National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope

Last updated

National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope was a 73-page report released on May 26, 2011 by US Senator Tom Coburn, a conservative Republican from Oklahoma, accusing the National Science Foundation of poor management and practices, criticizing various research projects, and in particular several in the social sciences. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Mainstream press coverage generated a public controversy and a stir in academia.

Contents

Report

The May 26, 2011 report "National Science Foundation: Under the Microscope" was highly critical of the National Science Foundation (NSF). Conservative Republican Senator Tom Coburn from Oklahoma argued that poor management and practices at NSF, "waste, fraud, duplication and mismanagement" have resulted in losses of over $1.2 billion, with a further $1.7 billion in unspent funds. [6] The report fingered several studies that exemplify "waste and duplication" in its press release:

An "$80,000 study on why the same teams always dominate March Madness", a "$315,000 study suggesting playing FarmVille on Facebook helps adults develop and maintain relationships", a study costing "$1 million for an analysis of how quickly parents respond to trendy baby names", a study costing "$50,000 to produce and publicize amateur songs about science, including a rap called "Money 4 Drugz," and a misleading song titled "Biogas is a Gas, Gas, Gas";" a study costing "$2 million to figure out that people who often post pictures on the internet from the same location at the same time are usually friends"; and "$581,000 on whether online dating site users are racist". [6] Ineffective management examples, cited in the report, included "ineffective contracting", "$1.7 billion in unspent funds sitting in expired, undisbursed grant accounts", "at least $3 million in excessive travel funds", "a lack of accountability or program metrics to evaluate expenditures" and "inappropriate staff behavior including porn surfing and Jello wrestling and skinny-dipping at NSF-operated facilities in Antarctica". [6]

The report has recommended to clarify and establish guidelines on what is meant by "transformative science", measure success and ensure accountability, improve grant accountability, reduce duplication, consolidate the Directorate for Education & Human Resources and most controversially, eliminate the Social, Behavioral, and Economics Directorate which receives a total of $200–300 million per year. [6] The press release noted that "The social sciences should not be the focus of our premier basic scientific research agency". [6] Coburn questioned whether "these social sciences represent obvious national priorities that deserve a cut of the same pie" as the natural sciences. [7]

Reception and critique

In 2011, NSF replied to the report, saying that it "has been diligent about addressing concerns from members of Congress about workforce and grant management issues, and NSF's excellent record of tracking down waste and prosecuting wrongdoing is apparent" from the report itself, and that even some of the cases featured in the press release, like the inappropriate actions in the Antarctica facility, were internally reviewed and dealt with within the NSF. [8] [7] It was pointed out that NSF's budget of about $7 billion represents about 0.5% of the projected 2011 federal deficit. [9] NSF has stated the report's claim for the biggest saving in unused money, is based on a "misreading of federal statutes", or an accounting misunderstanding. According to NSF, it is money obligated for multiyear grants. [10]

Controversy arose from the fact that the report highlighted many studies as pointless or wasteful, and made fun of them as "silly", or not "serious science". [2] It was claimed to undervalue the social sciences such as economics, political science, sociology, psychology, linguistics and others, [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [11] [12] [13] including, for example, collecting demographic statistics and other data on the US population, used in public policy and decision making. [13] Commentators have noted that attacks on "silly science" have a long tradition during economic downturns: in the 1970s a notable example was the Golden Fleece Awards established by Senator William Proxmire. [2]

Several professional associations of academics, such as the American Political Science Association and the Association for Psychological Science criticized the report. [14] [11] Academics allege that the report had inaccurate descriptions of their research, often misinterpreted them, or lacked the understanding of the underlying goals. [9] [2] [3] Others described it as "flat-out inaccurate". [15] Professor John Hibbing noted, it is "legitimate to ask what kind of scientific research is important and what isn't", but a nonscientific report by a politician may not be the best way to achieve this goal. [9]

On July 11, 2011, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) opposed in a letter to the House Appropriations Committee, to reduce funding for the NSF Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences, stating, as an example, that the work of social scientists had been part of the development of geographic information systems that could be used in responses to disasters such as the September 11 attacks. [16]

Impact

The report started a controversy, which resulted in a Congressional inquiry and one-year long study, with Texas Republican Lamar Smith chairing the House Science Committee, [17] and a 2014 Congressional proposal to limit NSF's grant-writing authority. In April 2014 the NSF board responded, breaking its tradition of not commenting on pending legislation. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Science Foundation</span> United States government agency

The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent agency of the United States federal government that supports fundamental research and education in all the non-medical fields of science and engineering. Its medical counterpart is the National Institutes of Health. With an annual budget of about $9.9 billion, the NSF funds approximately 25% of all federally supported basic research conducted by the United States' colleges and universities. In some fields, such as mathematics, computer science, economics, and the social sciences, the NSF is the major source of federal backing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Science Digital Library</span>

National Science Digital Library (NSDL) of the United States is an open-access online digital library and collaborative network of disciplinary and grade-level focused education providers operated by the Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education. NSDL's mission is to provide quality digital learning collections to the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education community, both formal and informal, institutional and individual. NSDL's collections are refined by a network of STEM educational and disciplinary professionals. Their work is based on user data, disciplinary knowledge, and participation in the evolution of digital resources as major elements of effective STEM learning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Coburn</span> American politician and physician (1948–2020)

Thomas Allen Coburn was an American politician and physician who served as a United States senator from Oklahoma from 2005 to 2015. A Republican, Coburn previously served as a United States representative from 1995 to 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American National Election Studies</span> Surveys of voters in USA

The American National Election Studies (ANES) are academically-run national surveys of voters in the United States, conducted before and after every presidential election. Although it was formally established by a National Science Foundation grant in 1977, the data are a continuation of studies going back to 1948. The study has been based at the University of Michigan since its origin and, since 2005, has been run in partnership with Stanford University. Its principal investigators for the first four years of the partnership were Arthur Lupia and Jon Krosnick. As of 2017, the principal investigators are Ted Brader and Vincent Hutchings of the University of Michigan and Shanto Iyengar of Stanford University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Political Science Association</span> Professional association of political science students and scholars in the United States

The American Political Science Association (APSA) is a professional association of political science students and scholars in the United States. Founded in 1903 in the Tilton Memorial Library of Tulane University in New Orleans, it publishes four academic journals: American Political Science Review, Perspectives on Politics, Journal of Political Science Education, and PS – Political Science & Politics. APSA Organized Sections publish or are associated with 15 additional journals.

Walden University is a private for-profit online university headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota. It offers bachelor's, master's, doctoral, and specialist degrees. The university is owned by Adtalem Global Education, which purchased the university in August 2021. The institution is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grant (money)</span> Non-repayable funds disbursed by one party to a recipient

A grant is a financial award given by a government entity, foundation, corporation, or other organization to an individual or organization for a specific purpose. Unlike loans, grants do not need to be repaid, making them an attractive source of funding for various activities, such as research, education, public service projects, and business ventures. Examples include student grants, research grants, the Sovereign Grant paid by the UK Treasury to the monarch, and some European Regional Development Fund payments in the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Golden Fleece Award</span> Tongue-in-cheek award issued by US Senator William Proxmire

The Golden Fleece Award (1975–1988) was a tongue-in-cheek award given to public officials in the United States for squandering public money. Its name is sardonically taken from the actual Order of the Golden Fleece, a prestigious chivalric award created in the late 15th century. It is a play on the transitive verb fleece, or charging excessively for goods or services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics</span> Group of academic disciplines

Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) is an umbrella term used to group together the distinct but related technical disciplines of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The term is typically used in the context of education policy or curriculum choices in schools. It has implications for workforce development, national security concerns, and immigration policy, with regard to admitting foreign students and tech workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Rubin</span> American cognitive scientist and science administrator

Philip E. Rubin is an American cognitive scientist, technologist, and science administrator known for raising the visibility of behavioral and cognitive science, neuroscience, and ethical issues related to science, technology, and medicine, at a national level. His research career is noted for his theoretical contributions and pioneering technological developments, starting in the 1970s, related to speech synthesis and speech production, including articulatory synthesis and sinewave synthesis, and their use in studying complex temporal events, particularly understanding the biological bases of speech and language.

The Institute for Information Infrastructure Protection (I3P) is a consortium of national cyber security institutions, including academic research centers, U.S. federal government laboratories, and nonprofit organizations, all of which have long-standing, widely recognized expertise in cyber security research and development (R&D). The I3P is managed by The George Washington University, which is home to a small administrative staff that oversees and helps direct consortium activities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Steve Alexander (businessman)</span> American businessman

Steve Alexander is a professional coach and communications expert, and founder and president of his own company, The Steve Alexander Group.

The 2011 United States federal budget was the United States federal budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 2011. The budget was the subject of a spending request by President Barack Obama. The actual appropriations for Fiscal Year 2011 had to be authorized by the full Congress before it could take effect, according to the U.S. budget process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University of Michigan Institute for Social Research</span>

The University of Michigan Institute for Social Research (ISR) is the largest academic social research and survey organization in the world, established in 1949. ISR includes more than 300 scientists from a variety of academic disciplines – including political science, psychology, sociology, economics, demography, history, anthropology, and statistics. The institute is a unit that houses five separate but interdependent centers which conduct research and maintain data archives. In 2021, Kathleen Cagney became the first woman in its history to be named Director of the institute.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robosquirrel</span> Robotic squirrel

Robosquirrel refers to several versions of robotic squirrels developed by researchers at the University of California, Davis and San Diego State University. Robosquirrel is currently in use and development in an interdisciplinary research project that uses biorobotics to investigate how communication between prey and predators evolve in response to each other. It has received extensive science and popular media coverage. It stirred controversy when Senator Tom Coburn listed it in his Wastebook 2012 as a scientific research project that wastes United States federal tax dollars. Senator Coburn's release of Wastebook 2012 was quickly picked up by the popular media and the robosquirrel project was the headline of many media stories.

The White House BRAIN Initiative is a collaborative, public-private research initiative announced by the Obama administration on April 2, 2013, with the goal of supporting the development and application of innovative technologies that can create a dynamic understanding of brain function.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cora Bagley Marrett</span> American sociologist

Cora Bagley Marrett is an American sociologist. From May 2011 until August 2014, Marrett served as the deputy director of the National Science Foundation.

Tara W. Hudiburg is an American forest scientist who specializes in ecosystem modeling. She is an associate professor at the University of Idaho in the department of Forest, Rangeland and Fire Sciences. Hudiburg was honored with the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers in 2019.

Adriana Galván is an American psychologist and expert on adolescent brain development. She is a professor of psychology at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) where she directs the Developmental Neuroscience laboratory. She was appointed the Jeffrey Wenzel Term Chair in Behavioral Neuroscience and the Dean of Undergraduate Education at UCLA.

Bala Chaudhary is an American soil ecologist. She is an Associate Professor of Environmental Studies at Dartmouth College.

References

  1. 1 2 The Unexamined Society David Brooks, The New York Times (July 7, 2011)
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Boyle, Alan. "Cosmic Log - Funny science sparks serious spat". MSNBC. Archived from the original on 2011-05-30. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  3. 1 2 3 "Coburn's NSF Idiocy : Mike the Mad Biologist". Scienceblogs.com. Archived from the original on 2011-09-06. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  4. 1 2 "Science GRO plays offense and defense in wake of new congressional attacks on behavioral science". Apa.org. June 2011. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  5. 1 2 Mervis, Jeffrey (2011-06-03). "Social Sciences Face Uphill Battle Proving Their Worth to Congress - ScienceInsider". News.sciencemag.org. Archived from the original on 2011-08-14. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Dr. Coburn Releases New Oversight Report Exposing Waste, Mismanagement at the National Science Foundation - Press Releases - Tom Coburn, M.D., United States Senator from Oklahoma". Coburn.senate.gov. 2011-05-26. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved 2015-10-14.
  7. 1 2 JENNY MANDEL of Greenwire (2011-05-26). "Sen. Coburn Sets Sight on Waste, Duplication at Science Agency". NYTimes.com. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  8. ↑ "Senate Report Finds Billions In Waste On Science Foundation Studies". Fox News. 2011-05-26. Retrieved 2011-12-17.
  9. 1 2 3 Pappas, Stephanie (2011-05-26). "Scientists Cry Foul Over Report Criticizing National Science Foundation - Technology & science - Science - LiveScience - NBC News". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  10. ↑ Mervis, Jeffrey (2011-05-26). "Senator's Criticism of Science Foundation Draws Fire - ScienceInsider". News.sciencemag.org. Archived from the original on 2011-09-03. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  11. 1 2 "All of Science Stands Behind Behavioral Science at NSF - Association for Psychological Science". Psychologicalscience.org. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  12. ↑ Environmental policy UC davis. June 2011
  13. 1 2 Poeppel, David (2011-07-15). "Coburn wrong on research - POLITICO.com Print View". Dyn.politico.com. Archived from the original on 2012-03-27. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  14. ↑ "APSA Responds to Senator Coburn's Report on NSF Funding | APSA". Apsanet.org. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  15. ↑ Koerth, Maggie (1999-05-17). "Coburn anti-NSF report misleading, factually incorrect – Boing Boing". Boingboing.net. Retrieved 2011-09-09.
  16. ↑ Letter from AAAS
  17. ↑ Brad Johnson How One GOP-Controlled Committee Is Waging A War On Science HPMG News, 06/24/2014
  18. ↑ Eli Kintisch,Should the Government Fund Only Science in the "National Interest"? National Geographic News. October 29, 2014
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.