NMS Viscolul

Last updated
Romanian MTB Viscolul.jpg
Viscolul arriving in the port of Constanța, 1940
History
Naval Ensign of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom
NameMTB-23
Builder Vospers, Portsmouth
Laid down1939
Launched1939
Completed1939
Commissioned1939
Out of service1940
FateSold to Romania
Naval ensign of Romania (1922-1947).svg Romania
NameViscolul
Commissioned1940
Out of service1944
FateCaptured by the Soviet Union
Naval Ensign of the Soviet Union (1950-1991).svg Soviet Union
NameTK-955
Commissioned1944
Out of service1945
FateReturned to Romania, later scrapped
Service record
Commanders: Ion Zaharia
Operations:
Victories:
  • 1 destroyer damaged
  • 1 submarine sunk
General characteristics
Class and type Vospers type motor torpedo boat
Type Motor torpedo boat/Escort vessel
Displacement32 tons
Length21.95 m (72 ft 0 in)
Beam5 m (16 ft 5 in)
Draft1.1 m (3 ft 7 in)
Propulsion3 Isotta-Fraschini petrol engines, 2 shafts, 3,450 horse power
Speed40 knots (74 km/h; 46 mph)
Complement12
Armament
  • 2 x quadruple 7.7 mm machine guns
  • 2 x 533 mm torpedo tubes
  • 8 depth charges or 4 mines

NMS Viscolul was the most successful and the longest-serving motor torpedo boat of the Romanian Navy during the Second World War. She supported the Siege of Odessa and took part in the action of 9 July 1941.

Contents

Construction and specifications

Viscolul was a Vospers-type motor torpedo boat, one of three purchased by Romania from the United Kingdom. The three boats were originally launched and completed in 1939 as MTB-20 (Viforul), MTB-21 (Vijelia) and MTB-23 (Viscolul). They were acquired by Romania in 1940. Along with her sister ships, Viscolul had a displacement of 32 tons, measuring 21.95 m (72.0 ft) in length, with a beam of 5 m (16 ft) and a draught of 1.1 m (3 ft 7 in). She was armed with two quadruple 7.7 mm machine guns, two torpedo tubes and could carry up to eight depth charges or four mines. Power plant consisted of three Isotta Fraschini petrol engines powering two shafts, generating 3,450 hp which gave her a top speed of 40 kn (74 km/h; 46 mph). She had a crew of up to 12. [1]

Service

Quadruple machine gun system used aboard Viscolul and her sisters Romanian quadruple naval machine gun.jpg
Quadruple machine gun system used aboard Viscolul and her sisters

During World War II, she was commanded by Lieutenant-Commander Ion Zaharia, who would later command the motor torpedo boat Vedenia and the entire Romanian MTB squadron, consisting of 7 boats. [2]

On 9 July 1941, one week after Romania launched Operation München as part of Operation Barbarossa , Viscolul and Vijelia, together with the 250t-class torpedo boat Năluca , engaged an enemy submarine near Mangalia. Năluca was the first to arrive at the scene and subsequently located and engaged the Soviet Shchuka-class submarine Shch-206. In the first part of the battle, Năluca attacked the submarine with 20 mm rounds, but the latter submerged in order to escape. The Romanian torpedo boat subsequently used depth charges, being soon joined by the two motor torpedo boats. At 2:56 pm, the Soviet submarine was confirmed sunk by Viscolul, none of her crew of 38 survived. [3] [4] [5] [6]

On the night of 18 September, during the Siege of Odessa, Viscolul and Vijelia attacked a Soviet convoy south of Odessa, each boat launching her two torpedoes at the closest enemy destroyer. Three of the four torpedoes missed. The fourth torpedo struck and damaged the Soviet destroyer, but failed to detonate. [7] [8]

On 9 November 1941, her sisters Viforul and Vijelia were sunk near Odessa by Soviet mines. [9]

Thus, Viscolul remained the sole MTB of the Romanian Navy for almost two years, until 7 MAS boats were acquired in August 1943. [10] By 1944, Viscolul was fitted for escort service. In this capacity, she carried out multiple escort missions in May 1944. [11]

Viscolul was captured by Soviet forces in September 1944 and commissioned as TK-955. She was returned 1 year later, but never commissioned again due to her bad condition.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romanian Naval Forces</span> Military unit

The Romanian Navy is the navy branch of the Romanian Armed Forces; it operates in the Black Sea and on the Danube. It traces its history back to 1860.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimean offensive</span> WWII offensives by USSR Red Army

The Crimean offensive, known in German sources as the Battle of the Crimea, was a series of offensives by the Red Army directed at the German-held Crimea. The Red Army's 4th Ukrainian Front engaged the German 17th Army of Army Group A, which consisted of Wehrmacht and Romanian formations. The battles ended with the evacuation of the Crimea by the Germans. German and Romanian forces suffered considerable losses during the evacuation.

NMS <i>Smeul</i> Romanian torpedo boat

NMS Smeul was a torpedo boat of the Royal Romanian Navy. She was commissioned in 1920, after initially serving as Tb 83 F in the Austro-Hungarian Navy during World War I. She and six more sister ships were awarded to Romania as reparations after the war ended.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Horia Macellariu</span>

Horia Macellariu was a Romanian rear admiral, commander of the Royal Romanian Navy's Black Sea Fleet during the Second World War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operation München</span>

Operation München was the Romanian codename of a joint German-Romanian offensive during the German invasion of the Soviet Union in World War II, with the primary objective of recapturing Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina and the Hertsa region, ceded by Romania to the Soviet Union a year before. The operation concluded successfully after 24 days of fighting. Axis formations involved included the Romanian Third and the Fourth Armies and the German Eleventh Army. The invasion was followed by a genocide against the Jewish population of Bessarabia.

NMS <i>Amiral Murgescu</i>

NMS Amiral Murgescu was a minelayer and convoy escort of the Romanian Navy, the first sea-going warship built in Romania and the largest Romanian-built warship of World War II. She laid numerous minefields, from the Bulgarian port of Burgas to the Crimean port of Sevastopol, which inflicted significant losses to the Soviet Black Sea Fleet. She also carried out numerous convoy escort missions and took part in the Axis evacuation of the Crimea in May 1944. Due to her success in combat, she was decorated twice by May 1944. She was captured by the Soviet Union in September 1944 and served until 1988, when she was scrapped.

NMS <i>Marsuinul</i>

NMS Marsuinul was a submarine of the Romanian Navy, one of the few warships built in Romania during the Second World War. She was the largest Romanian-built submarine and the most powerful and modern Axis submarine in the Black Sea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Submarine warfare in the Black Sea campaigns (1941)</span> Sea-based fighting during World War II

Submarine warfare in the Black Sea in World War II during 1941 primarily involved engagements between submarines of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet attacking Axis merchantmen defended by Romanian and Bulgarian warships. These engagements were a part of the naval Black Sea campaigns between Axis and Soviet naval forces.

The Romanian Navy during World War II was the main Axis naval force in the Black Sea campaigns and fought against the Soviet Union's Black Sea Fleet from 1941 to 1944. Operations consisted mainly of mine warfare, but there were also escort missions and localized naval engagements. The largest naval action fought by the Romanian Navy was the 26 June 1941 Raid on Constanța, and its most extensive operation was the 1944 evacuation of the Crimea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Action of 9 July 1941</span>

The action of 9 July 1941 was a naval engagement between the Soviet and Romanian navies during World War II, taking place near the Romanian port-city of Mangalia.

NMS <i>Constanța</i> Romanian submarine tender

NMS Constanța was a submarine tender of the Romanian Navy. She was commissioned in 1931 and fought in the Second World War, being scrapped in 1977.

NMS <i>Sublocotenent Ghiculescu</i>

NMS Sublocotenent Ghiculescu was a specialized ASW gunboat of the Romanian Navy. Initially built as a French warship in late World War I, she was purchased by Romania in 1920 and fought during World War II, sinking two submarines and one motor torpedo boat. After 1 year of Soviet service, she was returned to Romania and served as a survey vessel until 2002.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet Navy surface raids on Western Black Sea</span>

The Soviet Black Sea Fleet during the first years of the Black Sea campaigns (1941–44) conducted raiding operations along the Western coast of the Black Sea aimed to disrupt Axis communications and supplies by sea.

NMS <i>Năluca</i>

NMS Năluca was a torpedo boat of the Royal Romanian Navy. She was commissioned in 1920, after initially serving as Tb 82 F in the Austro-Hungarian Navy during World War I. She and six more sister ships were awarded to Romania as reparations after the war ended.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Action of 26 June 1941</span>

The action of 26 June 1941 consisted in an engagement between the navies of the Soviet Union and the Kingdom of Romania, taking place on the Chilia branch of the Danube Delta, near the commune of Ceatalchioi. The action resulted in a Romanian victory and the withdrawal of the Soviet vessels, one of them being damaged and later captured.

<i>OMm35</i>-class minelayer

The OMm35 class was a group of two small minelayers of the Czechoslovakian Navy. They were captured by Germany in 1939 and transferred to the Romanian Navy in 1941. The two vessels were then captured by Soviet forces in September 1944, their subsequent fates being unknown.

The Number 31 class was a group of four small multi-purpose motor launches of the Royal Romanian Navy. They served on the Danube and in the Black Sea aboard the escort minelayer Amiral Murgescu.

Submarine warfare in the Black Sea in World War II during 1942 involved engagements between primarily submarines of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet attacking Axis merchantmen defended by Romanian and German naval warships. These engagements were a part of the Black Sea campaigns between Axis and Soviet naval forces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Naval operations in Romanian-occupied Soviet waters</span>

Between 1941 and 1944, Romania held control over much of the Ukrainian Black Sea coast East of the Crimea. This was acquired during Operation Barbarossa. The Romanian conquest of the Soviet Western Black Sea coast started in July 1941 during Operation München and ended in October that year, after the Siege of Odessa. In the aftermath of these actions, Romania acquired two new sectors of coastline: the Bessarabian coast and the Transnistrian Coast. The latter was lost in April 1944, but the former was successfully defended until August 1944.

References

  1. Robert Gardiner, Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922-1946, Naval Institute Press, 1980, p. 362
  2. Jipa Rotaru, Ioan Damaschin, Glorie și dramă: Marina Regală Română, 1940-1945, Ion Cristoiu Publishing, 2000, p. 258
  3. Antony Preston, Warship 2001-2002, Conway Maritime Press, 2001, p. 72
  4. Cristian Crăciunoiu, Romanian navy torpedo boats, Modelism, 2003, p. 135
  5. Donald A Bertke, Gordon Smith, Don Kindell, World War II Sea War, Volume 4: Germany Sends Russia to the Allies, Bertke Publications, 2012, p. 134
  6. Jipa Rotaru, Ioan Damaschin, Glorie și dramă: Marina Regală Română, 1940-1945, Ion Cristoiu Publishing, 2000, pp. 34, 50 and 51
  7. Jipa Rotaru, Ioan Damaschin, Glorie și dramă: Marina Regală Română, 1940-1945, Ion Cristoiu Publishing, 2000, pp. 74-75
  8. Jipa Rotaru, Octavian Burcin, Vladimir Zodian, Mareșalul Ion Antonescu: Am făcut "războiul sfânt" împotriva bolșevismului: Campania anului 1941, p. 180
  9. Donald A Bertke, Gordon Smith, Don Kindell, World War II Sea War, Volume 4: Germany Sends Russia to the Allies, Bertke Publications, 2012, p. 390
  10. Robert Gardiner, Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922-1946, Naval Institute Press, 1980, p. 314
  11. Antony Preston, Warship 2001-2002, Conway Maritime Press, 2001, p. 84