeoRL..3523306G. doi:10.1029/2008GL036111. ISSN   0094-8276.
  24. Gualtieri, L.; Stutzmann, E.; Farra, V.; Capdeville, Y.; Schimmel, M.; Ardhuin, F.; Morelli, A. (2014-03-08). "Modelling the ocean site effect on seismic noise body waves". Geophysical Journal International. 197 (2): 1096–1106. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu042 . hdl: 10261/96740 . ISSN   1365-246X.
  25. Euler, G. G.; Wiens, D. A.; Nyblade, A. A. (2014-04-23). "Evidence for bathymetric control on the distribution of body wave microseism sources from temporary seismic arrays in Africa". Geophysical Journal International. 197 (3): 1869–1883. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggu105 . ISSN   0956-540X.
  26. 1 2 Nishida, Kiwamu; Takagi, Ryota (2016-08-26). "Teleseismic S wave microseisms". Science. 353 (6302): 919–921. Bibcode:2016Sci...353..919N. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7573. ISSN   0036-8075. PMID   27563094.
  27. Xiao, Han; Tanimoto, Toshiro; Xue, Mei (August 2021). "Study of S -Wave Microseisms Generated by Storms in the Southeast Australia and North Atlantic". Geophysical Research Letters. 48 (15). Bibcode:2021GeoRL..4893728X. doi:10.1029/2021GL093728. ISSN   0094-8276.
  28. Neale, Jennifer; Harmon, Nicholas; Srokosz, Meric (January 2017). "Monitoring remote ocean waves using P -wave microseisms". Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans. 122 (1): 470–483. Bibcode:2017JGRC..122..470N. doi:10.1002/2016JC012183. ISSN   2169-9275.
  29. Retailleau, Lise; Gualtieri, Lucia (2019-02-16). "Toward High-Resolution Period-Dependent Seismic Monitoring of Tropical Cyclones". Geophysical Research Letters. 46 (3): 1329–1337. Bibcode:2019GeoRL..46.1329R. doi:10.1029/2018GL080785. ISSN   0094-8276.