Natural head position

Last updated

Natural head position is a reproducible position of a head when it is in an upright position, with eyes looking straight at a mark. [1] The concept was introduced into the field of orthodontics in the late 1950s by Moorrees and Kean. [2] A horizontal line related to the natural head position has been recommended as the most reliable plane to study cephalometric analysis. [3]

Contents

History

Anthropologists and craniologists when studying skulls faced a dilemma which was related to the head position of the skulls relative to the head position of the living human beings. In order to take care of this problem a horizontal axis line outside the skull was used to approximate a natural head position of the skull. However, a linkage between an outside horizontal plane and a horizontal plane on the skull still had to be done. Thus, after several meetings, in 1882 at a craniometric conference in Frankfort, Germany a plane known as the Frankfort horizontal plane was proposed through left and right porion and left orbitale as a horizontal plane that can be used to study skulls. In the meeting of 1884, this plane was finally accepted. [4]

Drawbacks of other planes

Planes such as the Frankfort horizontal plane or sella-nasion plane have their own drawbacks. The anatomical points that these planes are based on are not known to be stable over time, which may lead to variability and error in studying the cephalometric analysis of a patient. For example, the nasion-sella line which part of our anterior skull is used as a reference line for lateral cephalometric radiographs. The nasion point is known to be move anteriorly and inferiorly over time and thus can lead to an error in the values that are used to study the maxillo-mandibular relationship to the cranial base in lateral cephalometrics. [5]

Frankfurt Horizontal plane itself has been known to show an error of anywhere between +9 and -7 degrees. This plane is compromised by two points: Porion and Orbitale. Identifying the porion by itself is shown high variability, especially due to the point machine porion sometimes overlapping the anatomical porion. [3]

Registration

Registration of natural head position was defined by Solow and Tallgren in 1970s. [6] They used the term 'orthoposition' in which a person is asked to stand in front of a mirror and look into their own eyes after a set of neck exercises. Other ways of registering natural head position have been described by Lundstrom [7] who used an operator-based natural head position. Other methods such as use of inclinometer, [8] fluid device [9] or looking at a small light [10] have also been described.

Reproducibility

Ideally, a cephalometric plane should have good reliability, good individual reproducibility, and be as close to true horizontal plane and true vertical plane as possible. Many studies over time have discussed the reproducibility of the natural head position in patients. [11] Cooenrad and Morees in 1958, performed a study where they looked at two groups of 20-year-old female students at the Forsyth School for Dental Hygienists were radiographed in their natural head position. They showed in their short-term study that the reproducibility error was 2.05 degrees. [2] In a long-term study done by Cooke et al., [12] they showed 1.9 degree error at 5-year mark and 2.23 degree of error at 15 year mark.

See also

Related Research Articles

Cephalometry

Cephalometry is the study and measurement of the head, usually the human head, especially by medical imaging such as radiography. Craniometry, the measurement of the cranium (skull), is a large subset of cephalometry. Cephalometry also has a history in phrenology, which is the study of personality and character as well as physiognomy, which is the study of facial features. Cephalometry as applied in a comparative anatomy context informs biological anthropology. In clinical contexts such as dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery, cephalometric analysis helps in treatment and research; cephalometric landmarks guide surgeons in planning and operating.

Crossbite

Crossbite is a form of malocclusion where a tooth has a more buccal or lingual position than its corresponding antagonist tooth in the upper or lower dental arch. In other words, crossbite is a lateral misalignment of the dental arches.

Cephalometric analysis is the clinical application of cephalometry. It is analysis of the dental and skeletal relationships of a human skull. It is frequently used by dentists, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons as a treatment planning tool. Two of the more popular methods of analysis used in orthodontology are the Steiner analysis and the Downs analysis. There are other methods as well which are listed below.

Cecil C. Steiner was a dentist and one of Edward H. Angle's first students in 1921. He developed a form of cephalometric analysis, presented in 1953, referred to as the Steiner method of analysis.

A jaw abnormality is a disorder in the formation, shape and/or size of the jaw. In general abnormalities arise within the jaw when there is a disturbance or fault in the fusion of the mandibular processes. The mandible in particular has the most differential typical growth anomalies than any other bone in the human skeleton. This is due to variants in the complex symmetrical growth pattern which formulates the mandible.

Ravindra Nanda Chair, Department of Craniofacial Sciences

Dr. Ravindra Nanda is a professor and Head of the Department of Craniofacial Sciences and Chair of the Division of Orthodontics at the University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine. He is part of the founding faculty of School of Dental Medicine and has been at the University of Connecticut since 1972 where he also holds an Alumni Chair in the Orthodontics Division. He is an innovator of various appliances in orthodontics. His research and clinical interests include adolescent and adult orthodontics, the biology of tooth mobility, craniofacial orthopedics, biomechanics and developing efficient mechanics to deliver orthodontic care.

Interproximal reduction (IPR) is the practice of mechanically removing enamel from between the teeth to achieve orthodontic ends, such as to correct crowding, or reshape the contact area between neighboring teeth.

Lingual braces are one of the many types of the fixed orthodontic treatment appliances available to patients needing orthodontics. They involve attaching the orthodontic brackets on the inner sides of the teeth. The main advantage of lingual braces is their near invisibility compared to the standard braces, which are attached on the buccal (cheek) sides of the tooth. Lingual braces were invented by Craven Kurz in 1976.

Charles J. Burstone was an American orthodontist who was notable for his contributions to biomechanics and force-systems in the field of orthodontics. He was well known for co-development of new orthodontic material such as beta titanium, nickel titanium, and long fiber-reinforced composite. He wrote more than 200 articles in scientific fields.

Milo Hellman was an American orthodontist and an instructor at Angle School of Orthodontia and Chair of NYU Orthodontic Program. He is known for his contributions to the field of Orthodontia via his research on the relationship between teeth, jaws and face.

Birdsall Holly Broadbent Jr. was an American orthodontist known for this contributions to the field of orthodontics. He co-developed the Bolton Standards along with his grandfather Birdsall Holly II. The work is based on the Broadbent-Bolton Growth study, which the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation has called "the most complete human craniofacial growth study in the world".

Birdsall Holly Broadbent Sr. was an American orthodontist who is credited with developing and introducing the technique of cephalometric roentgenography to orthodontics. He also devised the cephalometer, which accurately positions a patient's head with reference to the x-ray source.

Dr. William J. Clark is a Scottish orthodontist known for developing Twin Block Appliance in Orthodontics. This appliance was developed by Dr. Clark in 1977 in Scotland and since then this appliance has been used in correction of Class 2 malocclusions with retrognathic mandible. He also developed invisible TransForce Appliance in 2004.

Dr. Robert M. Ricketts was an American orthodontist known for many contributions in the field of orthodontics. Most important contributions were related to his development of Ricketts' Cephalometric Analysis and an .018-inch slot in an orthodontic bracket. His research focused on the growth and structural variation of the face and jaws.

Activator Appliance is an Orthodontics appliance that was developed by Viggo Andresen in 1908. This was one of the first functional appliances that was developed to correct functional jaw in the early 1900s. Activator appliance became the universal appliance that was used widely throughout Europe in the earlier part of the 20th century.

Molar distalization is a process in the field of Orthodontics which is used to move molar teeth, especially permanent first molars, distally (backwards) in an arch. This procedure is often used in treatment of patients who have Class 2 malocclusion. The cause is often the result of loss of E space in an arch due to early loss of primary molar teeth and mesial (forward) migration of the molar teeth. Sometimes molars are distalized to make space for other impacted teeth, such as premolars or canines, in the mouth.

Pendulum is an orthodontic appliance, developed by James J. Hilgers in 1992, that use forces to distalize the upper 1st molars to create space for eruption of impacted teeth or allowing correction of Class 2 malocclusion. This appliance is a fixed type of distalizing appliance that does not depend on the compliance of each patient to work. Hilgers published an article in Journal of Clinical Orthodontics in 1992 describing the appliance.

Open bite is a type of orthodontic malocclusion which has been estimated to occur in 0.6% of the people in the United States. This type of malocclusion has no vertical overlap or contact between the anterior incisors. The prevalence varies between different populations, for instance, occurring with 16% in black people and 4% in white people. The term "open bite" was coined by Carevelli in 1842.

Anthony Gianelly (1936–2009) was an American orthodontist. He developed the bi-dimensional technique, which is widely used in various private practices of orthodontics and has been the subject of numerous publications over the years.

Orthodontic indices are one of the tools that are available for orthodontists to grade and assess malocclusion. Orthodontic indices can be useful for an epidemiologist to analyse prevalence and severity of malocclusion in any population.

References

  1. ↑ "Radiographic Cephalometry: From Basics to 3-D Imaging, Second Edition (Book/CD-ROM set)". www.quintpub.com. Retrieved 2017-11-21.
  2. 1 2 "Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs: By Coenraad F. A. Moorrees and Martin R. Kean. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.16: 213–234, June 1958". American Journal of Orthodontics. 45 (10): 785–791. 1959-10-01. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(59)90124-1.
  3. 1 2 Lundström, Anders; Lundström, Fredrik (May 1, 1995). "The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 107 (5): 537–540. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(95)70121-4.
  4. ↑ Meiyappan, N.; Tamizharasi, S.; Senthilkumar, K. P.; Janardhanan, K. (August 2015). "Natural head position: An overview". Journal of Pharmacy & Bioallied Sciences. 7 (Suppl 2): S424–S427. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.163488. ISSN   0976-4879. PMC   4606633 . PMID   26538891.
  5. ↑ Houston, W. J. (1991). "Bases for the analysis of cephalometric radiographs: intracranial reference structures or natural head position". Proceedings of the Finnish Dental Society. Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran Toimituksia. 87 (1): 43–49. PMID   2057489.
  6. ↑ Solow, B.; Tallgren, A. (November 1971). "Natural head position in standing subjects". Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 29 (5): 591–607. doi:10.3109/00016357109026337. ISSN   0001-6357. PMID   5290983.
  7. ↑ Lundström, A.; Lundström, F.; Lebret, L. M.; Moorrees, C. F. (April 1995). "Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research". European Journal of Orthodontics. 17 (2): 111–120. doi:10.1093/ejo/17.2.111. ISSN   0141-5387. PMID   7781719.
  8. ↑ Preston, C. B.; Evans, W. G.; Todres, J. I. (March 1997). "The relationship between ortho head posture and head posture measured during walking". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 111 (3): 283–287. doi:10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70186-0. ISSN   0889-5406. PMID   9082850.
  9. ↑ Showfety, K. J.; Vig, P. S.; Matteson, S. (June 1983). "A simple method for taking natural-head-position cephalograms". American Journal of Orthodontics. 83 (6): 495–500. doi:10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90248-8. ISSN   0002-9416. PMID   6574706.
  10. ↑ Cleall, J. F. (August 1965). "DEGLUTITION: A STUDY OF FORM AND FUNCTION". American Journal of Orthodontics. 51 (8): 566–594. doi:10.1016/0002-9416(65)90028-x. ISSN   0002-9416. PMID   14331958.
  11. ↑ Madsen, D. P.; Sampson, W. J.; Townsend, G. C. (2008-10-01). "Craniofacial reference plane variation and natural head position". The European Journal of Orthodontics. 30 (5): 532–540. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn031 . ISSN   0141-5387. PMID   18632837.
  12. ↑ Cooke, Michael S.; Orth, D. (1990-06-01). "Five-year reproducibility of natural head posture: A longitudinal study". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 97 (6): 489–494. doi:10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80029-0. PMID   2353678.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.