Murder of Amanda Duffy

Last updated

Amanda Duffy, a 19-year-old Scottish student, was killed in grisly circumstances in 1992. The main suspect, Francis Auld, was tried for murder in the High Court of Justiciary in Glasgow and was acquitted when the jury returned a majority verdict of "not proven". A bid by prosecutors to try Auld for a second time on the basis of new evidence was rejected by the courts in 2016. [1] Auld died of pancreatic cancer in July 2017, aged 45. [2]

Contents

The outcome of Auld's trial prompted a national conversation around the continued existence of the "not proven" verdict and around double jeopardy rules. [3]

Murder

Duffy, a 19-year-old student at Motherwell College, went missing in the early hours of Saturday 30 May 1992 after a night out with friends, celebrating the fact she had been called to audition at the Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama. [4] Her body was found by passers-by that evening in an area of waste ground near a car park at Miller Street, Hamilton, South Lanarkshire.

Duffy was found "lying on her back, naked from the waist down, with her face and head covered in blood" and branches and twigs "had been inserted into her mouth, nostrils and vagina". [5] According to a post mortem examination, she had died between 1.30 am and 1.30 pm, having suffered extensive blunt force injuries to the head and neck, as well as asphyxia and injuries to the anus and rectum. [5]

Trial

20-year-old Francis Auld was tried for Duffy's murder in 1992. Witnesses had seen Auld with Duffy between midnight and 1 am. A bite to Duffy's right breast, which would have been "excruciatingly painful" and was inflicted within an hour prior to death, matched Auld's dental features. However, Auld said that he had left Duffy in the company of someone named "Mark", who was never identified. [5] The jury returned a majority verdict of "not proven" in November 1992. [6]

Aftermath

Threatening phone calls

In 1994, Auld was convicted of making threatening phone calls to two former friends, and sentenced to 240 hours community service. He admitted telling one of them "Patrick, you thought Amanda was the last. Well, you're next, after Caroline." [7]

Civil action

In 1995, Duffy's parents, Joe and Kathleen, sued Auld in civil court, where the standard of evidence is lower. Auld did not contest the lawsuit and the couple were awarded a £50,000 payout. [8] [3] This amount was never paid. [9]

Calls to scrap "not proven" verdict

Following the verdict in the criminal trial, Duffy's parents launched a high-profile campaign for the "not proven" verdict to be abolished in Scots law. A national petition was launched at an event in Glasgow addressed by Joe Duffy. In 1993, the couple's Member of Parliament, George Robertson, launched the Criminal Procedure (Abolition Of Not Proven Verdict) (Scotland) Bill in the House of Commons to scrap the verdict, though its likelihood of success was considered slim. [10]

The Duffys' campaign also increased pressure on the Scottish Office, which eventually launched a consultation on scrapping the "not proven" verdict in 1994. MP John Home Robertson, in a 1995 bid to scrap the verdict, praised "Kathleen and Joe Duffy for the thoughtful and constructive campaign that they have been waging". [11] When the Scottish Parliament debated scrapping the verdict in 2016, the Duffy case was cited by MSP Michael McMahon in support of scrapping the verdict. [12]

Bid for retrial

After the introduction of the Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011 , which allows for a person to be tried twice for the same crime in certain circumstances, Strathclyde Police reopened an investigation into Duffy's murder in 2012 because they believed that "certain people have information in relation to Amanda's murder that they are withholding, perhaps from a sense of misguided loyalty". Police Scotland's cold case unit later re-examined the crime on the instruction of the Crown Office.

In 2015, prosecutors launched a bid under the Act to re-try Auld for the murder. [6] However, the bid was rejected by judges in February 2016. [13] Jim Govan, the chief forensic scientist at the original trial, then went on public record, saying the jury got the verdict wrong and there was more than enough evidence to convict. [14] Auld died of cancer in July 2017. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

In jurisprudence, double jeopardy is a procedural defence that prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same charges following an acquittal or conviction and in rare cases prosecutorial and/or judge misconduct in the same jurisdiction. Double jeopardy is a common concept in criminal law – in civil law, a similar concept is that of res judicata. The double jeopardy protection in criminal prosecutions bars only an identical prosecution for the same offence; however, a different offence may be charged on identical evidence at a second trial. Res judicata protection is stronger – it precludes any causes of action or claims that arise from a previously litigated subject matter.

In law, a conviction is the determination by a court of law that a defendant is guilty of a crime. A conviction may follow a guilty plea that is accepted by the court, a jury trial in which a verdict of guilty is delivered, or a trial by judge in which the defendant is found guilty.

Jury nullification, also known in the United Kingdom as jury equity, or a perverse verdict, is when the jury in a criminal trial gives a verdict of not guilty even though they think a defendant has broken the law. The jury's reasons may include the belief that the law itself is unjust, that the prosecutor has misapplied the law in the defendant's case, that the punishment for breaking the law is too harsh, or general frustrations with the criminal justice system. Some juries have also refused to convict due to their own prejudices in favor of the defendant. Such verdicts are possible because a jury has an absolute right to return any verdict it chooses. Nullification is not an official part of criminal procedure but is the logical consequence of two rules governing the systems in which it exists:

  1. Jurors cannot be punished for passing an incorrect verdict.
  2. In many jurisdictions, a defendant who is acquitted cannot be tried a second time for the same offense.
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acquittal</span> The legal result of a verdict of not guilty

In common law jurisdictions, an acquittal means that the prosecution has failed to prove that the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the charge presented. It certifies that the accused is free from the charge of an offense, as far as criminal law is concerned. The finality of an acquittal is dependent on the jurisdiction. In some countries, such as the United States, an acquittal prohibits the retrial of the accused for the same offense, even if new evidence surfaces that further implicates the accused. The effect of an acquittal on criminal proceedings is the same whether it results from a jury verdict or results from the operation of some other rule that discharges the accused. In other countries, like Australia and the UK, the prosecuting authority may appeal an acquittal similar to how a defendant may appeal a conviction — but usually only if new and compelling evidence comes to light or the accused has interfered with or intimidated a juror or witness.

Guy Paul Morin is a Canadian who was wrongly convicted of the October 1984 rape and murder of his nine-year-old next-door neighbour, Christine Jessop of Queensville, north of Toronto, Ontario. DNA testing led to a subsequent overturning of this verdict. On October 15, 2020, the Toronto Police Service announced a DNA match identifying Calvin Hoover as the one whose semen was recovered from Jessop’s underwear. Hoover killed himself in 2015.

Not proven is a verdict available to a court of law in Scotland. Under Scots law, a criminal trial may end in one of three verdicts, one of conviction ("guilty") and two of acquittal.

Jury tampering is the crime of unduly attempting to influence the composition or decisions of a jury during the course of a trial. The means by which this crime could be perpetrated can include attempting to discredit potential jurors to ensure they will not be selected for duty. Once selected, jurors could be bribed or intimidated to act in a certain manner on duty. It could also involve making unauthorized contact with them for the purpose of introducing prohibited outside information and then arguing for a mistrial. In the United States, people have also been charged with jury tampering for handing out pamphlets and flyers indicating that jurors have certain rights and obligations, including an obligation to vote their conscience notwithstanding the instructions they are given by the judge.

Kriss Donald was a 15-year-old white Scottish teenager who was kidnapped and murdered in Glasgow in 2004 by a gang of five men of Pakistani origin, some of whom fled to Pakistan after the crime. Daanish Zahid, Imran Shahid, Zeeshan Shahid and Mohammed Faisal Mustaq were later found guilty of racially motivated murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. A fifth man, Zahid Mohammed, pleaded guilty to kidnapping, assault and lying to police and was sentenced to five years in prison. He later went on to testify against the other four at their trials.

Melvin Henry Ignatow was a resident of Louisville, Kentucky, who was tried for the 1988 murder of his former girlfriend, Brenda Sue Schaefer. The case was controversial since Ignatow was acquitted of the charge, but later admitted to killing Schaefer. Under the legal principle of double jeopardy, however, Ignatow could not be tried a second time for the murder. He was instead convicted and served roughly 7 years in prison for several instances of perjury in his grand jury testimony for the case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glasgow ice cream wars</span> 1980s turf war between rival gangs

The ice cream wars were turf wars in the East End of Glasgow, Scotland, in the 1980s between rival criminal organisations selling drugs and stolen goods from ice cream vans. Van operators were involved in frequent violence and intimidation tactics, the most notable example of which involved a driver and his family who were killed in an arson attack that resulted in a twenty-year court battle. The conflicts generated widespread public outrage, and earned the Strathclyde Police the nickname of "Serious Chimes Squad" for its perceived failure to address them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Amanda Knox</span> American writer and activist

Amanda Marie Knox is an American author, activist, and journalist. She spent almost four years incarcerated in Italy after her wrongful conviction in the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher, a fellow exchange student, with whom she shared an apartment in Perugia. In 2015, Knox was definitively acquitted by the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation. In 2024, an Italian appellate court upheld Amanda Knox's slander conviction for falsely accusing Patrick Lumumba of murdering Meredith Kercher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World's End Murders</span> Crime in Edinburgh, Scotland, in 1977

The World's End Murders is the colloquial name given to the murder of two girls, Christine Eadie, 17, and Helen Scott, 17, in Edinburgh, in October 1977. The case is so named because both victims were last seen alive leaving The World's End pub in Edinburgh's Old Town. The only person to stand trial accused of the murders, Angus Robertson Sinclair, was acquitted in 2007 in controversial circumstances. Following the amendment of the law of double jeopardy, which would have prevented his retrial, Sinclair was retried in October 2014 and convicted of both murders on 14 November 2014. He was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years, the longest sentence by a Scottish court, meaning he would have been 106 years old when he was eligible for a potential release on parole. He died at HM Prison Glenochil aged 73 on 11 March 2019. Coincidentally, he died on the same day the BBC's Crimewatch Roadshow programme profiled the murders.

The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: "[N]or shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb..." The four essential protections included are prohibitions against, for the same offense:

Capital punishment in South Africa was abolished on 6 June 1995 by the ruling of the Constitutional Court in the case of S v Makwanyane, following a five-year and four-month moratorium that had been in effect since February 1990.

Ludwig v. Massachusetts, 427 U.S. 618 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Massachusetts two-tier court system did not deprive Ludwig of his U.S. Const., Amend. XIV right to a jury trial and did not violate the double jeopardy clause of the U.S. Const., Amend. V.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011 is an Act of the Scottish Parliament which received Royal Assent on 27 April 2011. and came into force on 28 November 2011. The Act creates a statutory basis for the rule against trying a person twice for the same crime. The Act also creates three narrow exceptions to this rule.

Blueford v. Arkansas, 566 U.S. 599 (2012), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified the limits of the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar retrial of counts that a jury had previously unanimously voted to acquit on, when a mistrial is declared after the jury deadlocked on a lesser included offense.

David Smith is an English repeat murderer, rapist and suspected serial killer who came to national prominence in 1999 when he was convicted of murdering a sex worker six years after having been acquitted of an "almost identical" murder. Cleared of the murder of 33-year-old west London sex worker Sarah Crump in 1993, Smith was found guilty in 1999 of the killing of 21-year-old Paddington sex worker Amanda Walker. Smith has since been linked to a number of other murders of sex workers across Britain.

Michael Weir is a British double murderer and serial burglar who was the first person in English legal history to have been convicted of the same crime twice. In 1999, he was jailed for the murder of 78-year-old war veteran Leonard Harris. Weir's conviction was quashed a year later at the Court of Appeal on a technicality, only for him to be re-convicted in 2019 in a 'double jeopardy' case after new evidence was found. Weir was also convicted in 2019 of the murder of 83-year-old Rose Seferian, who was also killed during a burglary five weeks after Harris, which made additional history as the first time a second murder charge was added to a double jeopardy case. Upon Weir's conviction at the Old Bailey in December 2019, Justice Maura McGowan told the jury that they had made "legal history".

References

  1. ↑ "Francis Auld retrial bid rejected over Amanda Duffy death in 1992". BBC News. 19 February 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  2. 1 2 Hannan, Martin (12 July 2017). "Francis Auld – the man who stood trial for the murder of student Amanda Duffy – dies of cancer aged 45" . Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  3. 1 2 Garavelli, Dani (3 June 2012). "Justice for Amanda Duffy". The Scotsman. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  4. ↑ "Murder of drama student Amanda Duffy reopened". The Herald. 30 May 2012. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  5. 1 2 3 "THE APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 3(3)(B) OF THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY (SCOTLAND) ACT 2011 BY HER MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE AGAINST FRANCIS DAVID AULD". 19 February 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  6. 1 2 "Lord Advocate invokes double jeopardy law over 1992 murder". Scottish Legal News . 11 May 2015. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  7. ↑ "Community service for man cleared of Duffy murder". The Herald. 1 April 1994. Retrieved 24 December 2018.
  8. ↑ "Auld declines to contest civil action. Amanda Duffy's parents left shocked by outcome of £50,000 suit". The Herald. 26 May 1995. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  9. ↑ "Family may never get justice after man accused of killing teen dies". The Herald. 12 July 2017. Retrieved 24 December 2018.
  10. ↑ "MP joins call to abolish 'not proven' verdicts". The Independent. 9 March 1993. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  11. ↑ "Verdict of not proven no longer competent". 7 June 1995. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  12. ↑ "Official Report: Meeting of the Parliament 25 February 2016". 25 February 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  13. ↑ "Crown's 'double jeopardy' application to retry Francis Auld for murder of Amanda Duffy refused". Scottish Legal News . 22 February 2016. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  14. ↑ Lynn McPherson, The jury got it wrong: Amanda Duffy murder scene investigators break silence on not proven case, Daily Record , 28 February, 2016
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.