Operation Eagle Eye (United States)

Last updated October 28, 2024

Operation Eagle Eye was a Republican Party voter suppression operation in the 1960s in Arizona to challenge minority voters. In the United States only citizens have ever been able to vote, and in 1964 only literate citizens could vote, so it was legal to ensure that (1) a potential voter was literate, and (2) a potential voter was a United States Citizen. Through the employment of literacy tests, oral demands to interpret the United States Constitution and detailed questions about a potential voter's origins and how long the potential voter had been in the United States,^[1] Republican workers would challenge minority voters, especially those with broken English. William Rehnquist, later chief justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, is said to have been the head of a group of lawyers hoping to challenge voters in minority Democratic precincts.^[2] Operation Eagle Eye was a two-year effort, and the laws in Arizona have since made this kind of challenge illegal.^[1]

Precursor to Operation Eagle Eye (1954-1962)

Beginning in the early 1950s and 60s, it became popular for politicians to appeal to Southern whites through racially charged campaign messages.

Many succeeding Republican candidates and almost all Republican presidents made racial appeals – some subtle, some otherwise – to southern whites still angry at federal abolition of the Jim Crow system. This became known as the ‘Southern Strategy’. ^[3]

Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson’s overwhelming popularity in the polls at the time – just a year in after taking office in the aftermath of Kennedy’s assassination – and his relentless talk of civil rights and voting rights heightened Republican National Committee concerns and swung the door wide open for voter suppression strategies of all kinds. It was in this context that the infamous Operation Eagle Eye was born. As shameful and un-American as it was, RNC’s goal was simple – to develop a strategy around voter suppression to win elections – and it has been effective.^[3] Many now believe that the 1958 ballot security program implemented in Arizona was the precursor to Operation Eagle Eye and the blueprint for which it was designed.^[3]

Operation Eagle Eye Launches (1964)

The Republican National Committee announced its plan to conduct a nationwide ballot security program entitled "Operation Eagle Eye" in 1964. It was to be employed in the presidential election between Barry Goldwater and President Lyndon B. Johnson.

At the time, Operation Eagle Eye was virtually unknown but a highly organized and financed effort by the Republican party to suppress minority voting.^[3] The RNC insisted it was necessary to protect the integrity of the American ballot and against voter fraud. "OEE" became the nation's first large-scale anti-voter fraud campaign where the Republican National Committee recruited tens of thousands of volunteers to show up at polling places, mostly in inner-cities, to challenge voter eligibility. In particular, whether the voter was able to read since literacy was a requirement to vote. The recruited poll watchers used a variety of tactics, including asking voters to read a portion of the Constitution,^[4] cameras, two-way radios, and calls to Republican-friendly sheriffs.^[3] This attempt to thwart electoral fraud by challenging voters at the polls only served to intimidate minorities and swing elections in favor of Republicans.

Future Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist was a prominent figure during the years of Operation Eagle Eye. He was a poll watcher with direct involvement in challenging voters at the polls as early as 1958.^[3] Years later during Rehnquist's Senate confirmation hearings to become Chief Justice, a US District Attorney in Phoenix at the time testified that he had seen Rehnquist challenging black and hispanic voters at precincts in South Phoenix.^[5] Rehnquist denied any such involvement.^[4] However, his association with OEE remained a stain on his reputation despite being confirmed as Chief Justice in 1986.^[4]

Another key figure in Operation Eagle Eye was Charles Barr, its National Director. He was responsible for employing "100,000 poll-watchers with the objective of challenging over a million voters",^[4]however, he denied any discriminatory practices.

1964 Ballot Security Program Initiatives

The General Outline of the 1964 Ballot Security Program included the following instructions:^[4]

Create in each state an effective Ballot Security Organization under leadership of the State Ballot Security Officer.
Research and study State Election Laws, irregularities and errors, and how to combat and correct.
Attend national educational conferences for Ballot Security Officers.
Observe and report pre-election violations.
Recruit and train poll watchers and challengers, where permitted, to secure each precinct.
Appoint qualified and true Republicans as election officials in each precinct. Determine that registration is being properly conducted.
Strive to improve canvassing methods to identify unqualified, non-existent voters and eliminate them from the lists.
Plan, schedule, supervise and teach training courses designed to eliminate fraud and error for Republican election officials, watchers, and challengers.
Prepare and distribute materials and check lists for study and reference by precinct officials.
Focus press attention on the problem and program.
Secure effective cooperation of law enforcement officials.
Set up an Election Day security network to advise and act on ballot irregularity matters.
Collect information in the event of prosecution or other proceedings following an election.
Determine that ballots and machines are safeguarded after the election.
Develop new plans and ideas to improve future operations by Ballot Security Officers, considering possible legislative amendments to improve the election laws for future elections.

How Operation Eagle Eye Worked

Purging Voter Lists Through Vote Caging - Typically a method of purging voters lists, voter caging consists of sending mail to addresses on the voter registration polls and counting the number of returned or undelivered pieces of mail. This becomes the basis for purging the voter list. This is unreliable because mail can be returned for any number of reasons. However, in 1964, Eagle Eye supporters challenged 1.8 million voters' eligibility with this tactic.
Distribution of Deterrent Paraphernalia - Eagle Eye supporters also sent misleading or deceptive mailers to the voter lists. Some examples of this voter intimidation were mailers indicating a voter who had committed a traffic violation, etc. would be arrested after voting, or anonymous calls to minority voters telling them they would be harassed at the polls. The most offensive was encouraging minority voters to write-in Dr. Martin Luther King's name for president knowing this would nullify their votes.^[3]
The Deployment of Poll Watchers to Challenge Voters on Election Day - Challenging voters at the polls could happen in a number of ways. They could be asked humiliating questions, demanded to show citizenship papers, or asked to show proof they could read. Voters were challenged if they appeared on the purged voters list.

Psychological deterrence was a significant aspect of the OEE efforts. The Republican strategy attempted to discourage illegitimate voters from committing fraud by simply creating the appearance that they were being watched. It was for this reason that RNC leaders also encouraged poll watchers to bring cameras.^[3]

Political Legacy of Operation Eagle Eye (1970s - Present)

In 1964, the Republican, Barry Goldwater suffered a stunning defeat. And although President Johnson won the election by a wide margin, out of Operation Eagle Eye emerged a frightening concept:

"Some of the methods employed by Eagle Eye became part of the modus operandi of subsequent Republican campaigns. These include challenging of Democratic voters at polls without cause, humiliation of uneducated voters, efforts to slow down voting in Democratic precincts, special targeting of minority, low-income neighborhoods for challenges and developing an attitude among ballot security teams that encourages stereotyping low-income and minority voters as venal and stupid."^[3]

After Operation Eagle Eye, literacy tests were challenged by the state of Arizona and the federal government instituted a ban on the requirement.^[6]

The Operation's Enduring Legacy

The footprint for OEE has endured for decades and the effects are still felt to this day. At the time OEE was launched, immigration was not a prominent issue because Latinos in Arizona "knew their place". Now immigration has taken a larger role in politics and discourages minorities from voting in border states. Similar OEE tactics are still being employed against Latinos in fear of deportation.^[6]

As of February 2014, there were 31 states with laws requiring some form of identification at the polls, while others are still pending court challenges.^[3] Instead of mobilizing voters, the Republican South has led a new charge for restrictive voting laws in response to changing demographics, and ideological shifts among the party. In addition to Operation Eagle Eye style voter suppression, voter caging, intimidation and dissemination of false voting information, the new Republican party has also had to respond to recent allegations of gerrymandering.

Related Research Articles

The 2004 Washington gubernatorial election was held on November 2, 2004. The race gained national attention for its legal twists and extremely close finish, among the closest political races in United States election history. Republican Dino Rossi was declared the winner in the initial automated count and again in a subsequent automated recount, but after a second recount done by hand, Democrat Christine Gregoire took the lead by a margin of 129 votes.

Vote counting is the process of counting votes in an election. It can be done manually or by machines. In the United States, the compilation of election returns and validation of the outcome that forms the basis of the official results is called canvassing.

Voter caging is a colloquial term referring to a campaign activity used to remove, or attempt to remove, targeted voters from official lists of registered voters. It occurs when a non-governmental organization, such as a political party or a campaign, sends first-class mail to registered voters, in order to compile a so-called "challenge list" of the names of those whose letters are returned undelivered. The fact that the mail was returned as undeliverable may be seen as either proof, or strong evidence of, the person no longer residing at the address on their voter registration. The challenge list is presented to election officials with the suggestion that the officials should purge these names from the voter registration rolls or to challenge voters' eligibility to vote on the grounds that the voters no longer reside at their registered addresses.

Voter suppression are tactics used to discourage or prevent specific groups of people from voting or registering to vote. It is distinguished from political campaigning in that campaigning attempts to change likely voting behavior by changing the opinions of potential voters through persuasion and organization, activating otherwise inactive voters, or registering new supporters. Voter suppression, instead, attempts to gain an advantage by reducing the turnout of certain voters. Suppression is an anti-democratic tactic associated with authoritarianism.

During the 2004 United States elections, there was controversy around various aspects of the voting process, including whether voting had been made accessible to all those entitled to vote, whether ineligible voters were registered, whether voters were registered multiple times, and whether the votes cast had been correctly counted.

The National Ballot Security Task Force (BSTF) was founded in 1981 in New Jersey, United States by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to discourage voter turnout among likely Democratic voters in the gubernatorial election.

Electoral reform in Texas refers to efforts to change the voting and election laws in the State of Texas.

Frank LaRose is an American politician who has served as the 51st Secretary of State of Ohio since January 2019. He was a Republican member of the Ohio State Senate for two terms, from January 2011 to January 2019. He was a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in the 2024 election, challenging incumbent Senator Sherrod Brown. He lost to Bernie Moreno in the primary.

Voter ID laws in the United States are laws that require a person to provide some form of official identification before they are permitted to register to vote, receive a ballot for an election, or to actually vote in elections in the United States.

Voter suppression in the United States consists of various legal and illegal efforts to prevent eligible citizens from exercising their right to vote. Such voter suppression efforts vary by state, local government, precinct, and election. Voter suppression has historically been used for racial, economic, gender, age and disability discrimination. After the American Civil War, all African-American men were granted voting rights, but poll taxes or language tests were used to limit and suppress the ability to register or cast a ballot. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 improved voting access. Since the beginning of voter suppression efforts, proponents of these laws have cited concerns over electoral integrity as a justification for various restrictions and requirements, while opponents argue that these constitute bad faith given the lack of voter fraud evidence in the United States.

Electoral fraud in the United States, also known as voter fraud, involves illegal voting in or manipulation of United States elections. Types of fraud include voter impersonation or in-person voter fraud, mail-in or absentee ballot fraud, illegal voting by noncitizens and double voting.

The 2016 Arizona Democratic presidential primary was held on March 22 in the U.S. state of Arizona as one of the Democratic Party's primaries ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, also called the Voter Fraud Commission, was a Presidential Commission established by Donald Trump that ran from May 11, 2017, to January 3, 2018. The Trump administration said the commission would review claims of voter fraud, improper registration, and voter suppression. The establishment of the commission followed Trump's false claim that millions of illegal immigrants had voted in the 2016 presidential election, costing him the popular vote. Vice President Mike Pence was chosen as chair of the commission and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach was its vice chair and day-to-day administrator.

Ballot collecting, also known as "ballot harvesting" or "ballot chasing", is the gathering and submitting of completed absentee or mail-in voter ballots by third-party individuals, volunteers or workers, rather than submission by voters themselves directly to ballot collection sites. It occurs in some areas of the U.S. where voting by mail is common, but some other states have laws restricting it.

The following is a timeline of major events before, during, and after the 2020 United States presidential election, the 59th quadrennial United States presidential election, from November 2020 to January 2021. For prior events, see Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election (2017–2019) and Timeline of the 2020 United States presidential election.

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case related to voting rights established by the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (VRA), and specifically the applicability of Section 2's general provision barring discrimination against minorities in state and local election laws in the wake of the 2013 Supreme Court decision Shelby County v. Holder, which removed the preclearance requirements for election laws for certain states that had been set by Sections 4(b) and 5. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee involves two of Arizona's election policies: one outlawing ballot collection and another banning out-of-precinct voting. The Supreme Court ruled in a 6–3 decision in July 2021 that neither of Arizona's election policies violated the VRA or had a racially discriminatory purpose.

Following the 2020 United States presidential election and the unsuccessful attempts by Donald Trump and various other Republican officials to overturn it, Republican lawmakers initiated a sweeping effort to make voting laws more restrictive within several states across the country. According to the Brennan Center for Justice, as of October 4, 2021, more than 425 bills that would restrict voting access have been introduced in 49 states—with 33 of these bills enacted across 19 states so far. The bills are largely centered around limiting mail-in voting, strengthening voter ID laws, shortening early voting, eliminating automatic and same-day voter registration, curbing the use of ballot drop boxes, and allowing for increased purging of voter rolls. Republicans in at least eight states have also introduced bills that would give lawmakers greater power over election administration after they were unsuccessful in their attempts to overturn election results in swing states won by Democratic candidate Joe Biden in the 2020 election. The efforts garnered press attention and public outrage from Democrats, and by 2023 Republicans had adopted a more "under the radar" approach to achieve their goals.

The Election Integrity Act of 2021, originally known as the Georgia Senate Bill 202, is a law in the U.S. state of Georgia overhauling elections in the state. It replaced signature matching requirements on absentee ballots with voter identification requirements, limits the use of ballot drop boxes, expands in-person early voting, bars officials from sending out unsolicited absentee ballot request forms, reduces the amount of time people have to request an absentee ballot, increases voting stations or staff and equipment where there have been long lines, makes it a crime for outside groups to give free food or water to voters waiting in line, gives the Georgia General Assembly greater control over election administration, and shortens runoff elections, among other provisions.

The election denial movement in the United States is a widespread false belief among many Republicans that elections in the United States are rigged and stolen through election fraud by Democrats. Adherents of the movement are referred to as election deniers. Election fraud conspiracy theories have spread online and through conservative conferences, community events, and door-to-door canvassing. Since the 2020 United States presidential election, many Republican politicians have sought elective office or taken legislative steps to address what they assert is weak election integrity leading to widespread fraudulent elections, though no evidence of systemic election fraud has come to light and many studies have found that it is extremely rare.

The United States Republican Party has undertaken a broad range of efforts to disrupt the 2024 United States presidential election so that its candidate, Donald Trump, has a greater chance of winning. The efforts come amidst a larger election denial movement among Republicans in the United States since the 2020 election.

References

1 2 Roddy, Dennis (December 2, 2000). "Columnists - Just our Bill". Post Gazette. Retrieved 2007-09-08.
↑ Wang, Tova (2012). The Politics of Voter Suppression : Defending and Expanding Americans' Right to Vote. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0801450853.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Guernsey, Sherwood; Harrison, Lee (August 2015). "Why Can't I Vote; The Republican Party's 50-Year Assault on Voting Rights, and how you can fight back!" (PDF). A Nation At Risk.
1 2 3 4 5 Davidson, Chandler; Dunlap, Tanya; Kenny, Gale; Wise, Benjamin (September 2004). "Republican ballot security programs: Vote protection or minority vote suppression or both?" (PDF). A Report to the Center for Voting Rights and Protection.
↑ Andrews, Robert. "Former Prosecutor Says He Saw Rehnquist in Voter Confrontation Effort". Associated Press. Retrieved 25 August 2020.
1 2 Provis, Dorine; Rojas-Weisner, Martha; Velasco, German (2014). "Peripheral Matters: The Emergence of Legalized Politics in Local Struggles Over Unauthorized Immigration". Law & Social Inquiry. 39 (3). Cambridge University Press: 601–620. doi:10.1111/lsi.12080. hdl: 2286/R.I.26132 . ISSN 0897-6546. S2CID 153564380.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[PG-1] 1 2 Roddy, Dennis (December 2, 2000). "Columnists - Just our Bill". Post Gazette. Retrieved 2007-09-08.

[2] Wang, Tova (2012). The Politics of Voter Suppression : Defending and Expanding Americans' Right to Vote. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0801450853.

[:0-3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Guernsey, Sherwood; Harrison, Lee (August 2015). "Why Can't I Vote; The Republican Party's 50-Year Assault on Voting Rights, and how you can fight back!" (PDF). A Nation At Risk.

[:1-4] 1 2 3 4 5 Davidson, Chandler; Dunlap, Tanya; Kenny, Gale; Wise, Benjamin (September 2004). "Republican ballot security programs: Vote protection or minority vote suppression or both?" (PDF). A Report to the Center for Voting Rights and Protection.

[5] Andrews, Robert. "Former Prosecutor Says He Saw Rehnquist in Voter Confrontation Effort". Associated Press. Retrieved 25 August 2020.

[:2-6] 1 2 Provis, Dorine; Rojas-Weisner, Martha; Velasco, German (2014). "Peripheral Matters: The Emergence of Legalized Politics in Local Struggles Over Unauthorized Immigration". Law & Social Inquiry. 39 (3). Cambridge University Press: 601–620. doi:10.1111/lsi.12080. hdl: 2286/R.I.26132 . ISSN 0897-6546. S2CID 153564380.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]