Murder in Australian law

Last updated

In Australia, murder is a criminal offence where a person, by a voluntary act or omission, causes the death of another person with either intent to kill, intent to inflict grievous bodily harm, or with reckless indifference to human life. [1] It may also arise in circumstances where the accused was committing, or assisting in the commission, of a different serious crime that results in a person's death. It is usually punished by life imprisonment. Australia is a federal nation and the law of murder is mostly regulated under the law of its constituent states and territories. There is also federal murder offence available in limited circumstances. [2] [3]

Contents

South Australia

In South Australia, the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935, [4] states:

"Any person who commits murder shall be guilty of an offence and shall be imprisoned for life." [5]

No further definition for murder can be found within the Act. 'Life' is also poorly defined, with section 5 of the Act stating:

'"liable to be imprisoned for life" means "liable to be imprisoned for life or any lesser term."' [6]

Instead, particulars of 'murder' and 'life' are defined by the common law. However, because this provision of law uses mandatory language ('shall be imprisoned for [7] [8] life'), it clearly indicates that life imprisonment is thus the mandatory punishment for murder in South Australia. [ vague ]

New South Wales

In the NSW Crimes Act 1900 murder is defined as follows: [9] [10]

Murder shall be taken to have been committed where the act of the accused, or thing by him or her omitted to be done, causing the death charged, was done or omitted with reckless indifference to human life, or with intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily harm upon some person, or done in an attempt to commit, or during or immediately after the commission, by the accused, or some accomplice with him or her, of a crime... [9]

[ vague ]

Under NSW law, the maximum penalty for murder is life imprisonment, [11] with a standard non-parole period of 20 years, [12] or 25 years for the murder of a child under the age of 18. [12] In order to be found guilty of murder under the New South Wales Crimes Act 1900, intent to cause grievous bodily harm or reckless indifference to human life is sufficient to secure a conviction for murder. [9] Reckless indifference to human life is characterised by the awareness of the probability (as opposed to possibility), [10] [13] [14] of the accused's act resulting in a person's death (as opposed to merely resulting in grievous bodily harm). [15] [16] Felony murder (called constructive murder in Australian jurisdictions) [9] [17] [18] [19] and murder by omission are also recognised crimes in this jurisdiction. [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [ vague ]

Section 23 of the Crimes Act 1900 provides for the partial defence of provocation, and can refer to actions taken by the deceased both immediately before, and prior to, the murder. [25] [26] [27] If proven by the defence where there is a charge of murder, the jury will be directed to reduce the offence to manslaughter. [25] [28] [29] [30] [31] If prior to or at the time of the committal proceedings an offender enters a plea of guilty to the lesser offence of manslaughter on the grounds of provocation, and it is accepted by the Crown, they are entitled to a discount on their corresponding sentence. [32] [33] [34] [ vague ]

However, this is not the case in Victoria, Tasmania or Western Australia - the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), in Section 3B, states:

The rule of law that provocation reduces the crime of murder to manslaughter is abolished. [35]

In assessing guilt for murder, the intention in the precise method in which death occurred is irrelevant as long as the requisite mens rea and actus reus is satisfied. [15] : para [70]  The relevant actus reus for murder is where an act (or omission) has caused death. [9]

The mens rea for murder is:

  1. an intent to kill; [9] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41]
  2. an intent to inflict grievous bodily harm; [13] [14] or
  3. reckless indifference to human life, where the defendant foresaw the probability, as opposed to possibility, of his or her actions resulting in death. [15] [42]

In NSW, a person can also be found guilty of murder if they kill a person during or immediately after the commission of a crime that is punishable by imprisonment of 25 years or more. [9] [17] [43] [44]

See also

Related Research Articles

In the terminology of law, an assault is the act of causing physical harm or unwanted physical contact to another person, or, in some legal definitions, the threat or attempt to do so. It is both a crime and a tort and, therefore, may result in criminal prosecution, civil liability, or both. Additionally, assault is a criminal act in which a person intentionally causes fear of physical harm or offensive contact to another person. Assault can be committed with or without a weapon and can range from physical violence to threats of violence. Assault is frequently referred to as an attempt to commit battery, which is the deliberate use of physical force against another person. The deliberate inflicting of fear, apprehension, or terror is another definition of assault that can be found in several legal systems. Depending on the severity of the offense, assault may result in a fine, imprisonment, or even death.

In law, provocation is when a person is considered to have committed a criminal act partly because of a preceding set of events that might cause a reasonable individual to lose self control. This makes them less morally culpable than if the act was premeditated (pre-planned) and done out of pure malice. It "affects the quality of the actor's state of mind as an indicator of moral blameworthiness."

The rule of felony murder is a legal doctrine in some common law jurisdictions that broadens the crime of murder: when someone is killed in the commission of a dangerous or enumerated crime, the offender, and also the offender's accomplices or co-conspirators, may be found guilty of murder.

Attempted murder is a crime of attempt in various jurisdictions.

Criminal transmission of HIV is the intentional or reckless infection of a person with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This is often conflated, in laws and in discussion, with criminal exposure to HIV, which does not require the transmission of the virus and often, as in the cases of spitting and biting, does not include a realistic means of transmission. Some countries or jurisdictions, including some areas of the U.S., have enacted laws expressly to criminalize HIV transmission or exposure, charging those accused with criminal transmission of HIV. Other countries charge the accused under existing laws with such crimes as murder, manslaughter, attempted murder, assault or fraud.

Assault occasioning grievous bodily harm is a term used in English criminal law to describe the severest forms of battery. It refers to two offences that are created by sections 18 and 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. The distinction between these two sections is the requirement of specific intent for section 18; the offence under section 18 is variously referred to as "wounding with intent" or "causing grievous bodily harm with intent", whereas the offence under section 20 is variously referred to as "unlawful wounding", "malicious wounding" or "inflicting grievous bodily harm".

Malice aforethought is the "premeditation" or "predetermination" required as an element of some crimes in some jurisdictions and a unique element for first-degree or aggravated murder in a few. Insofar as the term is still in use, it has a technical meaning that has changed substantially over time.

Assault occasioning actual bodily harm is a statutory offence of aggravated assault in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Hong Kong and the Solomon Islands. It has been abolished in the Republic of Ireland and in South Australia, but replaced with a similar offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law of Australia</span>

The criminal law of Australia is the body of law in Australia that relates to crime.

In criminal law, intent is a subjective state of mind that must accompany the acts of certain crimes to constitute a violation. A more formal, generally synonymous legal term is scienter: intent or knowledge of wrongdoing.

In English criminal law, intention is one of the types of mens rea that, when accompanied by an actus reus, constitutes a crime.

In the criminal law of Australia, self-defence is a legal defence to a charge of causing injury or death in defence of the person or, to a limited extent, property, or a partial defence to murder if the degree of force used was excessive.

Murder is an offence under the common law legal system of England and Wales. It is considered the most serious form of homicide, in which one person kills another with the intention to unlawfully cause either death or serious injury. The element of intentionality was originally termed malice aforethought, although it required neither malice nor premeditation. Baker states that many killings done with a high degree of subjective recklessness were treated as murder from the 12th century right through until the 1974 decision in DPP v Hyam.

Manslaughter is a common law legal term for homicide considered by law as less culpable than murder. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is sometimes said to have first been made by the ancient Athenian lawmaker Draco in the 7th century BC.

<i>Crimes Act 1900</i> Legislation of NSW, Australia that establishes a majority of criminal offences

The Crimes Act1900 (NSW) is an Act of the Parliament of New South Wales that defines an extensive list of offences and sets out punishments for the majority of criminal offences in New South Wales (NSW), Australia. The Act, alongside the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) and the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), form the almost complete basis of criminal law for the State. It is the primary criminal law statute of NSW, and which formed the basis for the Australian Capital Territory's Crimes Act1900 (ACT).

Allan Baker and Kevin Crump are a notorious Australian duo of rapists and double murderers who were sentenced to life imprisonment in 1974. Baker is serving his sentence at Clarence Correctional Centre whereas Crump died incarcerated at Wellington Correctional Centre in 2023.

Fault, as a legal term, refers to legal blameworthiness and responsibility in each area of law. It refers to both the actus reus and the mental state of the defendant. The basic principle is that a defendant should be able to contemplate the harm that his actions may cause, and therefore should aim to avoid such actions. Different forms of liability employ different notions of fault, in some there is no need to prove fault, but the absence of it.

Bruce Allan Burrell was an Australian convicted kidnapper and double murderer, who in 2006 was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment plus 44 years for the 1995 murder of 74-year-old Dorothy Davis and the 1997 murder of 39-year-old Kerry Whelan, neither of whom were ever found, with Burrell not revealing the location of his victims' bodies. Burrell died at the Prince of Wales Hospital at Randwick, whilst still in prison custody on 4 August 2016, aged 63, from lung and liver cancer.

Life imprisonment is the most severe criminal sentence available to the courts in Australia. Most cases attracting the sentence are murder. It is also imposed, albeit rarely, for sexual assault, manufacturing and trafficking commercial quantities of illicit drugs, and offences against the justice system and government security.

Elizabeth Lillian Fullerton is an Australian lawyer, specialising in criminal law, who has been a judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales since February 2007.

References

  1. ↑ For e.g., Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 18
  2. ↑ Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) s 115.1
  3. ↑ Lanham, David; Wood, David; Bartal, Bronwyn; Evans, Rob (2006). Criminal Laws in Australia. Federation Press. ISBN   978-1-86287-558-6.
  4. ↑ Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA).
  5. ↑ Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 11 Murder.
  6. ↑ Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 5 Interpretation .
  7. ↑ Balestrieri, Davide; Giraldi, Carmen (2000). Introduzione allo studio del diritto penale irlandese. I principi (in Italian). CEDAM. ISBN   978-88-13-22928-3.
  8. ↑ Cadoppi, Alberto (1992). Mens rea (in Italian). Utet.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 18 Murder and manslaughter defined.
  10. 1 2 Murray v The Queen [2002] HCA 26 , (2002) 211 CLR 193, High Court.
  11. ↑ Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 19a Punishment for murder.
  12. 1 2 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Table Standard non-parole periods.
  13. 1 2 R v Crabbe [1985] HCA 22 , (1985) 156 CLR 464(26 March 1985), High Court.
  14. 1 2 Boughey v R [1986] HCA 29 , (1986) 161 CLR 10, High Court.
  15. 1 2 3 Royall v R [1991] HCA 27 , (1991) 172 CLR 378(25 June 1991), High Court.
  16. ↑ Campbell v R [2014] NSWCCA 175 , Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  17. 1 2 Ryan v R [1967] HCA 2 , (1967) 121 CLR 205, High Court.
  18. ↑ R v Munro (1981) 4 A Crim R 67, Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW). LawCite records.
  19. ↑ Mraz v The Queen [1955] HCA 59 , (1955) 93 CLR 493, High Court.
  20. ↑ R v Taktak (1988) 14 NSWLR 226, Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW). LawCite records.
  21. ↑ Stone and Dobinson [1977] QB 354, Court of Appeal (England and Wales). LawCite records.
  22. ↑ Burns v R [2002] HCA 35 , (2012) 246 CLR 334, High Court.
  23. ↑ R v Styman; R v Taber [2004] NSWCCA 245 , Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  24. ↑ R v BW & SW [2009] NSWSC 529 , Supreme Court (NSW).
  25. 1 2 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 23 Trial for murder--partial defence of extreme provocation.
  26. ↑ Davis v R (1998) 100 A Crim R 573, Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  27. ↑ Edwards v R [1973] AC 648, Privy Council (on appeal from Hong Kong).
  28. ↑ Stingel v R [1990] HCA 61 , (1990) 171 CLR 312, High Court.
  29. ↑ Singh v R [2012] NSWSC 637 , Supreme Court (NSW).
  30. ↑ R v Fahda [2013] NSWCCA 86 , Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  31. ↑ Moffa v R [1977] HCA 14 , (1977) 138 CLR 601, High Court.
  32. ↑ R v Johnson [2003] NSWCCA 129 (22 May 2003), Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  33. ↑ R v Won [2012] NSWSC 855 , Supreme Court (NSW).
  34. ↑ R v Sparks; R v D Stracey; R v P Stracey [2010] NSWSC 1512 , Supreme Court (NSW).
  35. ↑ Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 3B.
  36. ↑ Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 12(1)(a).
  37. ↑ Criminal Code (NT) s 156.
  38. ↑ Criminal Code (Qld) s 302 Murder.
  39. ↑ Criminal Code (Tas) s 157(1)(a).
  40. ↑ Criminal Code (WA) s 279.
  41. ↑ South Australia and Victoria do not have statutory definitions of ‘murder’ but in these jurisdictions the common law applies.
  42. ↑ R v Cittadini [2009] NSWCCA 302 , Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
  43. ↑ Wilson v R [1992] HCA 31 , (1992) 174 CLR 313, High Court at [318], [323]-[328], [332]-[335] per Mason CJ, Toohey, Gaudron, and McHugh JJ).
  44. ↑ Hudd v R [2013] NSWCCA 57 (15 March 2013), Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.