National Commission for the Prevention of Torture

Last updated

National Commission for the Prevention of Torture
(in German) Nationale Kommission zur Verhütung von Folter
(in French) Commission nationale de prévention de la torture
(in Italian) Commissione nazionale per la prevenzione della tortura
Logo der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft.svg
Independent administrative authority overview
Formed2010;14 years ago (2010)
Jurisdiction Switzerland
HeadquartersSchwanengasse, 2 ; 3003 Bern
Website https://www.nkvf.admin.ch/

The National Commission for the Prevention of Torture (NCPT) is an independent Swiss federal body. It was created by the Federal Council in 2010 following the ratification of the UN Optional Protocol against Torture. Its role is to monitor respect for human rights in Switzerland and to make recommendations to the authorities where necessary. The NCPT is strongly committed to the issues of detention conditions, conditions of deportation of migrants and living conditions in institutions (e.g. psychiatric institutions). In addition to its regular reports (visits to detention facilities, etc.), the Commission publishes reports on specific topics.

Contents

Overview

Background

On 24 September 2009 the Swiss Confederation became the fiftieth state to sign the UN Optional Protocol against Torture. [1] One of the conditions for signing was the creation of a commission dedicated to the monitoring and prevention of torture on the territory of the country in question, and the Federal Council established the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture for this purpose in 2010. [2] [3]

Besides the UN Optional Protocol, the activities of the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture are governed and regulated by the Federal Act on the Commission for the Prevention of Torture. [4]

Missions and activities

The commission's main task is to visit places of deprivation of liberty. The commission's main task is to visit places of deprivation of liberty. This definition should be understood in a very broad sense. Thus, while prisons are the primary places of detention, the scope of the NCPT's visit also includes police stations (many of which have cells for police custody), psychiatric hospitals and administrative detention centres. These places are inherently prone to human rights abuses. [5]

Initially, it was not the task of the commission to observe deportation flights of rejected migrants. However, it was acquired in 2012 after severe criticism of the methods used by the federal administration and the need for the Confederation to bring itself into legal conformity with European directives.

The main activities of the committee are the publication of reports on the visits of the institutions carried out by its members. It also publishes specific reports on issues within its remit. Finally, it can carry out lobbying activities, including public statements as in 2012. [6]

Membership and organisation

The commission is composed of 12 members, all experts in criminal justice or deprivation of liberty. [7] [8]

A group of observers, also experts in these fields, may be mandated by the commission to observe repatriation flights. [9]

History

In 2006, the Federal Council submitted a proposal for the creation of a commission for the prevention of torture to the Parliament. [10] This was part of the process of ratifying the UN Optional Protocol against Torture.

In 2009, the Confederation launched a campaign to recruit experts in order to create the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture the following year. [8] At the same time, the Parliament voted to create the NCPT. [11]

The National Commission for the Prevention of Torture is established in 2010. [3] [12]

In 2012, at the end of its second year of operation, the President of the NCPT calls for changes in the organisation of the commission. [13] It indicates in particular that its organisational structure should be reviewed in order to legally clarify several observation missions carried out outside its initial administrative framework.

Mission extension: observers of deportations of rejected migrants

In the early 2010s, Switzerland was marked by a major controversy concerning the deportation of rejected migrants. Following the death of a 29-year-old Nigerian during deportation, the methods used by the Federal Office for Migration during repatriation are being strongly criticised. [14] The violence surrounding the special flights is being denounced.

In order to return people who refuse to take a scheduled flight to their country of origin, including under police escort, the Swiss administration has chosen to operate special flights. [14] These flights, which numbered 45 in 2008 and 43 in 2009, are specially chartered by the authorities to deport recalcitrant people. Migrants are shackled to get on the plane, even tied to chairs and carried if they resist boarding. Once on the plane, they are tied to their seats.

In 2011, the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture published a severe report on the methods of deportation during special flights by the Federal Office for Migration. [15] [16] Although the frequency of special flights was slowed down by the criminal investigation in 2010, [17] the commission's observers report that the procedure used to deport recalcitrant migrants remained almost the same as when the young Nigerian died. The only significant difference is the presence of a doctor on the aircraft. However, there are insufficient doctors and their training is not adapted to this context. The members of the committee are particularly critical of the systematic use of the maximum security procedure, where other countries apply procedures in a more gradual and nuanced way. For example, the use of heavy restraints and shackles is the norm on Swiss special flights, while the Austrian authorities explain that restraints and handcuffs are used in only 5% of cases.

Moreover, in violation of a European regulation, the Federal Office for Migration did not appoint independent observers to monitor the proper conduct and respect for human rights during deportations. [16] In March 2012, a solution was found by adding the accompanying of returned migrants to the scope of the NCPT's tasks. This monitoring of the NCPT [18] [19] [5] requires a set of legal adjustments to ensure the independence of the observers. For example, it is not the Federal Office for Migration that mandates the commission to observe the smooth running of special flights.

Concerns and criticisms

Even before the establishment of the commission, reservations were expressed about the tasks and usefulness of the body. The reservations and criticisms generally concern the lack of resources allocated to the commission, its usefulness in relation to its resources and also the usefulness of signing up to binding international agreements on this issue. [20] [10]

Lack of funds

During the parliamentary debate to establish the commission, Amnesty criticised the Federal Council's proposals. While the association defends the merits of a body to monitor places of deprivation of liberty, it criticises the political authorities for the lack of resources that it is planned to allocate to it, given its broad field of competence (visits to prisons, but also to psychiatric hospitals, police stations, etc.). [10]

The President of the NCPT considers in 2010 that the budget foreseen for the functioning of the commission is insufficient. [20]

In 2019, the UN delegation of the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture made its first official visit to Switzerland. [21] After several days of visits to prisons, police stations, psychiatric hospitals and administrative detention centres in the cantons of Zurich, Geneva, Bern and Vaud, the UN experts called on the Confederation to increase the financial resources made available to the commission to carry out its tasks.

Alibi Committee

The parliamentary debate that preceded the creation of the commission shows the tensions generated by the authority of such a body. [10] While associations such as Amnesty or MPs such as Martine Brunschwig Graf recommend an ambitious policy and an extensive use of the NCPT, including the creation of a permanent secretariat (an essential condition to ensure its effectiveness according to the association), the Council of States is more reserved. Besides removing the reference to a permanent secretariat, it removes the notion of regularity for visits. A series of subsequent amendments reintroduce the regularity of visits but fail to create the permanent secretariat, which is merely foreseen. The position of the Swiss MPs therefore makes human rights defenders fear that the commission does not have sufficient credibility and legitimacy to be effective. The NCPT could then become counterproductive in the fight against torture, serving as an alibi for the authorities to dismiss critics.

Furthermore, the members of the committee recognise the difficulty they have in adopting an objective position on certain issues. [20] Indeed, having been chosen for their expertise and experience, the various members sometimes find themselves in conflicting positions. They then ask not to work on certain subjects, complicating the organisation of the NCPT's follow-up and raising fears of potential conflicts of interest.

Finally, it is the Commission itself which, noting the lack of resources and certain operational difficulties for the experts, fears playing an alibi role. [20]

Usefulness of international agreements against torture

Consistent with its sovereignist positions and its refusal to see the Confederation sign the Protocol, the Swiss People's Party (SVP) criticises the creation of the commission, which it considers unnecessary. [10] For the party representatives, such international conventions have little impact, as they are not signed by states that engage in reprehensible practices and create a complex legal situation for countries that are already active in this area. In a more general way, it is the obligation to comply with binding international standards (obligation of visits by an independent body) that is rejected by this political movement. The SVP points out that Swiss places of detention are visited, including by foreign bodies, without the need for a legal framework and the ratification of international agreements.

Human rights groups counter by pointing out that the strength of these agreements comes from the signatory countries and their willingness to create a binding legal framework on these issues. [10] They also indicate that the practical implementation of the agreements is leading authorities to innovate and create useful new structures. For example, the creation of monitoring commissions was not envisaged at the beginning of the UN's reflections on the Optional Protocol. It is only with practice that the various actors have concluded that these bodies are important.

In 2012, the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture called on the federal and political authorities to include the crime of torture in the Swiss criminal code. [6] The members of the NCPT explain that the legal provisions in force in the country must be brought into line with UN standards. [22] They are too ambiguous and their application is too restrictive. The aim is to clarify local situations in which appellants cannot invoke international law. This position paper is part of the preparation of the Universal Periodic Review before the Human Rights Council and echoes the demands of several associations involved in the issue in Switzerland.

Acceptance of the committee's work

In its first year of operation in 2011, the Commission publishes two reports on the Hindelbank prison (Bern) and the administrative detention centre in Grenchen (Valais). In the face of the Bernese authorities' distrust of the commission's work, associations indicate that the administrative authorities should rather rely on the commission's authority and influence in order to obtain support. [23]

During its Universal Periodic Review before the Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland highlights its concrete achievements in the defence of human rights. In this respect, the creation of the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture is considered a success by the authorities. [24]

The establishment of the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture has been welcomed by many international bodies involved in humanitarian and human rights issues. For example, during the review of Switzerland by the UN Human Rights Committee in 2017, the UN specialists welcomed the creation and progress made possible by the National Commission for the Prevention of Torture (the previous review dated from 2009, before the creation of the NCPT). [25] [26] On this occasion, the Committee recommends that the Confederation ensure the presence of CNPT observers during the removal of rejected migrants.

See also

Related Research Articles

The foreign relations of Switzerland are the primary responsibility of the Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA). Some international relations of Switzerland are handled by other departments of the federal administration of Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alain Berset</span> 97th President of the Swiss Confederation

Alain Berset is a Swiss politician who served as a Member of the Swiss Federal Council from 2012 to 2023. A member of the Social Democratic Party (SP/PS), he headed the Federal Department of Home Affairs from when he took office. Berset served as President of the Swiss Confederation for 2018 and 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Eritrea</span>

Human rights in Eritrea are viewed, as of the 2020s, by non-governmental organisations (NGOs) such as Human Rights Watch as among the worst in the world, particularly with regards to freedom of the press. Eritrea is a one-party state in which national legislative elections have been repeatedly postponed, the judiciary is weak, and constitutional provisions protecting individual freedom have yet to be fully implemented. Some Western countries, particularly the United States, accuse the government of Eritrea of arbitrary arrest and detentions and of detaining an unknown number of people without charge for their political activism. Additionally, Eritrean citizens, both men and women, are forcibly conscripted into the military with an indefinite length of service and used as forced labour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Juan E. Méndez</span> Argentine lawyer and activist

Juan E. Méndez is an Argentine lawyer, former United Nations Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, and a human rights activist known for his work on behalf of political prisoners.

Human Rights in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are substantially restricted. The UAE does not have democratically elected institutions and citizens don't have the right to change their government or form political parties. Activists and academics who criticize the government are detained and imprisoned, and their families are often harassed by the state security apparatus. There are reports of forced disappearances of foreign nationals and Emirati citizens, who have been abducted, detained and tortured in undisclosed locations, and denied the right to a speedy trial and access to counsel during investigations by the UAE government. Human Rights Watch states that Emirati laws maintain capital punishment and discriminate against women, migrants and LGBT individuals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Switzerland</span>

Human rights are largely respected in Switzerland, one of Europe's oldest democracies. Switzerland is often at or near the top in international rankings of civil liberties and political rights observance. Switzerland places human rights at the core of the nation's value system, as represented in its Federal Constitution. As described in its FDFA's Foreign Policy Strategy 2016-2019, the promotion of peace, mutual respect, equality and non-discrimination are central to the country's foreign relations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Morocco</span>

Morocco became a highly repressive country under the absolute monarchy of King Hassan II, and continues to be considered repressive under the reign of King Mohammed VI, though the latter has instituted some reforms. Dozens of journalists, artists, and ordinary citizens are regularly sentenced to lengthy prison sentences for exercising basic rights enjoyed elsewhere in the world, such as freedom of the press, protesting the government, or criticizing government officials. Morocco heavily restricts basic human rights, such as freedom of speech, the right to assembly, and the right to criticize officials. Moroccans also feel the pressures of inflation within the country, such as the lack of basic services like healthcare, clean water, and the difficulty of parents to access quality education for their children. While there have been a handful of reforms that have been generally welcomed internationally, most Moroccans feel this is insufficient, and continue to be unhappy with the trajectory of the country under the policies of King Mohammed VI, despite his transition of the government to an ostensible constitutional monarchy. Under his father, King Hassan II, Morocco had one of the worst human rights records in Africa and the world, especially during the time period known as the "Years Of Lead", which lasted from the early 1960s until the late 1980s; it was a period in the country's history that was known for the brutal repression of political dissent and opposition, that involved wide-scale arrests, arbitrary detention, lengthy imprisonment, and even killings of political opponents. Currently, Morocco continues to face some of these issues, as well as other human rights problems, such as poor prison conditions, the mistreatment of women and the LGBT community, and the widespread use of torture by police. Despite the considerable improvements made in the last several years under the leadership of King Mohammed VI, who has rolled back some of his father's harshest decrees, repression of political dissidence, and torture of citizens by officials, is still commonplace in Morocco today.

The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment or shortly Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) is the anti-torture committee of the Council of Europe. Founded to enforce the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the CPT visits places of imprisonment in signatory countries and issues reports on violations of the convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Switzerland</span>

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Switzerland are some of the most progressive by world standards. Social attitudes and the legal situation have liberalised at an increasing pace since the 1940s, in parallel to the situation in Europe and the Western world more generally. Legislation providing for same-sex marriage, same-sex adoption, and IVF access was accepted by 64% of voters in a referendum on 26 September 2021, and entered into force on 1 July 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Federation of Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture</span> International non-governmental organisation (NGO) for the defence of human rights

The International Federation of ACATs, FIACAT, is an international, non-governmental, Christian human rights organisation, created in 1987, which fights for the abolition of torture and the death penalty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture</span> 2002 treaty supplementing the UN Convention Against Torture

The Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment is a treaty that supplements to the 1984 United Nations Convention Against Torture. It establishes an international inspection system for places of detention modeled on the system that has existed in Europe since 1987.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in Switzerland</span>

Crime in Switzerland is combated mainly by cantonal police. The Federal Office of Police investigates organised crime, money laundering and terrorism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal administration of Switzerland</span> Executive branch of the federal authorities of Switzerland

The federal administration of Switzerland is the ensemble of agencies that constitute, together with the Swiss Federal Council, the executive branch of the Swiss federal authorities. The administration is charged with executing federal law and preparing draft laws and policy for the Federal Council and the Federal Assembly.

Murat Gasaev, was a Russian refugee in Spain. An ethnic Chechen from the Republic of Ingushetia, he was extradited to Russia in December 2008 despite protests by human rights organizations including Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. It was feared that Gasaev might be at risk of torture and ill-treatment, as well as the denial of a fair trial due to the potential use of evidence extracted under torture in Russia.

The largest immigrant groups in Switzerland are those from Germany, Italy, France, the former Yugoslavia, Albania, Portugal and Turkey, including Turks and Kurds. Between them, these six groups account for about 1.5 million people, 60% of the Swiss population with immigrant background, or close to 20% of total Swiss population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Immigration detention in the United States</span>

The United States government holds tens of thousands of immigrants in detention under the control of Customs and Border Protection and the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT) is an international non-government organization focused on the prevention of torture and other acts considered as cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. The organization was founded in 1977 by Jean-Jacques Gautier under the name Swiss Committee against Torture.

Ousman Sonko is a former Gambian politician. He served as Interior Minister between 2006 and 2016 under the Gambian dictator Yahya Jammeh. During this period he is suspected of taking part in acts of torture, including in detention centers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 Swiss same-sex marriage referendum</span> 26 September 2021 national referendum in Switzerland

The 2021 Swiss same-sex marriage referendum was a facultative referendum held in Switzerland on 26 September 2021 about an amendment to the Civil Code to legalise marriage between people of the same sex, as well as adoption rights for same-sex couples and access to assisted reproductive technology for lesbian couples. The amendment was called "marriage for all" in Swiss public discourse.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Caroline Dayer</span> Swiss feminist educator

Caroline Dayer is a Swiss feminist researcher, educator and writer specializing in gender studies. She is known for her engagement in LGBT rights and makes regular interventions as an expert in the media in Switzerland on issues like homophobia, sexism and street harassment.

References

  1. ↑ "La Suisse ratifie l'OPCAT - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch (in French). Retrieved 2020-06-05.
  2. ↑ Praktikumsstelle (January 20, 2006). "Convention contre la torture: Commission nationale SVP - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch (in French). Retrieved June 5, 2006.
  3. 1 2 "La CNPT publie son premier rapport d'activité". www.nkvf.admin.ch. June 30, 2011. Retrieved June 5, 2006.
  4. ↑ "Cadre juridique". www.nkvf.admin.ch (in French). Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  5. 1 2 Yves Petignat (March 22, 2012). "La Commission contre la torture accompagnera les vols spéciaux". Le Temps (in French).
  6. 1 2 Nationale Kommission zur Verhütung von Folter (May 11, 2012). "Einführung des Foltertatbestandes im schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuch" (PDF). www.nkvf.admin.ch (in German).
  7. ↑ "Membres". www.nkvf.admin.ch (in French). Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  8. 1 2 Praktikumsstelle. "La future Commission contre la torture se cherche des membres - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  9. ↑ "Équipe d'observateurs". www.nkvf.admin.ch (in French). Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Valérie de Graffenried (July 14, 2008). "La future Commission nationale contre la torture risque d'être une simple instance alibi". Le Temps (in French).
  11. ↑ "Les séances en bref (ATS) – Session de printemps 2009". www.parlament.ch (in French). March 9, 2009. Retrieved June 4, 2020.
  12. ↑ "La Commission nationale de prévention de la torture effectue sa première intervention officielle en Valais". www.nkvf.admin.ch (in French). June 5, 2020.
  13. ↑ Blandine, Guignier (October 20, 2012). "La Commission contre la torture revient sur sa deuxième année d'activité - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  14. 1 2 Ariane Gigon (March 19, 2010). "Un Nigérian meurt avant son expulsion forcée". SwissInfo (in French).
  15. ↑ Valérie de Graffenried (December 1, 2011). ""Ficeler les personnes à déporter comme des saucissons n'est pas acceptable"". Le Temps (in French). Archived from the original on June 4, 2020. Retrieved May 11, 2023.
  16. 1 2 Ron Hochuli (March 9, 2011). "Berne persiste à expulser à la dure ses requérants". RTS Info.
  17. ↑ ats / ant (June 2010). "Des mesures suite à la mort du requérant à Zurich". RTS Info.
  18. ↑ Valérie de Graffenried (March 13, 2012). "Vols spéciaux: solution trouvée pour les observateurs indépendants". Le Temps.
  19. ↑ "Vols spéciaux: la Commission de prévention de la torture contrôlera les retours". Le Temps. March 22, 2012.
  20. 1 2 3 4 Valérie de Graffenried (14 July 2008). "La future Commission nationale contre la torture risque d'être une simple instance alibi". Le Temps.
  21. ↑ "Torture: l'ONU demande à Berne plus de financement". 20 Minutes. February 12, 2019.
  22. ↑ Isabelle, Michaud (May 21, 2012). "La Commission nationale de prévention demande l'introduction du crime de torture dans le code pénal suisse - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  23. ↑ Stage (November 17, 2011). "Premiers rapports de la Commission nationale contre la torture - humanrights.ch". www.humanrights.ch. Retrieved June 5, 2020.
  24. ↑ Sandra Moro (October 29, 2012). "Droits de l'homme: la Suisse peut mieux faire". Le Temps.
  25. ↑ ats / ta (July 27, 2017). "La Suisse tancée pour ses initiatives contraires au droit international". RTS Info.
  26. ↑ ats / nxp (July 27, 2017). "Initiatives populaires à mieux contrôler vis-à-vis du droit international". Le Matin.

Appendices

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.