Orthogonal polyhedron

Last updated
AGK-pentacube.png
Jessen's icosahedron.svg
A polycube is an example of the orthogonal polyhedron, whereas Jessen's icosahedron is not

An orthogonal polyhedron is a polyhedron in which all edges are parallel to the axes of a Cartesian coordinate system, [1] resulting in the orthogonal faces and implying the dihedral angle between faces are right angles.

Though the angles between Jessen's icosahedron's faces are right angles, the edges are not axis-parallel, thus Jessen's icosahedron is not an orthogonal polyhedron. [2]

Polycubes are a special case of orthogonal polyhedra that can be decomposed into identical cubes and are three-dimensional analogs of planar polyominoes. [3] Orthogonal polyhedra can be either convex (such as rectangular cuboids) or non-convex. [2] [4]

Orthogonal polyhedra were used by Sydler (1965), who showed that any polyhedron is equivalent to a cube: it can be decomposed into pieces that later can be used to construct a cube. This showed the requirements for the polyhedral equivalence conditions in terms of the Dehn invariant. [5] [2] Orthogonal polyhedra may also be used in computational geometry, where their constrained structure has enabled advances in problems unsolved for arbitrary polyhedra, for example, unfolding the surface of a polyhedron to a polygonal net. [6]

The simple orthogonal polyhedra, as defined by Eppstein & Mumford (2014), are the three-dimensional polyhedra such that three mutually perpendicular edges meet at each vertex and that have the topology of a sphere. [4] By using Steinitz's theorem, there are three different classes: the arbitrary orthogonal polyhedron, the skeleton of its polyhedron drawn with a hidden vertex by the isometric projection, and the polyhedron wherein each axis-parallel line through a vertex contains other vertices. All of these are polyhedral graphs that are cubic and bipartite. [7]

References

  1. O'Rourke, Joseph (2013), "Dürer's Problem", in Senechal, Marjorie (ed.), Shaping Space: Exploring Polyhedra in Nature, Art, and the Geometrical Imagination, Springer, p. 86, doi:10.1007/978-0-387-92714-5, ISBN   978-0-387-92714-5
  2. 1 2 3 Jessen, Børge (1967), "Orthogonal icosahedra", Nordisk Matematisk Tidskrift, 15 (2): 90–96, JSTOR   24524998, MR   0226494 .
  3. Gardner, Martin (November 1966), "Mathematical Games: Is it possible to visualize a four-dimensional figure?", Scientific American , 215 (5): 138–143, doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1166-138, JSTOR   24931332
  4. 1 2 Eppstein, David; Mumford, Elena (2014), "Stenitz theorems for simple orthogonal polyhedra", Journal of Computational Geometry, 5 (1): 179–244.
  5. Sydler, J.-P. (1965), "Conditions nécessaires et suffisantes pour l'équivalence des polyèdres de l'espace euclidien à trois dimensions", Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici (in French), 40: 43–80, doi:10.1007/bf02564364, MR   0192407, S2CID   123317371
  6. O'Rourke, Joseph (2008), "Unfolding orthogonal polyhedra", Surveys on discrete and computational geometry, Contemp. Math., vol. 453, Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society, pp. 307–317, doi: 10.1090/conm/453/08805 , ISBN   978-0-8218-4239-3, MR   2405687 .
  7. Christ, Tobias; Hoffmann, Michael (August 10–12, 2011), "Wireless Localization within Orthogonal Polyhedra" (PDF), 23d Canadian Conference on Computational Geometry, 2011 (PDF), pp. 467–472.

Further reading