Monika Schmidt | |
---|---|
Judge of the Industrial Court of NSW | |
In office 16 June 1993 –26 July 2009 | |
Judge of the Supreme Court of NSW | |
In office 27 July 2009 –11 September 2019 | |
Personal details | |
Born | Hohenlimburg,North Rhine-Westphalia,West Germany (now Germany) | 20 August 1956
Nationality | Australian |
Alma mater | University of Sydney |
Occupation | Judge,Lawyer |
Monika Schmidt AM was a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales from 2009 until 2019,appointed to the Common Law Division,having previously been a judge of the Industrial Court of New South Wales for 16 years. [1]
Schmidt was educated at the University of Sydney and received her LL.B. in 1979.
Schmidt was a partner at Minter Ellison,a firm of solicitors,specialising in industrial and employment law,including lecturing at the University of Sydney. [1]
Schmidt was appointed as a judge of the Industrial Court of New South Wales in 1993,aged 32. [2] The Industrial Court of NSW had the equivalent status of the Supreme Court of NSW. [3] Schmidt was involved with the Judicial Commission of New South Wales,in 1996 becoming a member of the advisory committee on judicial education and as a member of the Conduct Division dealing with complaints about judicial officers. [4] In 1998 Schmidt was received a dual appointment as a Deputy President of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission. [1] Schmidt joined Justice Leone Glynn in a dissenting judgement on an important question of the jurisdiction of the Court, [5] a dissent that was subsequently approved by the NSW Court of Appeal. [6]
Schmidt was appointed as an acting judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,sitting for four months in 2009 before being permanently appointed to the Common Law Division from 27 July 2009. [4]
In 2013,Schmidt delivered a judgment in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal which was scathing of the remarks on sentence by District Court judge Garry Neilson,who had found that the seriousness of an incest offence was reduced "because there had been no ejaculation involved ... and because there was no rough handling involved",describing the remarks as having no foundation and not the subject of any evidence, [7] one of a number of judgments that resulted in the suspension of Judge Neilson from criminal trials. [8]
In 2014,Schmidt rejected an application that she refer a case to a male judge,because,as a female judge,she was suspected of being a feminist with leftist leanings. Schmidt noted that a judge was obligated under their oath of office obliged to determine issues impartially regardless of their personal views. [9] [10]
Schmidt retired on 11 September 2019. [11]
John Dyson Heydon is an Australian former judge and barrister who served on the High Court of Australia from 2003 to 2013 and the New South Wales Court of Appeal from 2000 to 2003,and previously served as Dean of the Sydney Law School. He retired from the bench at the constitutionally-mandated age of 70 and went on to chair the Royal Commission into Trade Union Governance and Corruption between 2014 and 2015,an appointment that was politically controversial due to his avowed conservatism and connections with the governing conservative party.
Kable v DPP,is a decision of the High Court of Australia. It is a significant case in Australian constitutional law.
The Supreme Court of New South Wales is the highest state court of the Australian State of New South Wales. It has unlimited jurisdiction within the state in civil matters,and hears the most serious criminal matters. Whilst the Supreme Court is the highest New South Wales court in the Australian court hierarchy,an appeal by special leave can be made to the High Court of Australia.
The District Court of New South Wales is the intermediate court in the judicial hierarchy of the Australian state of New South Wales. It is a trial court and has an appellate jurisdiction. In addition,the Judges of the Court preside over a range of tribunals. In its criminal jurisdiction,the Court may deal with all serious criminal offences except murder,treason and piracy. The Court's civil jurisdiction is generally limited to claims less than A$1,250,000.
The New South Wales Law Reports (NSWLR) are the authorised reports of the superior courts of New South Wales,Australia. The reports are published by the Council of Law Reporting for New South Wales.
Ronald Sackville is the Chair of the Royal Commission into Violence,Abuse,Neglect and Exploitation of People with Disability. He is a former acting judge of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and also a former judge of the Federal Court of Australia.
The court has been reestablished as of July 2024.
The Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales conciliates and arbitrates industrial disputes,sets conditions of employment and fixes wages and salaries by making industrial awards,approves enterprise agreements and decides other industrial matters in New South Wales,a state of Australia. The Commission was established with effect from 2 September 1996 pursuant to the Industrial Relations Act 1996.
The New South Wales Court of Appeal,part of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,is the highest court for civil matters and has appellate jurisdiction in the Australian state of New South Wales.
Sir Frederick Richard Jordan (1881–1949) was an Australian barrister,the 9th Chief Justice of New South Wales,and Lieutenant-Governor of New South Wales.
The Court of Arbitration was the first court in New South Wales,Australia,which dealt exclusively with industrial relations disputes in the early twentieth century. Justice Lance Wright claims that it perhaps was the first court of its type in the world. The court was unique at that time as it was the first court of its type to deal with labour relations between employer and employees on a compulsory basis. Previous arbitration measures between employer and employee had been on a voluntary basis or had been based on the criminal justice system through the use of criminal penalties. The conventional economic model is that both employer and employee enjoy equal bargaining power to set wages and conditions. This asserts that both parties are able to agree on a fair market price for the cost of labour free from distortions. However,where employers or employees group together,these outcomes can be distorted particularly in “boom”or “bust”economic conditions. The purpose of the court was to change the manner in which employers and employees negotiated pay and conditions. It was an attempt to reduce the power imbalances between employer groups or employee unions that arose from using collective bargaining,and the resulting use of that market power to influence wages,and also to reduce the threat of lockout or strikes to achieve those ends.
The Judicial Commission of New South Wales is an independent statutory corporation of the New South Wales Government that provides sentencing information and continuing education to and examines complaints made against judicial officers in New South Wales,Australia.
Virginia Margaret Bell is a former Justice of the High Court of Australia,the highest court in the Australian court hierarchy. She was sworn in on 3 February 2009,and retired on 28 February 2021.
The New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal,part of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,is the highest court for criminal matters and has appellate jurisdiction in the Australian State of New South Wales.
Jane Hamilton Mathews was a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales,a judge of the Federal Court of Australia and President of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.
Peter Aloysius McInerney,(1927-2014) was an Australian barrister and New South Wales Supreme Court judge.
Judicial independence is regarded as one of the foundation values of the Australian legal system,such that the High Court held in 2004 that a court capable of exercising federal judicial power must be,and must appear to be,an independent and impartial tribunal. Former Chief Justice Gerard Brennan described judicial independence as existing "to serve and protect not the governors but the governed",albeit one that "rests on the calibre and the character of the judges themselves". Despite general agreement as to its importance and common acceptance of some elements,there is no agreement as to each of the elements of judicial independence.